When they signed the NPT I don't think they imagined the US would conquer their neighbor on such suspicious pretenses, and then proceed to paint their leader with colorful propaganda, so it kind of throws the bets off a little.
That does not matter. A nuclear Iran is not beneficial to the region. I'm not even talking about Israel or the US, I'm leaving them out of the equation. If Iran developes a nuclear weapon it will cause an escalation in the region unseen since the hey days of the Cold War. It can destabilze and already fucked up region sending oil prices through the fucking roof. The nuclear prolifiration could easily spread to Southeast Asia with Pakistand and India increasing the size of their arsenal.
"When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
That does not matter. A nuclear Iran is not beneficial to the region. I'm not even talking about Israel or the US, I'm leaving them out of the equation. If Iran developes a nuclear weapon it will cause an escalation in the region unseen since the hey days of the Cold War. It can destabilze and already fucked up region sending oil prices through the fucking roof. The nuclear prolifiration could easily spread to Southeast Asia with Pakistand and India increasing the size of their arsenal.
A nuclear Iran is beneficial for Iran. Can you blame them for looking out for their own best interests?
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
A nuclear Iran is beneficial for Iran. Can you blame them for looking out for their own best interests?
It's not even beneficial to them. What is beneficial to Iran is a stable Middle East where Iran is an active leading member of the region. Iran will never obtain any of those goals if they develope nuclear weapons.
"When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
are you serious? several countries are threatening military action against them if they develop one. how is that beneficial?
It's called nuclear energy for electricity. There's fair sized population going on there.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
yea but not too early to say they are lying about only wanting nukes for peaceful purposes. dont ya think?
That's propaganda. Where's the evidence showing Iran wants to start blowing everything up? The media is trying to, but no cigar.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
It's not even beneficial to them. What is beneficial to Iran is a stable Middle East where Iran is an active leading member of the region. Iran will never obtain any of those goals if they develope nuclear weapons.
Nuclear power generation is not beneficial? We should shut all ours down then and go back to burning coal...
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
I think at this point it is starting toi become some what obvious that Iran may have other intentions.
That's interesting How so? What specifically is making it obvious?
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
o thats right. but it appears they want it for more then just that. how is that beneficial?
It appears?. How does it appear? What evidence specifically shows that?
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
WASHINGTON — Iran has provided answers to questions about its past nuclear activities, the United Nations' atomic watchdog reported Thursday, but hasn't provided "full transparency" about its current activities and continues to enrich uranium in defiance of the U.N. Security Council .
The report by the International Atomic Energy Agency warns that the agency's knowledge about Iran's current nuclear program "is diminishing" because Iran hasn't provided the same type of information since early last year that it had previously.
"The agency is not in a position to provide credible assurances about the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities in Iran ," says the confidential report, obtained by McClatchy Newspapers .
WASHINGTON — Iran has provided answers to questions about its past nuclear activities, the United Nations' atomic watchdog reported Thursday, but hasn't provided "full transparency" about its current activities and continues to enrich uranium in defiance of the U.N. Security Council .
The report by the International Atomic Energy Agency warns that the agency's knowledge about Iran's current nuclear program "is diminishing" because Iran hasn't provided the same type of information since early last year that it had previously.
"The agency is not in a position to provide credible assurances about the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities in Iran ," says the confidential report, obtained by McClatchy Newspapers .
I didn't see any sentence saying Iran is enriching plutonium to make a nuclear bomb. I did see something about there is a different type of information in this years reports compared to last years.
I find it interesting how the propaganda takes hold and people automatically assume they are racing to make a bombs to launch as fast as they can.
The media plants the seed, and for some people it grows.
The race to judgment on Iran is on.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
I didn't see any sentence saying Iran is enriching plutonium to make nuclear bomb. I did see something about there a different type of information (not less however) in this years reports compared to last years.
I find it interesting how the propaganda takes hold and people automatically assume they are racing to make a bombs to launch as fast as they can.
The media plants the seed, and for some people it grows.
The race to judgment on Iran is on.
well obviously the IAEA has a problem with Iran hiding its activities even if you dont. no they arent enriching plutonium. (why you mention that and not uranium is beyond me) they are enriching uranium. that can be used to make bombs too. did you know that?
and how is this propaganda? what the fuck is wrong with you? these are facts coming straight from the IAEA
The is beginning to sound like the Iraq has WMD thing to me...
a whole lot...
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
well obviously the IAEA has a problem with Iran hiding its activities even if you dont. no they arent enriching plutonium. (why you mention that and not uranium is beyond me) they are enriching uranium. that can be used to make bombs too. did you know that?
and how is this propaganda? what the fuck is wrong with you? these are facts coming straight from the IAEA
There was some article I remember reading saying they found traces of plutonium in Iran... perhaps I dreamt it. i can;t remember. It's not worth splitting hairs for brownie points imo.
We'll see if this trend continues, however I find it interesting people are equating it immediately to nuclear weapons being launched at everything now. That's the propaganda/hype portion.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
sadly it does. only this time the leader is openly admitting to enriching uranium.
Actually I think Iran probably does want them, and will most likely try to make, and possess them. I truly believe they will not ever use them (or want to use them), but I think they feel it's the only thing that will afford them some protection in the future. They have the oil, and they know people are coming for it. I don't believe they are vicious though, they are just looking at their neighbor (Iraq) and scared shitless.
It's going to get very interesting over the next 10 years, and probably not in an overly fantastic way.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
I think it's perfectly logical, and reasonable for Iran to seek nuclear weapons. They are being threatened by a nuclear weapon-weilding state. Therefore, it's only logical that they seek to arm themselves for a possible defense. The U.S is the aggressor and agitator here, not Iran. The U.S needs to fuck off out of it.
I think it's perfectly logical, and reasonable for Iran to seek nuclear weapons. They are being threatened by a nuclear weapon-weilding state. Therefore, it's only logical that they seek to arm themselves for a possible defense. The U.S is the aggressor and agitator here, not Iran. The U.S needs to fuck off out of it.
its not just the US who doesnt want Iran to have nukes chief. if Iran was truthful about its program then the US and the world would have no problem with them. but instead your buddy decides to lie, and if it continues, he will be dealt with severely.
its not just the US who doesnt want Iran to have nukes chief. if Iran was truthful about its program then the US and the world would have no problem with them. but instead your buddy decides to lie, and if it continues, he will be dealt with severely.
The US didn't even want Iran to have a nuclear reactor (uranium enrichment plant) go online in the first place. The threats started at that level. It's a little more encompassing than the reporting, or lack thereof, of how they are operating.
If he is dealt with severely (Iran bombed) the US economic system will face substantial peril, as larger countries will begin to intervene economically, and quite possibly militarily.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
WASHINGTON — Iran has provided answers to questions about its past nuclear activities, the United Nations' atomic watchdog reported Thursday, but hasn't provided "full transparency" about its current activities and continues to enrich uranium in defiance of the U.N. Security Council .
The report by the International Atomic Energy Agency warns that the agency's knowledge about Iran's current nuclear program "is diminishing" because Iran hasn't provided the same type of information since early last year that it had previously.
"The agency is not in a position to provide credible assurances about the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities in Iran ," says the confidential report, obtained by McClatchy Newspapers .
...
If you were Iranian... would you feel the same way about it?
...
I remember someone posting an aerial photo of the Korean Penisula at night and said the northern part was all dark and the south all lit up meant that the south was a better, safer place.
But, you couls also take it to mean: North Korea needs a nuclear power plant so they could have electricity to have lights.
...
right?
Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
Hail, Hail!!!
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Comments
That does not matter. A nuclear Iran is not beneficial to the region. I'm not even talking about Israel or the US, I'm leaving them out of the equation. If Iran developes a nuclear weapon it will cause an escalation in the region unseen since the hey days of the Cold War. It can destabilze and already fucked up region sending oil prices through the fucking roof. The nuclear prolifiration could easily spread to Southeast Asia with Pakistand and India increasing the size of their arsenal.
A nuclear Iran is beneficial for Iran. Can you blame them for looking out for their own best interests?
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
It's not even beneficial to them. What is beneficial to Iran is a stable Middle East where Iran is an active leading member of the region. Iran will never obtain any of those goals if they develope nuclear weapons.
yea but not too early to say they are lying about only wanting nukes for peaceful purposes. dont ya think?
are you serious? several countries are threatening military action against them if they develop one. how is that beneficial?
It's called nuclear energy for electricity. There's fair sized population going on there.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
That's propaganda. Where's the evidence showing Iran wants to start blowing everything up? The media is trying to, but no cigar.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
I think at this point it is starting toi become some what obvious that Iran may have other intentions.
Nuclear power generation is not beneficial? We should shut all ours down then and go back to burning coal...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
o thats right. but it appears they want it for more then just that. how is that beneficial?
That's interesting How so? What specifically is making it obvious?
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
It appears?. How does it appear? What evidence specifically shows that?
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
did you even read the article.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20...n_editors_ytop
WASHINGTON — Iran has provided answers to questions about its past nuclear activities, the United Nations' atomic watchdog reported Thursday, but hasn't provided "full transparency" about its current activities and continues to enrich uranium in defiance of the U.N. Security Council .
The report by the International Atomic Energy Agency warns that the agency's knowledge about Iran's current nuclear program "is diminishing" because Iran hasn't provided the same type of information since early last year that it had previously.
"The agency is not in a position to provide credible assurances about the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities in Iran ," says the confidential report, obtained by McClatchy Newspapers .
I didn't see any sentence saying Iran is enriching plutonium to make a nuclear bomb. I did see something about there is a different type of information in this years reports compared to last years.
I find it interesting how the propaganda takes hold and people automatically assume they are racing to make a bombs to launch as fast as they can.
The media plants the seed, and for some people it grows.
The race to judgment on Iran is on.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
well obviously the IAEA has a problem with Iran hiding its activities even if you dont. no they arent enriching plutonium. (why you mention that and not uranium is beyond me) they are enriching uranium. that can be used to make bombs too. did you know that?
and how is this propaganda? what the fuck is wrong with you? these are facts coming straight from the IAEA
a whole lot...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
sadly it does. only this time the leader is openly admitting to enriching uranium.
There was some article I remember reading saying they found traces of plutonium in Iran... perhaps I dreamt it. i can;t remember. It's not worth splitting hairs for brownie points imo.
We'll see if this trend continues, however I find it interesting people are equating it immediately to nuclear weapons being launched at everything now. That's the propaganda/hype portion.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Actually I think Iran probably does want them, and will most likely try to make, and possess them. I truly believe they will not ever use them (or want to use them), but I think they feel it's the only thing that will afford them some protection in the future. They have the oil, and they know people are coming for it. I don't believe they are vicious though, they are just looking at their neighbor (Iraq) and scared shitless.
It's going to get very interesting over the next 10 years, and probably not in an overly fantastic way.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
its not just the US who doesnt want Iran to have nukes chief. if Iran was truthful about its program then the US and the world would have no problem with them. but instead your buddy decides to lie, and if it continues, he will be dealt with severely.
The US didn't even want Iran to have a nuclear reactor (uranium enrichment plant) go online in the first place. The threats started at that level. It's a little more encompassing than the reporting, or lack thereof, of how they are operating.
If he is dealt with severely (Iran bombed) the US economic system will face substantial peril, as larger countries will begin to intervene economically, and quite possibly militarily.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
If you were Iranian... would you feel the same way about it?
...
I remember someone posting an aerial photo of the Korean Penisula at night and said the northern part was all dark and the south all lit up meant that the south was a better, safer place.
But, you couls also take it to mean: North Korea needs a nuclear power plant so they could have electricity to have lights.
...
right?
Hail, Hail!!!
i hope we bomb the hell out of iran
Good one Hitler.
You need to change the pronoun you use.. I have a feeling you will not be taking any part in that, "WE" stuff.
Hail, Hail!!!
yr right, too old...be there in spirit though
Make it easy to send the 19 year olds to face the bullets and lifetime in wheelchairs, huh?
Hail, Hail!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkwoU721TUA
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
If you're not joking. You're insane...for real.
Seriously.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")