Its Evolution Baby! (Target rumor related)

flyinwhole313flyinwhole313 Posts: 1,651
edited May 2009 in The Porch
To all the fans who are ready to call Pearl Jam sell-outs, and to a few of my friends whom which I spent the last 17 years rocking out to PJ with (who no longer call themselves fans, nor go to their shows) due to their alleged "sell-out" status, I UNDERSTAND how the idea of a Target partnership would seem to be against what the band stands for...I also UNDERSTAND how $88 face value tickets to see Eddie Vedder seems to be against what the man stands for, BUT look at what has happened to music over the past decade...Pearl Jam has made some TERRIFIC music over their past few albums, yet record sales are significantly dropped, WHY? The fucking Internet! They are NOT selling out, just trying to sell, period. WE ALL DOWNLOAD MUSIC (free) online, right? So how can you cry foul for OUR BAND, who does MORE FOR US THAN ANY BAND OUT THERE????? These bands we grew up with, listen to daily, LOVE...they need to thrive, and these guys aren't going to be able to tour every 2-3 years forever... I think it is noteworthy that they took a stand against Ticketmaster back in the day, even though it didn't help...look at how bad THAT has gotten...I tried to buy a $32 ticket to a show the other day, that came to $47 fucking dollars after "fees" that is almost a 50% upcharge, people!!!!!! 50%!!!!!!!!! And we ALL CONTRIBUTE TO THIS! Why? Because we have become a corporate society (...Crazy, indeed...), and though they MAY be selling their music through Target (who has a MONSTROUS Corporate display in Times Square, by the way) it is not like they are being sensored like Wal-Mart does with their CDs...So, yes I too HOPE not to hear of such corporate partnerships, but I think that Record Labels screw bands, and if Pearl Jam doesn't get promotion for their new album from a Record Label, and they are footing the bill for their own promotions, then whatever they do to promote for themselves is fine with me. It was easier to be anti-corporate in the 90s, NOW, you will go broke if you try...
Post edited by Unknown User on
«134

Comments

  • BMo-643BMo-643 Posts: 220
    I agree 100%

    Today's music scene and the scene that was going on when Pearl Jam took all of their stands couldn't be more opposite...Hell CD's where the big thing back then and those had to be bought...today you can get any album you want the day it comes out in about 2 minutes for nothing.....these bands today are doing whatever they can to make money because of shitty cd sales....and I for one am not going to bitch at them for promoting their new album and trying to make some money...
    Cincinnati 06'
    Lollapalooza 07'
    Bonnaroo 08'
    Columbus 10'
    Noblesville 10'
    Alpine Valley 11'
    Alpine Valley 11'
    Music Midtown 12'
    Wrigley Field 13'
    Cincinnati 14'
    Lexington 16'
  • JJ13769JJ13769 Posts: 10
    I LOVE THE BAND, AND PART OF THAT IS WHAT THEY STAND OR STOOD FOR. THIS HURTS A BIT FOR ME. TO BE HONEST I THINK THEY ARE AND HAVE SOLD OUT. WITH THAT SAID, I WILL ALWAYS BUY A NEW RECORD AND PROBALLY ENJOY IT. BUT MY PASSION AND A BIT OF RESPECT HAS BEEN TAKEN AWAY.

    PEACE
    jason jablon
  • Bugs29Bugs29 Posts: 96
    JJ13769 wrote:
    I LOVE THE BAND, AND PART OF THAT IS WHAT THEY STAND OR STOOD FOR. THIS HURTS A BIT FOR ME. TO BE HONEST I THINK THEY ARE AND HAVE SOLD OUT. WITH THAT SAID, I WILL ALWAYS BUY A NEW RECORD AND PROBALLY ENJOY IT. BUT MY PASSION AND A BIT OF RESPECT HAS BEEN TAKEN AWAY.

    PEACE

    I have to agree to a large extent...on the other hand you can't blame anyone for wanting to make money; we all do it and to judge someone else for it is a bit contradictory. So maybe it's not so much that I lost respect, but more that they became "mortal", so to speak.
  • DewieCoxDewieCox Posts: 11,430
    I think there's one problem with your theory, though. PJ has gotta be one of the least affected bands as far as album sales goes. S/T's almost sold 1mil copies and I dunno if Binaural and RA were really platinum albums to begin with. I don't think you can blame the internet for PJ's "demise" or the decision to work with Target.

    I think PJ has at least earned the benefit of the doubt with the Target thing. Would you rather them re-sign with a label? It seems like Target is gonna give PJ better backing than Sony records had for awhile.
  • Gonzo1977Gonzo1977 Posts: 1,696
    It's funny how people are already jumping to all these conclusions and calling the band "sellouts" yet we have no idea or announcment by either Target or Pearl Jam as to what this is all about.

    Let's wait unitl we get 100% confirmation about Pearl Jam and Target before we bring our guns to town ...Okay?
  • VOLITIONVOLITION Posts: 328
    Agreed.
    I don't give a shit what pearl jam does as long as i have a copy of the new abum in my hands the day of the release and it doesn't cost me a fortune to purhcase.
    The means of distrubtion to the masses has changed greatly the last twenty years and the band has evolved with the times to stay relevant. They will always do things on their terms with giving it a lot of thought first. They have given up millions and fucking millions b/c they believed in maintaining their integrirty..
    As far as i am concerend this late in the game Pearl Jam can do no wrong.Some of you people need to fucking chill and trust the band.This is all just rumors at this point , it drives me fucking crazy how some of you get so easily bent out of shape.
    "it feels like it's the end of the world and we all got a good seat. you know -- step right up, get your tickets...here we go."

    - EV
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    It was easier to be anti-corporate in the 90s, NOW, you will go broke if you try...
    The solution is NOT to give in to the corporations though! Do you realize what happens when corporations become monopolies and give the consumer even less of a choice? Do you realize that accepting the fact that corporations are taking over the country is showing that we're all sheep? Dictatorship is on its way if we the people decide to conform rather than to stick to our values. I am disappointed in my favorite band, the whole Target thing is wrong!!
  • DewieCoxDewieCox Posts: 11,430
    Jeanwah wrote:
    It was easier to be anti-corporate in the 90s, NOW, you will go broke if you try...
    The solution is NOT to give in to the corporations though! Do you realize what happens when corporations become monopolies and give the consumer even less of a choice? Do you realize that accepting the fact that corporations are taking over the country is showing that we're all sheep? Dictatorship is on its way if we the people decide to conform rather than to stick to our values. I am disappointed in my favorite band, the whole Target thing is wrong!!

    What about Letterman, SNL, Storytellers, MTV Unplugged, commercials for Yield and RA, signing with Sony 2x, touring with Ticketmaster etcetcetc?

    They sold out a long time ago.

    This deal is probably not much different than the deal they signed with J records.
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    DewieCox wrote:
    Jeanwah wrote:
    It was easier to be anti-corporate in the 90s, NOW, you will go broke if you try...
    The solution is NOT to give in to the corporations though! Do you realize what happens when corporations become monopolies and give the consumer even less of a choice? Do you realize that accepting the fact that corporations are taking over the country is showing that we're all sheep? Dictatorship is on its way if we the people decide to conform rather than to stick to our values. I am disappointed in my favorite band, the whole Target thing is wrong!!

    What about Letterman, SNL, Storytellers, MTV Unplugged, commercials for Yield and RA, signing with Sony 2x, touring with Ticketmaster etcetcetc?

    They sold out a long time ago.

    This deal is probably not much different than the deal they signed with J records.
    I will give this a chance, as it's still a rumor... but for a band who's ideals and activism is the core of who they are, it would be nice to hear an explanation for a decision like this. The band never cared about numbers and sales before, it was about the music. You don't simply get old and become a conformist all of a sudden. Yes, at least they've got their own label now, but there is no reason to partner with a big-box store. Are they listening to Cameron Crowe or something?
  • flyinwhole313flyinwhole313 Posts: 1,651
    DewieCox wrote:
    I think there's one problem with your theory, though. PJ has gotta be one of the least affected bands as far as album sales goes. S/T's almost sold 1mil copies and I dunno if Binaural and RA were really platinum albums to begin with. I don't think you can blame the internet for PJ's "demise" or the decision to work with Target.

    I think PJ has at least earned the benefit of the doubt with the Target thing. Would you rather them re-sign with a label? It seems like Target is gonna give PJ better backing than Sony records had for awhile.

    Did you read my post or is this a response to someone's response? I THINK this is a response to me, so...How is Pearl Jam not affected by album sales? I GUARANTEE that there are more people that OWN their music than who have paid for it. The internet IS to blame for the "demise" of the record sales industry, period. Pearl Jam included. That is no theory, friend.

    Would I rather them re-sign with a label? That is their decision, not mine. I am just bringing enlightenment to the board members who think Pearl Jam are "selling-out" if the Target rumor is a fact...
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    edited May 2009
    Jeanwah wrote:
    The solution is NOT to give in to the corporations though! Do you realize what happens when corporations become monopolies and give the consumer even less of a choice? Do you realize that accepting the fact that corporations are taking over the country is showing that we're all sheep? Dictatorship is on its way if we the people decide to conform rather than to stick to our values. I am disappointed in my favorite band, the whole Target thing is wrong!!

    At least Target Corporation is one of the most philanthropic companies in the US.

    Big monopolies/corporations have already taken over. There are a dozen or so companies that control everything anyway. That's why it is so difficult to boycott one company because you find out that this company actually belongs to another who has 25 or so other companies under their 'umbrella'. Should you wish to continue with your boycott, you find yourself unable to buy most of the goods you rely on.

    PJ, like any other band, need to sell their music to the masses - that's their job/their revenue. Seems people are putting a lot of words in the mouths of the band - they don't care about sales, they don't care about money, etc. That is very naive. They continue with all their good work but they also have their day job.

    Target is one way to get their stuff out there..... I don't really see a problem.
    Post edited by redrock on
  • heather_honeyheather_honey Posts: 140
    The title of this thread says it all, really. Times change - big box stores are the way people buy their cd's these days, pirate copies from the internet aside.

    Either the band moves with the times to stay viable and continues to attract a new, expanding audience or they wind up as 3 copies on the dusty shelf of an indie store most fans would probably bitch about the inconvenience of needing to get to. My local indie says that most of his sales, believe it or not, are from eBay. That tells me all I need to know about how many people actually go OUT and look for music these days.
    Why go home?
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    redrock wrote:
    Jeanwah wrote:
    The solution is NOT to give in to the corporations though! Do you realize what happens when corporations become monopolies and give the consumer even less of a choice? Do you realize that accepting the fact that corporations are taking over the country is showing that we're all sheep? Dictatorship is on its way if we the people decide to conform rather than to stick to our values. I am disappointed in my favorite band, the whole Target thing is wrong!!

    At least Target Corporation is one of the most philanthropic companies in the US. Big monopolies/corporations have already taken over. There are a dozen or so companies that control everything anyway. That's why it is so difficult to boycott one company because you find out that this company actually belongs to another who has 25 or so other companies under their 'umbrella'. Should you wish to continue with your boycott, you find yourself unable to buy most of the goods you rely on.
    I know this is a bit off topic, but the way to get around purchasing from big-box stores is to shop locally and from independent stores. It's very possible to boycott one company if you're a conscious consumer.
  • flyinwhole313flyinwhole313 Posts: 1,651
    Jeanwah wrote:
    It was easier to be anti-corporate in the 90s, NOW, you will go broke if you try...
    The solution is NOT to give in to the corporations though! Do you realize what happens when corporations become monopolies and give the consumer even less of a choice? Do you realize that accepting the fact that corporations are taking over the country is showing that we're all sheep? Dictatorship is on its way if we the people decide to conform rather than to stick to our values. I am disappointed in my favorite band, the whole Target thing is wrong!!
    Look, I agree with this IDEA, but do you drive a car? use gasoline? wear clothes? BUY clothes? SHOP at Target, Wal-mart, Best Buy, Starbucks, Barnes and Noble, etc.??? Be realistic, and get off of your cloud...
  • PJ Fan est. 1990PJ Fan est. 1990 Posts: 1,788
    i'm an aspiring musician, and i understand FULLY understand how difficult it is to make money with illegal downloading, it causes concert tickets to go up and the "sell out" rate to go up...

    i mean think of it this way...indie artists for the past few years have had COUNTLESS songs featured in commercials. (i.e. Apple, UPS, Chase) this is because the indie market is probably the weakest market... they don't get any radio play so you hear indie bands displaying their music all over commercial television just to get their sound heard

    this is kind of that situation...

    Pearl Jam is NO LONGER mainstream and thus their demographic is relatively small, compared to those in the mainstream...at least with the younger generation...so as of late, PJ has had to resort to the same corporate bullshit as indie bands

    yes i hate that PJ would be selling out...but i am understanding
  • flyinwhole313flyinwhole313 Posts: 1,651
    Jeanwah wrote:
    I know this is a bit off topic, but the way to get around purchasing from big-box stores is to shop locally and from independent stores. It's very possible to boycott one company if you're a conscious consumer.
    I dont think this is off topic. I buy all of my music from a privately owned record shop (Positively Records in Levittown, Pa), I have shopped at Target, but I go out of my way to "help out" with environmental issues, how my favorite band sells their music is IRRELEVANT.
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    Jeanwah wrote:
    It was easier to be anti-corporate in the 90s, NOW, you will go broke if you try...
    The solution is NOT to give in to the corporations though! Do you realize what happens when corporations become monopolies and give the consumer even less of a choice? Do you realize that accepting the fact that corporations are taking over the country is showing that we're all sheep? Dictatorship is on its way if we the people decide to conform rather than to stick to our values. I am disappointed in my favorite band, the whole Target thing is wrong!!
    Look, I agree with this IDEA, but do you drive a car? use gasoline? wear clothes? BUY clothes? SHOP at Target, Wal-mart, Best Buy, Starbucks, Barnes and Noble, etc.??? Be realistic, and get off of your cloud...
    I do drive a car, but no, I don't shop at those places and it's very doable. Just because mainstream America rely on big-box stores, does not mean everyone does.
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    Jeanwah wrote:
    It's very possible to boycott one company if you're a conscious consumer.
    How about you say you will boycott Philip Morris because you are against big tobacco companies. Look them up... see what else you will have to forgo (Oreos being one of their brands!!!). They own a MULTITUDE of other companies (who in turn will have their own 'sub-brands'). Now that is just ONE 'tobacco' company.

    Being an 'idealistic' conscious consumer is almost impossible.

    The way the consumer buys has changed over the years (oldie as I am, I remember we ALWAYS shopped locally at independent shops). Things have changed, the way we live has changed - more so in the US than in Europe. We mostly go to supermarkets where they have everything, shop once a week (if that much), expect to find everything under one roof (to save time), buy your food, your phone, your clothes and your music all in one place.
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    redrock wrote:
    Jeanwah wrote:
    It's very possible to boycott one company if you're a conscious consumer.
    How about you say you will boycott Philip Morris because you are against big tobacco companies. Look them up... see what else you will have to forgo (Oreos being one of their brands!!!). They own a MULTITUDE of other companies (who in turn will have their own 'sub-brands'. Now that is just ONE 'tobacco' company.

    Being an 'idealistic' conscious consumer is almost impossible.

    The way the consumer buys has changed over the years (oldie as I am, I remember we ALWAYS shopped locally at independent shops). Things have changed, the way we live has changed - more so in the US than in Europe. We mostly go to supermarkets where they have everything, shop once a week (if that much), expect to find everything under one roof (to save time), buy your food, your phone, your clothes and your music all in one place.
    Yes, it appears we live in an age of convenience. But what's very slowly emerging from this ultimate fast-track that America is on, is an underground slow movement. Not everyone is into the "buy everything under one roof" mentality.

    People are getting back to basics, watching their consumption habits, planting more gardens, living a lot more simpler. If you look hard enough, you'll find us. Not everyone is into the "times" as you'd like to believe. Not everyone is interested in what the big guy wants to sell. Because there's so much more to life than going shopping. Remember, we're not just consumers...we're humans, but the corporations want you to forget that.
  • drsluggodrsluggo Posts: 4,742
    Did the main Target exclusive thread get deleted? Crazy...
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    Jeanwah wrote:
    . Not everyone is into the "buy everything under one roof" mentality.
    People are getting back to basics, watching their consumption habits, planting more gardens, living a lot more simpler. If you look hard enough, you'll find us. Not everyone is into the "times" as you'd like to believe. Not everyone is interested in what the big guy wants to sell. Because there's so much more to life than going shopping.

    Not everyone, but 'the masses' do. I would like to see things go back like they were when I was younger. I shop locally, plant my garden, etc. I like to get my food 'fresh', ie from the greengrocers, the butcher , the fishmonger, the 'dairy' shop (cheese, eggs, etc.), and support the small business, but it's not possible for a lot of people. How many neighbourhoods have all those (usually) family run shops? Not many. Is it convenient? Not really... Whilst there are people looking at things differently, most are still in the 'rat race'.
  • flyinwhole313flyinwhole313 Posts: 1,651
    Jeanwah wrote:
    Yes, it appears we live in an age of convenience. But what's very slowly emerging from this ultimate fast-track that America is on, is an underground slow movement. Not everyone is into the "buy everything under one roof" mentality.

    People are getting back to basics, watching their consumption habits, planting more gardens, living a lot more simpler. If you look hard enough, you'll find us. Not everyone is into the "times" as you'd like to believe. Not everyone is interested in what the big guy wants to sell. Because there's so much more to life than going shopping. Remember, we're not just consumers...we're humans, but the corporations want you to forget that.

    In response, to clarify, my wife and I have and VERY actively DO practice being "green" as the corporate movement goes. I DO buy organic, if you asked my kids if they want to go to McDonalds, or Wal-Mart will respond "No, that is junk food, or we don't shop there", so any assumptions here on a personal level are off. I have taken all of this into consideration BEFORE my OP, and I think there are MUCH more important battles than this one. BUT in YOUR defense- I am glad someone feels this way. But Pearl Jam is a band, that is their business...and though I feel that the IMAGE of being anti-corporate is a pretty one, I bet all the guys wear Calvin Kleins anyway...
  • flyinwhole313flyinwhole313 Posts: 1,651
    By the way, if anyone wants to have THIS conversation over a few cold ones before the Eddie shows in Philly, I don't have plans yet.
  • DewieCoxDewieCox Posts: 11,430
    DewieCox wrote:
    I think there's one problem with your theory, though. PJ has gotta be one of the least affected bands as far as album sales goes. S/T's almost sold 1mil copies and I dunno if Binaural and RA were really platinum albums to begin with. I don't think you can blame the internet for PJ's "demise" or the decision to work with Target.

    I think PJ has at least earned the benefit of the doubt with the Target thing. Would you rather them re-sign with a label? It seems like Target is gonna give PJ better backing than Sony records had for awhile.

    Did you read my post or is this a response to someone's response? I THINK this is a response to me, so...How is Pearl Jam not affected by album sales? I GUARANTEE that there are more people that OWN their music than who have paid for it. The internet IS to blame for the "demise" of the record sales industry, period. Pearl Jam included. That is no theory, friend.

    Would I rather them re-sign with a label? That is their decision, not mine. I am just bringing enlightenment to the board members who think Pearl Jam are "selling-out" if the Target rumor is a fact...

    Some of it was directed at you.

    Tell me, which PJ album do you think would have sold a siginificant amount more? Yield was their last platinum album, Binaural isn't a mainstream album no matter you slice it, RA just isn't that good, and S/T is almost platinum. Those sales numbers don't really seem to reflect the internet digging into their sales.

    PJ isn't the entire music industry and have to be the least affected major band. I realize that the internet has changed the way the game is played.
    IMO the internet has helped PJ as much as it has hurt them.
  • flyinwhole313flyinwhole313 Posts: 1,651
    Eddie had his song on a commercial too, but it was not a BAD cause, and I am sure it WAS corporate as hell...
  • CJMST3KCJMST3K Posts: 9,722
    when i want music i pay for it. should i not now?
    ADD 5,200 to the post count you see, thank you. :)
    *NYC 9/28/96 *NYC 9/29/96 *NJ 9/8/98 (front row "may i play drums with you")
    *MSG 9/10/98 (backstage) *MSG 9/11/98 (backstage)
    *Jones Beach 8/23/00 *Jones Beach 8/24/00 *Jones Beach 8/25/00
    *Mansfield 8/29/00 *Mansfield 8/30/00 *Nassau 4/30/03 *Nissan VA 7/1/03
    *Borgata 10/1/05 *Camden 5/27/06 *Camden 5/28/06 *DC 5/30/06
    *VA Beach 6/17/08 *DC 6/22/08 *MSG 6/24/08 (backstage) *MSG 6/25/08
    *EV DC 8/17/08 *EV Baltimore 6/15/09 *Philly 10/31/09
    *Bristow VA 5/13/10 *MSG 5/20/10 *MSG 5/21/10
  • flyinwhole313flyinwhole313 Posts: 1,651
    CJMST3K wrote:
    when i want music i pay for it. should i not now?
    :lol: ok Yoda...
  • FlaggFlagg Posts: 5,856
    How else are they supposed to get their music out there to new fans? They really have about three choices.

    1) Wal Mart
    2) Target
    3) Best Buy

    That's just the way it works now since the demise of record stores. Sure they could ignore them and use the few remaining independent record stores or release it only through their own web site, but then who would buy it? The remaining Ten Club members and that's it. Unfortunately if they want to continue to record and release albums, they are going to have to play the game with someone.
    DAL-7/5/98,10/17/00,6/9/03,11/15/13
    BOS-9/28/04,9/29/04,6/28/08,6/30/08, 9/5/16, 9/7/16, 9/2/18
    MTL-9/15/05, OTT-9/16/05
    PHL-5/27/06,5/28/06,10/30/09,10/31/09
    CHI-8/2/07,8/5/07,8/23/09,8/24/09
    HTFD-6/27/08
    ATX-10/4/09, 10/12/14
    KC-5/3/2010,STL-5/4/2010
    Bridge School-10/23/2010,10/24/2010
    PJ20-9/3/2011,9/4/2011
    OKC-11/16/13
    SEA-12/6/13
    TUL-10/8/14
  • drsluggodrsluggo Posts: 4,742
    Flagg wrote:
    Unfortunately if they want to continue to record and release albums, they are going to have to play the game with someone.

    Well... you could always release the album to all stores which would obviously include smaller records stores, etc.

    Anyone think maybe Target will have an exclusive package with bonus video/tracks, but not exclusivity to the record itself? They do that all the time now with DVDs and CDs for both movie and music.
  • flyinwhole313flyinwhole313 Posts: 1,651
    drsluggo wrote:
    Flagg wrote:
    Unfortunately if they want to continue to record and release albums, they are going to have to play the game with someone.

    Well... you could always release the album to all stores which would obviously include smaller records stores, etc.

    Anyone think maybe Target will have an exclusive package with bonus video/tracks, but not exclusivity to the record itself? They do that all the time now with DVDs and CDs for both movie and music.
    I HIGHLY doubt it will be exclusive only to Target...
This discussion has been closed.