McCain busts a nut for child molesters

BarkingDogs

Strangest Tribe wrote:

It's not sex education it's teaching children to understand and report innappropriate behavior.

Just another example of the "Nanny State" that the Dems want.....why should the schools teach this when the PARENTS are the one who need to take the initiative and protect their child..not the schools, not the gov't and certainly not obama.

chromiam

Strangest Tribe wrote:

It's not sex education it's teaching children to understand and report innappropriate behavior.

Isn't that what parents are for??? Ohh wait I forgot Obama thinks it takes a village to raise a child and that "I'm my brothers and sisters keeper"... well fuck that, that some personal responsibility for yourself.. ohh wait Obama says people have to do that as well... damn I get lost in all of his cliches sometimes.

Anon

chromiam wrote:

Isn't that what parents are for??? Ohh wait I forgot Obama thinks it takes a village to raise a child and that "I'm my brothers and sisters keeper"... well fuck that, that some personal responsibility for yourself.. ohh wait Obama says people have to do that as well... damn I get lost in all of his cliches sometimes.

I absolutely agree about the taking personal responsibility for ourselves. With taking resonsibility, you also have to be prepared to make decisions that you may feel are best for YOU. that's exactly why i could never support Ms anti-abortion, anti enviroment, anti-stem cell research, anti euthanasia, anti gay marriage anti this and anti that Palin.

inmytree

Open wrote:

Then lets throw out all the child molestation laws while we're at it. Parents can protect their kids.

exactly...

hey, if the parents don't do there job, screw the kids...how dare anyone try to do anything to protect kids...

fuck 'em...at least that's what the right wing nuts want....

spyguy

inmytree wrote:

exactly...

hey, if the parents don't do there job, screw the kids...how dare anyone try to do anything to protect kids...

fuck 'em...at least that's what the right wing nuts want....

you guys ever hear of compromise? or finding common ground?

someone in between sexual education for a 5 year old and explaining to a 5 year old who stranger danger is. how bout that?

you guys are like little girls pouting and stomping your feet on the ground.

inmytree

spyguy wrote:

you guys ever hear of compromise? or finding common ground?

someone in between sexual education for a 5 year old and explaining to a 5 year old who stranger danger is. how bout that?

you guys are like little girls pouting and stomping your feet on the ground.

hey, if you want to be pro-pedophile, that's on you...

sounds to me like "you guys" may like little girls too much....

spyguy

inmytree wrote:

hey, if you want to be pro-pedophile, that's on you...

sounds to me like "you guys" may like little girls too much....

another scumbag comment. nicely done

SoonForgotten2

chromiam wrote:

Isn't that what parents are for??? Ohh wait I forgot Obama thinks it takes a village to raise a child and that "I'm my brothers and sisters keeper"... well fuck that, that some personal responsibility for yourself.. ohh wait Obama says people have to do that as well... damn I get lost in all of his cliches sometimes.

Again, in many cases sexual abuse comes from within the family. Why would anyone be against something that would make it easier for children to report or avoid abuse?

As I said before, there are many rubbish parents out there who simply do not raise their children properly. I, for one, am for breaking that cycle by the state providing essential education on all fronts. The US would be a lot better off without ignorant rednecks raising ignorant rednecks.

Why deny children vital knowledge?

Anon

spyguy wrote:

another scumbag comment. nicely done

ahem

spyguy wrote:

is this everyone's first election?


mud slinging and useless BS happens EVERY election. stop pretending this is something new

carry on...

spyguy

Pj_Gurl wrote:

ahem



carry on...

LOL are you kidding me? something wrong with what I said? and its somehow comparable to being called "pro-pedophile" ?

Anon

spyguy wrote:

LOL are you kidding me? something wrong with what I said? and its somehow comparable to being called "pro-pedophile" ?

I never said there was anything wrong with what you said. I was agreeing with you. It's just kinda amusing that you are one of the worst people here for making sarcastic comments and having 'sly spyguy' digs at people and then scream when it happens back to you. As if he was seriously calling you a pro-pedophile. C'mon now.

puremagic

Obama was talking about a real issue child molestation. John McCain's ad is making a mockery of that issue.


Hey, what did you expect!!! The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling just gave them the green light once they removed the death penalty for child rape, even incest child rape. Think about that next time you look at your child, your niece, and your nephew.

spyguy

Pj_Gurl wrote:

I never said there was anything wrong with what you said. I was agreeing with you. It's just kinda amusing that you are one of the worst people here for making sarcastic comments and having 'sly spyguy' digs at people and then scream when it happens back to you. As if he was seriously calling you a pro-pedophile. C'mon now.

inmytree wrote:

hey, if you want to be pro-pedophile, that's on you...

he was replying to my post. how should I have taken this comment?

I'm all for sarcastic shots but the line has to be drawn somewhere.

inmytree

spyguy wrote:

he was replying to my post. how should I have taken this comment?

I'm all for sarcastic shots but the line has to be drawn somewhere.

waaaaaa waa waaaaaaaaa

do you prefer puffs or keenex....

chromiam

SoonForgotten2 wrote:

Again, in many cases sexual abuse comes from within the family. Why would anyone be against something that would make it easier for children to report or avoid abuse?

As I said before, there are many rubbish parents out there who simply do not raise their children properly. I, for one, am for breaking that cycle by the state providing essential education on all fronts. The US would be a lot better off without ignorant rednecks raising ignorant rednecks.

Why deny children vital knowledge?

There are ignorant parents in every country so shouldn't this be a global law??? Nice dig at the rednecks though as if they are the only ones with problems....

I'm not denying anyone anything, I just think that there is a line to what should be taught at school and at home. Does this cross the line? Not necessarily but spending a large chunk of classroom time teaching about things that could better be covered in small short information sessions with younger children is a waste IMO. As they get older and the issues are more complicated, devote more time.

Strangest Tribe

When I was 7 years old I had an uncle that asked me if I ever had a hard-on...
I didn't understand what that meant... Perhaps if I had known I could have saved my cousin from years of sexual abuse.

...just sayin

Don't be a fuckhead because you are playing partisan politics asshole

spyguy

chiefojibwa wrote:

oh no!! somebody call spyguy a waaaaaaaaambulance!

inmytree wrote:

waaaaaa waa waaaaaaaaa

do you prefer puffs or keenex....

as long as you guys are comfortable being this immature, have at it. one day you might become an adult but I find it highly unlikely

spyguy

Strangest Tribe wrote:

When I was 7 years old I had an uncle that asked me if I ever had a hard-on...
I didn't understand what that meant... Perhaps if I had known I could have saved my cousin from years of sexual abuse.

...just sayin

Don't be a fuckhead because you are playing partisan politics asshole

thats horrible. where were your parents? you couldnt go to them? they never talked to you about such things?

sounds like a fault in parenting, not fault in public schooling.

inmytree

spyguy wrote:

thats horrible. where were your parents? you couldnt go to them? they never talked to you about such things?

sounds like a fault in parenting, not fault in public schooling.

wow...

holy fuckin shit, wow...

I wonder where you parents were...:rolleyes:

meme

cincybearcat wrote:

What's age appropriate for a 5 year old?

Last time I checked, that was kinda up to the parents, not the government. I think that's the main rub with this type of legislation.

Overall I'm for more and better sex education in schools...but the fine line as to when to start and what to include is more difficult for me. I guess I think if you have to hold anything back on the education, then that says the children aren't old enough for the school to be doing the teaching about it.

"It's inappropriate for someone to touch certain parts of your body, unless they have a reason to do so (medical, hygiene, etc.)."

I had not even thought about having that discussion with my child, and I was very relieved when he balked at his pediatrician when he touched his penis. That's great education there, which I demand and am thankful for.