"Loose Change" Director Chuckles Over Flight 93

jsand

What an asshole:

http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/02/video-loose-change-director-chuckles-over-flight-93/

Ahnimus

jsand wrote:

What an asshole:

http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/02/video-loose-change-director-chuckles-over-flight-93/

Whoa, I hate that website, that chick is such a moron, she is the long lost cousin of Ann Coulter, fuck. Anyway, I can't watch that video from work, sorry :(

Eliot Rosewater

jsand wrote:

What an asshole:

http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/08/02/video-loose-change-director-chuckles-over-flight-93/

No, no, no. The assholes here are those last radio DJs, Opie and Andy. Oh, and that cop that called in and said he saw WTC7 fall. He sounded like an asshole too....although I'm sure he's just flustered and upset and certainly traumatized over all this. What really makes that DJ an asshole is this statement regarding WTC7,"I would like to believe that it fell down in the mess of two planes and two buildings." How can anyone take that guy seriously? The creators of Loose Change are true Americans and should be regarded as heroes. Sure, some of their claims may seem a bit far-fetched, but it's very clear to me that 9/11 was absolutely an inside job. The bottom line for me is that it seems impossible to discredit their film with logic, science, and real facts....actually anything but blind ignorance.

Eliot Rosewater

Ahnimus wrote:

Whoa, I hate that website, that chick is such a moron, she is the long lost cousin of Ann Coulter, fuck. Anyway, I can't watch that video from work, sorry :(

Well, it's nothing more than ignorant ramblings of opinion. Not one fact in the entire video. Jsand, a video like that only hurts you non-believers.

prytocorduroy

What an idiotic video. Let's piece things together to make this guy look bad :rolleyes:

I don't agree with the Loose Change guy or our government. I don't know what to believe but when people are childish like that it just pushes me towards the other side. Good work guys :rolleyes:

Eliot Rosewater

danny72688 wrote:

What an idiotic video. Let's piece things together to make this guy look bad :rolleyes:

I don't agree with the Loose Change guy or our government. I don't know what to believe but when people are childish like that it just pushes me towards the other side. Good work guys :rolleyes:

Exactly...I actually think maybe the creators of that video are trying to sell Loose Change. That's how shitty the video was.

prytocorduroy

don't gimme no wrote:

Exactly...I actually think maybe the creators of that video are trying to sell Loose Change. That's how shitty the video was.

I swear they have to think they're so cool. I haven't done immature shit like that since 6th grade.

miller8966

wow that video was great! i cant believe people actually bought into what that guy from loose change was saying...Opie and Anthony made him look like the fool that he is...Great video!

And great job by O and A revealing what kind of an idiot that guy is

Ahnimus

miller8966 wrote:

wow that video was great! i cant believe people actually bought into what that guy from loose change was saying...Opie and Anthony made him look like the fool that he is...Great video!

And great job by O and A revealing what kind of an idiot that guy is

What guy? Korey Rowe or Dylan Avery?

WindNoSail

I agree with the ENTIRE content of this video. This just reinforces my belief that often times whacko libs are rude, classless, unintellegent, and worthless as far as a real discussion.

If you hate the video, then you are probably one of the people I just described. But, I don't hate you for it. I just hope you will actually watch it and consider the information as opposed to shutting down.

miller8966

Opie and Anthony really slammed that guy...wow i was laughing my ass off

Skitch Patterson

don't gimme no wrote:

No, no, no. The assholes here are those last radio DJs, Opie and Andy.

You can bash my country
you can bash my president
you can bash my family
you can bash my god.
do not bash my Opie and Anthony.

miller8966

Skitch Patterson wrote:

You can bash my country
you can bash my president
you can bash my family
you can bash my god.
do not bash my Opie and Anthony.

and dont forget jimmy norton!

hailhailkc

Exactly. If Bush and Co. masterminded this 9/11 plot to get into Iraq…which was based upon WMD…why weren't Bush and Co. smart enough to plant some WMD in Iraq to make themselves look good?

Why make yourself look like an ass after you do all of that masterminding and plotting for 9/11 JUST TO GET INTO IRAQ?!?!

Well?

Ahnimus

hailhailkc wrote:

Exactly. If Bush and Co. masterminded this 9/11 plot to get into Iraq…which was based upon WMD…why weren't Bush and Co. smart enough to plant some WMD in Iraq to make themselves look good?

Why make yourself look like an ass after you do all of that masterminding and plotting for 9/11 JUST TO GET INTO IRAQ?!?!

Well?

They did plant WMDs they gave them to Saddam, but he got rid of them and that screwed them all up. Besides 9/11 was a plan for the "war on terror" not just Iraq.

duncan in the sand

WindNoSail wrote:

I agree with the ENTIRE content of this video. This just reinforces my belief that often times whacko libs are rude, classless, unintellegent, and worthless as far as a real discussion.

If you hate the video, then you are probably one of the people I just described. But, I don't hate you for it. I just hope you will actually watch it and consider the information as opposed to shutting down.

Check out Scholars for 9/11 Truth. Listen to a man with a PHD in Nuclear Science say that there is no way that the metal in that building melted from the jet fuel. It CAN'T burn hot enough to make it happen.

duncan in the sand

Of course they counted on the blind patriotism of the right to ignore anything that might be too painful to face.

Abuskedti

they don't sound any funnier than the people here.

People trying to make sense of the actions of the United States are bound to sound stupid.

WindNoSail

duncan in the sand wrote:

Check out Scholars for 9/11 Truth. Listen to a man with a PHD in Nuclear Science say that there is no way that the metal in that building melted from the jet fuel. It CAN'T burn hot enough to make it happen.

Now I can take the science arguments, and I appreciate you offering that up. I understand, and maybe that is not currently explainable. I am open actually to the conspiracy arguments when made w/o rude and classless sniping from the woods. When this happens all I can think of jr high.

But to retort your question, what exactly do they propose would make it burn that hot if it is impossible by fuel? I mean it seems to me that jet fuel is one of the smartest ideas you could consider for generating a huge fire fast, and hot.

What accelerant do they propose that would make it that hot? How much would it take, how did it get there, etc.

And can you consider only the heat of the fuel, don't you have to consider all the other materials in the fire in combination with the fuel, inside the space of the building, etc. Don't all those variables change the equation?

hailhailkc

Ahnimus wrote:

They did plant WMDs they gave them to Saddam, but he got rid of them and that screwed them all up. Besides 9/11 was a plan for the "war on terror" not just Iraq.

We haven't exactly been on friendly terms with Iraq in the last 15 years or so, so when exactly did we give these WMD to Saddam? And don't tell me it was when Rumsfeld was over there shaking his hand, because we all know that's NOT the WMD that we're talking about. So…when did this exchange of WMD happen, and furthermore, how do you KNOW it happened? And most importantly, WHY would Saddam…someone who's hated us for the last 15 years…agree to plant WMD for us?

And furthermore…if it was a plan for the even bigger "war on terror"…wouldn't you be REALLY screwing yourself if you didn't know for sure that the WMD would be there when you said it would?!!?

Who takes a risk like that?!?!

WindNoSail

Abuskedti wrote:

they don't sound any funnier than the people here.

People trying to make sense of the actions of the United States are bound to sound stupid.

Abu and Duncan - you guys like one liners don't you? You assume all cons are closed minded and w/o intellect, but sometimes you guys sound snotty and spoiled.

So clever.....

duncan in the sand

hailhailkc wrote:

We haven't exactly been on friendly terms with Iraq in the last 15 years or so, so when exactly did we give these WMD to Saddam. And don't tell me it was when Rumsfeld was over there shaking his hand, because we all know that's NOT the WMD that we're talking about. So…when did this exchange of WMD happen, and furthermore, how do you KNOW it happened? And most importantly, WHY would Saddam…someone who's hated us for the last 15 years…agree to plant WMD for us?

And furthermore…if it was a plan for the even bigger "war on terror"…wouldn't you be REALLY screwing yourself if you didn't know for sure that the WMD would be there when you said it would?!!?

Who takes a risk like that?!?!

Simple. They really didn't care if they were found or not. They got into Iraq, and once there, it would be too late to challenge the WMD. So they looked bad, billions of dollars makes it all feel better.

duncan in the sand

WindNoSail wrote:

Abu and Duncan - you guys like one liners don't you? You assume all cons are closed minded and w/o intellect, but sometimes you guys sound snotty and spoiled.

So clever.....

You mean one-liners like..... Freedom is on the march, or.....They hate our freedoms, or.....Libs just want to cut and run, or.....the insurgency is in its last throes

duncan in the sand

WindNoSail wrote:

Now I can take the science arguments, and I appreciate you offering that up. I understand, and maybe that is not currently explainable. I am open actually to the conspiracy arguments when made w/o rude and classless sniping from the woods. When this happens all I can think of jr high.

But to retort your question, what exactly do they propose would make it burn that hot if it is impossible by fuel? I mean it seems to me that jet fuel is one of the smartest ideas you could consider for generating a huge fire fast, and hot.

What accelerant do they propose that would make it that hot? How much would it take, how did it get there, etc.

And can you consider only the heat of the fuel, don't you have to consider all the other materials in the fire in combination with the fuel, inside the space of the building, etc. Don't all those variables change the equation?

According to Prof. Jones of BYU, he claims that when they did chemical analysis of 2 pieces of the rubble, they found traces of a substance called Thermate, used by demolition crews. The Thermate, when combined with sulfur, will create a chemical reaction that will slice right through steel.

hailhailkc

duncan in the sand wrote:

Simple. They really didn't care if they were found or not. They got into Iraq, and once there, it would be too late to challenge the WMD. So they looked bad, billions of dollars makes it all feel better.

Actually, that's a pretty plausible scenario.

Ahnimus

hailhailkc wrote:

We haven't exactly been on friendly terms with Iraq in the last 15 years or so, so when exactly did we give these WMD to Saddam? And don't tell me it was when Rumsfeld was over there shaking his hand, because we all know that's NOT the WMD that we're talking about. So…when did this exchange of WMD happen, and furthermore, how do you KNOW it happened? And most importantly, WHY would Saddam…someone who's hated us for the last 15 years…agree to plant WMD for us?

And furthermore…if it was a plan for the even bigger "war on terror"…wouldn't you be REALLY screwing yourself if you didn't know for sure that the WMD would be there when you said it would?!!?

Who takes a risk like that?!?!

The US gave Saddam the weapons before the first gulf war. And Cheney did lie about there being WMDs he said before the war they know where the WMDs are, then afterwards when confronted by Ray McGovern I believe, he said "I didn't lie, I didn't say we knew where they were." there is a video of the two clips back-to-back. Sorry, I just can't seem to locate it right now. I'll keep looking for all this information for you.

Ahnimus

duncan in the sand wrote:

According to Prof. Jones of BYU, he claims that when they did chemical analysis of 2 pieces of the rubble, they found traces of a substance called Thermate, used by demolition crews. The Thermate, when combined with sulfur, will create a chemical reaction that will slice right through steel.

Let me correct that a bit. They found traces of Thermite, particularily potasium per manganese, they also found sulfur, which when added to thermite becomes the patented military incendiary thermate.

WindNoSail

duncan in the sand wrote:

You mean one-liners like..... Freedom is on the march, or.....They hate our freedoms, or.....Libs just want to cut and run, or.....the insurgency is in its last throes

Ummm, I was speaking to what you said....spin, spin, spin

Seriously though, they do hate us for our freedoms

WindNoSail

duncan in the sand wrote:

According to Prof. Jones of BYU, he claims that when they did chemical analysis of 2 pieces of the rubble, they found traces of a substance called Thermate, used by demolition crews. The Thermate, when combined with sulfur, will create a chemical reaction that will slice right through steel.

Slicing through metal in your theory is what brought down the towers, caused by explosives. Still doesn't explain what melted the metal.

Hell, for all I know thermate is used to make computer chips, or copiers, or maybe exists in the electrical wiring of the elevators.

duncan in the sand

Ahnimus wrote:

Let me correct that a bit. They found traces of Thermite, particularily potasium per manganese, they also found sulfur, which when added to thermite becomes the patented military incendiary thermate.

Thanks bro.

hailhailkc

Ahnimus wrote:

The US gave Saddam the weapons before the first gulf war. And Cheney did lie about there being WMDs he said before the war they know where the WMDs are, then afterwards when confronted by Ray McGovern I believe, he said "I didn't lie, I didn't say we knew where they were." there is a video of the two clips back-to-back. Sorry, I just can't seem to locate it right now. I'll keep looking for all this information for you.

You completely ignored what I said about the U.S. giving Saddam WMD before the first Gulf War. Those weapons, and the WMD that we here so much about today, are two totally different issues.