fire melts steel. 9/11 conspiracy theorists?

dangerboydangerboy Posts: 1,569
edited May 2007 in A Moving Train
never in history has fire melted steel, huh? 9/11 black helicopter tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists need to rethink that...and this was just one tanker of regular gasoline, not a huge airliner filled with jet fuel inpacting at 650 mph....

http://my.earthlink.net/article/nat?guid=20070429/46341840_3ca6_1552620070429-1236947502

A stretch of highway near the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge collapsed Sunday after a gasoline tanker crashed and burst into flames, leaving one of the nation's busiest spans in a state of near paralysis.

The tanker carrying 8,600 gallons of gasoline ignited around 3:45 a.m. after crashing into a pylon on the interchange, which connects westbound lanes of Interstate 80 to southbound I-880, on the edge of downtown Oakland about half a mile from the Bay Bridge's toll plaza

Witnesses reported flames rising up to 200 feet into the air. Heat exceeded 2,750 degrees and caused the steel beams holding up the interchange from eastbound I-80 to eastbound Interstate 580 above to buckle and bolts holding the structure together to melt, leading to the collapse, California Department of Transportation director Will Kempton said.


ebay isn't evil people are


The South is Much Obliged
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1345

Comments

  • mrwalkerbmrwalkerb Posts: 1,015
    holy shit did the driver get out ok?
    "I'm not suicidal, except when I drink. That's why we don't all drink at the same time, there'd be no-one alive to drive home..."
    Chris Cornell

    http://www.myspace.com/mrwalkerb
  • dangerboydangerboy Posts: 1,569
    mrwalkerb wrote:
    holy shit did the driver get out ok?

    walked away

    thank you for representing the good in humanity...the fact that this was your first thought says alot about you. alot of good


    ebay isn't evil people are


    The South is Much Obliged
  • the fires at the wtc were not hot enough to weaken the steel. this has been said in the NIST report. they were hot enough to significantly weaken the steel and cause it to buckle under the extreme pressure, basically. a lot of people who don't read updated information tend to think the official story still makes the claim that the fires melted the steel. i see your point, though,...
    you're a real hooker. im gonna slap you in public.
    ~Ron Burgundy
  • dangerboydangerboy Posts: 1,569
    the fires at the wtc were not hot enough to weaken the steel. this has been said in the NIST report. they were hot enough to significantly weaken the steel and cause it to buckle under the extreme pressure, basically. a lot of people who don't read updated information tend to think the official story still makes the claim that the fires melted the steel. i see your point, though,...

    well, you said that better than me, so thanks

    the steel was weakened on the bridge, and the bolts melted, not the whole steel structure...i stand clarified


    ebay isn't evil people are


    The South is Much Obliged
  • RushlimboRushlimbo Posts: 832
    dangerboy wrote:
    never in history has fire melted steel, huh? 9/11 black helicopter tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists need to rethink that...and this was just one tanker of regular gasoline, not a huge airliner filled with jet fuel inpacting at 650 mph....

    http://my.earthlink.net/article/nat?guid=20070429/46341840_3ca6_1552620070429-1236947502

    A stretch of highway near the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge collapsed Sunday after a gasoline tanker crashed and burst into flames, leaving one of the nation's busiest spans in a state of near paralysis.

    The tanker carrying 8,600 gallons of gasoline ignited around 3:45 a.m. after crashing into a pylon on the interchange, which connects westbound lanes of Interstate 80 to southbound I-880, on the edge of downtown Oakland about half a mile from the Bay Bridge's toll plaza

    Witnesses reported flames rising up to 200 feet into the air. Heat exceeded 2,750 degrees and caused the steel beams holding up the interchange from eastbound I-80 to eastbound Interstate 580 above to buckle and bolts holding the structure together to melt, leading to the collapse, California Department of Transportation director Will Kempton said.


    You highlighted the important part. Try again Nancy Drew.
    War is Peace
    Freedom is Slavery
    Ignorance is Strength
  • Still HereStill Here Posts: 661
    mrwalkerb wrote:

    holy shit did the driver get out ok?

    dangerboy wrote:
    walked away

    thank you for representing the good in humanity...the fact that this was your first thought says alot about you. alot of good

    definitely...there is hope for us yet :)
    PJ: Toledo-9/22/96. E. Lansing-8/18/98. Detroit-8/23/98. Detroit-10/7/00. Detroit-6/25 & 6/26/03. Toledo-10/2/04 [VFC]. Detroit-5/22/06. Chicago-8/5/07 [Lolla]. Cleveland-5/9/10. Baltimore-10/27/13.

    EV: Honolulu-4/21 & 4/22/07 [Kokua]. Detroit-6/26/11.
  • RushlimboRushlimbo Posts: 832
    mrwalkerb wrote:
    holy shit did the driver get out ok?

    The fire couldnt have been too hot if he didnt melt and collapse like those Germans in Indiana Jones.
    War is Peace
    Freedom is Slavery
    Ignorance is Strength
  • If you're interested. I didn't know about the cutting up and disposing of tapes into various different garbage cans.

    "The tape of interviews of air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 was intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand, cutting the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash cans around the building"

    http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/02/20-reasons-to-question-official-story.html

    .
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    If you're interested. I didn't know about the cutting up and disposing of tapes into various different garbage cans.

    "The tape of interviews of air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 was intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand, cutting the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash cans around the building"

    http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/02/20-reasons-to-question-official-story.html

    .


    quality-assurance manager who destroyed tape says he did so because he thought making tape was contrary to Federal Aviation Adm policy, which calls for written statements, and because he felt that controllers were not in correct frame of mind to have properly consented to taping because of stress of the day; inspector general ascribes destruction of tape to 'poor judgment'

    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F0091FFE3C580C748CDDAC0894DC404482&incamp=archive:search


    it's also weird that they would seal the tapes from the fire fighters at ground zero...we can hear the cell phone tapes over and over but not what they said??
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    El_Kabong wrote:
    quality-assurance manager who destroyed tape says he did so because he thought making tape was contrary to Federal Aviation Adm policy, which calls for written statements, and because he felt that controllers were not in correct frame of mind to have properly consented to taping because of stress of the day; inspector general ascribes destruction of tape to 'poor judgment'

    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F0091FFE3C580C748CDDAC0894DC404482&incamp=archive:search


    it's also weird that they would seal the tapes from the fire fighters at ground zero...we can hear the cell phone tapes over and over but not what they said??

    Let's stay on topic...

    So what about this 'open air fire fueld by gasoline that brought down a steel and concrete structure' in California? I thought you people claim this can't happen? Or is this just part of the conspiracy?
  • RushlimboRushlimbo Posts: 832
    69charger wrote:
    Let's stay on topic...

    So what about this 'open air fire fueld by gasoline that brought down a steel and concrete structure' in California? I thought you people claim this can't happen? Or is this just part of the conspiracy?

    Hehe. Yes, the physics of bolts melting on an overpass and the multiple steel columns of a 100 story building are comparable. Your new nickname shall be "Bridgeboy".
    War is Peace
    Freedom is Slavery
    Ignorance is Strength
  • Man 9/11 is looking freaky from almost every angle...something ain't right...

    ...especially when you see and hear Bush etc.. outright lying about it again and again and again.. Gmafb already...

    interesting chain of events:
    http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/

    .
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • dangerboydangerboy Posts: 1,569
    69charger wrote:
    Let's stay on topic...

    So what about this 'open air fire fueld by gasoline that brought down a steel and concrete structure' in California? I thought you people claim this can't happen? Or is this just part of the conspiracy?

    they can't. some insulting, dismissive replies, most dodging the issue entirely...


    ebay isn't evil people are


    The South is Much Obliged
  • dangerboydangerboy Posts: 1,569
    Rushlimbo wrote:
    Hehe. Yes, the physics of bolts melting on an overpass and the multiple steel columns of a 100 story building are comparable.

    yea. DUH! weakened steel and melting bolts in a 1000 foot building with 20 or 30 stories of weight above them would collapse way faster than some silly 30 foot highway bri.....oh, wait. i guess that wasn't your point at all, was it?


    ebay isn't evil people are


    The South is Much Obliged
  • ForestBrainForestBrain Posts: 460
    Quote I heard somewhere, don't remember who said it.....but it stuck:
    "Let the ignorant enjoy their ignorance, for it won't last forever."
    When life gives you lemons, throw them at somebody.
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    Quote I heard somewhere, don't remember who said it.....but it stuck:
    "Let the ignorant enjoy their ignorance, for it won't last forever."
    I like demsothenese(i think he said it),

    "For what each man wishes that he also believes to be true."


    edit:spelling
  • I'm not sure if I read this right...is someone is actually trying relate vertical core center columns in the WTC to how a bridge is designed?!?

    Last time I drove on a bridge I don't exactly remember driving through all the huge vertical steel beams everywhere throughout the lanes. Who comes up with this shit? Better yet who jumps on that boneheads bandwagon?

    Truly stunning comparison.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • moeaholicmoeaholic Posts: 535
    I'm not sure if I read this right...is someone is actually trying relate vertical core center columns in the WTC to how a bridge is designed?!?

    Last time I drove on a bridge I don't exactly remember driving through all the huge vertical steel beams everywhere throughout the lanes. Who comes up with this shit? Better yet who jumps on that boneheads bandwagon?

    Truly stunning comparison.

    i'm only seeing people talking about the melting of steel, not comparing the construction of a bridge to the construction of a building.
    "PC Load Letter?! What the fuck does that mean?"
    ~Michael Bolton
  • moeaholic wrote:
    i'm only seeing people talking about the melting of steel, not comparing the construction of a bridge to the construction of a building.

    I thought everyone and their dog has tested and proved what temperature steel melts at. What is the discussion in this case then?

    Open fire does not melt steel...end of story.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • moeaholicmoeaholic Posts: 535
    I thought everyone and their dog has tested and proved what temperature steel melts at. What is the discussion in this case then?

    Open fire does not melt steel...end of story.

    well, seems an open fire buckled steel and melted bolts in this case. i have no idea what the bolts were made of, but i highly doubt it was plastic.
    "PC Load Letter?! What the fuck does that mean?"
    ~Michael Bolton
  • moeaholic wrote:
    well, seems an open fire buckled steel and melted bolts in this case. i have no idea what the bolts were made of, but i highly doubt it was plastic.

    Weakened steel is one thing. Melted steel is an entirely different situation altogether.

    Anyhow back to 9/11. The bridge comparison is a completely pointless off topic discussion. Fire weakens steel yes...open fire cannot melt it. hmm...cannot melt steel....hmmm i.e. fire does not melt steel...hey!! there's proven and well known concept right there!

    It's stunning how anyone with more than a few brain cells to rub together can see nothing wrong with huge pools of melted steel glowing red hot (not hours or days) but for several weeks because of a little sprinkling of that "o so magic" super duper jet fuel.

    It really is inconceivable some people either can't, or don't, even blink at this utterly glaring and most impossible fact and reality.

    .
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • moeaholicmoeaholic Posts: 535
    Weakened steel is one thing. Melted steel is an entirely different situation altogether.

    Anyhow back to 9/11. The bridge comparison is a completely pointless off topic discussion. Fire weakens steel yes...open fire cannot melt it. hmm...cannot melt steel....hmmm i.e. fire does not melt steel...hey!! there's proven and well known concept right there!

    It's stunning how anyone with more than a few brain cells to rub together can see nothing wrong with huge pools of melted steel glowing red hot (not hours or days) but several weeks because of a little sprinkling of that "o so magic" super duper jet fuel.

    It really is inconceivable some people either can't, or don't, even blink at this utterly glaring and most impossible fact and reality.

    .

    you know, i don't normally reply to things in this forum because people take on the "holier than thou" attitude. and now, i'm sorry that i did. it amazes me that replies can't be made without hurling insults at anyone that doesn't agree.

    have fun tearing each other new assholes. i'm sure this thread will end up 20 pages long and have more insults than sane conversation.
    "PC Load Letter?! What the fuck does that mean?"
    ~Michael Bolton
  • moeaholic wrote:
    you know, i don't normally reply to things in this forum because people take on the "holier than thou" attitude. and now, i'm sorry that i did. it amazes me that replies can't be made without hurling insults at anyone that doesn't agree.

    have fun tearing each other new assholes. i'm sure this thread will end up 20 pages long and have more insults than sane conversation.

    hey anytime.. stop by again if you get lonely. One can't coddle the incomprehensible their entire lives. It's going on 6 years since this whole 9/11 fiasco... People are sensing the urge to forgo a few niceties at this stage of the game for those who still haven't caught up to speed.

    At some point you know it's gotta get a little ugly. Kinda like Iraq was/is...not to mention all the delicious and greatly warranted pentagon spending...you know...actually the list is pretty much endless.....just ask anyone with a keen eye these days ;)
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • Anyhow this is the thread where all this should be discussed in. Not whatever this new one is...

    http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=239695&highlight=9%2F11.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    It's stunning how anyone with more than a few brain cells to rub together can see nothing wrong with huge pools of melted steel glowing red hot (not hours or days) but for several weeks because of a little sprinkling of that "o so magic" super duper jet fuel.

    Where do you think the billions of Joules worth of kinetic energy from two falling 110 story office building went to?

    See if you can make the connection here...
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    Anyhow this is the thread where all this should be discussed in. Not whatever this new one is...

    http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=239695&highlight=9%2F11.

    I like this thread. I think we'll talk about it right here.

    Thanks.
  • 69charger wrote:
    I like this thread. I think we'll talk about it right here.

    Thanks.

    Have fun in your purple sky world...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    69charger wrote:
    Let's stay on topic...

    So what about this 'open air fire fueld by gasoline that brought down a steel and concrete structure' in California? I thought you people claim this can't happen? Or is this just part of the conspiracy?


    there is a difference between steel beams holding up an interchange (where it is spread out) and a building which has a much smaller area and probably more beams

    the bolts were what melted, what were the bolts made of?
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    El_Kabong wrote:
    there is a difference between steel beams holding up an interchange (where it is spread out) and a building which has a much smaller area and probably more beams

    You are making some pretty wild assumptions there.
    the bolts were what melted, what were the bolts made of?

    Steel.
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    Have fun in your purple sky world...

    Where do you think the billions of Joules worth of kinetic energy from two falling 110 story office building went to?

    See if you can make the connection here...

    Do you know what kinetic energy is or did I confuse you with the term Joules?
Sign In or Register to comment.