Al-Qaida No. 2 clears up a few things.....

1235

Comments

  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    69charger wrote:
    Watch it.

    As someone who is very interested in 9/11 I would think you'd be interested in watching this documentary.

    You're scared to watch it.

    I almost feel like using sign language. I'll look at it, but I must say your method of material presentation could def use some work.

    Oooo scary...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    I almost feel like using sign language. I'll look at it, but I must say your method of material presentation could def use some work.

    Oooo scary...

    Just watch it. Very in-depth.
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    I almost feel like using sign language. I'll look at it, but I must say your method of material presentation could def use some work.

    Oooo scary...

    So....

    What did you think of it?
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    So....

    What did you think of it?

    Day 2
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    69charger wrote:
    So....

    What did you think of it?

    Day 2


    It's a professionally produced assembly of information I've for the most part seen in one place or another. It was done well. National Geographic takes a very mainstream and unassuming position on 9/11.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • fuck
    fuck Posts: 4,069
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    It's a professionally produced assembly of information I've for the most part seen in one place or another. It was done well. National Geographic takes a very mainstream and unassuming position on 9/11.
    did it answer your question?
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    It's a professionally produced assembly of information I've for the most part seen in one place or another. It was done well. National Geographic takes a very mainstream and unassuming position on 9/11.

    Did it make sense to you or is it just more 'disinformation'?
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    _FiveAgainstOne_ wrote:
    did it answer your question?

    specifically? no.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • fuck
    fuck Posts: 4,069
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    specifically? no.
    so you ask a question... you get a reply to watch a movie... turns out the movie doesnt even answer the question...

    this board really is just weird...
  • lazymoon13
    lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    _FiveAgainstOne_ wrote:
    so you ask a question... you get a reply to watch a movie... turns out the movie doesnt even answer the question...

    this board really is just weird...

    yea I'm shocked and outraged myself. I mean how dare he?
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    yea I'm shocked and outraged myself. I mean how dare he?

    Ask a direct question get an indirect runaround answer...

    gotta love when that happens :rolleyes:
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • 69charger
    69charger Posts: 1,045
    .......
  • lazymoon13
    lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    69charger wrote:
    .......

    damn did you give up? great torrent btw
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Anyhow...so if anyone can tell me why Osama is not wanted for 9/11 on their top 10 fugitive list let me know...



    thanks.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • Commy
    Commy Posts: 4,984
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    Anyhow...so if anyone can tell me why Osama is not wanted for 9/11 on their top 10 fugitive list let me know...



    thanks.
    If Osama is wanted on the top ten list then so should Bush. Their families are both profiting from this 'war on terror'.
  • lazymoon13
    lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    Commy wrote:
    If Osama is wanted on the top ten list then so should Bush. Their families are both profiting from this 'war on terror'.

    how is the bush family profiting from the war on terror? do you have specifics? or is that just something people like you say.
  • lazymoon13
    lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    Anyhow...so if anyone can tell me why Osama is not wanted for 9/11 on their top 10 fugitive list let me know...



    thanks.

    http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm


    :confused:
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm


    :confused:


    That's ok, I know you're easily confused with this stuff. Just read a bit more thoroughly and you'll catch it.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    regardless...

    what 69 is trying to say is

    Not all muslims are terrorists. "No, but most of them are, and all it takes is most of them" - Eric Cartman
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • g under p
    g under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,237
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    how is the bush family profiting from the war on terror? do you have specifics? or is that just something people like you say.
    Halliburton has become synonymous with war profiteering, but there are lots of other greedy fingers in the pie. We name names on 10 of the worst.


    The 10 Most Brazen War Profiteers that are in some ways appear to be connected to this administration.

    The Greedy Bastids!

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


Categories