hey if a guy is willing to blow a month's wages getting me drunk i will be more than willing to say i believe LHO shot JFK. if that makes me a slut then line 'em up.
i need help. all i saw here was LHO which looked like lohan to me, surrounded by blow and slut, and the pavlovian reaction was started... im going to go now... i may be back in a few minutes...
i need help. all i saw here was LHO which looked like lohan to me, surrounded by blow and slut, and the pavlovian reaction was started... im going to go now... i may be back in a few minutes...
i'd turn gay for lindsay lohan. hmmm actually i wouldn't really have to turn gay, being an equal opportunity kinda gal anyway.
take your time conor.
hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
Oh so now we have a comedian that is now an authority on the subject... right... look at the facts... something isnt right with that day
If authority on reality and being able to make a sound judgment are what you're talking about, then yes he is an authority along with anyone else that is a rational, normal person. It's about time someone came out publicly and called you conspiracy folks a bunch of loons! It is insane to me that people think that the government blew those buildings up...i mean really if you think that then why are you still in this country? If I ever believed that our elected government had something to do with that I would move out of here...seriously go away.
“May you live to be 100 and may the last voice you hear be mine.” - Frank Sinatra
If authority on reality and being able to make a sound judgment are what you're talking about, then yes he is an authority along with anyone else that is a rational, normal person. It's about time someone came out publicly and called you conspiracy folks a bunch of loons! It is insane to me that people think that the government blew those buildings up...i mean really if you think that then why are you still in this country? If I ever believed that our elected government had something to do with that I would move out of here...seriously go away.
Take the government out of it. This is where people are getting hung up. The notions people have when you say "government" are obviously skewed one way or the other on this, so it is easier to simplify and clarify, that yes, 9/11 was a conspiracy. It was, there's no two ways about it. As for the government investigation on it, it has a whole lot to be desired.
i wonder if you conspiracy nuts also believe in intelligent design and that global warming is a hoax. THOSE dang scientists and their lies!!! its all a big conspiracy man i tells ya! its all lies!
Its not real! take the red pill! the truth is out there!
Tartar is a myth perpetuated by the American Dental Association!! Americans caused the holocaust! they eat babies in Kansas!
i wonder if you conspiracy nuts also believe in intelligent design and that global warming is a hoax. THOSE dang scientists and their lies!!! its all a big conspiracy man i tells ya! its all lies!
Its not real! take the red pill! the truth is out there!
Tartar is a myth perpetuated by the American Dental Association!!
no they are huge supports of global warming. I'm a little skeptical though.
i wonder if you conspiracy nuts also believe in intelligent design and that global warming is a hoax. THOSE dang scientists and their lies!!! its all a big conspiracy man i tells ya! its all lies!
Its not real! take the red pill! the truth is out there!
Tartar is a myth perpetuated by the American Dental Association!! Americans caused the holocaust! they eat babies in Kansas!
See? You're lacking good language and thinking skills when you say "conspiracy nuts".
Tell me this. How was 9/11 not a conspiracy to destroy WTC and the Pentagon?
no i agree it was a conspiracy, but a very simple one. not a ridiculous "Bush is the Illuminati" one.
But, that's what the push against the truth wants you to believe. That it is a polemic. You're either a "conspiracy nut" or you're not.
I think there's a lot more to it than that.
Honestly I dn't want to get into it with you on the details of that day.
Basically, where I'm at with it is that I don't think the fire from the jet fuel had anything to do with the buildings coming down. I'm 50/50 on the structural damage alone being the cause of the collapse(s).
Officially, the fire played a role in the buildings collapsing. I don't see it.
Basically, where I'm at with it is that I don't think the fire from the jet fuel had anything to do with the buildings coming down. I'm 50/50 on the structural damage alone being the cause of the collapse(s).
Officially, the fire played a role in the buildings collapsing. I don't see it.
dont you think fire weakened the steel support columns?
Oh...ok...right...I think I know where the air is coming from now
Way over you dude. I've naughty lately so I can't let loose with what I really think of you. But its not good. Any time someone brings up a point you can't explain you spew out this insulting crap or worse. Not to mention that every theory you've come up with has NO scientific basis whatsoever. None. Zip. Centre of a fucking dounut!! Put your credentials on the line. My Father was a steel erector for 30 years and my brother a top shelf engineer and none of us a fans of George W and his crew. But to think that this planned by them is plain foolishness. Let it happen more than likely, but planned and executed by them pure insanity!!
I think the jet impact alone could have caused the damage to the infrastructure to cause the building to collapse on itself. I'm not 100% certain on that, of course. Like I said, that's a 50/50 propostition, to me. From our government, we're not even told that is a possibility. We're told that the heat from the jet fuel weakened the steel causing the collapse. I just don't buy that. I don't buy it for the reason that the historical evidence out there just doesn't support such a claim.
I think the jet impact alone could have caused the damage to the infrastructure to cause the building to collapse on itself. I'm not 100% certain on that, of course. Like I said, that's a 50/50 propostition, to me. From our government, we're not even told that is a possibility. We're told that the heat from the jet fuel weakened the steel causing the collapse. I just don't buy that. I don't buy it for the reason that the evidence out there just doesn't support such a claim.
I dont disagree for a second that its possible the buildings 100% came down from those planes. and the damage of the planes alone. 100% possible, even probable.
but its just simple common sense that the heat from the fire, burning for a few hours, had weaken those columns. no one can debate that scientific fact that fire does indeed, weaken steel.
you only seem to be holding back because the government said it happened. maybe that got that one right this time? fire weakens steel.
not to mention the incredible weight of the towers. it was the largest concrete structure in the world at the time.
I dont disagree for a second that the buildings 100% came down from those planes. and the damage of the planes alone. 100% possible, even probable.
but its just simple common sense that the heat from the fire, burning for a few hours, had weaken those columns. no one can debate that scientific fact that fire does indeed, weaken steel.
you only seem to be holding back because the government said it happened. maybe that got that one right this time? fire weakens steel.
not to mention the incredible weight of the towers. it was the largest concrete structure in the world at the time.
[/end rant]
I only disagree with you that the fire had anything to do with it. I don't disagree because the government says it is so. If you look at the history of steel girdered buildings catching on fire you will see that fire has never had an impact on the structural integrity of the building. Now a lot of people, at this point, are going to say, "Well, it's jet fuel, dummy. It's super hot." It burns a little hotter, sure, but in the case of WTC the bulk of the fuel was burned up in the first moments of the impact. Anything burning after that was lighter fuel quality burn (and anything else that caught on fire), and that doesn't have any true impact on the structure of steel.
I only disagree with you that the fire had anything to do with it. I don't disagree because the government says it is so. If you look at the history of steel girdered buildings catching on fire you will see that fire has never had an impact on the structural integrity of the building. Now a lot of people, at this point, are going to say, "Well, it's jet fuel, dummy. It's super hot." It burns a little hotter, sure, but in the case of WTC the bulk of the fuel was burned up in the first moments of the impact. Anything burning after that was lighter fuel quality burn (and anything else that caught on fire), and that doesn't have any true impact on the structure of steel.
you had me until that last sentence. think about what you are saying...ZERO impact?
I'll try to find some research from what we both agree to be credible sources. but I'm hungry. be back later.
Think about it. What is your grill made of? How many years of lighter fluid and flame and heat does it take? Steel beams are made of the same stuff.
thats a clever example but think of the difference. a grill fire burns between 350 and 450 degrees? for a relatively short period of time. the fire gets cooler with time unless more and more coals are added.
the WTC was extremely hotter temps for a longer period of time.
and, most importantly, that grill is barring ZERO weight (except that 8 ounce filet ). take that same grill and balance a car on it and see how long the fire has to burn before the grill starts to bend.
thats a clever example but think of the difference. a grill fire burns between 350 and 450 degrees? for a relatively short period of time. the fire gets cooler with time unless more and more coals are added.
the WTC was extremely hotter temps for a longer period of time.
and, most importantly, that grill is barring ZERO weight (except that 8 ounce filet ). take that same grill and balance a car on it and see how long the fire has to burn before the grill starts to bend.
Way over you dude. I've naughty lately so I can't let loose with what I really think of you. But its not good. Any time someone brings up a point you can't explain you spew out this insulting crap or worse. Not to mention that every theory you've come up with has NO scientific basis whatsoever. None. Zip. Centre of a fucking dounut!! Put your credentials on the line. My Father was a steel erector for 30 years and my brother a top shelf engineer and none of us a fans of George W and his crew. But to think that this planned by them is plain foolishness. Let it happen more than likely, but planned and executed by them pure insanity!!
I couldn't give a flying hippo shit what your head likes or dislikes.
You're the guy that thinks that nothing fell into the basement.
You think you know everything but then you question nothing...
That right there tells me you're at a bit of a disadvantage in the logic dept...
good luck with that chachi...
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Comments
as if. :rolleyes: i roll. i parry. i thrust. generally i laugh and treat it all as a challenge that requires not much thought.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
i need help. all i saw here was LHO which looked like lohan to me, surrounded by blow and slut, and the pavlovian reaction was started... im going to go now... i may be back in a few minutes...
i'd turn gay for lindsay lohan. hmmm actually i wouldn't really have to turn gay, being an equal opportunity kinda gal anyway.
take your time conor.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
i promise to put in a good word for you when she and i are indulging in that post-coital cigarette then
oh please do conor.
i'm sure there's something i could teach the girl.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
in that case, i promise to send you a thank you card when she and i are enjoying our second post-coital cigarette!
just seeing the smile on your face will suffice.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
If authority on reality and being able to make a sound judgment are what you're talking about, then yes he is an authority along with anyone else that is a rational, normal person. It's about time someone came out publicly and called you conspiracy folks a bunch of loons! It is insane to me that people think that the government blew those buildings up...i mean really if you think that then why are you still in this country? If I ever believed that our elected government had something to do with that I would move out of here...seriously go away.
Im with you brother.
Take the government out of it. This is where people are getting hung up. The notions people have when you say "government" are obviously skewed one way or the other on this, so it is easier to simplify and clarify, that yes, 9/11 was a conspiracy. It was, there's no two ways about it. As for the government investigation on it, it has a whole lot to be desired.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
Its not real! take the red pill! the truth is out there!
Tartar is a myth perpetuated by the American Dental Association!! Americans caused the holocaust! they eat babies in Kansas!
no they are huge supports of global warming. I'm a little skeptical though.
See? You're lacking good language and thinking skills when you say "conspiracy nuts".
Tell me this. How was 9/11 not a conspiracy to destroy WTC and the Pentagon?
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
no i agree it was a conspiracy, but a very simple one. not a ridiculous "Bush is the Illuminati" one.
But, that's what the push against the truth wants you to believe. That it is a polemic. You're either a "conspiracy nut" or you're not.
I think there's a lot more to it than that.
Honestly I dn't want to get into it with you on the details of that day.
Basically, where I'm at with it is that I don't think the fire from the jet fuel had anything to do with the buildings coming down. I'm 50/50 on the structural damage alone being the cause of the collapse(s).
Officially, the fire played a role in the buildings collapsing. I don't see it.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
dont you think fire weakened the steel support columns?
Nope.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
Way over you dude. I've naughty lately so I can't let loose with what I really think of you. But its not good. Any time someone brings up a point you can't explain you spew out this insulting crap or worse. Not to mention that every theory you've come up with has NO scientific basis whatsoever. None. Zip. Centre of a fucking dounut!! Put your credentials on the line. My Father was a steel erector for 30 years and my brother a top shelf engineer and none of us a fans of George W and his crew. But to think that this planned by them is plain foolishness. Let it happen more than likely, but planned and executed by them pure insanity!!
is fire hot?
I think the jet impact alone could have caused the damage to the infrastructure to cause the building to collapse on itself. I'm not 100% certain on that, of course. Like I said, that's a 50/50 propostition, to me. From our government, we're not even told that is a possibility. We're told that the heat from the jet fuel weakened the steel causing the collapse. I just don't buy that. I don't buy it for the reason that the historical evidence out there just doesn't support such a claim.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
I dont disagree for a second that its possible the buildings 100% came down from those planes. and the damage of the planes alone. 100% possible, even probable.
but its just simple common sense that the heat from the fire, burning for a few hours, had weaken those columns. no one can debate that scientific fact that fire does indeed, weaken steel.
you only seem to be holding back because the government said it happened. maybe that got that one right this time? fire weakens steel.
not to mention the incredible weight of the towers. it was the largest concrete structure in the world at the time.
[/end rant]
I only disagree with you that the fire had anything to do with it. I don't disagree because the government says it is so. If you look at the history of steel girdered buildings catching on fire you will see that fire has never had an impact on the structural integrity of the building. Now a lot of people, at this point, are going to say, "Well, it's jet fuel, dummy. It's super hot." It burns a little hotter, sure, but in the case of WTC the bulk of the fuel was burned up in the first moments of the impact. Anything burning after that was lighter fuel quality burn (and anything else that caught on fire), and that doesn't have any true impact on the structure of steel.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
you had me until that last sentence. think about what you are saying...ZERO impact?
I'll try to find some research from what we both agree to be credible sources. but I'm hungry. be back later.
Have a Ditka for me. Da Bears...
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
Think about it. What is your grill made of? How many years of lighter fluid and flame and heat does it take? Steel beams are made of the same stuff.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
thats a clever example but think of the difference. a grill fire burns between 350 and 450 degrees? for a relatively short period of time. the fire gets cooler with time unless more and more coals are added.
the WTC was extremely hotter temps for a longer period of time.
and, most importantly, that grill is barring ZERO weight (except that 8 ounce filet
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
I just called some buddies over to help. I'll let ya know how it goes
but right now, I gots some shrimps on the grill that I need to take care of first
I couldn't give a flying hippo shit what your head likes or dislikes.
You're the guy that thinks that nothing fell into the basement.
You think you know everything but then you question nothing...
That right there tells me you're at a bit of a disadvantage in the logic dept...
good luck with that chachi...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
BLAH,BLAH...................BLAH BLAH BLAH