Hank Stienbrenner is a complete FOOL.

g under pg under p Posts: 18,196
edited March 2008 in All Encompassing Trip
"Red Sox Nation?" What a bunch of [expletive] that is," he said in an interview with The New York Times' Play magazine. "That was a creation of the Red Sox and ESPN, which is filled with Red Sox fans.

"Go anywhere in America and you won't see Red Sox hats and jackets, you'll see Yankee hats and jackets. This is a Yankee country. We're going to put the Yankees back on top and restore the universe to order."



What a COMPLETE BAFFOON Hank Stienbrenner is as in another outspoken moment, denounces Red Sox Nation.

Well he must of completely forgotten the Boston Red Sox led MLB last year in road attendance. Where's your "Yankee country" now, go have another drink Hank you surley could use it?

Peace
*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


Post edited by Unknown User on
«134

Comments

  • hank makes me laugh, plus he looks like big stein, especially with the facial features.
    Reading 2004
    Albany 2006 Camden 2006 E. Rutherford 2, 2006 Inglewood 2006,
    Chicago 2007
    Camden 2008 MSG 2008 MSG 2008 Hartford 2008.
    Seattle 2009 Seattle 2009 Philadelphia 2009,Philadelphia 2009 Philadelphia 2009
    Hartford 2010 MSG 2010 MSG 2010
    Toronto 2011,Toronto 2011
    Wrigley Field 2013 Brooklyn 2013 Brooklyn 2013 Philadelphia 2, 2013
    Philadelphia 1, 2016 Philadelphia 2 2016 New York 2016 New York 2016 Fenway 1, 2016
    Fenway 2, 2018
    MSG 2022
    St. Paul, 1, St. Paul 2 2023
    MSG 2024, MSG 2024
    Philadelphia 2024
    "I play good, hard-nosed basketball.
    Things happen in the game. Nothing you
    can do. I don't go and say,
    "I'm gonna beat this guy up."
  • LedbetterusLedbetterus Posts: 592
    I would like to see official statistics on the Red Sux leading road attendance. Because I highly doubt it. That being said, Hank Steinbrenner is the man! The fact that when George is gone and passed, he will be taking over the Yankees makes me so happy. His father is the best owner in sports history. No one has ever cared more about their team, and more about winning than George, and it seems he instilled the same beliefs in his sons.

    He's right too, Red Sux nation was created by New England loving ESPN annalists and the media. There was no such thing as Red Sux nation until 2004 and in a few years it will be nothing but a pimple on the face of the Yankees.

    Take your two rings and cherish them. It took the Sux 86 years to have fans. Same thing for the Pats. It's a bandwagon country, and the Pats and Sux are in the front conducting.

    Buckner, Boone, the Babe, and 18-1. Deal with it.
    Abraham Lincoln once said, "If you are a racist, I will attack you with the North."
  • mrwalkerbmrwalkerb Posts: 1,015
    I would like to see official statistics on the Red Sux leading road attendance. Because I highly doubt it. That being said, Hank Steinbrenner is the man! The fact that when George is gone and passed, he will be taking over the Yankees makes me so happy. His father is the best owner in sports history. No one has ever cared more about their team, and more about winning than George, and it seems he instilled the same beliefs in his sons.

    He's right too, Red Sux nation was created by New England loving ESPN annalists and the media. There was no such thing as Red Sux nation until 2004 and in a few years it will be nothing but a pimple on the face of the Yankees.

    Take your two rings and cherish them. It took the Sux 86 years to have fans. Same thing for the Pats. It's a bandwagon country, and the Pats and Sux are in the front conducting.

    Buckner, Boone, the Babe, and 18-1. Deal with it.


    uhh I'm from canada and the Yankees are example one of why baseball needs a salaray cap, shit they're even the evil empire
    "I'm not suicidal, except when I drink. That's why we don't all drink at the same time, there'd be no-one alive to drive home..."
    Chris Cornell

    http://www.myspace.com/mrwalkerb
  • g under pg under p Posts: 18,196
    I would like to see official statistics on the Red Sux leading road attendance. Because I highly doubt it. That being said, Hank Steinbrenner is the man! The fact that when George is gone and passed, he will be taking over the Yankees makes me so happy. His father is the best owner in sports history. No one has ever cared more about their team, and more about winning than George, and it seems he instilled the same beliefs in his sons.

    He's right too, Red Sux nation was created by New England loving ESPN annalists and the media. There was no such thing as Red Sux nation until 2004 and in a few years it will be nothing but a pimple on the face of the Yankees.

    Take your two rings and cherish them. It took the Sux 86 years to have fans. Same thing for the Pats. It's a bandwagon country, and the Pats and Sux are in the front conducting.

    Buckner, Boone, the Babe, and 18-1. Deal with it.

    :D That's funny and He's still an idiot, no bandwagoner here. I've been a fan since 1972 how long have you been a bandwagoner of the Yanks?

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • I would like to see official statistics on the Red Sux leading road attendance. Because I highly doubt it. That being said, Hank Steinbrenner is the man! The fact that when George is gone and passed, he will be taking over the Yankees makes me so happy. His father is the best owner in sports history. No one has ever cared more about their team, and more about winning than George, and it seems he instilled the same beliefs in his sons.

    He's right too, Red Sux nation was created by New England loving ESPN annalists and the media. There was no such thing as Red Sux nation until 2004 and in a few years it will be nothing but a pimple on the face of the Yankees.

    Take your two rings and cherish them. It took the Sux 86 years to have fans. Same thing for the Pats. It's a bandwagon country, and the Pats and Sux are in the front conducting.

    Buckner, Boone, the Babe, and 18-1. Deal with it.
    haha. how do you like steinbrenner????? he couldnt give 2 shits about the yankees!!! he only cares about money!
    he didnt even know what day pitchers and catcher reported.

    the yankees arent even making the playoffs this year.

    they have no chance in hell with little to no pitching.

    grow up and stop being jealous of the best team in baseball, best fans in baseball.

    torre was too god for a shit team.
    I will be what i could be
    Once I get out of this town


    9/29/04;6/27/08;6/30/08;8/23/09;08/24/09;5/17/10
  • http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q317/Colby892_2007/yhst-55719567251314_1988_8354720.gif


    that above is 100% true. the yankees bought championships.the red sox won them
    I will be what i could be
    Once I get out of this town


    9/29/04;6/27/08;6/30/08;8/23/09;08/24/09;5/17/10
  • ryan198ryan198 Posts: 1,015
    He's right too, Red Sux nation was created by New England loving ESPN annalists and the media. There was no such thing as Red Sux nation until 2004 and in a few years it will be nothing but a pimple on the face of the Yankees.

    Actually Red Sox Nation started in 1986, was written about in the 90's extensively in Boston (check globe articles and the 2 Shaughnessy books), but, and Steinbrenner is right the new corporate RSN came about when the new management teamed up with the Sawx loving media members of ESPN (see: Peter Gammons, Bill Simmons, Bob Ryan, Michael Smith, Michael Holley, Jackie Smith, Skip Bayless, and Eric Kusilias) to make this thing called Red Sox Nation. Unfortunately I think they here to stay.
  • g under pg under p Posts: 18,196
    I would like to see official statistics on the Red Sux leading road attendance. Because I highly doubt it. That being said, Hank Steinbrenner is the man! The fact that when George is gone and passed, he will be taking over the Yankees makes me so happy. His father is the best owner in sports history. No one has ever cared more about their team, and more about winning than George, and it seems he instilled the same beliefs in his sons.

    He's right too, Red Sux nation was created by New England loving ESPN annalists and the media. There was no such thing as Red Sux nation until 2004 and in a few years it will be nothing but a pimple on the face of the Yankees.

    Take your two rings and cherish them. It took the Sux 86 years to have fans. Same thing for the Pats. It's a bandwagon country, and the Pats and Sux are in the front conducting.

    Buckner, Boone, the Babe, and 18-1. Deal with it.

    You want official, there's your fricking official statistics at MLB....Attendence Report For 2007 and I hope you can handle the truth!
    "Go anywhere in America and you won't see Red Sox hats and jackets, you'll see Yankee hats and jackets. This is a Yankee country. We're going to put the Yankees back on top and restore the universe to order."

    What an idiot...Bring back George I liked him better. He showed more passion for the game not talking out his ass like his buffoon son Hank.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • Stone Is GodStone Is God Posts: 1,331
    I would like to see official statistics on the Red Sux leading road attendance. Because I highly doubt it. That being said, Hank Steinbrenner is the man! The fact that when George is gone and passed, he will be taking over the Yankees makes me so happy. His father is the best owner in sports history. No one has ever cared more about their team, and more about winning than George, and it seems he instilled the same beliefs in his sons.

    He's right too, Red Sux nation was created by New England loving ESPN annalists and the media. There was no such thing as Red Sux nation until 2004 and in a few years it will be nothing but a pimple on the face of the Yankees.

    Take your two rings and cherish them. It took the Sux 86 years to have fans. Same thing for the Pats. It's a bandwagon country, and the Pats and Sux are in the front conducting.

    Buckner, Boone, the Babe, and 18-1. Deal with it.

    I can't wait for Hank to fire Brian Cashman. After that he will deplete the farm system that Cashman has built up chasing after over-rated shitbags that can only hit.

    The reason why the Yankees won those series back in the 90's was because they had George locked away in a closet and they gave the young kids a chance to play. If George was around those banners from those four seasons would have never happened because he would have traded Williams, Jeter, ans Pettite.

    Here's the stats that really count: 2 World Series wins in the last 4 years for the Sox and 0 in the last 7 for the Yanks.

    Who are these Buckner, Boone, and Babe you speak of? I have a good memeory of A-Rod shrugging at second base after her bitch slap of Bronson Arroyo's glove with her big Hamburger Helper mitts.

    I will worry about the Yankees when they actually get some real pitching.
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me.
  • inmyrvminmyrvm Posts: 933
    he's an idiot. everyone hates the red sox AND the yankees.
    "Fuck the talkin' let's start rockin" - Eddie Vedder 9-5-00 Pittsburgh
    4/26/03 Pittsburgh 5/3/03 State College 7/12/03 Hershey 10/1/04 Reading 9/28/05 Pittsburgh 5/20/06 Cleveland 6/23/06 Pittsburgh 6/22/08 DC

    friends don't let friends listen to good charlotte
  • pjl44pjl44 Posts: 9,475
    http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q317/Colby892_2007/yhst-55719567251314_1988_8354720.gif


    that above is 100% true. the yankees bought championships.the red sox won them

    What???? The Red Sox won them...with a $20 million LF, $30 million for two starters (04), a $17 million starter (07), an $8 million closer (04), a $10 million catcher, etc. Of all World Series champions, they have the honor of doing it with the two highest payrolls. Boston won those rings EXACTLY how the Yankees did in the late 90s. All within the rules mind you, just don't start thinking they're the Minnesota Twins.

    And as a Yankee fan, Hank worries me. Overall I was a George fan, but wish he had stayed out of the baseball ops side. He also could have held back on some of the comments about Torre, Cashman, Jeter, etc. Hank has a lot of those traits, but doesn't seem quite as bright as George...hope Hal and co. can get him in line at some point.

    Edit: Don't forget the $12 million DH!
  • pjl44 wrote:
    What???? The Red Sox won them...with a $20 million LF, $30 million for two starters (04), a $17 million starter (07), an $8 million closer (04), a $10 million catcher, etc. Of all World Series champions, they have the honor of doing it with the two highest payrolls. Boston won those rings EXACTLY how the Yankees did in the late 90s. All within the rules mind you, just don't start thinking they're the Minnesota Twins.

    And as a Yankee fan, Hank worries me. Overall I was a George fan, but wish he had stayed out of the baseball ops side. He also could have held back on some of the comments about Torre, Cashman, Jeter, etc. Hank has a lot of those traits, but doesn't seem quite as bright as George...hope Hal and co. can get him in line at some point.

    Edit: Don't forget the $12 million DH!
    combine all the numbers above and thats not even half of what the yankees spent on talent in the 90's. i respect most of the spew pork skankees, but the management is disgraceful and classless.
    I will be what i could be
    Once I get out of this town


    9/29/04;6/27/08;6/30/08;8/23/09;08/24/09;5/17/10
  • pjl44pjl44 Posts: 9,475
    combine all the numbers above and thats not even half of what the yankees spent on talent in the 90's. i respect most of the spew pork skankees, but the management is disgraceful and classless.

    2007 Red Sox: $143 million
    2004 Red Sox: $127 million
    2000 Yankees: $92 million
    1999 Yankees: $88 million
    1998 Yankees: $63 million
    1996 Yankees: $52 million

    Source: http://content.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/salaries/default.aspx
  • pureocpureoc Posts: 2,383
    g under p wrote:
    [/color]

    What a COMPLETE BAFFOON Hank Stienbrenner is as in another outspoken moment, denounces Red Sox Nation.

    Well he must of completely forgotten the Boston Red Sox led MLB last year in road attendance. Where's your "Yankee country" now, go have another drink Hank you surley could use it?

    Peace

    Is this a shock, they guy is a New Yorker, which means he's apparently entitled to be an arrogant SOB. That being said, screw the AL, and the AL East. Yeah there are a lot of people in the Northeast, but the majority of people outside that region could give a flying bleep about the Red Sox and especially the Yankees. GO CUBS!!
    Alpine Valley 6/26/98, Alpine Valley 10/8/00, Champaign 4/23/03, Chicago 6/18/03, Alpine Valley 6/21/03, Grand Rapids 10/3/04
    Chicago 5/16/06, Chicago 5/17/06, Grand Rapids 5/19/06
    Milwaukee 6/29/06, Milwaukee 6/30/06, Lollapalooza 8/5/07
    Eddie Solo Milwaukee 8/19/08, Toronto 8/21/09, Chicago 8/23/09
    Chicago 8/24/09, Indianapolis 5/7/10, Ed Chicago 6/29/11, Alpine Valley 9/3/11 and 9/4/11, Wrigley 7/19/13, Moline 10/18/14, Milwaukee 10/20/14
  • yosi1yosi1 Posts: 3,272
    pureoc wrote:
    Is this a shock, they guy is a New Yorker, which means he's apparently entitled to be an arrogant SOB.

    I'm not a Yankee fan, but I am a New Yorker, so go to hell. You're just jealous that you live in the sticks.
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane.
  • brain of cbrain of c Posts: 5,213
    the apple dosn't fall far from the tree.
  • NY PJ1NY PJ1 Posts: 9,533
    pjl44 wrote:
    2007 Red Sox: $143 million
    2004 Red Sox: $127 million
    2000 Yankees: $92 million
    1999 Yankees: $88 million
    1998 Yankees: $63 million
    1996 Yankees: $52 million

    Source: http://content.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/salaries/default.aspx


    that ends his debate lol
  • NY PJ1NY PJ1 Posts: 9,533
    yosi wrote:
    I'm not a Yankee fan, but I am a New Yorker, so go to hell. You're just jealous that you live in the sticks.


    hehe the sticks
  • LedbetterusLedbetterus Posts: 592
    Lol, so the Sux had the best road attendance in 04 and 07, and you say they're not bandwagon? The Yanks only played 161 games last year and still pulled in almost 1.5 million more fans than the Sux. I didn't think about it before, but those are obvious bandwagon numbers. Lol, 2004 and 2007..

    And someone else said that Steinbrenner only cares about money.. so he spends the most money in baseball every year..? It's clear he only cares about money.. since he loves to spend it...

    And we come to the pitching comments.. The Yanks have 3 or 4 of the best young pitchers in the game. Purposely, for the last 2 years, they held these guys back while the old vets whittled away. Now, for once, we don't trade the new talent to get the old in Santana, and we hang on to Kennedy, Hughes, and Chamberlain. If our rotation doesn't completely dominate this year, it will next year.
    Abraham Lincoln once said, "If you are a racist, I will attack you with the North."
  • pjl44pjl44 Posts: 9,475
    Lol, so the Sux had the best road attendance in 04 and 07, and you say they're not bandwagon? The Yanks only played 161 games last year and still pulled in almost 1.5 million more fans than the Sux. I didn't think about it before, but those are obvious bandwagon numbers. Lol, 2004 and 2007.

    They pulled in 1.5 million more fans because Yankee Stadium has around 20,000 more seats than Fenway Park.
  • He's not a buffoon, someone who spells the word BAFFOON is a BUFFOON. And gimme a break on the bandwagon shit. What were the Sox drawing in the 90's? Team gets good, sells out every game. The Red Sox are the difintion of and textbook example of a Bandwagon Team
  • pjl44 wrote:
    They pulled in 1.5 million more fans because Yankee Stadium has around 20,000 more seats than Fenway Park.

    However, just like Boston, both teams are practically fielding all-star teams at this poin They SHOULD have great attendance numbers....Unlike my hometown Dodgers...3.8 Million of us still show up when we're fielding rookies and overpaid pitchers.

    Dodger Fans= FANS. I don't care what anyone says about L.A.....we're 1 good season away from setting all kinds of attendance records. Just look at the numbers.

    Oh, and just for the record, if the Yankees are the "Evil Empire"...then what is Boston these days with their ridiculous payroll and skyrocketing bids for foreign players?
  • How many show up in the 3rd inning and split after 7? Word around the league is that the Dodgers actually have the worst fans in baseball
  • WildsWilds Posts: 4,329
    I live in LA. Dodger fans are a joke. They sell a lot of tickets because they are so cheap they can't give them away. Fans show up in the good seats to be seen and leave just as quick. (3rd to 7th)

    The entire rest of the stadium is full of thugs that want to start trouble.


    And I still pull for the Blue in the National League. But it's not easy going to a game with that atmosphere.
  • pjl44 wrote:
    2007 Red Sox: $143 million
    2004 Red Sox: $127 million
    2000 Yankees: $92 million
    1999 Yankees: $88 million
    1998 Yankees: $63 million
    1996 Yankees: $52 million

    Source: http://content.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/salaries/default.aspx

    I have many points about what has been brought up...

    1. While I don't really care about either side of the argument about whether either team bought their championships. this chart is SO misleading. In 1996, a $52 million dollar payroll was ridiculous, much like a $143 million payroll last year. This chart reminds me of the old folks who say how much cheaper everything was when they were younger.

    2, I think the young Steinbrenners are asses. They have all the attitude of their dad, with none of the personality. And he is way off base with his comments. The Red Sox are WAY more popular. They draw well on the road because their fans travel with them, kind of similar to the way you see Terrible Towels wherever the Steelers play. When I went to the Orioles-Red Sox game in Baltimore last year, the Inner Harbor was packed with New Englanders in Dice K and Big Papi jerseys.

    3. As far as a salary cap, yeah it would be nice. But baseball certainly doesn't need one. There has been an incredible amount of competitive balance over the last 10 years, which proves a salary cap isn't really necessary. Sure, if I had a vote, I'd probably vote for one, but among all his bumbling in the commissioner's office, Bud Selig has managed to help the game become more level.

    4. All that being said, I love hearing Red Sox fans (and staff) call the Yankees the "Evil Empire." Even though the playing field is (fairly) level, both teams have it better than the rest of the league. I hate hearing The Red Sox turncoat @$$ of an owner John Henry complain about the Yankees.
    I love my female wife...
    we sit around and wonder exactly why our marriage should feel threatened by gay marriage
  • How about this test? Of the 4 Yankee WS winning teams, what is the average number of homegrown players tha were on each team. How about the 2 Red Sox winners? Off the top of my head, I'd say 8-10 for the Yankees, and 3-5 for the Sox. Did the 2004 team have 1 homegrown player on the team?
  • I would like to see official statistics on the Red Sux leading road attendance. Because I highly doubt it.
    g under p wrote:
    You want official, there's your fricking official statistics at MLB....Attendence Report For 2007 and I hope you can handle the truth!

    this is 100% true, and can be entirely accounted for by the difference in seating capacity between yankee stadium and fenway park (the former having about 20,000 more seats than the latter).

    if the yankees and red sox play nine games each at the other team's stadium over the course of a year, it adds up to 180,000 more road "fans" that the red sox draw than the yankees. that's 2,222 fans per game over an 81-game road schedule, which exceeds the reported difference of 1,414 in favor of the red sox. this is further illustrated by the fact that yankees road games in 2007 were filled to 83.4% capacity as opposed to 81.5% for the red sox.

    if both stadiums were of equal size, the yankees would lead the league in road attendance.

    it's one of those examples that demonstrates how you can use statistics to prove anything.

    see, kids... your third grade teacher was right. math really is fun! well... maybe not. but it can be useful for pointing things out that the media refuses to acknowledge.
  • WildsWilds Posts: 4,329
    The Sox are guilty of spending more than most. As a Sox fan that upsets me a bit, but there is no choice. When the Yankees started spending double then triple the Sox had to keep up or get lost behind.

    The American League East might be the most hated division for this purpose but it all points to the Yankees. The started the "arms" race and any team in that division has to spend.

    On a side note thought this was funny. Must have been quite a few Yankees fans at this event. lol.

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/03/01/money.giveaway.ap/index.html
  • this is 100% true, and can be entirely accounted for by the difference in seating capacity between yankee stadium and fenway park (the former having about 20,000 more seats than the latter).

    if the yankees and red sox play nine games each at the other team's stadium over the course of a year, it adds up to 180,000 more road "fans" that the red sox draw than the yankees. that's 2,222 fans per game over an 81-game road schedule, which exceeds the reported difference of 1,414 in favor of the red sox. this is further illustrated by the fact that yankees road games in 2007 were filled to 83.4% capacity as opposed to 81.5% for the red sox.

    if both stadiums were of equal size, the yankees would lead the league in road attendance.

    it's one of those examples that demonstrates how you can use statistics to prove anything.

    see, kids... your third grade teacher was right. math really is fun! well... maybe not. but it can be useful for pointing things out that the media refuses to acknowledge.



    I'm going to argue this point. Your argument doesn't prove the Red Sox have an advantage by playing more road games in the Bronx. Those seats at Yankee Stadium would have been full anyway.
    I love my female wife...
    we sit around and wonder exactly why our marriage should feel threatened by gay marriage
  • I have many points about what has been brought up...

    1. While I don't really care about either side of the argument about whether either team bought their championships. this chart is SO misleading. In 1996, a $52 million dollar payroll was ridiculous, much like a $143 million payroll last year. This chart reminds me of the old folks who say how much cheaper everything was when they were younger.

    2, I think the young Steinbrenners are asses. They have all the attitude of their dad, with none of the personality. And he is way off base with his comments. The Red Sox are WAY more popular. They draw well on the road because their fans travel with them, kind of similar to the way you see Terrible Towels wherever the Steelers play. When I went to the Orioles-Red Sox game in Baltimore last year, the Inner Harbor was packed with New Englanders in Dice K and Big Papi jerseys.

    3. As far as a salary cap, yeah it would be nice. But baseball certainly doesn't need one. There has been an incredible amount of competitive balance over the last 10 years, which proves a salary cap isn't really necessary. Sure, if I had a vote, I'd probably vote for one, but among all his bumbling in the commissioner's office, Bud Selig has managed to help the game become more level.

    4. All that being said, I love hearing Red Sox fans (and staff) call the Yankees the "Evil Empire." Even though the playing field is (fairly) level, both teams have it better than the rest of the league. I hate hearing The Red Sox turncoat @$$ of an owner John Henry complain about the Yankees.


    1. I think the biggest point to be made about those years is that the Yankees payroll wasnt the highest in the league for much of that time. That team was mostly homegrown, with a few free agents sprinkled in , along with a couple brilliant trades (O'Neill for Roberto kelly or Tino & Jeff Nelson for Mike Blowers and Sterling Hitchcock)

    2. I agree with you about Hank. george had the right to be somewhat obnoxious, as he bought the team for $12 millon, and turned it into a billion $ industry. Hank is just a member of the lucky sperm club. he should take a lesson from hal, and stay in the background. But I disagree about the Sox being more popular around the country. Everywher eyou look, some actor, rapper, basketball player, whatever is sporting a Yankee hat. Lebron james plays for Cleveland, grew up in the area, an dhe was rooting for NY

    3. A salary cap may help the sport a little, but I think a salary floor is needed more. How many teams have $12-$30 million payrolls, and collect $70 million in bvaseball welfare? They're knocked out of contention on Opening Day, but the owners don't care. They made a $50 mil profit without selling 1 ticket.

    4. John Henry is prrof that it pays to be friends with the corrupt interim commissioner for life, Bud Selig. 3 groups put in bids for the Sox, and Bud saw to it that his pal, who put in the lowest bid of all, got the team. While he still owned another team, and had a 1& interest on a 3rd team (The Yankees as you alluded to)
Sign In or Register to comment.