Home› All Encompassing Trip

Gene Wilder vs. Johnny Depp as Wonka

spongersponger Posts: 3,159
edited June 2008 in All Encompassing Trip
My vote goes to Wilder by a longshot. Depp kinda weirded me out in that role. Nowhere in the book does it say that Wonka had a base case of gender identity disorder.
reigning champion

http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=272825
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • CreedDiseaseCreedDisease Posts: 241
    sponger wrote:
    My vote goes to Wilder by a longshot. Depp kinda weirded me out in that role. Nowhere in the book does it say that Wonka had a base case of gender identity disorder.
    couldn't have said it better myself, wilder....
  • Ledbetterman10Ledbetterman10 Posts: 16,929
    Depp's great but he never had a chance with that role. it couldn't be done. sometimes, there's only one.
    2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2

    Pearl Jam bootlegs:
    http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
  • kcherubkcherub Posts: 961
    CreedDisease wrote:
    couldn't have said it better myself, wilder....

    Me, too! Johnny Depp was really good in the role, but I got the feeling he just might touch one of the kids if left alone with them... ;)
    I still want you all to "take care"--I am just damn tired of typing it.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/kcherub#p/a/u/0/N-UQprRqSwo
  • tvismyfriendtvismyfriend Posts: 2,118
    kcherub wrote:
    Me, too! Johnny Depp was really good in the role, but I got the feeling he just might touch one of the kids if left alone with them... ;)
    No wonder the umpa-lumpas looked sad.
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    Ledbetterman10 wrote:
    Depp's great but he never had a chance with that role. it couldn't be done. sometimes, there's only one.

    well said....depp is a great actor but wilder...c'mon...:)


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Zail7Gdqro
  • SweetAndLowSweetAndLow Posts: 178
    I love both actors' versions, but to me, Depp's interpretation was closer to what I remember from the book - wonka really was a reclusive, odd individual.
    __________________
    1998: East Troy2; East Lansing
    2000: Noblesville; Auburn Hills; Chicago
    2003: East Troy; Clarkston1
    2004: Toledo; Grand Rapids
    2006: Grand Rapids; Auburn Hills
    2009: Chicago
    2010: Columbus
    2011: East Troy (PJ20), both
    2013: Wrigley Field
    2014: Detroit
  • Rhinocerous SurpriseRhinocerous Surprise Posts: 4,423
    Wilder, definitely. He just defined the role. But I feel sorry for Depp, because he tried hard to make Wonka his own, but it just sorta fell flat. And it was kinda too much of the "Depp as weird character" routine.
    Smokey Robinson constantly looks like he's trying to act natural after being accused of farting.
  • nocode23nocode23 Posts: 411
    Wilder for sure! Depp had that Michael Jackson kinda thing going on that really creeped me out.
  • NY PJ1NY PJ1 Posts: 9,533
    not even close

    ORIGINAL EVERYTHING WAS WAY BETTER
  • phillyfanphillyfan Posts: 831
    wilder
    If you hate something dont you do it too
    world fucking champs!!!
  • you areyou are Posts: 1,651
    sponger wrote:
    My vote goes to Wilder by a longshot. Depp kinda weirded me out in that role. Nowhere in the book does it say that Wonka had a base case of gender identity disorder.

    wilder, but i haven't read the book....depp did creep me out. like someone else said...too close to michael jackson :o
    No need to be void, or save up on life...
    You got to spend it all
  • barakabaraka Posts: 1,268
    Depp is one of my favs, but that role was made for Wilder. He was quite brilliant in the role.
    The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance,
    but the illusion of knowledge.
    ~Daniel Boorstin

    Only a life lived for others is worth living.
    ~Albert Einstein
  • Kilgore_TroutKilgore_Trout Posts: 7,334
    ha... worse matchup since ehlo on jordan :D

    wilder of course!
    "Senza speme vivemo in disio"

    http://seanbriceart.com/
  • MikeLammi23MikeLammi23 Posts: 109
    sgossard3 wrote:
    ha... worse matchup since ehlo on jordan :D

    wilder of course!

    That's the greatest comparison ever. I'm a HUGE Jordan/Bulls fan.
    I'll be stealing that now, thank you.

    Not even close... Gene Wilder.
    10c #TBD

    "They said timing was everything, made him want to be everywhere,...there's a lot to be said for nowhere."
    "Let them wash away,... all those yesterdays."

    09/10/98, 08/23/00, 08/24/00, 08/25/00, 04/30/03, 07/09/03, 07/14/03, 06/01/06, 06/03/06, 06/24/08, 06/25/08
  • mattcozeamattcozea Posts: 377
    sgossard3 wrote:
    ha... worse matchup since ehlo on jordan :D
    Wow, all these years later and still rubbing it in... I LOVE IT! :D
    6-27-98 Alpine Valley
    10-8-00 Alpine Valley
    10-9-00 All State Arena, Chicago
    4-23-03 Assembly Hall, Champaign
    5-16-06 United Center, Chicago
    6-30-06 Marcus Amphitheater, Milwaukee
    8-05-07 Grant Park, Chicago
    8-21-08 EV, Auditorium Theater, Chicago
    8-22-08 EV, Auditorium Theater, Chicago
  • aNiMaLaNiMaL Posts: 7,117
    No contest - Gene Wilder owns that role outright!
  • LikeAnOceanLikeAnOcean Posts: 7,718
    I was never a really big fan of the original.. still have to see the remake to comment..
  • gabersgabers Posts: 2,787
    Gene Wilder was always one of my favorite comedic actors. He had a touch of sadness in his eyes that made his humor that much better. So charismatic, so spontaneous, so underrated, in my opinion.
  • MyHandsBoundMyHandsBound Posts: 698
    Wilder and the first movie was much, much, much better than the second.....:)....
  • MyHandsBoundMyHandsBound Posts: 698
    the ever lasting gob stopper....you can suck it and suck it and it will never get any smaller...:D
  • chimechime Posts: 7,839
    As a huge fan of all things Dahl I prefer the new film as it's sooooo much closer to the book.

    I really don't like the original.
    So are we strangers now? Like rock and roll and the radio?
  • surfanddestroysurfanddestroy Posts: 2,786
    I wouldn't say that one is better than the other, just different.
    But Depp was so much more like the character I imagined from the book.
    Astoria 20/04/06, Leeds 25/08/06, Prague 22/09/06, Wembley 18/06/07,
    Dusseldorf 21/06/07, Manchester 17/08/09, London 18/08/09, LA 06/10/09, LA 07/10/09.

    Ain't gonna be any middle anymore.
  • FinsburyParkCarrotsFinsburyParkCarrots Seattle, WA Posts: 12,223
    I haven't seen the Depp version, but I can't stand the fucker, so Wilder wins by default.
  • pickupyourwillpickupyourwill Posts: 3,135
    ~~~
  • pickupyourwillpickupyourwill Posts: 3,135
    ~~~
  • HushBullHushBull Posts: 996
    I prefer to splice the two films together. A little Johnny, a little Genie... it's like the Dark Side of the Moon/Wizard of Oz, swears.
    "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro"
  • pickupyourwillpickupyourwill Posts: 3,135
    HushBull wrote:
    I prefer to splice the two films together. A little Johnny, a little Genie... it's like the Dark Side of the Moon/Wizard of Oz, swears.

    dark chocolate
  • HushBullHushBull Posts: 996
    pickupyourwill wrote:
    dark chocolate

    Me likes, but I'm confused. Snozberry.
    "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro"
  • pickupyourwillpickupyourwill Posts: 3,135
    ......
  • HushBullHushBull Posts: 996
    Who's ever heard of a snozberry (sp?)... you know, it's in the original, I hope they didn't take it out of the Burton version, that would be sad...

    Does dark chocolate come with a weird sinister look only seen on madmen? would have to try that...
    "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro"
Sign In or Register to comment.