Financial Revolution Underway Led by Global Banking System
RolandTD20Kdrummer
Posts: 13,066
http://www.naturalnews.com/024863.html
"There is a quiet revolution going on. It's not a political revolution or a social revolution. It is being carried out without guns, bullets or physical violence, but this aspect makes it none the less real. The world is in the midst of a financial revolution led by the banking system whose representative in the U.S. is the Federal Reserve, a private bank that is not part of our current government system and does not hold reserves. The goal is the complete dominance, ownership and control of all assets by the government. What Americans are now witnessing may be the finest coup d'etat ever perpetrated.
Phase One: Get people to place their money where it can easily be taken from them
In the last quarter century, more people have been encouraged to put their money into the stock market. The Monetary De-Regulation Act of 1980 allowed Americans to invest overseas and foreigners to invest in the American markets. At the same time, employers began to discontinue defined benefit retirement plans for their employees. These plans were replaced by employer sponsored retirement accounts that offered stock as the only viable way to capture the kind of return needed to fund a retirement. The onus for management of these accounts fell to the employees who for the most part didn't have a clue about the stock market or how to manage money.
The stock market was hyped by everyone. Entire TV channels were devoted to continuous, all day coverage of the markets with one prevailing mantra: buy and hold. Investing for the long term was paved as the road to riches and retirement. Every effort was made to convince new investors that when the market declined, it was the time to buy even more stock. Soon the nation was obsessed with the stock market and statistics loudly heralded that more than half of Americans owned stocks either individually or through their retirement plans.
The market roared higher and the party was on, lasting until the new millennium. At that point people even began calling for Social Security funds to be put into the market, but try as they might, the Bush people were unable to put this last safety net for Americans into jeopardy. When it became apparent that Social Security funds couldn't be added to the market to fuel it even higher, the lights went out on the party, and people in the know scrambled to grab the money.
Part of the buy and hold mantra has been that the market always comes back. The problem is investors have to wait for the come-back, sometimes for decades. People who bought and held at the beginning of the Great Depression in 1929 did not break even again until 1954, and that doesn't account for inflation.
Selling high is one of the biggest transfers of wealth from the uninformed to those in the know. People selling at the top or shortly after the market starts to go down are able to walk away with the gains. People who hold can only watch as the market continues to decline and their gains evaporate. It is only because enough were conned into believing in the buy and hold strategy that there was a pool of money just waiting to be pocketed by the sellers.
The future looks rosy for those who sold at the top or shortly after the decline began. They have a pocket full of cash with which to capitalize on the next up market. Now all the commentators say cash is king. Too bad for those still holding stocks. Once those that are left in the market realize they have been had, they will sell too, bringing on another huge leg down of prices. The unfolding of this financial coup is helping them catch on, and the next leg down is probably right around the corner.
Phase Two: Gather assets and place them under government control
For those still thinking it is too late to sell and stubbornly holding on to their 401(K) accounts, new legislation is afoot to take care of them too. During the week of Oct. 6th, a professor of economic policy analysis laid out a plan before the House Education and Labor Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee's Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support. Here are the components of the plan.
1.All workers would receive a $600 annual inflation-adjusted subsidy from the U.S. government but would be required to invest 5 percent of their pay into a guaranteed retirement account administered by the Social Security Administration. This money would be invested in special government bonds accruing interest at 3 percent per year. (This is a lot like the current Social Security progam)
2.The current system of providing tax breaks on 401(k) contributions and earning would be eliminated. There would be no more federal subsidy of 401(k)s. A 401(k) could continue to exist, but there would no longer be the subsidy of the tax break.
3.Congress would allow workers to swap out their 401(k) assets and transfer their money into the new government plan, perhaps at the levels where the stock market was before the financial crisis began. (The idea here being to induce holders of 401(k) plans to turn over their plan assets to the government in exchange for restoring the balance in their 401(k) to the level prior to the stock market collapse in September and October)
4.The new plan would allow workers to pass on only half of their account balances to their heirs, with the government presumably keeping the remaining half
Under this plan, matching funds contributed by employers would also be subject to income taxation and additional FICA taxation for both employer and employee. Eliminating tax breaks would push individuals into higher tax brackets even though they have no additional disposable income. However, the most glaring feature of this plan is that the government would become the owner of 401(k) assets.
And for the crowning blow there is the Treasury's new guide for how the financial markets and their regulatory structures will be brought into line with and fit into the New Economic Order, another name for the New World Order, the ongoing creation of a solitary fascist world government resulting in the complete loss of sovereignty. The implementation the Blueprint for a Modernized Regulatory Structure (March 31, 2008) is being played out right now, in front of our very eyes. This document, according to its introductory paragraph, is designed to "ensure that finanical institutions have the ability to keep pace with evolving markets". It calls for the Secretary of the Treasury in consultation with the Chairman of the Federal Reserve to have the discretion to purchase assets as deemed necessary to effectively stabilize financial markets. It gives these two appointed, not elected, individuals the power to intervene in the markets of the country as they see fit when market conditions are unstable. It is a guarantee that market conditions will continue to be unstable while the transfer of assets into government hands is underway.
The bailout was the initiating salvo. It proclaimed the power outlined in the blueprint was going to be put into use to deal with a "banking crisis" that appeared one day out of nowhere. This bailout is but one tiny appetizer for the soon to be revealed main course, the unfettered grabbing of assets ranging from precious metals to paper assets and real estate. According to the blueprint which can easily be read online, savings and loans, state chartered banks, thrifts, credit unions, the mortgage industry, insurance carriers, and the transfer agents for Wall Street will be the first to fall under government control. The Blueprint gives the Federal Reserve the power to oversee all of American's financial markets. It brings the government in line with the socialist model cast for the New World Order. It creates an absolutist state controlled by corporations and international bankers.
Under this new authority, courts are barred from reviewing actions taken by the Treasury Secretary and the Federal Reserve. They are now effectively above the law and have more power than the President, who still must conform to the legal structures.
It is no coincidence that the "financial crisis" opening the door for this coup began during the ongoing hoopla over the presidential election. While the nation was busy obsessing over minute differences between the candidates, the central bankers were walking away with the real power. It is Paulson and Bernanke who now run the country. Obama and the role of the president have been marginalized. As programmed bankruptcy and economic depression set in, the American population will be reduced to serfdom with an economic status that parallels that of Mexico and other third world countries, preparing the way for the gathering of these countries under the New World Order.
A recent article by Kurt Nimmo quotes Carrol Quigley, a longstanding member of the Council on Foreign Relations who tried to warn us back in 1966 when he wrote: "The powers of financial capitalism had far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This stem was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank . . . sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."
http://www.naturalnews.com/cartoons/old-new-warfare_600.jpg
http://www.naturalnews.com/cartoons/bailout_600.jpg
"There is a quiet revolution going on. It's not a political revolution or a social revolution. It is being carried out without guns, bullets or physical violence, but this aspect makes it none the less real. The world is in the midst of a financial revolution led by the banking system whose representative in the U.S. is the Federal Reserve, a private bank that is not part of our current government system and does not hold reserves. The goal is the complete dominance, ownership and control of all assets by the government. What Americans are now witnessing may be the finest coup d'etat ever perpetrated.
Phase One: Get people to place their money where it can easily be taken from them
In the last quarter century, more people have been encouraged to put their money into the stock market. The Monetary De-Regulation Act of 1980 allowed Americans to invest overseas and foreigners to invest in the American markets. At the same time, employers began to discontinue defined benefit retirement plans for their employees. These plans were replaced by employer sponsored retirement accounts that offered stock as the only viable way to capture the kind of return needed to fund a retirement. The onus for management of these accounts fell to the employees who for the most part didn't have a clue about the stock market or how to manage money.
The stock market was hyped by everyone. Entire TV channels were devoted to continuous, all day coverage of the markets with one prevailing mantra: buy and hold. Investing for the long term was paved as the road to riches and retirement. Every effort was made to convince new investors that when the market declined, it was the time to buy even more stock. Soon the nation was obsessed with the stock market and statistics loudly heralded that more than half of Americans owned stocks either individually or through their retirement plans.
The market roared higher and the party was on, lasting until the new millennium. At that point people even began calling for Social Security funds to be put into the market, but try as they might, the Bush people were unable to put this last safety net for Americans into jeopardy. When it became apparent that Social Security funds couldn't be added to the market to fuel it even higher, the lights went out on the party, and people in the know scrambled to grab the money.
Part of the buy and hold mantra has been that the market always comes back. The problem is investors have to wait for the come-back, sometimes for decades. People who bought and held at the beginning of the Great Depression in 1929 did not break even again until 1954, and that doesn't account for inflation.
Selling high is one of the biggest transfers of wealth from the uninformed to those in the know. People selling at the top or shortly after the market starts to go down are able to walk away with the gains. People who hold can only watch as the market continues to decline and their gains evaporate. It is only because enough were conned into believing in the buy and hold strategy that there was a pool of money just waiting to be pocketed by the sellers.
The future looks rosy for those who sold at the top or shortly after the decline began. They have a pocket full of cash with which to capitalize on the next up market. Now all the commentators say cash is king. Too bad for those still holding stocks. Once those that are left in the market realize they have been had, they will sell too, bringing on another huge leg down of prices. The unfolding of this financial coup is helping them catch on, and the next leg down is probably right around the corner.
Phase Two: Gather assets and place them under government control
For those still thinking it is too late to sell and stubbornly holding on to their 401(K) accounts, new legislation is afoot to take care of them too. During the week of Oct. 6th, a professor of economic policy analysis laid out a plan before the House Education and Labor Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee's Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support. Here are the components of the plan.
1.All workers would receive a $600 annual inflation-adjusted subsidy from the U.S. government but would be required to invest 5 percent of their pay into a guaranteed retirement account administered by the Social Security Administration. This money would be invested in special government bonds accruing interest at 3 percent per year. (This is a lot like the current Social Security progam)
2.The current system of providing tax breaks on 401(k) contributions and earning would be eliminated. There would be no more federal subsidy of 401(k)s. A 401(k) could continue to exist, but there would no longer be the subsidy of the tax break.
3.Congress would allow workers to swap out their 401(k) assets and transfer their money into the new government plan, perhaps at the levels where the stock market was before the financial crisis began. (The idea here being to induce holders of 401(k) plans to turn over their plan assets to the government in exchange for restoring the balance in their 401(k) to the level prior to the stock market collapse in September and October)
4.The new plan would allow workers to pass on only half of their account balances to their heirs, with the government presumably keeping the remaining half
Under this plan, matching funds contributed by employers would also be subject to income taxation and additional FICA taxation for both employer and employee. Eliminating tax breaks would push individuals into higher tax brackets even though they have no additional disposable income. However, the most glaring feature of this plan is that the government would become the owner of 401(k) assets.
And for the crowning blow there is the Treasury's new guide for how the financial markets and their regulatory structures will be brought into line with and fit into the New Economic Order, another name for the New World Order, the ongoing creation of a solitary fascist world government resulting in the complete loss of sovereignty. The implementation the Blueprint for a Modernized Regulatory Structure (March 31, 2008) is being played out right now, in front of our very eyes. This document, according to its introductory paragraph, is designed to "ensure that finanical institutions have the ability to keep pace with evolving markets". It calls for the Secretary of the Treasury in consultation with the Chairman of the Federal Reserve to have the discretion to purchase assets as deemed necessary to effectively stabilize financial markets. It gives these two appointed, not elected, individuals the power to intervene in the markets of the country as they see fit when market conditions are unstable. It is a guarantee that market conditions will continue to be unstable while the transfer of assets into government hands is underway.
The bailout was the initiating salvo. It proclaimed the power outlined in the blueprint was going to be put into use to deal with a "banking crisis" that appeared one day out of nowhere. This bailout is but one tiny appetizer for the soon to be revealed main course, the unfettered grabbing of assets ranging from precious metals to paper assets and real estate. According to the blueprint which can easily be read online, savings and loans, state chartered banks, thrifts, credit unions, the mortgage industry, insurance carriers, and the transfer agents for Wall Street will be the first to fall under government control. The Blueprint gives the Federal Reserve the power to oversee all of American's financial markets. It brings the government in line with the socialist model cast for the New World Order. It creates an absolutist state controlled by corporations and international bankers.
Under this new authority, courts are barred from reviewing actions taken by the Treasury Secretary and the Federal Reserve. They are now effectively above the law and have more power than the President, who still must conform to the legal structures.
It is no coincidence that the "financial crisis" opening the door for this coup began during the ongoing hoopla over the presidential election. While the nation was busy obsessing over minute differences between the candidates, the central bankers were walking away with the real power. It is Paulson and Bernanke who now run the country. Obama and the role of the president have been marginalized. As programmed bankruptcy and economic depression set in, the American population will be reduced to serfdom with an economic status that parallels that of Mexico and other third world countries, preparing the way for the gathering of these countries under the New World Order.
A recent article by Kurt Nimmo quotes Carrol Quigley, a longstanding member of the Council on Foreign Relations who tried to warn us back in 1966 when he wrote: "The powers of financial capitalism had far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This stem was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank . . . sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."
http://www.naturalnews.com/cartoons/old-new-warfare_600.jpg
http://www.naturalnews.com/cartoons/bailout_600.jpg
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
1. People induced to invest in stocks
2. Stocks go bust
3. Creation of social security mark 2
4. Which shows the communism involved
5. which is the fascist NWO
And it's all a master plan by the NWO etc.
My judgement: 1 and 2 is fair enough, though simplified and with added ominosity. There are scoundrels out there that aim to lure people in to capitalize on their money, and they ran their game as far as they could, with good help from tax-specifically-and-regulation-generally-are-swear-words politicians. This happened, and some people were poised to gain from it.
Now, how this connects to 3, I have a hard time understanding. If they control government so thoroughly, why bother with the privatization spree beforehand? It makes more sense that the privatization spree was of "their" making, and that the new social security that was touched upon, is a reaction from the government to salvage something, after it's clear they've been had by the finance people. To me that looks like a sensible reaction to the stock disaster by expanding the much more secure social security.
And I suppose Bernanke and Paulson were given some power here, but although they aren't elected, they are appointed by those that are elected and answer ultimately to them. And if the elected congress, president etc doesn't like what they do, they dont get to go on doing it. And if "they" control all government, then why did they bother in the first place?
4 and 5 are bollocks ideological hysteria, really.
If "they" have all that control they are said to have, why on earth do they have to bother with schemes like this? Government, stocks, they have all the money anyway.
What's more likely, is that given the ideological drive towards more "free capitalism", less regulation, less government initiated by people with loads of money, have led to this situation, which has worsened because of "hands off" policies by the republicans in particular, but also deep within the democratic party. This is not only a US trend, but also noticable worldwide. Since it is apparent that hands off is not so good an idea after all, government re-regulates and takes the wheel again since it seems clear that the car couldnt drive itself after all, and we were heading straight off the road.
That's almost a little maxim for me: If "they" are so powerful, why do they bother with the schemes? Stability would be their best friend in the world. Conflicting interests and complicated interconnections for all of the involved looks to me much more likely.
Peace
Dan
"Every judgment teeters on the brink of error. To claim absolute knowledge is to become monstrous. Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty." - Frank Herbert, Dune, 1965
http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=272825
"Some who believe in a Pre-Tribulation rapture warn that the rapture is imminent, saying that all of the prophecies concerning the latter days have been fulfilled to the extent that the rapture could take place at any moment. Others suggest that certain requirements must first be met before a rapture can occur, such as these:
1. The nations of the world must unify their currency onto a universal standard.
2. There will be peace in Israel (Ezekiel 38).
3. There will be a one-world government, to correspond to the 7th beast of Revelation, prior to the Antichrist's 8th beast government.
4. The Jewish temple in Jerusalem must be rebuilt in its original place.
5. Observance of Old Testament commandments concerning animal sacrifices must be reinstated.
6. There will be a great falling away and the Antichrist will be revealed. 2 Thessalonians "
Religion does really strange things to how people rationalise things, and if there is a transfer of unfathomable wealth to certain elites in the process...it's a no lose situation.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
"But the least understood, and probably most important, reason has been missed by most secular analysts. Evangelicals support Israel because of biblical prophecy, including passages that tie the survival of Israel to the Second Coming of Jesus.
According to their reading of the Bible, God established a covenant with Abraham in the Book of Genesis. Essentially, says Beliefnet columnist Richard Land, a Southern Baptist leader with close ties to the Bush Administration, evangelicals support Israel because they believe "God blesses those that bless the Jews and curses those who curse the Jews. Consequently, we believe America needs to bless the Jews and Israel, because if we bless the Jews and support Israel, God blesses us. And if we don't, God curses us."
http://www.beliefnet.com/Faiths/Christianity/2002/06/The-Rapture-Factor.aspx
"As a result, Christian fundamentalists have become some of the strongest boosters of Israel and the most implacable foes of Islam, supporting even Israel's most hard-line policies on settlement expansion, seeing all these things as fulfillment of Biblical prophecy that the end times are near. Belief in the rapture and seeking to hasten its arrival trumps everything else."
"The more strategic benefit for Israel is that fundamentalist Christians now have a lot of clout with the American government and thus are likely to exert pressure to provide unqualified political support for Israeli policies, including economic and military aid."
http://blog.case.edu/singham/2005/05/12/jews_israel_and_the_rapture
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
I would like some real documentation the Zionist Jews really control the world financial system. I find that a stretch from the get go. That there are many jew with a lot of money, certainly. But that's far from them controlling world finance (assuming anyone really truly does, which I doubt). Not to mention what sort of groups and people you cozy up to with that statement...
As for religion giving people weird ideas, true. But a predominant sign as that the more radical and complete such an idea is, the fewer people believe in it. So I dont think that goes any way at all to legitimize the "controllers" of the world. What it does legitimize is a constant struggle between myriads of interest groups that gain temporary more or less power through government and big businesses deals. To control this, would require such an inanimous group with such discipline that I really don't see it happening.
Peace
Dan
"Every judgment teeters on the brink of error. To claim absolute knowledge is to become monstrous. Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty." - Frank Herbert, Dune, 1965
In my humble opinion you are exactly correct. A complex matrix of rules have evolved that mask real problems. Our issues are really so simple, and so are the solutions...
but too many benefit by diverting our attention to this or that trend.
The ultimate in "you can't see the forest for the trees"
the only question is how long can they keep this ball in the air.
In my humble opinion you are exactly correct. A complex matrix of rules have evolved that mask real problems. Our issues are really so simple, and so are the solutions...
but too many benefit by diverting our attention to this or that trend.
The ultimate in "you can't see the forest for the trees"
the only question is how long can they keep this ball in the air.
Look at the obvious pro bias towards Israel despite their actions. Look who controls the media. Who created usury?
the answers lie there..
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
So you're saying the money system is being manipulated due to overpopulation?
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
It is not enough to show that some people that are rich supports Israel to prove the global zionist conspiracy. Neither is it enough to show that since the US supports Israel, that means Israel controls the US
Peace
Dan
"Every judgment teeters on the brink of error. To claim absolute knowledge is to become monstrous. Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty." - Frank Herbert, Dune, 1965
You'll just chalk it up to conspiracy. If you look into it at some point, you'll see for yourself who owns what and where the interests lie.
Israel does control the US to a large degree...look how the all the politicians dance for them....it's ridiculous actually.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Ownership doesn't prove much unfortunately. You can't track businesses, then sort by whether they're owned by a jew or not, and add to Israel's tally like that. That would be grossly misleading, and not even true. For sure, it is generally interesting to track who owns what, but to use that to generalize further and assume positions and ideology based on an owner's ethnicity is misguided.
Show me to where it is documented this fact of yours. You obviously must have gained that certainty of yours from somewhere. Or is it just a feeling that jews own everything the times you checked something out?
Or dont you have any source that is moderately free of conspiracy-speak?
Peace
Dan
"Every judgment teeters on the brink of error. To claim absolute knowledge is to become monstrous. Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty." - Frank Herbert, Dune, 1965
To be honest I don't have the time to convince someon that probably will not see it regardless.
You don't have to believe it, I don't mind.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
As it is, I will just assume that your sources can't handle the light of day. I'm not asking you to rack up 20 youtube videos (which I would ignore anyway, since it takes too long to watch) or anything. Just indicate web-sites, books whatever, that backs your claims. Then I will know what's what and who said it in which context.
If you dont want to talk about it, why start a thread about it?
Peace
Dan
"Every judgment teeters on the brink of error. To claim absolute knowledge is to become monstrous. Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty." - Frank Herbert, Dune, 1965
Why is the media biased towards Israel? The largest media monopoly in Canada is comprised of Jewish interests that's no secret. In fact most of the mainstream media around the world is like this. Why do you think the general public is being manipulated into thinking a certain way in this regard? What is to gain? If you look at it from a religious/money perspective it makes sense that Israel is put first and the muslims are put second....demonised as terrorists actually. Oil is money, control the money (this is very key), and play in religious prophecy. The two go hand in hand in a certain direction. This is the reality we are living in currently.
What else explains why we are being led to believe all things muslim are dangerous, and to be mistrusted, and in the end...evil?
Who do you think is doing this?
Chance?
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Well said.
Typo Man: "Thanks kidz, but remembir, stay in skool!"
You seem to know something about something apparently.
Can you approach anything in post #17?
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Post 17 was the most ridiculous post in this entire thread and I did not feel it warranted a reaction. You've been asked for sources, you've given nothing. That's pretty much par for the course when you try to rile things up around here.
The media is sometimes biased in favor of Israel, but more and more I see coverage of the atrocities committed by Israel as well as the Palestinians. There's no conspiracy here. And why do the media demonize Muslims? Well, they demonize extremists. There just happen to be a lot of them. Look up terrorist attacks, beheadings, stonings, fundamentalist regimes and unstable countries with access to devastating weapons who believe their way is the only way. Do you see a commonality? Don't write that off as media bias. There's a reason there is a backlash against Muslims, and unfortunately it means PEOPLE, not the MEDIA, extend that bias beyond the fundamentalists to sometimes include the whole population, which of course is just wrong. But on the other hand, can you blame people for being scared, especially after 9/11?
Typo Man: "Thanks kidz, but remembir, stay in skool!"
I'd like to see you post a fear mongering link or a lengthy document about some high reaching conspiracy without an "I told you so" smirk on your face.
Typo Man: "Thanks kidz, but remembir, stay in skool!"
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1365
Funny, I'm not smiling.
And go find me a legitimate source that says the Jews run the World Bank and the Fed. All I find are crackpot religious pages and conspiracy sites.
Typo Man: "Thanks kidz, but remembir, stay in skool!"
So you're saying pro Israeli news organisations are promoting Muslims in a good light, or a bad light? Do you not see the blindingly obvious conflict of interest by default? You;re seeing the pseudo coverage, but where is the slant leaning? There's the catch.
Who is terrorizing who exactly?
This is why I refrain on some people, because they don't know enough about it to actually see through it.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
You're not a beam of information that needs to be brought to light, and condescension will get you nowhere.
Typo Man: "Thanks kidz, but remembir, stay in skool!"
Funny how you guys ask for links, like there is one link that explains everything. That's akin to ordering a diploma online, and saying you graduated from something.
It's as simple as following the money trail, and interests therein, and looking around at what is going on.
I'm going to go out on a limb and guess you believe the official 9/11 story in every aspect at face value.
That's a good indicator of what is a circular reality discussion.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
So... who is terrorizing who?
tell me.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Yes, we ask for links. I provided 1. I believe the score is now me 1, you 0. Your turn. You can’t call me out for providing a link. At least I’m trying.
No, I do not believe all of the 9/11 stories events that have been given to us. But I believe:
1) We were attacked by Muslim extremists
2) The PA crash was not a plane having been shot down
3) A plane hit the pentagon
4) The WTC fell under its own weight when the steel reached a critical malleable point due to the heat
5) It was not orchestrated by the US in any way shape or form.
Don't assume anything about me, or about anyone else here for that matter. I'm not a sheep and I can make my own decisions. I know when I am being spoonfed something.
Your condescension far outweighs any value you bring to the table with all of your posts.
Typo Man: "Thanks kidz, but remembir, stay in skool!"
Do you mean who am I scared of when I board a plane?
Look...Israel is not innocent, and neither are the Palestinians or the rest of the Muslim world. Don't try to turn this whole issue around and make the Jews out to be the only evil ones. None of us are clean. Period. Let's look at history and talk about persecution, shall we?
Typo Man: "Thanks kidz, but remembir, stay in skool!"
Well that's the crux of the official story in a nutshell. What you call condescension is what I call being up front and direct on an issue that merits it. People have been beating around the bush on this area of discussion for going on 8 years now.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
You mean look at history of foreign influence in the middle east based on financial gain, and core religious beliefs, and how the basic rights of the people living there come into play?
What are the Palestinians guilty of? being alive in a certain location? This is their crime?
hmm
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")