The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
He asked a stupid question and got psakibombed. Deal with it.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either. Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either. Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either. Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
so you are gonna sit there and defend a troll reporter?
gotcha.
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self.- Hemingway
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either. Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
so you are gonna sit there and defend a troll reporter?
gotcha.
I said twice it was a bad question. How is that defending him? I just don’t understand the praise for her answer. Not knowing what you’re talking about isnt a psakibomb answer. So criticizing a response is automatically defending Fox News, even when you agree it was a bad question?
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either. Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
so you are gonna sit there and defend a troll reporter?
gotcha.
he can have the opinion that doocey asked a bad question AND that psaki gave a bad answer and it doesn't deserve the "dunking" praise it's getting.
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either. Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
so you are gonna sit there and defend a troll reporter?
gotcha.
he can have the opinion that doocey asked a bad question AND that psaki gave a bad answer and it doesn't deserve the "dunking" praise it's getting.
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either. Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
so you are gonna sit there and defend a troll reporter?
gotcha.
he can have the opinion that doocey asked a bad question AND that psaki gave a bad answer and it doesn't deserve the "dunking" praise it's getting.
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either. Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
How did her answer “make no sense?” And how did her response “make her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about?”
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either. Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
How did her answer “make no sense?” And how did her response “make her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about?”
Some people get it.
Because his question was are you considering reopening the pipeline, in other words, make it flow? Her answer was no because it’s not flowing. Obviously, if it was flowing he wouldn’t ask you to turn it on make it flow. There are so many better answers, like the pipeline wouldn’t hav e been completed until 2023 so it would t make a difference, or that it only accounts for something like 5% of our oil and we can make that up other ways. But when you just say “we’re not going to make it flow because it’s not flowing” sounds like you don’t know what the keystone pipeline is.
QUESTION: Would President Biden ever undo his executive order that stopped the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline?
JEN PSAKI: Are you suggesting that would solve the gas prices issue?
QUESTION: Well, do you think that that would maybe affect prices faster than getting the whole country off of fossil fuels?
JEN PSAKI: I actually don't think it would. The Keystone was not an oil field, it's a pipeline.
QUESTION: Yeah.
JEN PSAKI: Also, the oil is continuing to flow in just through other means. So, it actually would have nothing to do with the current supply imbalance.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either. Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
she looked like she just had no answer, because her answer wasn’t even a correct response to his question. It’s even worse on paper, not as bad if you watched the clip. If you remove the glasses most on here look through, most of her answers are deflection or non truths. She plays a really good defense of Biden, she should get a raise. She’ll be quitting come June though anyway.
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either. Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
How did her answer “make no sense?” And how did her response “make her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about?”
Some people get it.
Because his question was are you considering reopening the pipeline, in other words, make it flow? Her answer was no because it’s not flowing. Obviously, if it was flowing he wouldn’t ask you to turn it on make it flow. There are so many better answers, like the pipeline wouldn’t hav e been completed until 2023 so it would t make a difference, or that it only accounts for something like 5% of our oil and we can make that up other ways. But when you just say “we’re not going to make it flow because it’s not flowing” sounds like you don’t know what the keystone pipeline is.
For folks paying attention, a more detailed response isn't necessary. What's next? She didn't bust out the maps, charts, graphs and picture-book to explain why Keystone won't impact gas prices? The fucking pipeline isn't even built, at least the extension, so no, its not a matter of turning it on.
Douchey's sole role at these press conferences is to get sound bites. There's absolutely no interest nor intent of Faux news to accurately portray this Administration's policies on anything. Her response was anything other than "making no sense" or "make her look like she didn't know what she was talking about."
QUESTION: Would President Biden ever undo his executive order that stopped the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline?
JEN PSAKI: Are you suggesting that would solve the gas prices issue?
QUESTION: Well, do you think that that would maybe affect prices faster than getting the whole country off of fossil fuels?
JEN PSAKI: I actually don't think it would. The Keystone was not an oil field, it's a pipeline.
QUESTION: Yeah.
JEN PSAKI: Also, the oil is continuing to flow in just through other means. So, it actually would have nothing to do with the current supply imbalance.
That’s a better answer. But that exchange wasn’t in the clip that was shared that was being commented on. I was just commenting on what was shared and the responses to it.
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either. Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
she looked like she just had no answer, because her answer wasn’t even a correct response to his question. It’s even worse on paper, not as bad if you watched the clip. If you remove the glasses most on here look through, most of her answers are deflection or non truths. She plays a really good defense of Biden, she should get a raise. She’ll be quitting come June though anyway.
disagree on this completely. I think she's incredibly articulate and answers in full. unlike Lying Barbie of the last admin.
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either. Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
How did her answer “make no sense?” And how did her response “make her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about?”
Some people get it.
Because his question was are you considering reopening the pipeline, in other words, make it flow? Her answer was no because it’s not flowing. Obviously, if it was flowing he wouldn’t ask you to turn it on make it flow. There are so many better answers, like the pipeline wouldn’t hav e been completed until 2023 so it would t make a difference, or that it only accounts for something like 5% of our oil and we can make that up other ways. But when you just say “we’re not going to make it flow because it’s not flowing” sounds like you don’t know what the keystone pipeline is.
Reopen something not constructed? Makes perfect sense.
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either. Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
she looked like she just had no answer, because her answer wasn’t even a correct response to his question. It’s even worse on paper, not as bad if you watched the clip. If you remove the glasses most on here look through, most of her answers are deflection or non truths. She plays a really good defense of Biden, she should get a raise. She’ll be quitting come June though anyway.
LOL...you're playing off a false narrative. Educate yourself please for the love of god.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either. Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
How did her answer “make no sense?” And how did her response “make her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about?”
Some people get it.
Because his question was are you considering reopening the pipeline, in other words, make it flow? Her answer was no because it’s not flowing. Obviously, if it was flowing he wouldn’t ask you to turn it on make it flow. There are so many better answers, like the pipeline wouldn’t hav e been completed until 2023 so it would t make a difference, or that it only accounts for something like 5% of our oil and we can make that up other ways. But when you just say “we’re not going to make it flow because it’s not flowing” sounds like you don’t know what the keystone pipeline is.
Sounds to me like she knew exactly what she was talking about and this was the perfect answer to his nonsensical question. Not sure why you don't get it, but the rest of us do.
24 years old, mid-life crisis
nowadays hits you when you're young
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either. Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
she looked like she just had no answer, because her answer wasn’t even a correct response to his question. It’s even worse on paper, not as bad if you watched the clip. If you remove the glasses most on here look through, most of her answers are deflection or non truths. She plays a really good defense of Biden, she should get a raise. She’ll be quitting come June though anyway.
The question was dumb, but her answer seems equally dumb. As far as I can tell Keystone is flowing, the extension Keystone XL was canceled. It wasn’t going to be finished for another year or 2. So asking if rethinking Keystone would impact the oil is a dumb question, it wouldnt be ready for at least a year. But saying it’s not flowing as your answer is equally dumb. Of course it’s not, that’s why he asked about finishing it and turning it on. You wouldnt finish and turn on a pipeline that’s already flowing. Her answer made no sense either. She should have just said it wouldnt make a difference because it wouldn’t have been completed instead of asking why turn on something that isn’t flowing.
you have to treat disrespectful assholes like the disrespectful assholes that they are.
would you prefer if she never calls on him again? i would, but hey, any chance to dunk on a fox news reporter is good for me.
But it wasn’t a dunk on him. Her answer made no sense either. Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
she looked like she just had no answer, because her answer wasn’t even a correct response to his question. It’s even worse on paper, not as bad if you watched the clip. If you remove the glasses most on here look through, most of her answers are deflection or non truths. She plays a really good defense of Biden, she should get a raise. She’ll be quitting come June though anyway.
Wrong on every point. Her answer was CORRECT given the situation with the XL pipeline and gas supply/prices, and the way she responded was PERFECT, give the troll question that was thrown at her. Psaki is killing it in her role as Press Secretary.
24 years old, mid-life crisis
nowadays hits you when you're young
Leaked Kremlin Memo to Russian Media: It Is “Essential” to Feature Tucker Carlson
The Russian government has pressed outlets to highlight the Fox host’s Putin-helping broadcasts.
On March 3, as Russian military forces bombed Ukrainian cities as part of Vladimir Putin’s illegal invasion of his neighbor, the Kremlin sent out talking points to state-friendly media outlets with a request: Use more Tucker Carlson.
“It is essential to use as much as possible fragments of broadcasts of the popular Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who sharply criticizes the actions of the United States [and] NATO, their negative role in unleashing the conflict in Ukraine, [and] the defiantly provocative behavior from the leadership of the Western countries and NATO towards the Russian Federation and towards President Putin, personally,” advises the 12-page document written in Russian. It sums up Carlson’s position: “Russia is only protecting its interests and security.” The memo includes a quote from Carlson: “And how would the US behave if such a situation developed in neighboring Mexico or Canada?”
The document—titled “For Media and Commentators (recommendations for coverage of events as of 03.03)”—was produced, according to its metadata, at a Russian government agency called the Department of Information and Telecommunications Support, which is part of the Russian security apparatus. It was provided to Mother Jones by a contributor to a national Russian media outlet who asked not to be identified. The source said memos like this one have been regularly sent by Putin’s administration to media organizations during the war. Independent media outlets in Russia have been forced to shut down since the start of the conflict.
As The Mick would say: "continues..."
0
Options
mickeyrat
up my ass, like Chadwick was up his Posts: 35,886
Leaked Kremlin Memo to Russian Media: It Is “Essential” to Feature Tucker Carlson
The Russian government has pressed outlets to highlight the Fox host’s Putin-helping broadcasts.
On March 3, as Russian military forces bombed Ukrainian cities as part of Vladimir Putin’s illegal invasion of his neighbor, the Kremlin sent out talking points to state-friendly media outlets with a request: Use more Tucker Carlson.
“It is essential to use as much as possible fragments of broadcasts of the popular Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who sharply criticizes the actions of the United States [and] NATO, their negative role in unleashing the conflict in Ukraine, [and] the defiantly provocative behavior from the leadership of the Western countries and NATO towards the Russian Federation and towards President Putin, personally,” advises the 12-page document written in Russian. It sums up Carlson’s position: “Russia is only protecting its interests and security.” The memo includes a quote from Carlson: “And how would the US behave if such a situation developed in neighboring Mexico or Canada?”
The document—titled “For Media and Commentators (recommendations for coverage of events as of 03.03)”—was produced, according to its metadata, at a Russian government agency called the Department of Information and Telecommunications Support, which is part of the Russian security apparatus. It was provided to Mother Jones by a contributor to a national Russian media outlet who asked not to be identified. The source said memos like this one have been regularly sent by Putin’s administration to media organizations during the war. Independent media outlets in Russia have been forced to shut down since the start of the conflict.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
0
Options
The Juggler
Behind that bush over there. Posts: 47,315
Leaked Kremlin Memo to Russian Media: It Is “Essential” to Feature Tucker Carlson
The Russian government has pressed outlets to highlight the Fox host’s Putin-helping broadcasts.
On March 3, as Russian military forces bombed Ukrainian cities as part of Vladimir Putin’s illegal invasion of his neighbor, the Kremlin sent out talking points to state-friendly media outlets with a request: Use more Tucker Carlson.
“It is essential to use as much as possible fragments of broadcasts of the popular Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who sharply criticizes the actions of the United States [and] NATO, their negative role in unleashing the conflict in Ukraine, [and] the defiantly provocative behavior from the leadership of the Western countries and NATO towards the Russian Federation and towards President Putin, personally,” advises the 12-page document written in Russian. It sums up Carlson’s position: “Russia is only protecting its interests and security.” The memo includes a quote from Carlson: “And how would the US behave if such a situation developed in neighboring Mexico or Canada?”
The document—titled “For Media and Commentators (recommendations for coverage of events as of 03.03)”—was produced, according to its metadata, at a Russian government agency called the Department of Information and Telecommunications Support, which is part of the Russian security apparatus. It was provided to Mother Jones by a contributor to a national Russian media outlet who asked not to be identified. The source said memos like this one have been regularly sent by Putin’s administration to media organizations during the war. Independent media outlets in Russia have been forced to shut down since the start of the conflict.
Breaking news.....there is a lot of stupidity and ignorance over at focksnooze.
Now imagine the people who watch, listen, and believe their bullshit.
Come on man, they get their pundits from the finest places, Rachel is an alum of MTV's "Real World". What more qualifications does one need to discuss global affairs?
Breaking news.....there is a lot of stupidity and ignorance over at focksnooze.
Now imagine the people who watch, listen, and believe their bullshit.
Come on man, they get their pundits from the finest places, Rachel is an alum of MTV's "Real World". What more qualifications does one need to discuss global affairs?
Comments
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Im not saying it was a good question, I just don’t see how you can appreciate her response. It made her look like she didn’t know what she was talking about either.
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
gotcha.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
I just don’t understand the praise for her answer. Not knowing what you’re talking about isnt a psakibomb answer. So criticizing a response is automatically defending Fox News, even when you agree it was a bad question?
www.headstonesband.com
Some people get it.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
JEN PSAKI: Are you suggesting that would solve the gas prices issue?
QUESTION: Well, do you think that that would maybe affect prices faster than getting the whole country off of fossil fuels?
JEN PSAKI: I actually don't think it would. The Keystone was not an oil field, it's a pipeline.
QUESTION: Yeah.
JEN PSAKI: Also, the oil is continuing to flow in just through other means. So, it actually would have nothing to do with the current supply imbalance.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Douchey's sole role at these press conferences is to get sound bites. There's absolutely no interest nor intent of Faux news to accurately portray this Administration's policies on anything. Her response was anything other than "making no sense" or "make her look like she didn't know what she was talking about."
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
www.headstonesband.com
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Sounds to me like she knew exactly what she was talking about and this was the perfect answer to his nonsensical question. Not sure why you don't get it, but the rest of us do.
nowadays hits you when you're young
nowadays hits you when you're young
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/03/exclusive-kremlin-putin-russia-ukraine-war-memo-tucker-carlson-fox/
Leaked Kremlin Memo to Russian Media: It Is “Essential” to Feature Tucker Carlson
The Russian government has pressed outlets to highlight the Fox host’s Putin-helping broadcasts.
On March 3, as Russian military forces bombed Ukrainian cities as part of Vladimir Putin’s illegal invasion of his neighbor, the Kremlin sent out talking points to state-friendly media outlets with a request: Use more Tucker Carlson.
“It is essential to use as much as possible fragments of broadcasts of the popular Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who sharply criticizes the actions of the United States [and] NATO, their negative role in unleashing the conflict in Ukraine, [and] the defiantly provocative behavior from the leadership of the Western countries and NATO towards the Russian Federation and towards President Putin, personally,” advises the 12-page document written in Russian. It sums up Carlson’s position: “Russia is only protecting its interests and security.” The memo includes a quote from Carlson: “And how would the US behave if such a situation developed in neighboring Mexico or Canada?”
The document—titled “For Media and Commentators (recommendations for coverage of events as of 03.03)”—was produced, according to its metadata, at a Russian government agency called the Department of Information and Telecommunications Support, which is part of the Russian security apparatus. It was provided to Mother Jones by a contributor to a national Russian media outlet who asked not to be identified. The source said memos like this one have been regularly sent by Putin’s administration to media organizations during the war. Independent media outlets in Russia have been forced to shut down since the start of the conflict.
As The Mick would say: "continues..."
as a nameless mod ordered the mick to say.......
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Now imagine the people who watch, listen, and believe their bullshit.
www.headstonesband.com
www.headstonesband.com