It's such a ridiculously baited question it doesn't even merit keystrokes...
If you have to even ask it's not worth explaining
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
That about what I expected you'd say in response Nothing personal.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
How is Israels agenda (that Barak supports 110%) different from the neo-con agenda?
OK, I'll bite:
The neo-con agenda is about installing democracies in troubled areas of the world, by force if necessary, in hopes that democracy will spread, in turn bringing peace to those regions.
Israel's agenda is, basically, to try not to get wiped off the face of the Earth.
Personally, my questions about Obama stem from whether or not he will be aggressive enough in national security issues. not whether he'll be too aggressive.
everybody wants the most they can possibly get
for the least they could possibly do
but somehow what you do is different? you cant smell the shit your shoveling? you make it so easy to expose your vomit.
You can;t see the connection between zionism and neo-conservatism
holy fuckk. brutal dude...f-in brutal
cement upstairs..block solid..
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
The neo-con agenda is about installing democracies in troubled areas of the world, by force if necessary, in hopes that democracy will spread, in turn bringing peace to those regions.
Hate to say it, but that's a fallacy. That angle has been seen through a long time ago. It's not about democracy at all.
It was just a tactic to get public support.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Ron Paul? I hate to admit it but I can't even consider him because he can't win. The Republicans will never nominate him and (as things now stand) an Independent can't win either. All an Independent can do (ala Nader) is siphon enough resonable people's votes away so that we're left with Bush. I don't like it but I can't see how we are ever going to keep the people with all the money from deciding who has all the power. It's shaping up to be another awful election....
you know whats brutal is your ability to have a conversation. you arent interested in debate. how can you be? you already know all the answers.
america is a great country because people like you arent one. you are a brainwashed extremist.
So you don't the know the connection. Ok...well..that explains it. Lack of comprehension on the issue *is* the issue.
All you had to say was you don't know. Why pretend to.. then be insulting on top of it all?
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
And you missed the entire point of my post. Congratulations.
The point: Israel's agenda is different, in that they are just trying to not get killed. I don't mind Obama supporting Israel in that particular area.
The answer is...They are connected integrally in the fight to combat Islamic terrorism. In every regard actually, to the point that they share a lot of money to fight the very same terrorist causes as though they are one mind.
They are the exact same mind actually in some cases when it comes to fighting terrorism. Mostly because the US has a lot of dual Israeli-American citizens throughout the current admin, that affect a lot of US foreign policy in regards to Israel. (edit: and the entire middle east....and elsewhere)
Also......AIPAC.... American Israel Public Affairs Committee
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
The answer is...They are connected integrally in the fight to combat Islamic terrorism. In every regard actually, to the point that they share a lot of money to fight the very same terrorist causes as though they are one mind.
You win a harmonica!
everybody wants the most they can possibly get
for the least they could possibly do
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Fuck you and everyone else who says Nothing Personal. Its always personal here...
I'll let them know...or maybe history will let them know...hehe
Nothing personal...
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
names...names...they pale somewhat in the presence of facts and logic.
But I digress... personality issue debates are far more informative usually.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
I don't hate Israel. I hate zionist neo-conservative concepts toward humanity.
As should everybody. Jews hate Zionism. True patriots hate neo-conservatives.
I dislike people that support these two cluster fuck principles on humanity.
As should everybody.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
So can anyone intelligently answer my original question on why exactly Obama would taking the stance of providing unanimous support to Israel, and what that means?
I see some avid supporters here, I'm sure this has come up before in their research. It's a pretty big issue looking forward into the next step towards terrorism.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Lighten up, Francis. If in anyway you were referring partially to my KKK remark, it was light hearted teasing. Hence the blue, winkey, smiley faced guy.
"When all your friends and sedatives mean well but make it worse... better find yourself a place to level out."
Comments
There you go again assuming you know more than us.
Whatever that fucking means. Heh
yea I did. good dodge.
It's such a ridiculously baited question it doesn't even merit keystrokes...
If you have to even ask it's not worth explaining
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
That about what I expected you'd say in response Nothing personal.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
but somehow what you do is different? you cant smell the shit your shoveling? you make it so easy to expose your vomit.
OK, I'll bite:
The neo-con agenda is about installing democracies in troubled areas of the world, by force if necessary, in hopes that democracy will spread, in turn bringing peace to those regions.
Israel's agenda is, basically, to try not to get wiped off the face of the Earth.
Personally, my questions about Obama stem from whether or not he will be aggressive enough in national security issues. not whether he'll be too aggressive.
for the least they could possibly do
You can;t see the connection between zionism and neo-conservatism
holy fuckk. brutal dude...f-in brutal
cement upstairs..block solid..
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Hate to say it, but that's a fallacy. That angle has been seen through a long time ago. It's not about democracy at all.
It was just a tactic to get public support.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
http://thedailybackground.com/media/images/blog//ZZ7A57B3DE.jpg
ds
And no one makes me close my eyes
So I throw the windows wide
And call to you across the sky....
And you missed the entire point of my post. Congratulations.
The point: Israel's agenda is different, in that they are just trying to not get killed. I don't mind Obama supporting Israel in that particular area.
for the least they could possibly do
you know whats brutal is your ability to have a conversation. you arent interested in debate. how can you be? you already know all the answers.
america is a great country because people like you arent one. you are a brainwashed extremist.
So you don't the know the connection. Ok...well..that explains it. Lack of comprehension on the issue *is* the issue.
All you had to say was you don't know. Why pretend to.. then be insulting on top of it all?
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
but I want the hear the answers from the smartest guy on the internet. teach us. teach us all.
The answer is...They are connected integrally in the fight to combat Islamic terrorism. In every regard actually, to the point that they share a lot of money to fight the very same terrorist causes as though they are one mind.
They are the exact same mind actually in some cases when it comes to fighting terrorism. Mostly because the US has a lot of dual Israeli-American citizens throughout the current admin, that affect a lot of US foreign policy in regards to Israel. (edit: and the entire middle east....and elsewhere)
Also......AIPAC.... American Israel Public Affairs Committee
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
You win a harmonica!
for the least they could possibly do
Fuck you and everyone else who says Nothing Personal. Its always personal here...
fucking eh!
sweet!
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
I'll let them know...or maybe history will let them know...hehe
Nothing personal...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Nothing intelligent about being a fanatic.
names...names...they pale somewhat in the presence of facts and logic.
But I digress... personality issue debates are far more informative usually.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Question why do yu hate Isreal so much?
His rabbi botched the briss.
Isn't it obvious? The guy is a Ron Paul fanatic. They're all Ku Kluxers and white supremacists.
Nice.
for the least they could possibly do
I don't hate Israel. I hate zionist neo-conservative concepts toward humanity.
As should everybody. Jews hate Zionism. True patriots hate neo-conservatives.
I dislike people that support these two cluster fuck principles on humanity.
As should everybody.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
no brains no argument just grade school..
Pass the cement on the PJ forum tonight.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
I see some avid supporters here, I'm sure this has come up before in their research. It's a pretty big issue looking forward into the next step towards terrorism.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Lighten up, Francis. If in anyway you were referring partially to my KKK remark, it was light hearted teasing. Hence the blue, winkey, smiley faced guy.