Lisbon Treaty?

Heineken Helen

nobody wrote:

as you make out certain countries as wise and noble and others as arrogant and oppressive...

I'm not making anything out. I'm just commenting on how they're actually behaving in this instance.

nobody

Heineken Helen wrote:

I'm not making anything out. I'm just commenting on how they're actually behaving in this instance.

I find that you often tend to respond to the semantics of my posts rather than the factual content, but that's just me...

I am out of here for good, at least until there's some substantive news again...

m.

Heineken Helen

Rhinocerous Surprise wrote:

Some of the treaty could have been cleared by legislation, he said, and the rest put to the popular vote.

I agree with this.

Heineken Helen

nobody wrote:

I find that you often tend to respond to the semantics of my posts rather than the factual content, but that's just me...

I am out of here for good, at least until there's some substantive news again...

m.

I don't understand why the REASON for a potential polish no vote is relevant in response to what I said? All I said is that the rest of Europe probably couldn't give a fuck about Ireland, Poland and Czech Republic... and your reply was to tell me the polish government's bad. Ya know, I think that's another reason Lisbon can't work. Europe is too different. EVERY country in Europe is vastly different... you can't put something to a vote that will change the dynamics of each and every country (mainly to suit the bigger countries) and expect every country to agree or accept it. Some of us don't work like that... and that's what MAKES europe so great is that every country is so different. I just wish France and Germany would stop trying to make us all... well... France and Germany.