Gun Debate

dunkman

gue_barium wrote:

It's not his "belief". He wants me to search the friggen thread and prove my point.

I will.

Not today.

it wont take long... i didnt post too much on this thread.. i dont think

onelongsong

gue_barium wrote:

I got it covered. You're not helping.

I have to ask you something.

I saw where you said something about selling Native American's buffalo toes. What the fuck are buffalo toes, and can I get a buffalo thumb?

the toes are the hard shell protecting the foot. buffalo do not have one solid hoove; they have two toes. toes is the proper word given to them.

onelongsong

dunkman wrote:

take the bullets out of them and it'll be a piece of piss... then when your done trying to act like some fucking hardman hero i'll gladly kick your arse and take the gun off you

says the man in the dress.

rebornFixer

dunkman wrote:

the dark side is strong with this one

again i call for america to ban idiocy

About as likely as the Scottish banning drinking and whining about the English.

rebornFixer

onelongsong wrote:

says the man in the dress.

He's a Scot ... No weapons, just a good ol' fashioned tussle in the pub.

dunkman

onelongsong wrote:

says the man in the dress.

thats twice you've used that 'joke'.... and twice it was shit

well then imagine the humiliation when i took your beloved gun off you wearing a skirt... point and mock, point and mock

dunkman

reborncareerist wrote:

About as likely as the Scottish banning drinking and whining about the English.

ok we all know thats never going to happen

onelongsong

reborncareerist wrote:

He's a Scot ... No weapons, just a good ol' fashioned tussle in the pub.

that's fine but the plan is the stupidest i've ever heard. why not tell the insurgents to throw away their bullets so we can disarm them? we could end this war in two days then.

the challenge was to try to take an americans gun away. the answer was to give him our bullets first. this in itself should show that the task is impossible.

gue_barium

Testosterone Party!!!!

dunkman

onelongsong wrote:

the challenge was to try to take an americans gun away. the answer was to give him our bullets first. this in itself should show that the task is impossible.

it says you have the right to bear arms.. not ammunition.

onelongsong

dunkman wrote:

thats twice you've used that 'joke'.... and twice it was shit

well then imagine the humiliation when i took your beloved gun off you wearing a skirt... point and mock, point and mock

it's no "joke". it's true isn't it?

so where is the wilderness in scottland? where is the open range where the gun is only a tool needed to produce food for your nation? IMO; you talk like you've got a paper arsehole. you compare the conditions of life in one small country and without knowledge of another; you try to force your views which do not apply to the second country. laws relevant in NYC do not apply to the conditions in say elko nevada. what works for you will not work here. if innocent people in america were disarmed; america would need to become a police state to protect the citizens from the criminals who would then rule the country. it would take gestapo like tactics to disarm americans which again; is a violation of rights.

live in your perfect world and feel safe there. but banning guns in america is like trying to ban alcohol in scottland.

onelongsong

dunkman wrote:

it says you have the right to bear arms.. not ammunition.

i load my own ammunition.

edit: it also says for the purpose of defending the country against invaders and a rouge government. a reasonable person would know that means ammunition to opperate the weapon is included.

gue_barium

onelongsong wrote:

i load my own ammunition.

edit: it also says for the purpose of defending the country against invaders and a rouge government. a reasonable person would know that means ammunition to opperate the weapon is included.

for criminy's sake, festus, you are not who you are for a piece of metal.

get that through your thick, stupid, buffalo skull.

dunkman

onelongsong wrote:

it's no "joke". it's true isn't it?

so where is the wilderness in scottland? where is the open range where the gun is only a tool needed to produce food for your nation? IMO; you talk like you've got a paper arsehole. you compare the conditions of life in one small country and without knowledge of another; you try to force your views which do not apply to the second country. laws relevant in NYC do not apply to the conditions in say elko nevada. what works for you will not work here. if innocent people in america were disarmed; america would need to become a police state to protect the citizens from the criminals who would then rule the country. it would take gestapo like tactics to disarm americans which again; is a violation of rights.

live in your perfect world and feel safe there. but banning guns in america is like trying to ban alcohol in scottland.

1. a kilt is like a skirt.. which wraps around the waist. a dress is full-length... so wrong unfortunately

2. unfortunately your oafish education highlights your failure to grasp common knowledge geography and other countries cultures... i.e. you keep calling it Scottland and me a Scott... it has no double 't'.. its Scotland as clearly stated on my location

3. Where is the wilderness in Scotland...?? again Scotland is famous worldwide for its mountains, forests, open land, scenery, lochs, fishing, hunting, etc etc... we invented wilderness (along with many many other things considering we are a piss-ant country :rolleyes: )

dunkman

onelongsong wrote:

i load my own ammunition.

edit: it also says for the purpose of defending the country against invaders and a rouge government.

French Communists



sorry, i had to

dunkman

onelongsong wrote:

a reasonable person would know that means ammunition to opperate the weapon is included.

wrong... a reasonable person would have to assume that... and assumption isnt a 'right'

assumption also relies on aforementioned person being "reasonable"... and was VTech shooter reasonable? no

onelongsong

gue_barium wrote:

for criminy's sake, festus, you are not who you are for a piece of metal.

get that through your thick, stupid, buffalo skull.

well bevis; when working with buffalo; you can be killed before you knew what hit you. the same dangers apply to cows but cows can't outrun a horse or jump 6 feet in the air. when working with them we use a .22 with birdshot as a control tool. it isn't needed often but it'll save your life. when rounding up animals from the open range; you are subject to other dangers such as mountain lions. i've seen one rip the face off a horse. we have wolves; bears; snakes; coyotes; and a score of other animals we must protect ourselves against.

my point here is that america is like one country with several other countries within it. what works in your world doesn't necessesarily work in mine. you sit here and discuss how you want to alter my world yet if i talk about altering your's you get all up in arms. so forgive me when you talk about taking away my occupation and i get upset.

gue_barium

onelongsong wrote:

well bevis; when working with buffalo; you can be killed before you knew what hit you. the same dangers apply to cows but cows can't outrun a horse or jump 6 feet in the air. when working with them we use a .22 with birdshot as a control tool. it isn't needed often but it'll save your life. when rounding up animals from the open range; you are subject to other dangers such as mountain lions. i've seen one rip the face off a horse. we have wolves; bears; snakes; coyotes; and a score of other animals we must protect ourselves against.

my point here is that america is like one country with several other countries within it. what works in your world doesn't necessesarily work in mine. you sit here and discuss how you want to alter my world yet if i talk about altering your's you get all up in arms. so forgive me when you talk about taking away my occupation and i get upset.

You don't have wolves in arizona.

in any case the point i was making is that, that it may be a tool of the trade, it does not a human being make.

onelongsong

dunkman wrote:

1. a kilt is like a skirt.. which wraps around the waist. a dress is full-length... so wrong unfortunately

2. unfortunately your oafish education highlights your failure to grasp common knowledge geography and other countries cultures... i.e. you keep calling it Scottland and me a Scott... it has no double 't'.. its Scotland as clearly stated on my location

3. Where is the wilderness in Scotland...?? again Scotland is famous worldwide for its mountains, forests, open land, scenery, lochs, fishing, hunting, etc etc... we invented wilderness (along with many many other things considering we are a piss-ant country :rolleyes: )

a skirt is a type of dress.

so i mispell; look at some of the other posters. i have no reason to think about scoTland thus no need to perfect the spelling

yes; the scoTs have stripped the country of dangerous animals and doesn't have need for personal protection. it's a different situation here and that needs to be taken into consideration.

onelongsong

gue_barium wrote:

You don't have wolves in arizona.

in any case the point i was making is that, that it may be a tool of the trade, it does not a human being make.

wolves were reintroduced many years ago. try to keep up. my nevada ranch has an over population of wolves. people in idaho are trying to pass legislation to start shooting wolves because of the over-population and damage they are doing.