Gun Laws in America

1356713

Comments

  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    miller8966 wrote:
    This is america its not the UK.

    And......? Are you guys less capable of decent behaviour than in the UK?
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    redrock wrote:
    Hell jlew.. I find it scary how we're agreeing!!! :D


    tell me about it.
  • Uncle LeoUncle Leo Posts: 1,059
    miller8966 wrote:
    they would use a sword

    I am in good shape. I can run away from most people with a sword. But I can't run from a bullet.
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • miller8966miller8966 Posts: 1,450
    redrock wrote:
    And......? Are you guys less capable of decent behaviour than in the UK?

    No we have different laws than you do. WE DONT WANT TO BE LIKE YOU.
    America...the greatest Country in the world.
  • Uncle LeoUncle Leo Posts: 1,059
    redrock wrote:
    Hell jlew.. I find it scary how we're agreeing!!! :D

    I am quite taken aback that non only do I agree with jlew, but know1!
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    no, it would not make it difficult. you don't want anyone to have guns, but you know that's impossible. so, don't make it, or wish for it to be, such that only criminals would have guns.


    I never said I want a ban on ALL guns. I want a ban on assault guns such as machine guns.

    I agree people should be allowed to have small arms for protection, and have very strict laws to obtain those guns.
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    The citizens can't hardly stand in front of their houses with their pistols, rifles and shotguns while the government rolls into town to enforce their tyranny with tanks, missiles and bombs now can they?

    In other words, the right to bear SOME small arms is all we have left, but it's a moot point now.

    Back in the day, the citizens could stand in front of their houses with their rifles and have a reasonable chance of defending them when the government comes to town with their rifles.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    Uncle Leo wrote:
    I am quite taken aback that non only do I agree with jlew, but know1!

    My views fall all along the spectrum. I'm not just some right or left wing clone.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Concede what? That less guns means less gun crime? I certainly agree with that. Now, let me ask you something: how are you going to enforce your gun ban?

    the same way drugs are enforced. arrest people who have them. make tough penalties for having them.

    what kind of answer are you looking for? i'm sure you are aware how law enforcement works


    No ways to get around them? So you're going to actively ban the production of guns?


    why much to take it to such an extreme? Laws can be written and enforced for a very large portion of the public, criminals included, to not get a gun.
  • redrock wrote:
    Just scan news reports, etc.

    The news doesn't report the gun owners that don't commit crimes.
    A lot of gun crimes are not committed by hardened criminals but are 'opportunistic'. If they did not have a gun readily available, the outcome may have been different.

    It certainly may have. If they didn't have arms, the outcomes may also have been different. Can I get you a saw?
  • Uncle LeoUncle Leo Posts: 1,059
    know1 wrote:
    My views fall all along the spectrum. I'm not just some right or left wing clone.

    I know. I have agreed with you a couple of times before. But many of us (myself included) are guilty of pigeon-holing people. After all, we are screen-names, not personalities. And you tend to (at least per my observation) be more conservative.
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • jlew24asu wrote:
    the same way drugs are enforced. arrest people who have them. make tough penalties for having them.

    How will you arrest them?
    what kind of answer are you looking for? i'm sure you are aware how law enforcement works

    I am sure, that's why I'm struggling to understand your "gun ban".
    why much to take it to such an extreme?

    Because you said before that you were going to eliminate all the loopholes and any way to get around them. I don't think I'm the one who's taking it to an extreme.
    Laws can be written and enforced for a very large portion of the public, criminals included, to not get a gun.

    Laws can be written and enforced for a very large portion of the public, criminals included, to make it hard to get a gun. If you think that any law can prevent anyone who wishes to from getting a gun, you're fooling yourself. Particularly considering how many guns are already out there.
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    miller8966 wrote:
    No we have different laws than you do. WE DONT WANT TO BE LIKE YOU.

    Every country has different laws but just being a decent human being is universal. Perhaps I would rather live in this country where they are trying to combat violent crime in whatever way they can than live in a country with one of the highest rates of violent crime!
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    How will you arrest them?

    police officers


    I am sure, that's why I'm struggling to understand your "gun ban".

    ok ready. I want a ban on some guns, not all.


    Because you said before that you were going to eliminate all the loopholes and any way to get around them. I don't think I'm the one who's taking it to an extreme.

    call it optimism. I'm not a law maker or lawyer.


    Laws can be written and enforced for a very large portion of the public, criminals included, to make it hard to get a gun. If you think that any law can prevent anyone who wishes to from getting a gun, you're fooling yourself. Particularly considering how many guns are already out there.


    ok hard(er) to get one. I'll take it.
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    Can I get you a saw?

    Wow.. good comeback! Throw a saw at me from a moving vehicle and I'd be extremely unlucky if I get badly hurt, let alone die (like that kid that was shot for thowing eggs)....
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    Uncle Leo wrote:
    I know. I have agreed with you a couple of times before. But many of us (myself included) are guilty of pigeon-holing people. After all, we are screen-names, not personalities. And you tend to (at least per my observation) be more conservative.

    That's a fair assumption. I think I have more conservative views than liberal ones in general.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    know1 wrote:
    That's a fair assumption. I think I have more conservative views than liberal ones in general.


    me too. group hug guys. no wait, I hate gays. j/k :D
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    The news doesn't report the gun owners that don't commit crimes.

    Nope.. and it doesn't report people who do not commit fraud. It doesn't report people who don't rape a child. It doesn't report.... I'm sure you get my drift.....
  • redrock wrote:
    Wow.. good comeback! Throw a saw at me from a moving vehicle and I'd be extremely unlucky if I get badly hurt, let alone die (like that kid that was shot for thowing eggs)....

    Once you cut off my arms (arms are used in 99.9% of violent crimes) with that saw, I won't be throwing anything at anyone.
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    jlew24asu wrote:
    me too. group hug guys. no wait, I hate gays. j/k :D

    I'm not a guy.... and I'm not a lesbian... damn... I might be a bit liberal.. does that blow it for me? :D
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    Once you cut off my arms (arms are used in 99.9% of violent crimes) with that saw, I won't be throwing anything at anyone.

    I'd have to run after your car once I've picked up the saw before I could do that. Then I would have to make sure you didn't just eat a hot curry because you could spit in my eye and blind me.
  • redrock wrote:
    Nope.. and it doesn't report people who do not commit fraud. It doesn't report people who don't rape a child. It doesn't report.... I'm sure you get my drift.....

    I do get your drift. Now, again, why do you think that "average" citizens are committing gun crimes and, citing as proof, news reports that are only reporting the actions of unaverage criminal citizens?
  • redrock wrote:
    I'd have to run after your car once I've picked up the saw before I could do that. Then I would have to make sure you didn't just eat a hot curry because you could spit in my eye and blind me.

    Yes -- your "to-ban" list is getting quite long. Perhaps forced lobotomies would simply take care of the entire problem.
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    I do get your drift. Now, again, why do you think that "average" citizens are committing gun crimes and, citing as proof, news reports that are only reporting the actions of unaverage criminal citizens?

    It's those people who are perfectly 'normal' & 'average' when they purchase their guns.. no police record, no mental illness in the past, etc. They find themselves under pressure, stress, anger.. whatever.... They think what a lot of people may think "I'd kill the bastard if I could".. then.. Oh wait! I've got a gun... I'll use it! And act upon their impulse.

    Again, no previous record.. no nothing. How many times have we heard of these things happening with family, neighbours, witnesses saying "He/she is such a nice person.. nobody would have thought.."

    These people are the ones that I identify as 'average'. Non average would be your gangsters, etc...

    You know perfectly what I mean....
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    There are over 200 million guns floating around the U.S. A quality firearm, well cared for, will be perfectly operational for hundreds of years. A collector can easily have tens, or even hundreds of thousands of dollars invested in his or her collection ... they're not going to simply hand them over. Dream about it all you want, it's not going to happen.

    Maybe what we should be talking about is a ban on the sale of ammunition. That is at least vaguely realistic.
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • jlew24asu wrote:
    police officers

    And how will those police officers take my gun, if I don't want to give it to them?
    ok ready. I want a ban on some guns, not all.

    Which guns do you not want to ban?
    call it optimism. I'm not a law maker or lawyer.

    Thank goodness. Otherwise, we might all be in some hot water.
    ok hard(er) to get one. I'll take it.

    Good. Now, why do you think making it hard to get a gun will prevent gun crime? It's harder now than ever to get a gun in this country, yet your violent crime rates are nearly triple what they were 50 years ago. Furthermore, attempts to limit the purchase of guns show little effect on violent crime. For every case where violent crime drops after the passage of such laws, there's another case where it goes up.
  • hippiemom wrote:
    There are over 200 million guns floating around the U.S. A quality firearm, well cared for, will be perfectly operational for hundreds of years. A collector can easily have tens, or even hundreds of thousands of dollars invested in his or her collection ... they're not going to simply hand them over. Dream about it all you want, it's not going to happen.

    Maybe what we should be talking about is a ban on the sale of ammunition. That is at least vaguely realistic.

    I'm not cool with banning ammo either, but at least this girl is thinking. Banning ammunition sales would make much more sense than banning guns, giving the goals of many here.
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    I'm not cool with banning ammo either, but at least this girl is thinking. Banning ammunition sales would make much more sense than banning guns, giving the goals of many here.

    Apparently it is easy to make ammo. Would have to ban gunpowder and all!
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    hippiemom wrote:
    There are over 200 million guns floating around the U.S. A quality firearm, well cared for, will be perfectly operational for hundreds of years. A collector can easily have tens, or even hundreds of thousands of dollars invested in his or her collection ... they're not going to simply hand them over. Dream about it all you want, it's not going to happen.

    Maybe what we should be talking about is a ban on the sale of ammunition. That is at least vaguely realistic.


    again, I dont want a ban on all guns. some yes, the rest very hard to get.

    boo hooo for the avid gun collector.
  • callencallen Posts: 6,388
    hippiemom wrote:
    There are over 200 million guns floating around the U.S. A quality firearm, well cared for, will be perfectly operational for hundreds of years. A collector can easily have tens, or even hundreds of thousands of dollars invested in his or her collection ... they're not going to simply hand them over. Dream about it all you want, it's not going to happen.

    Maybe what we should be talking about is a ban on the sale of ammunition. That is at least vaguely realistic.

    Chris does a routine on charging $1000.00 per round.....no more drive by's...no more bystanders being hit......and a line...."You know Mo Fo that once I save up I'm gonna come back and shoot your a$$." Really quite funny....course on practicle side of things...amo can be easily made...so this wouldn't work......
    10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG
Sign In or Register to comment.