if you are told lies to sign a contract, how is it valid??

124»

Comments

  • dg1979us wrote:
    I guess you do what they are doing. That is a personal decision for them and if they think the penalty is worth their convictions then more power to them, I certainly cant disrespect that.

    Me either. The amount of disrespect I've read for these guys is unbelievable.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    dg1979us wrote:
    I guess you do what they are doing. That is a personal decision for them and if they think the penalty is worth their convictions then more power to them, I certainly cant disrespect that.


    absolutely!
    anyone who stands behind their convictions and willing accepts the consequences of their choices/actions...nothing but respect for that. far too few in any realm actually stand behind their convictions to such a degree so i too fail to see how one could disrespect such.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    Here is an interesting article in regard to the Geneva POW Convention and American Federal law. There is a protocol in American federal law that must abide by the Geneva Convention. I'm googling more about that relationship now.
    http://www.counterpunch.org/vanbergen01182005.html

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    Now here's some good reading. This link provides many links that question the legality of the US-led invasion on Iraq. Most of them seem to be from 2003.

    http://www.robincmiller.com/ir-legal.htm

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    What you should really be doing is working really hard to convince people not to enlist....not trying to harp about it being illegal or they were mislead (of which you will never convince more than a handful of people...myself included and I oppose war). If we could stop people from enlisting, then it would be a lot more difficult to conduct a war, huh?
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    know1 wrote:
    What you should really be doing is working really hard to convince people not to enlist....not trying to harp about it being illegal or they were mislead (of which you will never convince more than a handful of people...myself included and I oppose war). If we could stop people from enlisting, then it would be a lot more difficult to conduct a war, huh?

    I don't think there's anything wrong with men and women wanting to serve our country in a military role. I'm not a pacifist. We are a safer nation served honorably by our Armed Forces whether you want to believe that or not.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    know1 wrote:
    What you should really be doing is working really hard to convince people not to enlist....not trying to harp about it being illegal or they were mislead (of which you will never convince more than a handful of people...myself included and I oppose war). If we could stop people from enlisting, then it would be a lot more difficult to conduct a war, huh?
    ...and I'm not "harping" about the illegality of Iraq, and the chain of command having broken down. I believe the focus that Watada has chosen is the honorable one in terms of the way our soldiers could be considering this Iraq conflict and the roles they play in it.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    Staceb10 wrote:
    You have to be able to prove fraud or coercion to get them to enlist. As soon as someone can do that then they can get the contract voided.

    what about this?
    http://forums.pearljam.com/showpost.php?p=4462729&postcount=33

    Staceb10 wrote:
    But let me ask you this..do you honestly believe that people that enlist don't realize that if we go to war they would have to fight? That's just ridiculous.


    no, but it seems like fraud to me, and it seems like if someone fraudulently gets you to sign a contract there should be some recourse
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    know1 wrote:
    (I'm still waiting to hear what lies are told and whether they are told by all recruiters...)


    really?? all you had to do was read post #6 to find at least one of the answers...
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    dg1979us wrote:
    I understand that. But who has declared Iraq illegal? Just because they "think" it is illegal doesnt make it so (though I agree with them). They need to go to court and prove that.


    i think the un did, didn't they? does it really matter? we pulled out of the international criminal court...we broke international law in this, as we have many times...we acted unilateraly. we act like a rogue nation, like the big kid on the block who can do what he wants b/c he has the force
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    your choice is to not volunarily sign up in the first place.
    and i am not going to assume what soldiers are *made* to do......but first and foremost, for this discussion anyway...to me it's what you are given, your CHOICE to vountarily sign up or not......and agreed to said terms.....that's the legality of the contract, anything else imo is another discussion.

    what if i sold you a car and told you it was in perfect condition and all that...so you buy the car and it breaks down and ends up being a peice of junk...could you not sue to get your money back?
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    baraka wrote:
    Hey Kabong!

    I think it is dependent on what the contract states. Sadly, folks sign contracts everyday without understanding the legal ramifications, either by being misled, or lack of understanding the language of the contract. I think once the contract is signed, it is valid, even if the individual was misled or simply didn't understand it. It's very important to understand what you are signing. Unfortunately, it seems one needs a lawyer sometimes to translate the meaning and we all know how expensive that can be. :eek:

    hiya baraka!

    i guess so...but it seems like if i mislead someone into signing something there should be a recource...

    i guess it would be hard to prove a recruiter lied to you, how would you prove it?
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    edit...

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515

    That Colonel is full of shit in his surprise.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    El_Kabong wrote:
    what if i sold you a car and told you it was in perfect condition and all that...so you buy the car and it breaks down and ends up being a peice of junk...could you not sue to get your money back?

    You can sue anybody for anything. Winning the suit is a different story, and I believe you would not win in the example above.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    El_Kabong wrote:
    really?? all you had to do was read post #6 to find at least one of the answers...

    Here was post #6:

    "i'm not so sure i agree w/ you on this one...at least for the recruiters...if they are knowingly lying to ppl to get them sent to a war based on more lies and bullshit....i don't find them that innocent.

    if i set girls up w/ my friend who slipped them ruffies(sp) and raped them and i knew he was gonna do this...even if i don't rape them myself i am an accomplice in the act, right?

    and i'm not trying to pigeonhole all recruiters, just the ones who knowingly trick ppl into signing up for this shit"

    I guess I'm dense, but I do not see the specific lie that is being told.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    El_Kabong wrote:
    what if i sold you a car and told you it was in perfect condition and all that...so you buy the car and it breaks down and ends up being a peice of junk...could you not sue to get your money back?

    you could sue and you may win especially since you don't say you have a written contract. The military is smart and they have very well-worded written contracts which are much easier to enforce. The lesson is read the contract and if you want to make sure something is there make it in the appendix that army contract offers. If it's not in the contract, it doesn't matter. Now, it is shady if they make promises to get you to sign that they have no intention of upholding but the contract states in bold letters that anything said or promised outside the contract is invalid.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • sonicreducersonicreducer Posts: 713
    El_Kabong wrote:
    i'm not so sure i agree w/ you on this one...at least for the recruiters...if they are knowingly lying to ppl to get them sent to a war based on more lies and bullshit....i don't find them that innocent.

    if i set girls up w/ my friend who slipped them ruffies(sp) and raped them and i knew he was gonna do this...even if i don't rape them myself i am an accomplice in the act, right?

    and i'm not trying to pigeonhole all recruiters, just the ones who knowingly trick ppl into signing up for this shit

    the recruiters are knowingly lying to people because of the orders they received and the bonuses they get for getting more recruits (speculating). if you find out who they answer to, attack them. if you attack the recruiters, their bosses will just replace them with someone else who does the same shit, right? i don't know how recruitment works up the ladder, but there has to be some type of document protecting citizens from those lies,... id like to do some research on it. my grandma has been a civilian on an AFB for 20+, so ill ask her and see what kind of info i can get,...
    you're a real hooker. im gonna slap you in public.
    ~Ron Burgundy
  • gue_barium wrote:
    That Colonel is full of shit in his surprise.

    Very much so.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • trappedinmyradiotrappedinmyradio Posts: 1,189
    El_Kabong wrote:
    just a thought i had...certain ppl say about the troops that they signed the contract so they get what they are given...but these same ppl will admit recruiters lie to get them to sign the contract...that they tell them whatever they think will get them to sign...so, then, how is the 'contract' valid if they were pretty much lied to and tricked into signing it??

    this is TOO easy to answer...when you sign a contract you READ the contract...you DO NOT listen to what someone is SAYING! if you fail to read it, then you are at fault...not the recruiter.

    NEXT!
    I'll dig a tunnel
    from my window to yours
  • bgivens33bgivens33 Posts: 290
    know1 wrote:
    What you should really be doing is working really hard to convince people not to enlist....not trying to harp about it being illegal or they were mislead (of which you will never convince more than a handful of people...myself included and I oppose war). If we could stop people from enlisting, then it would be a lot more difficult to conduct a war, huh?

    so I'm just a bit curious as to what you'd suggest if we get attacked again.... and we have no military?? I'm fairly certain if an 18 year old is old enough to shoot someone, he is old enough to read a contract.
  • DinghyDogDinghyDog Posts: 587
    edited November 2012
    -
    Post edited by DinghyDog on
Sign In or Register to comment.