Over 400 Scientists disput global warming

810wmb

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=f80a6386-802a-23ad-40c8-3c63dc2d02cb


knock yrselves out

Byrnzie

810wmb wrote:

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=f80a6386-802a-23ad-40c8-3c63dc2d02cb


knock yrselves out

That's great! We can all carry on polluting and destroying the environment then!

keeponrockin

Even IF Global Warming isn't true (which i SERIOUSLY doubt) what harm could come with being less polluting?

lalalalaaaaaaaa

810wmb wrote:

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=f80a6386-802a-23ad-40c8-3c63dc2d02cb


knock yrselves out

Quit being jealous of Al Gore and his Nobel prize..

flywallyfly

810wmb wrote:

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=f80a6386-802a-23ad-40c8-3c63dc2d02cb


knock yrselves out

Sweet Jesus !! That 400 is out of a world total of like 420, right? We've been bamboozled @!!!!!!!!!

gabers

I love that Inhofe is a member of this committee. Public enemy #1 for the environment in congress and he's on the committee. Thank God his days are numbered. What a tool.

I am glad there is skepticism. That's what's great about scientific theory. There are always skeptics. And sometimes, theories are proven wrong. It doesn't make these scientists right though. Look, there is a direct coorelation with and increase of CO2 in the atmosphere and increased global temps. That is as simple as you can make it. There are a million varying factors that can impact the final outcome, but this is a statistic that you simply can't dispute.

mammasan

810wmb wrote:

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=f80a6386-802a-23ad-40c8-3c63dc2d02cb


knock yrselves out

The title of your thread is misleading. These scientist disput the idea of man made global warming. They believe that there is a climate shift occuring but that it is a natural cycle not a result of man's activity.

Honestly I think it's high time we stop arguing about what is causing the climate shift and focus more on how we will deal with the climate shift. There is very little chance that it can be reversed, if it is man made, and no chance if it is a natural cycle. We need to focus on we will adapt to say another ice age because from the looks of thing one may be coming and if we are ill prepared all of humanity will suffer because of our ignorance.

farfromglorified

keeponrockin wrote:

Even IF Global Warming isn't true (which i SERIOUSLY doubt) what harm could come with being less polluting?

Try not exhaling any CO2 for an hour. That would be less polluting. See if any harm comes of it.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

I gonna take the catalytic converter off my car now and reclaim all that extra HP those stingy environmentalists have robbed from me...clean air b@strds!!!

callen

keeponrockin wrote:

Even IF Global Warming isn't true (which i SERIOUSLY doubt) what harm could come with being less polluting?

drivers- selfishness, not wanting to be inconvenienced.

callen

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

I gonna take the catalytic converter off my car now and reclaim all that extra HP those stingy environmentalists have robbed from me...clean air b@strds!!!

Probably increase your gas mileage and decrease performance.....yes do realize your being sarcastic...

callen

mammasan wrote:

The title of your thread is misleading. These scientist disput the idea of man made global warming. They believe that there is a climate shift occuring but that it is a natural cycle not a result of man's activity.

Honestly I think it's high time we stop arguing about what is causing the climate shift and focus more on how we will deal with the climate shift. There is very little chance that it can be reversed, if it is man made, and no chance if it is a natural cycle. We need to focus on we will adapt to say another ice age because from the looks of thing one may be coming and if we are ill prepared all of humanity will suffer because of our ignorance.

Humanity may suffer....but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

onelongsong

810wmb wrote:

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=f80a6386-802a-23ad-40c8-3c63dc2d02cb


knock yrselves out

400 scientists out of what? 4 million? so we have 400 idiots that can't see the ice melting. those 400 idiots can't read growth rings of corals. those 400 idiots have never been to a city and seen the brown clouds hanging over them. these 400 idiots paid to speak this before congress so the oil companies cannot be held responsable.
let's see how many idiots believe them.

onelongsong

mammasan wrote:

The title of your thread is misleading. These scientist disput the idea of man made global warming. They believe that there is a climate shift occuring but that it is a natural cycle not a result of man's activity.

Honestly I think it's high time we stop arguing about what is causing the climate shift and focus more on how we will deal with the climate shift. There is very little chance that it can be reversed, if it is man made, and no chance if it is a natural cycle. We need to focus on we will adapt to say another ice age because from the looks of thing one may be coming and if we are ill prepared all of humanity will suffer because of our ignorance.

you are so right. but we can prove man is the cause in several ways. first is ice core samples which are almost gone. the pollution in the atmosphere collects in the ice. another way is the process of elimination. we haven't had enough volcanic activity to cause it; we haven't had massive releases of frozen methane. every time this cycle occured; we've found a reason. volcanic activity is natural; but at least once it has caused global warming and an extinction followed. i don't however know how they can call this a natural cycle of earth. the causes in each case of global warming has been different.
it's easy to prove the cause; but the cause doesn't matter anymore because it cannot be reversed. we are passed the point of no return and those not prepared will die. i predict 2/3 of the earths population. this includes the tens of thousands that have already died as a result of global warming.
instead of looking for the cause; you should be looking at the outcome. what happened the 4 times the earth was faced with global warming? where were the sea levels? where were the coastlines? these are the questions to be asked now.

macgyver06

yes 810... the beaches arent in any danger


lol... where did this clown come from

onelongsong

callen wrote:

Probably increase your gas mileage and decrease performance.....yes do realize your being sarcastic...

it's increase performance and decrease gas milage.
and i think everyone knows he was being sarcastic.

farfromglorified

onelongsong wrote:

it's easy to prove the cause; but the cause doesn't matter anymore because it cannot be reversed. we are passed the point of no return and those not prepared will die. i predict 2/3 of the earths population. this includes the tens of thousands that have already died as a result of global warming.

You keep saying it, but it never gets any less entertaining.

mammasan

onelongsong wrote:

you are so right. but we can prove man is the cause in several ways. first is ice core samples which are almost gone. the pollution in the atmosphere collects in the ice. another way is the process of elimination. we haven't had enough volcanic activity to cause it; we haven't had massive releases of frozen methane. every time this cycle occured; we've found a reason. volcanic activity is natural; but at least once it has caused global warming and an extinction followed. i don't however know how they can call this a natural cycle of earth. the causes in each case of global warming has been different.
it's easy to prove the cause; but the cause doesn't matter anymore because it cannot be reversed. we are passed the point of no return and those not prepared will die. i predict 2/3 of the earths population. this includes the tens of thousands that have already died as a result of global warming.
instead of looking for the cause; you should be looking at the outcome. what happened the 4 times the earth was faced with global warming? where were the sea levels? where were the coastlines? these are the questions to be asked now.

I believe that it is a natural cycle of the earth, but that mankind has had a significant impact on this cycle in someway. I believe that we have either excellerated the process or intensified it. Either way we need to start focusing on how we can adapt to any changes that will occur because of it. It is not our generation that will suffer but those after us and the least we can do is to start figuring out way on how we, and future generations, will deal with the changes.

callen

onelongsong wrote:

it's increase performance and decrease gas milage.
and i think everyone knows he was being sarcastic.

wrong...take a car that has an OBD II computer...oh lets say all 1997 and later models....they have O2 sensor in front and behind catalytic converter...take that converter out and you'll kill your gas mileage and power. Yea if you have a 1976 Chevy you may be right...but after 97 or so...and you'll kill performance. Modern catalytic converters are very efficient...very little if any restriction on exhaust.

Collin

This won't change my mind. I've always been an advocate of less polution.

Also, forget about global warming for a minute, man has clearly made an impact on earth, we're fucking up our fresh water and our air, we're chopping down woods etc.

macgyver06

is 810wmb... jlew??