Do condoms stop the spread of HIV? McCain: "You've stumped me."

onelongsong

Vedderlution_Baby! wrote:

Then you are beyond ignorant of condoms. First off, it doesnt matter how big or small you are, there is a condom for you. Secondly, condoms are ran through a series of tests more rigorous than anything you can put them through. And thirdly, there are female condoms you can put on the vagina so you can do oral and still be safe. No wonder you've had so many bad experiences with condoms. You do know they go on the penis right? They're not going to work if you put them on your fingers.

when i needed to use condoms; they didn't come in different sizes; and there were no vagina condoms.
secondly; maybe it's the testing that weakens them.
i haven't needed them in 10 years so i'm not up on the latest. i make sure i know my partners and that is the best way to avoid aids.

Ahnimus

onelongsong wrote:

i'm not a church person. church was invented by man in his flawed ways as a means to power. i am however spiritual.

Exactly

you're not doing it right if you're not breaking condoms. or you're just small.
and if you're not using your tounge you completely missed the plot. try putting a condom on your tounge.

Haha man. Have you ever blown up a condom? They are massive. There is no way your size can break a condom and I'm not exactly small myself.

I don't need to put a condom on my tongue, the chance of contracting anything through saliva is low enough that it might as well be zero. See above post.

Ahnimus

onelongsong wrote:

when i needed to use condoms; they didn't come in different sizes; and there were no vagina condoms.
secondly; maybe it's the testing that weakens them.
i haven't needed them in 10 years so i'm not up on the latest. i make sure i know my partners and that is the best way to avoid aids.

The standard size is fine unless you are too small.

Trau

Pearl Jam and toast wrote:

Right on. I don't really see monogamy as a religious thing, just a part of being a good person. Be faithful! Also it's DEFINETLY not healthy activity to be sleeping around.. Abstinance is irrational and completely impractical, but monogamy is a pretty good way to go.

Well that's why AIDS has spread so much in the first place. The more people who have multiple partners, the more of a chance there is that shit is going to spread.

onelongsong

Ahnimus wrote:

Exactly



Haha man. Have you ever blown up a condom? They are massive. There is no way your size can break a condom and I'm not exactly small myself.

I don't need to put a condom on my tongue, the chance of contracting anything through saliva is low enough that it might as well be zero. See above post.

that's what every "johnny cum quickly" says. it's friction and movement.

then how is aids contracted between lesbians?

onelongsong

Ahnimus wrote:

The standard size is fine unless you are too small.

when you're too small they slip off.

Ahnimus

onelongsong wrote:

that's what every "johnny cum quickly" says. it's friction and movement.

then how is aids contracted between lesbians?

Pussy rubbing probably. Did you look at the stats? There is no lesbian transmission listed, it's part of the Other** because it rarely happens.

Ahnimus

onelongsong wrote:

when you're too small they slip off.

That is what I said.

onelongsong

Ahnimus wrote:

Pussy rubbing probably. Did you look at the stats? There is no lesbian transmission listed, it's part of the Other** because it rarely happens.

WAKE UP.

Ahnimus

onelongsong wrote:

WAKE UP.

What?

If I acknowledge Christ as my saviour than I will know more about HIV/AIDS than if I spent a few weeks on CDC website?

Does God give you all the answers in private conversations?

Ahnimus

onelongsong wrote:

that's what every "johnny cum quickly" says. it's friction and movement.

Wait, wait. I just realized you are saying that I cum quickly.

WTF?

Vedderlution_Baby

onelongsong wrote:

when i needed to use condoms; they didn't come in different sizes; and there were no vagina condoms.
secondly; maybe it's the testing that weakens them.
i haven't needed them in 10 years so i'm not up on the latest. i make sure i know my partners and that is the best way to avoid aids.

So ten years ago, condoms only came in one size? can any of you other old timers vouch for this statement? I'm having a hard time believing that something that's been used since the ancient egyptians came in only one size until 1987.


By the way, they don't put each condom through a series of tests. They randomly select a certain number of condoms from each batch and test them. Although some companies do test each condom with either electricity or air to check for holes before they roll and package them.


And just FYI, the female condom came to be in 1988.

Jeanie

Vedderlution_Baby! wrote:

So ten years ago, condoms only came in one size? can any of you other old timers vouch for this statement? I'm having a hard time believing that something that's been used since the ancient egyptians came in only one size until 1987.


By the way, they don't put each condom through a series of tests. They randomly select a certain number of condoms from each batch and test them. Although some companies do test each condom with either electricity or air to check for holes before they roll and package them.


And just FYI, the female condom came to be in 1988.

Maybe it's a generational thing vedderlution. I can honestly say that condoms where known about but AIDS/HIV wasn't the big spectre it is today when I was growing up. AND you had buckley's chance mostly of getting a guy to put on a condom in my younger years. Girls needed to be on the pill if they wanted to protect themselves from pregnancy and that was about all you could hope for. I am aware that dental dams exist but would no more attempt to get someone to use one of those than I would a condom. So perhaps this is about perspective?

I think that the HIV epidemic has definitely changed how people view condoms. And I think that the safe sex message that came with HIV/AIDs has completely changed the sexual landscape. But it wasn't always like this.

lucylespian

cutback wrote:

All this does is convince me McCain is only interested in getting elected not wanting to lead. He will do and say whatever it takes to get elected.

Sadly though, this is a problem of the system, not the individual. If he doesn't get elected, it doesn't matter what he thinks. ONce in, he can start being a bit more opinionated.

gue_barium

McCain reminds me of Nixon; delusional in his quest for the Presidency with some sort of unhealthy mythic-religious reverence for the office itself.
"It's not just a job, it's being closer to God."

onelongsong

Vedderlution_Baby! wrote:

So ten years ago, condoms only came in one size? can any of you other old timers vouch for this statement? I'm having a hard time believing that something that's been used since the ancient egyptians came in only one size until 1987.


By the way, they don't put each condom through a series of tests. They randomly select a certain number of condoms from each batch and test them. Although some companies do test each condom with either electricity or air to check for holes before they roll and package them.


And just FYI, the female condom came to be in 1988.

i remember being home sick back in the mid to late 80's. i had sally jesse rafeal on the tele and they were talking about aids. they announced the new vaginal condom but also showed another way lesbians can avoid aids. it involved wearing that thing that held up nylons in the old days with the wire over button clips. they said to take saran wrap and attach it so the pubic area was covered and said when both side became wet; you'd lose very little feeling.
the point of this is that women can contract aids from eachother. thus the invention of the vaginal condom.

anyone that knows how to pleasure a woman orally knows this simply won't do. there's a lot more to it.

Ahnimus

onelongsong wrote:

i remember being home sick back in the mid to late 80's. i had sally jesse rafeal on the tele and they were talking about aids. they announced the new vaginal condom but also showed another way lesbians can avoid aids. it involved wearing that thing that held up nylons in the old days with the wire over button clips. they said to take saran wrap and attach it so the pubic area was covered and said when both side became wet; you'd lose very little feeling.
the point of this is that women can contract aids from eachother. thus the invention of the vaginal condom.

anyone that knows how to pleasure a woman orally knows this simply won't do. there's a lot more to it.

Actually the vaginal condom is more effective than a regular condom. Where did you get the idea that it was invented for lesbians?

lol, how do you pleasure a woman orally, oh, master of the clit?

floyd1975

Ahnimus wrote:

Actually the vaginal condom is more effective than a regular condom. Where did you get the idea that it was invented for lesbians?

lol, how do you pleasure a woman orally, oh, master of the clit?

You call in a female friend to join the party.

onelongsong

Ahnimus wrote:

Actually the vaginal condom is more effective than a regular condom. Where did you get the idea that it was invented for lesbians?

from the show.

lol, how do you pleasure a woman orally, oh, master of the clit?

i'm not going into graphics here. ask the woman you're with what she likes. ask the woman to teach you. don't think you know everything. a woman should have 3 orgasms orally before you do your thing. forget you exist and concentrate on her.
there's a few tips for you.

Ahnimus

onelongsong wrote:

from the show.

That's why I don't like television. The simpsons will tell you the epidermis is your hair.

i'm not going into graphics here. ask the woman you're with what she likes. ask the woman to teach you. don't think you know everything. a woman should have 3 orgasms orally before you do your thing. forget you exist and concentrate on her.
there's a few tips for you.

That doesn't sound as complicated as you initially suggested.

Actually I mostly disagree with you. The state of mind of the women is of the utmost importance. If they are not in the mood you could be down there all day. I got one of my partners in such a state of mind that as I went to touch her, her body shook and she came without me hardly touching her at all.

Wether a woman enjoys clitoral or sub-cervical stimulation at different depths and frequencies of motion isn't normally a matter of discussion. A woman will typically communicate their feelings through body movement and auditory expression. The degree to which they feel pleasure, is often relative to how deep they sink their fingernails into your skin.

It should be a progressive experience, where speed and depth of penetration are proportional to the level of response exhibited by the woman.

Anyway, I'm getting pretty discriptive now. I don't want to give all the secrets away either.