Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
The is beginning to sound like the Iraq has WMD thing to me...
a whole lot...
It is totally the WMD's all over again. I remember saddam not fully complying with the wepons inspectors and therefore that meant he did have WMD's which funnily enough he did not.
Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
It is totally the WMD's all over again. I remember saddam not fully complying with the wepons inspectors and therefore that meant he did have WMD's which funnily enough he did not.
It can't happen twice in a row (can it?). This new pre-emptive strategy is nothing but fear mongering. The worst part is because it's in the dark, each time.
Turn the lights out and imagine all the bad things that can come out of your closet....let your imagination run wild while the media plays all sorts of scary music in the background!
I mean g-dammit already.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
I sure hope we never invade. even if proof is on the table. but they are just asking for trouble by doing this shit.
So, what is it? Invasion? Bombs?
I think that if china and russia weren't overprotective of Iran, bombs would already have dropped. The situation is blocked because nothing can be done right now, and meanwhile Iran is provocating everyone because it makes the US and the EU's influence less and less credible on the international scene.
And if Iran looks at it's major muslim neighbours : Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Turkey : one of them is a US ally, one of them has the nuclear bomb and two of them have been invaded. That may have given them some kind of clue on what is happening around.
It is totally the WMD's all over again. I remember saddam not fully complying with the wepons inspectors and therefore that meant he did have WMD's which funnily enough he did not.
why cant you and your tea bag partner roland understand the one huge major difference......their president is openly admitting to enriching uranium.....and now is purposely hiding something.
So, what is it? Invasion? Bombs?
I think that if china and russia weren't overprotective of Iran, bombs would already have dropped. The situation is blocked because nothing can be done right now, and meanwhile Iran is provocating everyone because it makes the US and the EU's influence less and less credible on the international scene.
And if Iran looks at it's major muslim neighbours : Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Turkey : one of them is a US ally, one of them has the nuclear bomb and two of them have been invaded. That may have given them some kind of clue on what is happening around.
all of the bullshit you just mentioned can be avoided if Iran is 100% transparent and honest with their program.
why cant you and your tea bag partner roland understand the one huge major difference......their president is openly admitting to enriching uranium.....and now is purposely hiding something.
If it is hiding something that bothers you so much. You should have no qualms about any country invading Israel to prove that they have nuclear weapons. Or even bombing them just cause they won't be honest. I know you wouldn't have a problem with that now would you? Jews are no more honest then the Arabs in the area.
all of the bullshit you just mentioned can be avoided if Iran is 100% transparent and honest with their program.
Yes I understood that, but they won't be 100% transpartent because it makes the US and the EU look like a bunch of fools and why should they refrain from doing that? But what if they keep on doing what they do? What was your point by saying "I sure hope we never invade. even if proof is on the table. but they are just asking for trouble by doing this shit."?
seriously, does everyone think its ok for Iran to have nukes?
all nuclear weapons should be disarmed completely... we need to progress to a nuclear weapon free world for our future generations. if we dont we are a complete failure
including our 10,000 nuclear weapons currently in stockpile
why cant you and your tea bag partner roland understand the one huge major difference......their president is openly admitting to enriching uranium.....and now is purposely hiding something.
Yes jlew he is admitting enriching uranium for a nuclear power station, no?
Did you believe it when they lied and said saddam had WMD's? I bet your post were the same as this one.
Personally to me newspapers, goverments, you know the desperate for war people, have lied so much that i don't believe a word they say anymore. Hell i wonder if they know anymore when they speak actual truth.
Ever heard the story of the boy who cried wolf?
And also i still do not see why Iran should not have nukes. It's hypocrisy at it's finest.
Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
Personally to me newspapers, goverments, you know the desperate for war people, have lied so much that i don't believe a word they say anymore. Hell i wonder if they know anymore when they speak actual truth.
well the people talking in the article I posted work for the IAEA. maybe you shouldnt have such a closed minded view of the world.
And also i still do not see why Iran should not have nukes. It's hypocrisy at it's finest.
because this isnt a fucking game. we cant let everyone in the world have nukes just because. if they want nuclear power, thats different, but they are openly lying about their program now. their are rules to follow in this game, and they're not. Iran having nukes could lead to an arms race in the region with all extremist Islamic fascists dictators seeking to gain these horrible weapons. most of those governments have proven they cant be trusted and these ruthless dictators change all the time. just look at pakistan. that is the last country on earth who should have them, but they do. now the world is watching to see who comes to power.
Did you magically forget what you typed in the quote that proceeded my comment?
Anyway Jlew and crew. If we were worried about lies being a reason to bomb and invade places, the whole lead up to your and yes it is your Iraqi war would be less then enough to have bombs dropped on the good ole U S of Eh. You know the WMD, uranium from Niger, the whole BS shooting match most of you bought into.
Did you magically forget what you typed in the quote that proceeded my comment?
Anyway Jlew and crew. If we were worried about lies being a reason to bomb and invade places, the whole lead up to your and yes it is your Iraqi war would be less then enough to have bombs dropped on the good ole U S of Eh. You know the WMD, uranium from Niger, the whole BS shooting match most of you bought into.
no, i read it..why does 9/11 look good?
yeah, what about all the other crap iraq did..anyway, i think they had wmd's anyway. it's been proved that shitdamm had some chem factorys either starting or started..
the biggest difference is we know the guy has the nuke plants up and running, spouting shit and beating the drum for war.
Anyway Jlew and crew. If we were worried about lies being a reason to bomb and invade places, the whole lead up to your and yes it is your Iraqi war would be less then enough to have bombs dropped on the good ole U S of Eh. You know the WMD, uranium from Niger, the whole BS shooting match most of you bought into.
I have said from the beginning, (even in some posts in the fucking thread) that invasion is that last thing I want. even if they have them.
and I especially do not want bombings or invasion based on lies alone.
you fucking people are so thick. there is a big difference between WMD with Iran and Iraq. Saddam said they didnt have them and Iran's president said they are moving forward with enriching uranium. Iran's president will stand there and say its for electricity but proceed to lie about it directly to the IAEA.
as much as I dont want war with Iran, if they move forward with the program and continue to openly lie and give the world the finger, they will suffer the consequences.
because this isnt a fucking game. we cant let everyone in the world have nukes just because. if they want nuclear power, thats different, but they are openly lying about their program now. their are rules to follow in this game, and they're not. Iran having nukes could lead to an arms race in the region with all extremist Islamic fascists dictators seeking to gain these horrible weapons. most of those governments have proven they cant be trusted and these ruthless dictators change all the time. just look at pakistan. that is the last country on earth who should have them, but they do. now the world is watching to see who comes to power.
No it's not a game and personally i think no one should have nukes at all.
But again i will ask you how you equate not reveling everything with them making nukes, you are jumping to big conclusions.
Personally i feel the west is the biggest threat to world peace at the moment.
Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
No it's not a game and personally i think no one should have nukes at all.
But again i will ask you how you equate not reveling everything with them making nukes, you are jumping to big conclusions.
Personally i feel the west is the biggest threat to world peace at the moment.
at the moment, with the US in Iraq, yes we are disrupting peace. but Iran is bringing trouble on itself but not being honest about their nuke program. be honest and 100% transparent and we wouldnt be having this conversation.
you automatically dismiss it. which closes your mind.
at the moment, with the US in Iraq, yes we are disrupting peace. but Iran is bringing trouble on itself but not being honest about their nuke program. be honest and 100% transparent and we wouldnt be having this conversation.
Ok in america, Iraq had WMD's in the rest of the world it is known to be false. Happy.
Oh and while your there would you like to tell me who sold them the cemical wepons? Oh would that be america.
Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
* All told, 52% of Iraq's international chemical weapon equipment was of German origin.
* Around 21% of Iraq’s international chemical weapon equipment was French.
* About 100 tons of mustard gas also came from Brazil.
* The United Kingdom paid for a chlorine factory that was intended to be used for manufacturing mustard gas
* An Austrian company gave Iraq calutrons for enriching uranium. The nation also provided heat exchangers, tanks, condensers, and columns for the Iraqi chemical weapons infrastructure, 16% of the international sales.
* Singapore gave 4,515 tons of precursors for VX, sarin, tabun, and mustard gasses to Iraq.
* The Dutch gave 4,261 tons of precursors for sarin, tabun, mustard, and tear gasses to Iraq.
* Egypt gave 2,400 tons of tabun and sarin precursors to Iraq and 28,500 tons of weapons designed for carrying chemical munitions.
* India gave 2,343 tons of precursors to VX, tabun, Sarin, and mustard gasses.
* Luxemburg gave Iraq 650 tons of mustard gas precursors.
* Spain gave Iraq 57,500 munitions designed for carrying chemical weapons. In addition, they provided reactors, condensers, columns and tanks for Iraq’s chemical warfare program, 4.4% of the international sales.
* China provided 45,000 munitions designed for chemical warfare.
I just posted a link showing you proof he used WMDs yet you say its false? wow talk about close minded.
No i said america sold the chemical wepons that you point out from 98 to Saddam.
What i am saying is the reason for going into the Iraq war were false, ok understand.
Now least you forget england is involved in the stupidity of that war and therefore we have news on it aswell, and our stupid puppet goverment sold us the same bullshit you were sold.
It is a known fact that the WMD's story is false now let it go.
Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
you fucking people are so thick. there is a big difference between WMD with Iran and Iraq. Saddam said they didnt have them and Iran's president said they are moving forward with enriching uranium. Iran's president will stand there and say its for electricity but proceed to lie about it directly to the IAEA.
So the States and maybe a couple of other countries gave Iraq the gasses to use once upon a time and (to steal a term from you) you people are so thick and have a memory of a goldfish that you can just let it slide. Or you will use your old, "that was then" line.
And because I am lazy to look up who started up Irans nuke program back in the day of the Shah, knowing it was either the US or France I do believe. So tell me again Captain America, why I should even bother to listen to the hot air about chemicals and atom chasing coming from you or anybody who lives in your country who has the wet dream of nobody who you get told to not like having a nuclear program.
* All told, 52% of Iraq's international chemical weapon equipment was of German origin.
* Around 21% of Iraq’s international chemical weapon equipment was French.
* About 100 tons of mustard gas also came from Brazil.
* The United Kingdom paid for a chlorine factory that was intended to be used for manufacturing mustard gas
* An Austrian company gave Iraq calutrons for enriching uranium. The nation also provided heat exchangers, tanks, condensers, and columns for the Iraqi chemical weapons infrastructure, 16% of the international sales.
* Singapore gave 4,515 tons of precursors for VX, sarin, tabun, and mustard gasses to Iraq.
* The Dutch gave 4,261 tons of precursors for sarin, tabun, mustard, and tear gasses to Iraq.
* Egypt gave 2,400 tons of tabun and sarin precursors to Iraq and 28,500 tons of weapons designed for carrying chemical munitions.
* India gave 2,343 tons of precursors to VX, tabun, Sarin, and mustard gasses.
* Luxemburg gave Iraq 650 tons of mustard gas precursors.
* Spain gave Iraq 57,500 munitions designed for carrying chemical weapons. In addition, they provided reactors, condensers, columns and tanks for Iraq’s chemical warfare program, 4.4% of the international sales.
* China provided 45,000 munitions designed for chemical warfare.
Now least you forget england is involved in the stupidity of that war and therefore we have news on it aswell, and our stupid puppet goverment sold us the same bullshit you were sold.
It is a known fact that the WMD's story is false now let it go.
saddam had WMDs at one point. learn to get that through your thick little head.
So the States and maybe a couple of other countries gave Iraq the gasses to use once upon a time and (to steal a term from you) you people are so thick and have a memory of a goldfish that you can just let it slide. Or you will use your old, "that was then" line.
maybe a couple other states? you mean Germany, France, UK, Brazil, Autria, Singapore, Epypt, India, Luxenburg, Spain, China and im sure many more we dont know about eh?
I have never used a that was then line. and I have no idea what you are getting at anyway?
And because I am lazy to look up who started up Irans nuke program back in the day of the Shah, knowing it was either the US or France I do believe. So tell me again Captain America, why I should even bother to listen to the hot air about chemicals and atom chasing coming from you or anybody who lives in your country who has the wet dream of nobody who you get told to not like having a nuclear program.
your fucking rants make no sense. its the IAEA who is calling the shots. not the US, France, UK or anyone else.
saddam had WMDs at one point. learn to get that through your thick little head.
Yes and your point is what? The reasons for going to war were false, so weather they had WMDs a few years previously or not is of no consequence little boy.
Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
Yes and your point is what? The reasons for going to war were false, so weather they had WMDs a few years previously or not is of no consequence little boy.
I'm not little. and maybe you should try some of your own material
good to see you finally agree that WMDs existed. now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go debate with some of the grown ups.
Comments
no, i guess i would sent the people who SIGNED UPto be in the army...you know those people who go to war for their country
i'm just koo koo for nuke juice
of koo koo for cocoa puffs
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
It is totally the WMD's all over again. I remember saddam not fully complying with the wepons inspectors and therefore that meant he did have WMD's which funnily enough he did not.
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
It can't happen twice in a row (can it?). This new pre-emptive strategy is nothing but fear mongering. The worst part is because it's in the dark, each time.
Turn the lights out and imagine all the bad things that can come out of your closet....let your imagination run wild while the media plays all sorts of scary music in the background!
I mean g-dammit already.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
So, what is it? Invasion? Bombs?
I think that if china and russia weren't overprotective of Iran, bombs would already have dropped. The situation is blocked because nothing can be done right now, and meanwhile Iran is provocating everyone because it makes the US and the EU's influence less and less credible on the international scene.
And if Iran looks at it's major muslim neighbours : Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Turkey : one of them is a US ally, one of them has the nuclear bomb and two of them have been invaded. That may have given them some kind of clue on what is happening around.
This is why 911 looked great!
why cant you and your tea bag partner roland understand the one huge major difference......their president is openly admitting to enriching uranium.....and now is purposely hiding something.
all of the bullshit you just mentioned can be avoided if Iran is 100% transparent and honest with their program.
If it is hiding something that bothers you so much. You should have no qualms about any country invading Israel to prove that they have nuclear weapons. Or even bombing them just cause they won't be honest. I know you wouldn't have a problem with that now would you? Jews are no more honest then the Arabs in the area.
Yes I understood that, but they won't be 100% transpartent because it makes the US and the EU look like a bunch of fools and why should they refrain from doing that? But what if they keep on doing what they do? What was your point by saying "I sure hope we never invade. even if proof is on the table. but they are just asking for trouble by doing this shit."?
all nuclear weapons should be disarmed completely... we need to progress to a nuclear weapon free world for our future generations. if we dont we are a complete failure
including our 10,000 nuclear weapons currently in stockpile
disgusting
you act like it is a video game...
grow up
Yes jlew he is admitting enriching uranium for a nuclear power station, no?
Did you believe it when they lied and said saddam had WMD's? I bet your post were the same as this one.
Personally to me newspapers, goverments, you know the desperate for war people, have lied so much that i don't believe a word they say anymore. Hell i wonder if they know anymore when they speak actual truth.
Ever heard the story of the boy who cried wolf?
And also i still do not see why Iran should not have nukes. It's hypocrisy at it's finest.
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
saddam did have WMDs at some point in time. where they went probably died with saddam.
well the people talking in the article I posted work for the IAEA. maybe you shouldnt have such a closed minded view of the world.
because this isnt a fucking game. we cant let everyone in the world have nukes just because. if they want nuclear power, thats different, but they are openly lying about their program now. their are rules to follow in this game, and they're not. Iran having nukes could lead to an arms race in the region with all extremist Islamic fascists dictators seeking to gain these horrible weapons. most of those governments have proven they cant be trusted and these ruthless dictators change all the time. just look at pakistan. that is the last country on earth who should have them, but they do. now the world is watching to see who comes to power.
what does this mean?
hey slick, you grow up...
i'm aware it's not a video game, champ
pull your head outta yr butt
everyone believes iran when the say they don't want nukes, but when the say they want israel gone, everyone says "he's just blowing smoke"
what a bunch of crap
Did you magically forget what you typed in the quote that proceeded my comment?
Anyway Jlew and crew. If we were worried about lies being a reason to bomb and invade places, the whole lead up to your and yes it is your Iraqi war would be less then enough to have bombs dropped on the good ole U S of Eh. You know the WMD, uranium from Niger, the whole BS shooting match most of you bought into.
no, i read it..why does 9/11 look good?
yeah, what about all the other crap iraq did..anyway, i think they had wmd's anyway. it's been proved that shitdamm had some chem factorys either starting or started..
the biggest difference is we know the guy has the nuke plants up and running, spouting shit and beating the drum for war.
so fuck him...i really hope we do bomb his ass
I have said from the beginning, (even in some posts in the fucking thread) that invasion is that last thing I want. even if they have them.
and I especially do not want bombings or invasion based on lies alone.
you fucking people are so thick. there is a big difference between WMD with Iran and Iraq. Saddam said they didnt have them and Iran's president said they are moving forward with enriching uranium. Iran's president will stand there and say its for electricity but proceed to lie about it directly to the IAEA.
as much as I dont want war with Iran, if they move forward with the program and continue to openly lie and give the world the finger, they will suffer the consequences.
OMG you still believe that? It is a lie, plain simple, let it go.
I don't have a closed minded view i just don't eat up every piece of warmongering crap that the papers print.
No it's not a game and personally i think no one should have nukes at all.
But again i will ask you how you equate not reveling everything with them making nukes, you are jumping to big conclusions.
Personally i feel the west is the biggest threat to world peace at the moment.
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/rls/18714.htm
you automatically dismiss it. which closes your mind.
at the moment, with the US in Iraq, yes we are disrupting peace. but Iran is bringing trouble on itself but not being honest about their nuke program. be honest and 100% transparent and we wouldnt be having this conversation.
Ok in america, Iraq had WMD's in the rest of the world it is known to be false. Happy.
Oh and while your there would you like to tell me who sold them the cemical wepons? Oh would that be america.
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
I just posted a link showing you proof he used WMDs yet you say its false? wow talk about close minded.
came from all over the world, including the big bad USA.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction#Program_development_1960s_-_1980s
http://jarrarsupariver.blogspot.com/2007/01/where-did-saddam-get-his-chemical.html
* All told, 52% of Iraq's international chemical weapon equipment was of German origin.
* Around 21% of Iraq’s international chemical weapon equipment was French.
* About 100 tons of mustard gas also came from Brazil.
* The United Kingdom paid for a chlorine factory that was intended to be used for manufacturing mustard gas
* An Austrian company gave Iraq calutrons for enriching uranium. The nation also provided heat exchangers, tanks, condensers, and columns for the Iraqi chemical weapons infrastructure, 16% of the international sales.
* Singapore gave 4,515 tons of precursors for VX, sarin, tabun, and mustard gasses to Iraq.
* The Dutch gave 4,261 tons of precursors for sarin, tabun, mustard, and tear gasses to Iraq.
* Egypt gave 2,400 tons of tabun and sarin precursors to Iraq and 28,500 tons of weapons designed for carrying chemical munitions.
* India gave 2,343 tons of precursors to VX, tabun, Sarin, and mustard gasses.
* Luxemburg gave Iraq 650 tons of mustard gas precursors.
* Spain gave Iraq 57,500 munitions designed for carrying chemical weapons. In addition, they provided reactors, condensers, columns and tanks for Iraq’s chemical warfare program, 4.4% of the international sales.
* China provided 45,000 munitions designed for chemical warfare.
No i said america sold the chemical wepons that you point out from 98 to Saddam.
What i am saying is the reason for going into the Iraq war were false, ok understand.
Now least you forget england is involved in the stupidity of that war and therefore we have news on it aswell, and our stupid puppet goverment sold us the same bullshit you were sold.
It is a known fact that the WMD's story is false now let it go.
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
So the States and maybe a couple of other countries gave Iraq the gasses to use once upon a time and (to steal a term from you) you people are so thick and have a memory of a goldfish that you can just let it slide. Or you will use your old, "that was then" line.
And because I am lazy to look up who started up Irans nuke program back in the day of the Shah, knowing it was either the US or France I do believe. So tell me again Captain America, why I should even bother to listen to the hot air about chemicals and atom chasing coming from you or anybody who lives in your country who has the wet dream of nobody who you get told to not like having a nuclear program.
came from all over the world, including the big bad USA.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_an...96 0s_-_1980s
http://jarrarsupariver.blogspot.com/...-chemical.html
* All told, 52% of Iraq's international chemical weapon equipment was of German origin.
* Around 21% of Iraq’s international chemical weapon equipment was French.
* About 100 tons of mustard gas also came from Brazil.
* The United Kingdom paid for a chlorine factory that was intended to be used for manufacturing mustard gas
* An Austrian company gave Iraq calutrons for enriching uranium. The nation also provided heat exchangers, tanks, condensers, and columns for the Iraqi chemical weapons infrastructure, 16% of the international sales.
* Singapore gave 4,515 tons of precursors for VX, sarin, tabun, and mustard gasses to Iraq.
* The Dutch gave 4,261 tons of precursors for sarin, tabun, mustard, and tear gasses to Iraq.
* Egypt gave 2,400 tons of tabun and sarin precursors to Iraq and 28,500 tons of weapons designed for carrying chemical munitions.
* India gave 2,343 tons of precursors to VX, tabun, Sarin, and mustard gasses.
* Luxemburg gave Iraq 650 tons of mustard gas precursors.
* Spain gave Iraq 57,500 munitions designed for carrying chemical weapons. In addition, they provided reactors, condensers, columns and tanks for Iraq’s chemical warfare program, 4.4% of the international sales.
* China provided 45,000 munitions designed for chemical warfare.
I agree and have not disputed that
saddam had WMDs at one point. learn to get that through your thick little head.
I have never used a that was then line. and I have no idea what you are getting at anyway?
your fucking rants make no sense. its the IAEA who is calling the shots. not the US, France, UK or anyone else.
Yes and your point is what? The reasons for going to war were false, so weather they had WMDs a few years previously or not is of no consequence little boy.
The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
I'm not little. and maybe you should try some of your own material
good to see you finally agree that WMDs existed. now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go debate with some of the grown ups.