The Official Philadelphia Flyers Thread

blackredyellow

I just can't see Bryzgalov signing with Philly before testing the market. Why would he? Rumors are that he wants to be paid in line with the top players in the league, so unless Philly blows him away with an offer, why wouldn't he wait to see what else is out there? And would Holmgren really throw $7 million out there on a goalie?

81

blackredyellow wrote:

I just can't see Bryzgalov signing with Philly before testing the market. Why would he? Rumors are that he wants to be paid in line with the top players in the league, so unless Philly blows him away with an offer, why wouldn't he wait to see what else is out there? And would Holmgren really throw $7 million out there on a goalie?

i'm sure he has an idea of what a top flight goalie is worth....and he had to be prepared to pay it before he made the deal.



As for Bryzgalov signing...he may look at it as a great opportunity to win the cup with a solid team in front of him, vs what he has played with the last sevearl years in AZ. maybe he takes a tad less money for a better chance of winning the cup.

polaris_x

best way to lower the gaa for flyer goaltenders is to get some forwards to play D ... sure, the current roster is not fantastic but goalies are a huge reflection of the system and players in front of them ... there were too many times this post season where the goalie was left hung to dry and lot of it is the pride the forwards take on playing in their own end ...

neilybabes86

WOW a real goalie :?

81

neilybabes86 wrote:

WOW a real goalie :?

if they can sign him watch out...Flyers are going to over take the Rang......errr.....never mind....

neilybabes86

The 81 wrote:

neilybabes86 wrote:

WOW a real goalie :?

if they can sign him watch out...Flyers are going to over take the Rang......errr.....never mind....

yup and maybe will actually win a cup.... :?

its only been 35 years or so

Phantom Pain

The rumor I heard was Carter to Columbus for the 8th overall pick

I have no idea what CB's cap space or anything but just a rumor I heard

I think in 2012 Carter's NTC kicks in so moving him now would be a lot easier

81

neilybabes86 wrote:

The 81 wrote:

neilybabes86 wrote:

WOW a real goalie :?

if they can sign him watch out...Flyers are going to over take the Rang......errr.....never mind....

yup and maybe will actually win a cup.... :?

its only been 35 years or so

what was it, 54 years in the big apple? current run is back up to 17. is that right?

neilybabes86

The 81 wrote:

neilybabes86 wrote:

The 81 wrote:

if they can sign him watch out...Flyers are going to over take the Rang......errr.....never mind....

yup and maybe will actually win a cup.... :?

its only been 35 years or so

what was it, 54 years in the big apple? current run is back up to 17. is that right?

yup..but that was the past ....this is the present

94 was awhile ago....and the flyers are 18 years b4 94.....

win a cup bud

pjhawks

neilybabes86 wrote:

yup..but that was the past ....this is the present

94 was awhile ago....and the flyers are 18 years b4 94.....

win a cup bud

2 in 36 years is still better than 1 in 72 years.

neilybabes86

pjhawks wrote:

neilybabes86 wrote:

yup..but that was the past ....this is the present

94 was awhile ago....and the flyers are 18 years b4 94.....

win a cup bud

2 in 36 years is still better than 1 in 72 years.

if u say so..personally i would rather have the last one 17 years ago rather than 35

81

rangers could barely compete for a cup when there only 6 teams playing.

neilybabes86

flyers suck anhd have no goalie

The Juggler

neilybabes86 wrote:

pjhawks wrote:

neilybabes86 wrote:

yup..but that was the past ....this is the present

94 was awhile ago....and the flyers are 18 years b4 94.....

win a cup bud

2 in 36 years is still better than 1 in 72 years.

if u say so..personally i would rather have the last one 17 years ago rather than 35

dude. once you hit 10 years it's ancient history.

1994

neilybabes86

The Juggler wrote:

neilybabes86 wrote:

neilybabes86 wrote:

yup..but that was the past ....this is the present

94 was awhile ago....and the flyers are 18 years b4 94.....

win a cup bud

if u say so..personally i would rather have the last one 17 years ago rather than 35

dude. once you hit 10 years it's ancient history.

1994

then the flyers are relic's dude

The Juggler

neilybabes86 wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

neilybabes86 wrote:

if u say so..personally i would rather have the last one 17 years ago rather than 35

dude. once you hit 10 years it's ancient history.

1994

then the flyers are relic's dude

both ancient history. that's the point. the statue of limitations on talking shit about a championship from 1994 ended before No Code came out.

Jearlpam0925

The Juggler wrote:

neilybabes86 wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

dude. once you hit 10 years it's ancient history.

1994

then the flyers are relic's dude

both ancient history. that's the point. the statue of limitations on talking shit about a championship from 1994 ended before No Code came out.

Statute.

neilybabes86

The Juggler wrote:

neilybabes86 wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

dude. once you hit 10 years it's ancient history.

1994

then the flyers are relic's dude

both ancient history. that's the point. the statue of limitations on talking shit about a championship from 1994 ended before No Code came out.

statute

The Juggler

Jearlpam0925 wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

neilybabes86 wrote:

then the flyers are relic's dude

both ancient history. that's the point. the statue of limitations on talking shit about a championship from 1994 ended before No Code came out.

Statute.

ha...i think this is an inadvertant seinfled reference. is it not?

81

no, i think it's statue