woo hoo!

ForestBrain
ForestBrain Posts: 460
edited April 2007 in A Moving Train
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070418/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_abortion

I continued to read more, and the stinking methods of abortion are barbaric! It's despicable! Oh this makes me too mad....
When life gives you lemons, throw them at somebody.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«134567

Comments

  • lucylespian
    lucylespian Posts: 2,403
    You stink !!!
    Music is not a competetion.
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    Something wrong with that term "partial birth" it's not like the baby is coming out on it's own and when it starts to scream they quickly slash it's head off and pull the body out with tongs. The term doesn't seem to really describe the process. As far as I'm concerned the procedure is just as humane as any other procedure.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • ForestBrain
    ForestBrain Posts: 460
    Man, that's so cold, cold-hearted. "They just crush their skulls. Nothing wrong with that!"
    What is wrong with you that you think that's okay?!
    The stupid women made their choice when they got pregnant.
    When life gives you lemons, throw them at somebody.
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    ForestBrain wrote:
    Man, that's so cold, cold-hearted. "They just crush their skulls. Nothing wrong with that!"
    What is wrong with you that you think that's okay?!
    The stupid women made their choice when they got pregnant.

    How is it any worse than dismemberment? Where they slowly pick pieces of the baby apart, starting with legs, then arms, and just slowly cutting back the torso? Why wasn't that method banned? Oh it doesn't have a disturbing name? I don't get it.

    But I think your last statement is pretty myopic and ignorant. Not every woman makes the choice to get pregnant.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • hodge
    hodge Posts: 519
    ForestBrain wrote:
    The stupid women made their choice when they got pregnant.

    People make mistakes.

    Also, what if they were raped? don't be so ignorant.
    ..and you will come to find that we are all one mind, capable of all that's imagined and all conceivable
  • prism
    prism Posts: 2,440
    it's a very tiny fraction of abortions that are performed. leave what other women do between the woman and her doctor

    if you don't like it then here's some advice "don't have a partial-birth abortion"
    *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
    angels share laughter
    *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
  • hippiemom
    hippiemom Posts: 3,326
    ForestBrain wrote:
    Man, that's so cold, cold-hearted. "They just crush their skulls. Nothing wrong with that!"
    What is wrong with you that you think that's okay?!
    The stupid women made their choice when they got pregnant.
    You are aware, aren't you, that this method is rarely used, typically only in cases where the life or health of the mother is at stake?
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • prism
    prism Posts: 2,440
    hippiemom wrote:
    You are aware, aren't you, that this method is rarely used, typically only in cases where the life or health of the mother is at stake?


    hippiemom is right. this procedure is usually only used in case where the fetus has hydranencephaly http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydranencephaly making the head too large because of massive swelling to remove even if it's seperated from the body. even if these babies are born intact they cannot survive.
    *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
    angels share laughter
    *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    prism wrote:
    hippiemom is right. this procedure is usually only used in case where the fetus has hydranencephaly http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydranencephaly making the head too large because of massive swelling to remove even if it's seperated from the body. even if these babies are born intact they cannot survive.

    What if it's just anencephaly? Or do you think babies can survive without a brain?
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • small town beck
    small town beck Posts: 6,691
    ForestBrain wrote:
    Man, that's so cold, cold-hearted. "They just crush their skulls. Nothing wrong with that!"
    What is wrong with you that you think that's okay?!
    The stupid women made their choice when they got pregnant.

    Did you just say stupid women made their choice? Who the fuck are you? Last time I checked women didn't get pregnant on their own and surprise, surprise WE actually enjoy sex too :eek:

    As already stated that procedure is rarely used. I am not sure I could have an abortion myself but I certainly believe the choice should be available up until a certain time in the pregnancy.

    If it it makes you so angry I encourage you to hand out condoms and do some safe sex promotion. I also encourage you to maybe learn a little more respect for women. Misogyny is so last century :rolleyes:
  • prism
    prism Posts: 2,440
    Ahnimus wrote:
    What if it's just anencephaly? Or do you think babies can survive without a brain?

    sometimes they have enough of a brainstem to be able to regulate breathing and have a heartbeat. but even then they're nothing more than a vegetable remaining unconscious without the ability to see or hear or feel anything. I know that in cases where the parents don't allow the baby to die letting nature take it's course, some of these babies have been kept alive artificially for quite awhile, though I can't understand a reasoning for doing that.
    *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
    angels share laughter
    *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    ForestBrain wrote:
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070418/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_abortion

    I continued to read more, and the stinking methods of abortion are barbaric! It's despicable! Oh this makes me too mad....

    congratulations.
  • Brain of J.Lo
    Brain of J.Lo Posts: 3,259
    As someone who has experienced pregnancy complications that were potentially life-threatening, I find this frightening and sad.
  • ForestBrain
    ForestBrain Posts: 460
    Ahnimus wrote:
    How is it any worse than dismemberment? Where they slowly pick pieces of the baby apart, starting with legs, then arms, and just slowly cutting back the torso? Why wasn't that method banned? Oh it doesn't have a disturbing name? I don't get it.

    But I think your last statement is pretty myopic and ignorant. Not every woman makes the choice to get pregnant.
    That why I continued in my first post. I knew that was done. But at least ONE method has been made illegal.
    I do not want kids, in the worst way. But if I ever got pregnant, I would not get an abortion. If you can't control yourself, you can't make the baby pay for your mistakes. If I were to get pregnant, and it would risk my life, I'de give mine for the baby's. That little baby cannot protect himself. I am a woman, I don't want kids, I respect some...not all..(I have no respect for women that get abortions), but I darn well would never kill my own kid. I can't even believe that's legal.
    What a cold-hearted, selfish world.
    When life gives you lemons, throw them at somebody.
  • hippiemom
    hippiemom Posts: 3,326
    ForestBrain wrote:
    If I were to get pregnant, and it would risk my life, I'de give mine for the baby's.
    That's your decision to make, but you've got one hell of a lot of nerve thinking you can make that decision for anyone else.
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • Brain of J.Lo
    Brain of J.Lo Posts: 3,259
    ForestBrain wrote:
    If I were to get pregnant, and it would risk my life, I'de give mine for the baby's. That little baby cannot protect himself.

    While that's VERY noble of you, it's a very uneducated statement that really doesn't make sense. Do you really think that when a woman's life is threatened by complications of the pregnancy that the baby's life is not also threatened???
  • ForestBrain
    ForestBrain Posts: 460
    That's where I differ. I'de leave it in the hands of God.
    When life gives you lemons, throw them at somebody.
  • ForestBrain
    ForestBrain Posts: 460
    hippiemom wrote:
    That's your decision to make, but you've got one hell of a lot of nerve thinking you can make that decision for anyone else.
    ohhhh, I see. It's perfectly okay for a woman to decide to murder her baby. I'm SO sorry.
    When life gives you lemons, throw them at somebody.
  • prism
    prism Posts: 2,440
    ForestBrain wrote:
    That's where I differ. I'de leave it in the hands of God.



    hahaha....as if "God" would give a rat's ass about you or your baby.
    *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
    angels share laughter
    *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
  • ForestBrain
    ForestBrain Posts: 460
    You either don't believe in God, or you hate him. That's your choice.
    But if there is a God, believe me, people are going to pay for killing their babies.
    When life gives you lemons, throw them at somebody.

Categories