Home› A Moving Train

family sue school over brokeback movie...

darkcrowdarkcrow Posts: 1,102
edited May 2007 in A Moving Train
how rather pathetic


http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/a46571/family-sue-after-class-watch-brokeback.html

Family sue after class watch 'Brokeback'
Tuesday, May 15 2007, 12:29 BST

By Dave West


'Brokeback Mountain' / Entertainment Films
The family of a girl who was shown Brokeback Mountain at school is suing the education authority.

They say Jessica Turner, 12, was emotionally damaged by watching the movie, about two bisexual cowboys, and are claiming $400,000 (£202,000) in damages.

The claim alleges negligence, false imprisonment and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Turner's family say she felt she could not leave her Ashburn Community Elementary School class and still needs counselling for the experience.

Papers filed by the Turners also say Ms Buford, a stand-in teacher, introduced the film by telling pupils: "What happens in Ms Buford's class stays in Ms Buford's class."
DOWNLOAD THE LATEST ISSUE OF The Last Reel: http://www.mediafire.com/?jdsqazrjzdt
http://www.myspace.com/thelastreel http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=19604327965
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1345

Comments

  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    Did something bad happen in that movie? I never saw it.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • OttOtt Posts: 403
    What a Stooopid teacher. I haven't seen the movie, but def know of it. What teacher in their right mind would show that to elementary kids?!? And to expect them to remain quiet about it? Puuuhleeeeeeeeeeease! These kids dime each other out at the drop of a hat. You CAN NOT get twenty kids to keep a secret. No effin way.

    The parents are over-reacting to be sure, but the teacher screwed up. Big time.

    Ott
    'Give me some music; music, moody food/ of us that trade in love'
    -Shakespeare
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    Ms. Buford Mountain. Coming to a TV near you!
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • darkcrowdarkcrow Posts: 1,102
    gue_barium wrote:
    Did something bad happen in that movie? I never saw it.
    neither have i but according to my sister its about two cowboys who fall in love.... i guess the parents are scared of gay people... otherwise known as homophobia
    DOWNLOAD THE LATEST ISSUE OF The Last Reel: http://www.mediafire.com/?jdsqazrjzdt
    http://www.myspace.com/thelastreel http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=19604327965
  • OttOtt Posts: 403
    darkcrow wrote:
    neither have i but according to my sister its about two cowboys who fall in love.... i guess the parents are scared of gay people... otherwise known as homophobia
    Regardless of the parental views on homosexuals, their daughter should not have been made to view this movie at school. Totally inappropriate. I fail to see the relevance in a twelve year old's class room. Explain the lesson learned, please. Other than that learned by the teacher to better screen her viewing list.

    Ott
    'Give me some music; music, moody food/ of us that trade in love'
    -Shakespeare
  • ajedigeckoajedigecko \m/deplorable af \m/ Posts: 2,430
    Ott wrote:
    Regardless of the parental views on homosexuals, their daughter should not have been made to view this movie at school. Totally inappropriate. I fail to see the relevance in a twelve year old's class room. Explain the lesson learned, please. Other than that learned by the teacher to better screen her viewing list.

    Ott
    i agree, as an educator and father, well stated.
    live and let live...unless it violates the pearligious doctrine.
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    Ott wrote:
    Regardless of the parental views on homosexuals, their daughter should not have been made to view this movie at school. Totally inappropriate. I fail to see the relevance in a twelve year old's class room. Explain the lesson learned, please. Other than that learned by the teacher to better screen her viewing list.

    Ott

    Maybe if you tell us what the movie was about it might help explain your position better. I saw lots of dumb movies when I was in school. It's no big deal.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    It was a very good movie, but showing it to a room full of 12 year-olds was a boneheaded move if ever I heard one.

    The parents would be better served to worry about why their daughter is such a little pansy ass that she's "emotionally damaged" by watching a movie.

    Everyone here is behaving badly.
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    hippiemom wrote:
    It was a very good movie, but showing it to a room full of 12 year-olds was a boneheaded move if ever I heard one.

    The parents would be better served to worry about why their daughter is such a little pansy ass that she's "emotionally damaged" by watching a movie.

    Everyone here is behaving badly.

    you said "bone".
    he heh heh
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • ajedigeckoajedigecko \m/deplorable af \m/ Posts: 2,430
    gue_barium wrote:
    Maybe if you tell us what the movie was about it might help explain your position better. I saw lots of dumb movies when I was in school. It's no big deal.
    policy within most unified school districts prohibit the viewing of any film that contains the rating of "PG or >". If and when the movie is to be shown a parental notification must be obtained.
    live and let live...unless it violates the pearligious doctrine.
  • darkcrowdarkcrow Posts: 1,102
    Ott wrote:
    Regardless of the parental views on homosexuals, their daughter should not have been made to view this movie at school. Totally inappropriate. I fail to see the relevance in a twelve year old's class room. Explain the lesson learned, please. Other than that learned by the teacher to better screen her viewing list.

    Ott
    i dunno how explicite it got... but i wonder if the teachers screened romeo and juliet (The bazz lurman version) would the parents have done the same thing?

    i went to catholic school so we never saw anything too graphic.. i think the most explicit thing we were shown was an episdoe of xfiles... i think it was toombs... nice ep
    DOWNLOAD THE LATEST ISSUE OF The Last Reel: http://www.mediafire.com/?jdsqazrjzdt
    http://www.myspace.com/thelastreel http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=19604327965
  • hendrix78hendrix78 Posts: 507
    It was stupid to show that movie to a group of 12 year olds, BUT, there's no way the family should be allowed to sue over it. I understand the legal arguments invovled and that their probably is a decent case, but that just shows that the tort laws are completely screwed. If the girl needs coulnseling just because she saw a movie with gay people, she has real issues. People need to get thicker skins. This is nothing but a money grab by her family. These people need to stay in their trailer and quit their whining.
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    ajedigecko wrote:
    policy within most unified school districts prohibit the viewing of any film that contains the rating of "PG or >". If and when the movie is to be shown a parental notification must be obtained.

    Lemme see. I guess i need to go back and sue my school then.

    We saw: Star Wars (not sure what the rating, but there was a lot of War).
    Billy Jack (still don't know why we saw that, it was pretty cool).
    One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (outstanding!).
    To Kill a Mockingbird (in 6th grade).

    And many others I can't remember at the moment.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • OttOtt Posts: 403
    darkcrow wrote:
    i dunno how explicite it got... but i wonder if the teachers screened romeo and juliet (The bazz lurman version) would the parents have done the same thing?

    i went to catholic school so we never saw anything too graphic.. i think the most explicit thing we were shown was an episdoe of xfiles... i think it was toombs... nice ep
    At least Romeo and Juliet is based on classic Literature. A modern representation of the play would be enlightening. As far as the post about To Kill a Mockingbird, that's in "the canon" as well. Our English teacher (Senior year, mind you) showed us the Star Wars trilogy as it related to Romoe and Juliet (I think!). She tied it in to the work. And gay love (I respect the choice) and inter-galactic salvation are totally different.

    Ott
    'Give me some music; music, moody food/ of us that trade in love'
    -Shakespeare
  • JaneNYJaneNY Posts: 4,438
    Because it is an R movie, I think parents should decide whether their kids get to see it, not the school.
    R.i.p. Rigoberto Alpizar.
    R.i.p. My Dad - May 28, 2007
    R.i.p. Black Tail (cat) - Sept. 20, 2008
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    JaneNY wrote:
    Because it is an R movie, I think parents should decide whether their kids get to see it, not the school.
    Absolutely.

    I just had to sign for my daughter to watch the documentary about the Dixie Chicks, and she's already 18.
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    hendrix78 wrote:
    These people need to stay in their trailer and quit their whining.

    That part was uncalled for.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    JaneNY wrote:
    Because it is an R movie, I think parents should decide whether their kids get to see it, not the school.

    It's an R movie?
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    gue_barium wrote:
    It's an R movie?
    Yeah, it's an R, I don't think I'd want my 12 year-old watching it. There's no full frontal nudity or anything, but it's pretty damn clear what's going on. Still, it shouldn't cause anyone emotional damage :rolleyes:
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • chipboychipboy Posts: 137
    My son had to have a permission slip for My Fair Lady. Would there be this kind of outrage if they watched Saving Private Ryan? Probably not but I think the fact that the teacher knew she was doing the wrong thing when she said "what happens in here stays in here" means she should have been fired already. Unfortunately the lawsuit is proably the only thing that the school system will respond to.
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    I think kids are more damaged watching 'American Idol'... or worse, 'Dancing With The Stars'. Talk about something turning you gay.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    Cosmo wrote:
    I think kids are more damaged watching 'American Idol'... or worse, 'Dancing With The Stars'. Talk about something turning you gay.

    Hmmm. Tell us about that process, brother cool.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    Cosmo wrote:
    I think kids are more damaged watching 'American Idol'... or worse, 'Dancing With The Stars'. Talk about something turning you gay.


    hehehe


    i'm still trying to figure out the educatiuonal value of this or vitually any movie.....have we really given up?.....:confused:
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    gue_barium wrote:
    Hmmm. Tell us about that process, brother cool.
    ...
    Simple... watch 'Dancing with The Stars'... you're gay.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • AbookamongstthemanyAbookamongstthemany Posts: 8,209
    Cosmo wrote:
    ...
    Simple... watch 'Dancing with The Stars'... you're gay.

    :p:D
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    Cosmo wrote:
    ...
    Simple... watch 'Dancing with The Stars'... you're gay.

    Wanna date, or something?
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • hendrix78hendrix78 Posts: 507
    gue_barium wrote:
    That part was uncalled for.


    It was, but I meant it to be harsh because I have utter contempt for these people for bringing a lawsuit over this. The teacher should be fired for breaking school rules, and that should be the end of it.
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    if someone can sue over saying the pledge of allegiance; or the 10 commandments in front of a courthouse; then yes; they have a good case. i hope they win big.
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    onelongsong wrote:
    if someone can sue over saying the pledge of allegiance; or the 10 commandments in front of a courthouse; then yes; they have a good case. i hope they win big.

    What's this got to do with that?


    http://blkirk.myweb.uga.edu/webpage/pilgrim.jpeg
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    onelongsong wrote:
    if someone can sue over saying the pledge of allegiance; or the 10 commandments in front of a courthouse; then yes; they have a good case. i hope they win big.
    The big difference being that the people suing over the pledge are suing have the pledge removed from the classroom, or made optional ... not for hundreds of thousands in damages.

    The people suing over the 10 Commandments in front of the courthouse ... same thing, they want them removed, they're not asking for a big pile of cash.

    These people are just trying to enrich themselves at taxpayer expense. "Emotionally damaged," right :rolleyes: They should fire the teacher, apologize to the parents, and that should be the end of it.
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
Sign In or Register to comment.