Going to the US?

135

Comments

  • Heineken HelenHeineken Helen Posts: 18,095
    dunkman wrote:
    well all i'm saying is that the procedures they put in place will be 'used' more on specific target groups... and history kinda shows that past terrorists incidents have, in the vast majority, been carried out by Middle Eastern men who follow Islam.

    Nah, I remember not so long ago when all the bad people had Irish accents... and all Irish people were therefore guilty before proven innocent. But hey, that's history, and who are we to learn from history? :o it's just been proven time and time again that such measures do NOT deter. It's alright I suppose if the bad people are those we can't relate to... specifically if it's not us. But if all the bad people are middle eastern muslims, why they hell do they want MY information?
    dunkman wrote:
    it's a situation thats been created for the US.. not by them.

    That depends on whether you believe in conspiracy theories or not :p
    The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
    Verona??? it's all surmountable
    Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
    Wembley? We all believe!
    Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
    Chicago 07? And love
    What a different life
    Had I not found this love with you
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    Collin wrote:
    So where do you draw the line, dunk?


    depends.. if a guy from Nigeria who has a string of sexual convictions is not allowed into the UK then.. well thats tough shit... quite right. if he has a drunk driving conviction then its fine for him to enter surely? although as a result of that conviction it might be useful for the government/police to know this if the guy then hires a car and is caught drink driving then they'll know he has a history of this, etc... information is useful if used correctly...

    this information is only shared, used, passed around other governments if the person is suspected of criminal activities, a threat to security, etc....
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    Nah, I remember not so long ago when all the bad people had Irish accents... and all Irish people were therefore guilty before proven innocent. But hey, that's history, and who are we to learn from history? :o it's just been proven time and time again that such measures do NOT deter. It's alright I suppose if the bad people are those we can't relate to... specifically if it's not us. But if all the bad people are middle eastern muslims, why they hell do they want MY information?

    they want your information so they can be all-inclusive and very very PC about the whole process... if they just targted a certain group they would appear to be very non-diplomatic about it... but in reality they will be targeting those groups for spot checks and stuff... (see!!! now you've got me into conspiracy crap :D:D )


    they want to know who is in their country and what they ar doing... if i had a party in my house and there were 2 people i didnt know i'd want to know who they were as well...
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • CollinCollin Posts: 4,931
    dunkman wrote:
    depends.. if a guy from Nigeria who has a string of sexual convictions is not allowed into the UK then.. well thats tough shit... quite right. if he has a drunk driving conviction then its fine for him to enter surely? although as a result of that conviction it might be useful for the government/police to know this if the guy then hires a car and is caught drink driving then they'll know he has a history of this, etc... information is useful if used correctly...

    this information is only shared, used, passed around other governments if the person is suspected of criminal activities, a threat to security, etc....

    So would you be ok with it if your government decided to implant its citizens with a chip? Something which has all your information, everything they could possible need.
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • Heineken HelenHeineken Helen Posts: 18,095
    dunkman wrote:
    depends.. if a guy from Nigeria who has a string of sexual convictions is not allowed into the UK then.. well thats tough shit... quite right. if he has a drunk driving conviction then its fine for him to enter surely? although as a result of that conviction it might be useful for the government/police to know this if the guy then hires a car and is caught drink driving then they'll know he has a history of this, etc... information is useful if used correctly...

    this information is only shared, used, passed around other governments if the person is suspected of criminal activities, a threat to security, etc....
    Dunk... if somebody already has any conviction they won't be allowed in anyway... the only people allowed in are those with NO criminal records... so I don't see how that's relevant? :confused:
    The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
    Verona??? it's all surmountable
    Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
    Wembley? We all believe!
    Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
    Chicago 07? And love
    What a different life
    Had I not found this love with you
  • Heineken HelenHeineken Helen Posts: 18,095
    dunkman wrote:
    they want your information so they can be all-inclusive and very very PC about the whole process... if they just targted a certain group they would appear to be very non-diplomatic about it... but in reality they will be targeting those groups for spot checks and stuff... (see!!! now you've got me into conspiracy crap :D:D )


    they want to know who is in their country and what they ar doing... if i had a party in my house and there were 2 people i didnt know i'd want to know who they were as well...
    would you do a background check on those people first? :D or would you trust the people who brought them there... those who are already your guests? Except... they're not your guests, they are also residents of your house.

    Racial profiling is hardly conspiracy theorist stuff dunk!
    The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
    Verona??? it's all surmountable
    Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
    Wembley? We all believe!
    Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
    Chicago 07? And love
    What a different life
    Had I not found this love with you
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    Dunk... if somebody already has any conviction they won't be allowed in anyway... the only people allowed in are those with NO criminal records... so I don't see how that's relevant? :confused:


    this simply aint true :)


    mrs dunks cousin from Virginia has a DUI conviction... got in here no problems.


    different levels of criminal convictions are used Hells :)
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • Heineken HelenHeineken Helen Posts: 18,095
    dunkman wrote:
    this simply aint true :)


    mrs dunks cousin from Virginia has a DUI conviction... got in here no problems.


    different levels of criminal convictions are used Hells :)
    I'm not talking about British immigration!

    was mrs dunks cousin honest about the conviction on the visa form? I'm surprised at that... I know people refused entry to the US for less.
    The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
    Verona??? it's all surmountable
    Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
    Wembley? We all believe!
    Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
    Chicago 07? And love
    What a different life
    Had I not found this love with you
  • dunkman wrote:
    for the 3rd time... what do YOU think they will DO with YOUR information?

    It doesn't matter what anybody thinks they will do with the information. They quite simply shouldn't be asking for it in the first place because there is the simple fact that once they do have it there is the potential for them to abuse that information.

    I don't believe in giving up a few personal freedoms just to pad myself with an illusion of feeling a bit more safe so I'd have to agree with the original poster here in that this may be going a bit overboard on the security issues.

    It always seems small at first, but everything is usually just a stepping stone to a heightened level.
  • he still standshe still stands Posts: 2,835
    It always seems small at first, but everything is usually just a stepping stone to a heightened level.

    EXACTLY.

    Especially with the vast improvements in technology, there is an endless amount of use and abuse that can be done with this data. I don't know that anyone here can comprehend how many ways our government can use this data to oppress us.

    I think the people who don't see a problem with these government activities just need to read "1984", see the similarities between the book and today's world, and you'll see the "slippery slope" that we're talking about here. ;)
    Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    I'm not talking about British immigration!

    was mrs dunks cousin honest about the conviction on the visa form? I'm surprised at that... I know people refused entry to the US for less.


    read two posts back.. I WAS talking about UK immigration... :confused:

    He didnt need a VISA to come here, but he has to declare any current convictions... he didnt need entry into the US.. he is American.. i said he is from Virginia. :confused:
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    EXACTLY.

    Especially with the vast improvements in technology, there is an endless amount of use and abuse that can be done with this data. I don't know that anyone here can comprehend how many ways our government can use this data to oppress us.

    I think the people who don't see a problem with these government activities just need to read "1984", see the similarities between the book and today's world, and you'll see the "slippery slope" that we're talking about here. ;)


    i work for the government... i know first hand how genuinely inept it is with its data storage. :D:D

    they dont give 1 iota about some guy from Iowa visiting his Auntie Jenny in North Wales... but if he is a convincted sex offender... or a drug dealer... thats when they take notice... 99% of the tourists entering here will never be bothered.
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • he still standshe still stands Posts: 2,835
    dunkman wrote:
    i work for the government... i know first hand how genuinely inept it is with its data storage. :D:D

    they dont give 1 iota about some guy from Iowa visiting his Auntie Jenny in North Wales... but if he is a convincted sex offender... or a drug dealer... thats when they take notice... 99% of the tourists entering here will never be bothered.

    you must be in the Outer Party then... ;)

    I know it may seem like paranoia, but tracking my movements, where I am traveling, and what I'm doing is NOT something I enjoy.
    Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.
  • EXACTLY.

    Especially with the vast improvements in technology, there is an endless amount of use and abuse that can be done with this data. I don't know that anyone here can comprehend how many ways our government can use this data to oppress us.

    I think the people who don't see a problem with these government activities just need to read "1984", see the similarities between the book and today's world, and you'll see the "slippery slope" that we're talking about here. ;)

    I haven't even read that book but it just is so blatantly obvious to me and it stuns me with the amount of complacency most people seem to have with this kind of thing.
  • dunkman wrote:
    i work for the government... i know first hand how genuinely inept it is with its data storage. :D:D

    they dont give 1 iota about some guy from Iowa visiting his Auntie Jenny in North Wales... but if he is a convincted sex offender... or a drug dealer... thats when they take notice... 99% of the tourists entering here will never be bothered.


    I too, work for the government and I definitely pick up on certain personalities who, given the opportunity, will abuse their power to conform things to their personal views.
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    I too, work for the government and I definitely pick up on certain personalities who, given the opportunity, will abuse their power to conform things to their personal views.


    not quite the same as an office full of Big Brothers all frantically searching our details and hoping to use our passport pics and our fingerprints to dupe the world into believing one of us is responsible for the death of the Leader of Ecuador's daughter though is it...

    picking up on the personality of an unscrupulous government worker is not quite the same as what Helen and others on here thinks is happening to their details once they click 'send' on their next US travel plans.
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    Dunk... if somebody already has any conviction they won't be allowed in anyway... the only people allowed in are those with NO criminal records... so I don't see how that's relevant? :confused:


    in where? Ireland? the US?

    remember this post as you have typed in "..the only people allowed in are those with NO criminal records.."


    Collin: i've never said i was ok with having a chip put under my skin.. i'm not a big fan of needles and stuff.. but a card with a chip on it.. no problem
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • fanch75fanch75 Posts: 3,734
    White person topics in this thread:

    Diversity

    Awareness

    Traveling

    Being an expert on YOUR culture

    Being offended
    Do you remember Rock & Roll Radio?
  • eyedclaareyedclaar Posts: 6,980
    I too, work for the government and I definitely pick up on certain personalities who, given the opportunity, will abuse their power to conform things to their personal views.


    Agreed.

    I too, work for the government, and the less they know about my activites the better. I will take freedom over safety any day.
    Idaho's Premier Outdoor Writer

    Please Support My Writing Habit By Purchasing A Book:

    https://www.createspace.com/3437020

    http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000663025696

    http://earthtremors.blogspot.com/
  • Heineken HelenHeineken Helen Posts: 18,095
    dunkman wrote:
    i work for the government... i know first hand how genuinely inept it is with its data storage. :D:D
    Isn't that one more good reason not to let them have it? Forget about what THEY might do with it... like I said, any computer database system is potentially hackable... also they could leave all that sensitive information lying around on a train... twice... or something!
    The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
    Verona??? it's all surmountable
    Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
    Wembley? We all believe!
    Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
    Chicago 07? And love
    What a different life
    Had I not found this love with you
  • Heineken HelenHeineken Helen Posts: 18,095
    I haven't even read that book but it just is so blatantly obvious to me and it stuns me with the amount of complacency most people seem to have with this kind of thing.
    Me too... even before I read the book. Maybe don't read it... if you already believe this kinda thing happens, it'll give you nightmares ;)
    The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
    Verona??? it's all surmountable
    Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
    Wembley? We all believe!
    Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
    Chicago 07? And love
    What a different life
    Had I not found this love with you
  • Heineken HelenHeineken Helen Posts: 18,095
    dunkman wrote:
    not quite the same as an office full of Big Brothers all frantically searching our details and hoping to use our passport pics and our fingerprints to dupe the world into believing one of us is responsible for the death of the Leader of Ecuador's daughter though is it...

    picking up on the personality of an unscrupulous government worker is not quite the same as what Helen and others on here thinks is happening to their details once they click 'send' on their next US travel plans.
    dunk... a government is made up of people is it not? In ANY group of people there will be those who are dishonest and those who are cheats. I don't want THOSE people having access to my information... and once you hand it over, you really have no idea who the fuck HAS access to it and what they could do. Don't forget identity theft is also a big one these days.
    The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
    Verona??? it's all surmountable
    Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
    Wembley? We all believe!
    Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
    Chicago 07? And love
    What a different life
    Had I not found this love with you
  • Heineken HelenHeineken Helen Posts: 18,095
    fanch75 wrote:
    White person topics in this thread:

    Diversity

    Awareness

    Traveling

    Being an expert on YOUR culture

    Being offended
    :rolleyes: thanks for your valuable input.

    I'm pretty sure they're traits in EVERY race! Even yours... whatever the fuck that is... since you're apparently not white... and I've seen pics of you that are obviously not black either :confused:
    The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
    Verona??? it's all surmountable
    Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
    Wembley? We all believe!
    Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
    Chicago 07? And love
    What a different life
    Had I not found this love with you
  • Heineken HelenHeineken Helen Posts: 18,095
    eyedclaar wrote:
    Agreed.

    I too, work for the government, and the less they know about my activites the better. I will take freedom over safety any day.
    Oooooooooooohhh dunk, 2 government workers disagreeing with you, eh?

    Unfortunately eyedclaar, I think freedom is only an illusion these days. We're only free to do what we're allowed to do :(
    The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
    Verona??? it's all surmountable
    Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
    Wembley? We all believe!
    Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
    Chicago 07? And love
    What a different life
    Had I not found this love with you
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    Oooooooooooohhh dunk, 2 government workers disagreeing with you, eh?

    Unfortunately eyedclaar, I think freedom is only an illusion these days. We're only free to do what we're allowed to do :(

    thats the cool thing about us intelligent government workers... we can have a disagreement about something and it doesnt matter :p

    i'm outta this thread as your last sentence makes me laugh too much.
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • Heineken HelenHeineken Helen Posts: 18,095
    dunkman wrote:
    thats the cool thing about us intelligent government workers... we can have a disagreement about something and it doesnt matter :p

    i'm outta this thread as your last sentence makes me laugh too much.
    that's cool :) don't bother answering my comments to YOU then so :p
    The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
    Verona??? it's all surmountable
    Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
    Wembley? We all believe!
    Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
    Chicago 07? And love
    What a different life
    Had I not found this love with you
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    that's cool :) don't bother answering my comments to YOU then so :p

    you're good at missing mine.. so why should i answer yours?
    dunkman wrote:
    in where? Ireland? the US?

    remember this post as you have typed in "..the only people allowed in are those with NO criminal records.."
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • Heineken HelenHeineken Helen Posts: 18,095
    dunkman wrote:
    you're good at missing mine.. so why should i answer yours?
    Great way to ignore my points again :)

    The US dunk, the US. I'm pretty sure a lot of countries don't accept convicted criminals anymore either.
    The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
    Verona??? it's all surmountable
    Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
    Wembley? We all believe!
    Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
    Chicago 07? And love
    What a different life
    Had I not found this love with you
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    Great way to ignore my points again :)

    The US dunk, the US. I'm pretty sure a lot of countries don't accept convicted criminals anymore either.

    so please explain how the following people are allowed into the US.

    Sean Ryder
    Russell Brand
    Keith Richards
    Paul McCartney
    Me
    etc

    Dunk... if somebody already has any conviction they won't be allowed in anyway... the only people allowed in are those with NO criminal records... so I don't see how that's relevant? :confused:

    so those with NO criminal records.... hmmmm.

    this sounds exactly like the 'there are NO banks that issue Visa Debit cards in Ireland' kinda statement!!!
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • Heineken HelenHeineken Helen Posts: 18,095
    dunkman wrote:
    so please explain how the following people are allowed into the US.

    Sean Ryder
    Russell Brand
    Keith Richards
    Paul McCartney
    etc
    etc
    etc




    so those with NO criminal records.... hmmmm.

    this sounds exactly like the 'there are NO banks that issue Visa Debit cards in Ireland' kinda statement!!!

    they're not people... they're celebs ;) different rule... although Amy Winehouse was banned, wasn't she? Snoop dogg is banned from the UK I believe. Have a look at the US immigration site... that's where I got my information from... NOT thin air :) . Of course there will always be exceptions to the rule... even strong rules like this, there are minimal exceptions. But I don't think the average person can expect the same treatment as Paul McCartney in todays celeb worshipping world, do you?
    The Astoria??? Orgazmic!
    Verona??? it's all surmountable
    Dublin 23.08.06 "The beauty of Ireland, right there!"
    Wembley? We all believe!
    Copenhagen?? your light made us stars
    Chicago 07? And love
    What a different life
    Had I not found this love with you
Sign In or Register to comment.