Al-Qaida No. 2 clears up a few things.....

2456

Comments

  • lazymoon13
    lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    Collin wrote:
    I agree with that. All I'm saying is Bush & co are liars and deliberately presented the whole "they hate our freedoms" as a reason why they attacked the US. Because they couldn't say: "They attacked us because of our presence in the Middle East. Now, let's go invade Afghanistan and Iraq!"

    frankly I didn't need a reason as to "why" they attacked us on 9/11. they did. Now, lets go invade afgah. good enough for me. as for Iraq, ugh. different story.

    but yes, I do know the main reason for being attacked is our presence in Saudi Arabia and our support of Israel......and they hate our way of life ;)
  • lazymoon13
    lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    Collin wrote:
    I have no idea what Al-Qaeda's stance is on global warming. And I don't care. I said I agreed with that statement to a certain extent.

    I know, I was just being an ass. sorry :)
  • Collin
    Collin Posts: 4,931
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    I know, I was just being an ass. sorry :)

    It's cool, man.

    We're all asses sometimes :D
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    I disagree. I think they do hate our freedoms. not enough to be the sole reason to attack us, but the hatred is there. just look at the "laws" of extreme Islam. they are completely opposite of freedom. especially the treatment of women.

    just look at what he said in the interview...

    al-Zawahri said it was against Islamic religious law for any Muslim to live permanently in a Western country because in doing so they would "have permanent stay there under the laws of the infidels."

    Bin Laden has specifically listed all his grievances towards the west and not one of them is that we are a democratic free country.

    They may not like or agree with the way we live our lives but that is not why they attacked us.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • macgyver06
    macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    mammasan wrote:
    Well according to the 2007 National Intelligence Estimate, Al Qaida makes up only about 15% of the insurgency in Iraq. They are far from being our greatest opponent in Iraq.


    you are aware thats a completely... COMPLETELY bogus poll right?
  • Wow...Al Qaida now has a stance on global warming??? How fucking bizarre this world is getting...
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    macgyver06 wrote:
    you are aware thats a completely... COMPLETELY bogus poll right?

    It's not a poll. It's an intel report. It's not the only one either. Most intel reports, from several different agencies, state that Al Qaida backed fighters make up a minority of the insurgency. You can believe the report or not but don't confuse it with some type of poll.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    Wow...Al Qaida now has a stance on global warming??? How fucking bizarre this world is getting...

    I guess this makes them eco-terrorists.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • mammasan wrote:
    I guess this makes them eco-terrorists.

    Hehe...I think it just makes them ridiculous. I'll give them credit though - blowing yourself up is certainly a net positive in terms of reducing carbon emissions.
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    Hehe...I think it just makes them ridiculous. I'll give them credit though - blowing yourself up is certainly a net positive in terms of reducing carbon emissions.

    A good way to reduce your carbon footprint.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • NMyTree
    NMyTree Posts: 2,374
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    so ignore and disregard what he says? doesn't seem like an intelligent thing to do.


    Did I say I ignore?

    I read, I listen and then form my own opinions on the subject matter.

    Sometimes it leads to disregarding, sometimes not.
  • The surge is working.... lol

    quick....hand them some more guns and train them to kill and pay the rest off..

    someone is getting suckered that's for sure...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • lazymoon13
    lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    The surge is working.... lol

    quick....hand them some more guns and train them to kill and pay the rest off..

    someone is getting suckered that's for sure...

    hehe...

    omg....
  • lazymoon13 wrote:
    hehe...

    omg....

    yeah depleted Uranium...hehe omg..
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • lazymoon13
    lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    what happen to all the 9/11 inside job people?? don't ya just hate it when al-qaida admits this?
  • Collin
    Collin Posts: 4,931
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    what happen to all the 9/11 inside job people?? don't ya just hate it when al-qaida admits this?

    This doesn't necessarily disprove their theory, though.
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • lazymoon13 wrote:
    what happen to all the 9/11 inside job people?? don't ya just hate it when al-qaida admits this?

    I hope they find another dusty Bin Laden tape lying around soon...

    this second in command stuff is light on substance...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • lazymoon13
    lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    Collin wrote:
    This doesn't necessarily disprove their theory, though.

    sure it does. the theory is that bush did it. al-qaida wasn't on those planes. a missile hit the pentagon. bombs went off at wtc to bring the building down. and all that garbage.
  • NMyTree
    NMyTree Posts: 2,374
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    frankly I didn't need a reason as to "why" they attacked us on 9/11. they did.

    And therein lies the problem with too many Americans.

    You don't need a reason as to "why"?


    Hmmmm.........doesn't seem like an intelligent thing to do.
  • lazymoon13
    lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    NMyTree wrote:
    And therein lies the problem with too many Americans.

    You don't need a reason as to "why"?

    Hmmmm.........doesn't seem like an intelligent thing to do.

    after the fact sure. but initially, no. action needed to be taken immediately.

    If I walk up and punch you in the face, you aren't going to find out why I did that. you are going to defend yourself, maybe even fight back. then find out why the hell I did that.