Here we go again... at least use facts instead of making things up about doing nothing after the first wtc, and how could Clinton as governor of Arkansas stop Saddam from killing thousands of people during Reagan's presidency?
clinton gave the biologicals to saddam. it was all over the news during the anthrax scare after 9/11 when scientists were trying to discover if the anthrax found was from the strain given to saddam. remember??? bill let saddam and bin ladin grow stronger which allowed them to carry out terrorist acts. evidently, you haven't read this article. http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={524F0261-37CB-40C1-8291-014E1940EC27}
It isn't as if bin Laden didn't need the money. As journalist Richard Miniter pointed out in his book Losing Bin Laden, "the most compelling reason for bin Laden to work with Iraq was money." Al Qaeda officials have repeatedly whined, while under interrogation, that cash was always a problem. Saddam, on the other hand, had over $11 billion to play with, from skimming billions off the lucrative UN "Oil-for-Food" scam operation
This visit went well - very well. Saddam's intelligence service in essence cut a check directly to Zawahiri, for $300,000. American officials learned of this payout by "a senior member" of Iraqi intelligence. An administration official later told Stephen Hayes that the payout is so credible as to be undisputed: "It's a lock," the official said. U.S. News and World Report broke the story, and to date no one has ever come forward to question the reality of this payment. But what did the good terrorist doctor do with Saddam's cash?
allowing them to grow strong was the same as being in business with them.
clinton gave the biologicals to saddam. it was all over the news during the anthrax scare after 9/11 when scientists were trying to discover if the anthrax found was from the strain given to saddam. remember??? bill let saddam and bin ladin grow stronger which allowed them to carry out terrorist acts. evidently, you haven't read this article. http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={524F0261-37CB-40C1-8291-014E1940EC27}
It isn't as if bin Laden didn't need the money. As journalist Richard Miniter pointed out in his book Losing Bin Laden, "the most compelling reason for bin Laden to work with Iraq was money." Al Qaeda officials have repeatedly whined, while under interrogation, that cash was always a problem. Saddam, on the other hand, had over $11 billion to play with, from skimming billions off the lucrative UN "Oil-for-Food" scam operation
This visit went well - very well. Saddam's intelligence service in essence cut a check directly to Zawahiri, for $300,000. American officials learned of this payout by "a senior member" of Iraqi intelligence. An administration official later told Stephen Hayes that the payout is so credible as to be undisputed: "It's a lock," the official said. U.S. News and World Report broke the story, and to date no one has ever come forward to question the reality of this payment. But what did the good terrorist doctor do with Saddam's cash?
allowing them to grow strong was the same as being in business with them.
If it's in FrontPage Magazine, it has to be true... Even Cheney and Rumsfeld have backed down from the claim that al-Zawahiri met with Saddam's people and got financial support.
I don't know enough about the anthrax scare with the anthrax coming from the US, but even if it was true who are these "thousands of people" that Saddam killed with this anthrax?
And the rip that all Clinton did was chase tail is about as stupid as people complaining about Bush taking so many vacations. You act like chasing tail is a full time job.... How does banging an intern take any more time than another president banging his wife.
My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
If it's in FrontPage Magazine, it has to be true... Even Cheney and Rumsfeld have backed down from the claim that al-Zawahiri met with Saddam's people and got financial support.
I don't know enough about the anthrax scare with the anthrax coming from the US, but even if it was true who are these "thousands of people" that Saddam killed with this anthrax?
And the rip that all Clinton did was chase tail is about as stupid as people complaining about Bush taking so many vacations. You act like chasing tail is a full time job.... How does banging an intern take any more time than another president banging his wife.
the mass graves found in iraq and kuait where saddam used biologicals. he was given more than anthrax.
you'll have to ask bill. he certainly didn't do much else other than talk so it musta been a full time job for him.
well....if she has no fucking control of her personal life.....
and she could let that manipulating, lying, sexual deviate, wife cheating, sexual harrassing piece of crap husband of hers control her for 40 years......
how the fuck am i supposed to believe she has the backbone to lead a nation????
sexual deviate? soliciting pages is deviant. banging your intern is par for the course in high-powered management positions in america. what's so awful about cheating? who cares?
she didnt becos their marriage is more about coalition-building and political power. i don't think she gives a shit who bill fucks as long as he doesn't screw up her political career. and that's up to them. they've probly had an open marriage for years.
well; by barbera standing by W's side when he was sick (yes; it's an illness) she showed strength. she showed conviction.
but what bill did isn't an illness. sure; he claimed sex addiction but when you talk to counsellers who deal in this illness; sex addicts need sex several times a day. they crave sex with different people. so if bill has the addiction; he didn't have any time to run the country. [and that explains a lot]
addiction is an illness? i thought it was a crime? shouldn't laura have reported dubya and sent him to prison to save his life?
She is not worse than the other politicians. She is at worst just another politician.
I can only conclude she is hated because she is a powerful woman.
The first step is to recognize the problem.
i dont hate her..but she has done absolutely NOTHING and people think she is like mother theresa...i really dont understand how this could happen...
SHE HAS DONE NOTHING and yet she is front runner to become president... if you think Bush is clueless....
WAIT!
there are qualified people in this country who have been in politics, have beeen in the senate...who have been in congress or governor that have clues on how things work and dont rely on money and lies... and these people don't get heard..
so we are resorted to talking about the rich candidates... because like 2001 when people voted a phony cowboy into office rather than a guy who spent 8 years in the white house 2nd in command.
and if you say...well Hillary was in the white house...
i dont hate her..but she has done absolutely NOTHING and people think she is like mother theresa...i really dont understand how this could happen...
SHE HAS DONE NOTHING and yet she is front runner to become president... if you think Bush is clueless....
WAIT!
there are qualified people in this country who have been in politics, have beeen in the senate...who have been in congress or governor that have clues on how things work and dont rely on money and lies... and these people don't get heard..
so we are resorted to talking about the rich candidates... because like 2001 when people voted a phony cowboy into office rather than a guy who spent 8 years in the white house 2nd in command.
and if you say...well Hillary was in the white house...
SHE WASNT...it was Bill Clinton.
in the 90's i had a bumper sticker that said:
I DON'T LIKE THE PRESIDENT OR HER HUSBAND.
but you are right. she hasn't done anything. just like her husband. and the guy who spent 8 years second in command is now off his wagon. he picked an important cause and turned it into something people don't believe. just because he's a nutter. he started spewing wrong information so the public turned a deaf ear to him. the cowboy was the only logical choice. then he ran against a traitor so again; the cowboy was the only choice. with the democraatic choices we have this election; another cowboy will be our only logical choice again.
in the 90's i had a bumper sticker that said:
I DON'T LIKE THE PRESIDENT OR HER HUSBAND.
but you are right. she hasn't done anything. just like her husband. and the guy who spent 8 years second in command is now off his wagon. he picked an important cause and turned it into something people don't believe. just because he's a nutter. he started spewing wrong information so the public turned a deaf ear to him. the cowboy was the only logical choice. then he ran against a traitor so again; the cowboy was the only choice. with the democraatic choices we have this election; another cowboy will be our only logical choice again.
Bush was the better Choice over Gore??
Heres something interesting... if Bush hadn tbeen elected...9/11 wouldnt have happened... put that in your pipe
addiction is an illness? i thought it was a crime? shouldn't laura have reported dubya and sent him to prison to save his life?
i would have; but evidently he cleaned up without prison. but meth is different. it stays in the body for years. you can't clean up on your own. most rehabs are 30 days and it takes 45 days to break the addiction to meth so you can start healing a person. i sent my kid to a boot camp for 30 days before finding out that's not long enough for meth.
Heres something interesting... if Bush hadn tbeen elected...9/11 wouldnt have happened... put that in your pipe
9/11 was in the works in the 90's. gore was suppose to be elected b/c he wouldn't have done anything about it. going through with it on bush's watch was a crap shoot.
bush did what clinton should have after the first WTC attack. we had planes bombing afganistan within hours of the 9/11 attacks. bush knew who was going to attack; just not when or where. congress would never have agreed to a premtive strike. so to please the american people; we waited until we were attacked first. if you want to blame someone; look in the mirror.
bush did what clinton should have after the first WTC attack. we had planes bombing afganistan within hours of the 9/11 attacks.
I wonder if Clinton would have continued reading a children's book for seven minutes after being told our country is under attack.
I also wonder if he would have known that most of the terrorists were actually Saudis, not Afganis, and if that might have influenced his decision to bomb the shit out of the wrong country.
9/11 was in the works in the 90's. gore was suppose to be elected b/c he wouldn't have done anything about it. going through with it on bush's watch was a crap shoot.
bush did what clinton should have after the first WTC attack. we had planes bombing afganistan within hours of the 9/11 attacks. bush knew who was going to attack; just not when or where. congress would never have agreed to a premtive strike. so to please the american people; we waited until we were attacked first. if you want to blame someone; look in the mirror.
You're just making up excuses as you go along... if it's a trust issue... who DO you trust? Do you actually trust any of them?
I do... I trust Obama. One of the reasons so many from both sides of the political aisle like Obama can be attributed to trust in his character. For the last 16 years I haven't had any trust in the leader of my country and I will not vote for HRC as she is calculative and politically motivated.
Trading magic for fact, no tradebacks... So this is what it's like to be an adult...
that link doesn't give a date. you usually don't tell someone you're going to hit them before you hit them.
i could be wrong. i'm only going by what a nephew told me who supposedly was there.
clinton gave the biologicals to saddam. it was all over the news during the anthrax scare after 9/11 when scientists were trying to discover if the anthrax found was from the strain given to saddam. remember??? http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={524F0261-37CB-40C1-8291-014E1940EC27}
It isn't as if bin Laden didn't need the money. As journalist Richard Miniter pointed out in his book Losing Bin Laden, "the most compelling reason for bin Laden to work with Iraq was money." Al Qaeda officials have repeatedly whined, while under interrogation, that cash was always a problem. Saddam, on the other hand, had over $11 billion to play with, from skimming billions off the lucrative UN "Oil-for-Food" scam operation
This visit went well - very well. Saddam's intelligence service in essence cut a check directly to Zawahiri, for $300,000. American officials learned of this payout by "a senior member" of Iraqi intelligence. An administration official later told Stephen Hayes that the payout is so credible as to be undisputed: "It's a lock," the official said. U.S. News and World Report broke the story, and to date no one has ever come forward to question the reality of this payment. But what did the good terrorist doctor do with Saddam's cash?
allowing them to grow strong was the same as being in business with them.
Front Page Magazine is a conservative organization that staunchly supports war in the Middle East. If Saddam had been supplying Al Qaeda with that kind of dough, it would have been crammed down our throats by the Bush Administration as a rationale for invading Iraq. You should find more credible sources.
Trading magic for fact, no tradebacks... So this is what it's like to be an adult...
9/11 was in the works in the 90's. gore was suppose to be elected b/c he wouldn't have done anything about it. going through with it on bush's watch was a crap shoot.
bush did what clinton should have after the first WTC attack. we had planes bombing afganistan within hours of the 9/11 attacks. bush knew who was going to attack; just not when or where. congress would never have agreed to a premtive strike. so to please the american people; we waited until we were attacked first. if you want to blame someone; look in the mirror.
in the 90's i had a bumper sticker that said:
I DON'T LIKE THE PRESIDENT OR HER HUSBAND.
but you are right. she hasn't done anything. just like her husband. and the guy who spent 8 years second in command is now off his wagon. he picked an important cause and turned it into something people don't believe. just because he's a nutter. he started spewing wrong information so the public turned a deaf ear to him. the cowboy was the only logical choice. then he ran against a traitor so again; the cowboy was the only choice. with the democraatic choices we have this election; another cowboy will be our only logical choice again.
a traitor? how was john kerry a traitor? shitty candidate and a terrible potential-president, sure. but traitor?
that link doesn't give a date. you usually don't tell someone you're going to hit them before you hit them.
i could be wrong. i'm only going by what a nephew told me who supposedly was there.
ah, of course. your nephew who was there. like your dad whose gold was robbed. like your son with the meth problem. and the friend framed and sent to prison. your life is just one huge soap opera isn't it? never a single reputable and unbiased public source of information. it's always hearsay. "i know a guy who knew this other guy and they told him *insert bullshit here*"
the mass graves found in iraq and kuait where saddam used biologicals. he was given more than anthrax.
right... the ones from the uprising during Bush Sr.'s term? Seriously, what mass graves were found from thousands of deaths that happened during or after clinton's presidency with biological weapons?
that link doesn't give a date. you usually don't tell someone you're going to hit them before you hit them.
i could be wrong. i'm only going by what a nephew told me who supposedly was there.
You are so full of shit... you spew made up "facts" to support your arguments, but when you are called on them being bullshit, you either ignore it and then repeat the same crap in later threads, or you brush it off as something you heard or something someone told you.
We all get it... you hate the Clintons and everything they do... that's fine, but why make stuff up to support your feelings?
My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
Comments
clinton gave the biologicals to saddam. it was all over the news during the anthrax scare after 9/11 when scientists were trying to discover if the anthrax found was from the strain given to saddam. remember??? bill let saddam and bin ladin grow stronger which allowed them to carry out terrorist acts. evidently, you haven't read this article.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={524F0261-37CB-40C1-8291-014E1940EC27}
It isn't as if bin Laden didn't need the money. As journalist Richard Miniter pointed out in his book Losing Bin Laden, "the most compelling reason for bin Laden to work with Iraq was money." Al Qaeda officials have repeatedly whined, while under interrogation, that cash was always a problem. Saddam, on the other hand, had over $11 billion to play with, from skimming billions off the lucrative UN "Oil-for-Food" scam operation
This visit went well - very well. Saddam's intelligence service in essence cut a check directly to Zawahiri, for $300,000. American officials learned of this payout by "a senior member" of Iraqi intelligence. An administration official later told Stephen Hayes that the payout is so credible as to be undisputed: "It's a lock," the official said. U.S. News and World Report broke the story, and to date no one has ever come forward to question the reality of this payment. But what did the good terrorist doctor do with Saddam's cash?
allowing them to grow strong was the same as being in business with them.
If it's in FrontPage Magazine, it has to be true... Even Cheney and Rumsfeld have backed down from the claim that al-Zawahiri met with Saddam's people and got financial support.
I don't know enough about the anthrax scare with the anthrax coming from the US, but even if it was true who are these "thousands of people" that Saddam killed with this anthrax?
And the rip that all Clinton did was chase tail is about as stupid as people complaining about Bush taking so many vacations. You act like chasing tail is a full time job.... How does banging an intern take any more time than another president banging his wife.
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
the mass graves found in iraq and kuait where saddam used biologicals. he was given more than anthrax.
you'll have to ask bill. he certainly didn't do much else other than talk so it musta been a full time job for him.
sexual deviate? soliciting pages is deviant. banging your intern is par for the course in high-powered management positions in america. what's so awful about cheating? who cares?
she didnt becos their marriage is more about coalition-building and political power. i don't think she gives a shit who bill fucks as long as he doesn't screw up her political career. and that's up to them. they've probly had an open marriage for years.
addiction is an illness? i thought it was a crime? shouldn't laura have reported dubya and sent him to prison to save his life?
Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
i dont hate her..but she has done absolutely NOTHING and people think she is like mother theresa...i really dont understand how this could happen...
SHE HAS DONE NOTHING and yet she is front runner to become president... if you think Bush is clueless....
WAIT!
there are qualified people in this country who have been in politics, have beeen in the senate...who have been in congress or governor that have clues on how things work and dont rely on money and lies... and these people don't get heard..
so we are resorted to talking about the rich candidates... because like 2001 when people voted a phony cowboy into office rather than a guy who spent 8 years in the white house 2nd in command.
and if you say...well Hillary was in the white house...
SHE WASNT...it was Bill Clinton.
in the 90's i had a bumper sticker that said:
I DON'T LIKE THE PRESIDENT OR HER HUSBAND.
but you are right. she hasn't done anything. just like her husband. and the guy who spent 8 years second in command is now off his wagon. he picked an important cause and turned it into something people don't believe. just because he's a nutter. he started spewing wrong information so the public turned a deaf ear to him. the cowboy was the only logical choice. then he ran against a traitor so again; the cowboy was the only choice. with the democraatic choices we have this election; another cowboy will be our only logical choice again.
Bush was the better Choice over Gore??
Heres something interesting... if Bush hadn tbeen elected...9/11 wouldnt have happened... put that in your pipe
i would have; but evidently he cleaned up without prison. but meth is different. it stays in the body for years. you can't clean up on your own. most rehabs are 30 days and it takes 45 days to break the addiction to meth so you can start healing a person. i sent my kid to a boot camp for 30 days before finding out that's not long enough for meth.
9/11 was in the works in the 90's. gore was suppose to be elected b/c he wouldn't have done anything about it. going through with it on bush's watch was a crap shoot.
bush did what clinton should have after the first WTC attack. we had planes bombing afganistan within hours of the 9/11 attacks. bush knew who was going to attack; just not when or where. congress would never have agreed to a premtive strike. so to please the american people; we waited until we were attacked first. if you want to blame someone; look in the mirror.
Cousin Eddie "You serious, Clark?"
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
he's just blowing smoke. that's too rediculous to be serious.
I wonder if Clinton would have continued reading a children's book for seven minutes after being told our country is under attack.
I also wonder if he would have known that most of the terrorists were actually Saudis, not Afganis, and if that might have influenced his decision to bomb the shit out of the wrong country.
By "hours" you mean "8 weeks" right?
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
no; it was hours. cnn was reporting it by noon arizona time.
There wasn't any strike on Afghanistan until October of 2001.
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
have you got a link to prove that?
I do... I trust Obama. One of the reasons so many from both sides of the political aisle like Obama can be attributed to trust in his character. For the last 16 years I haven't had any trust in the leader of my country and I will not vote for HRC as she is calculative and politically motivated.
I'm looking, and while I'm at it, do you have a link to prove that we did attack Afghanistan on 9/11.
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/10/07/ret.attack.bush/index.html
4 weeks after 9/11...my mistake
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
that link doesn't give a date. you usually don't tell someone you're going to hit them before you hit them.
i could be wrong. i'm only going by what a nephew told me who supposedly was there.
October 7, 2001 Posted: 4:43 PM EDT (2043 GMT)
then again look at the video on the right, it once again says October 7
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
Front Page Magazine is a conservative organization that staunchly supports war in the Middle East. If Saddam had been supplying Al Qaeda with that kind of dough, it would have been crammed down our throats by the Bush Administration as a rationale for invading Iraq. You should find more credible sources.
STAGGERINGLY MISINFORMED
have you got a link to prove 9/11 was a sure bet if gore was elected but only a crapshoot when bush took office?
a traitor? how was john kerry a traitor? shitty candidate and a terrible potential-president, sure. but traitor?
ah, of course. your nephew who was there. like your dad whose gold was robbed. like your son with the meth problem. and the friend framed and sent to prison. your life is just one huge soap opera isn't it? never a single reputable and unbiased public source of information. it's always hearsay. "i know a guy who knew this other guy and they told him *insert bullshit here*"
amen
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
right... the ones from the uprising during Bush Sr.'s term? Seriously, what mass graves were found from thousands of deaths that happened during or after clinton's presidency with biological weapons?
You are so full of shit... you spew made up "facts" to support your arguments, but when you are called on them being bullshit, you either ignore it and then repeat the same crap in later threads, or you brush it off as something you heard or something someone told you.
We all get it... you hate the Clintons and everything they do... that's fine, but why make stuff up to support your feelings?
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln