Why aren't Rush in the RRHOF

mindi
mindi Posts: 1,862
edited August 2007 in Other Music
I wonder about this a lot.
Anyone else?
To 10c; "Your PJ tshirt should be tight enough to show you're a woman and loose enough to show you're a lady." - bionicamy
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13456

Comments

  • 12345AGNST1
    12345AGNST1 Posts: 4,906
    rrhof? rock and roll hall of fame? theyre not in that? they fucking should be
    5/28/06, 6/27/08, 10/28/09, 5/18/10, 5/21/10
    8/7/08, 6/9/09
  • keeponrockin
    keeponrockin Posts: 7,446
    They need to be.
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,839
    are they considered a rock band just a ? .....
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • mindi
    mindi Posts: 1,862
    rrhof? rock and roll hall of fame? theyre not in that? they fucking should be
    Yep Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.
    As far as I know they are not in it. Someone please tell me I am wrong, that would make my day!

    Most people i know who hate Rush have to admit they are great musicians!
    To 10c; "Your PJ tshirt should be tight enough to show you're a woman and loose enough to show you're a lady." - bionicamy
  • cause they suck :-\
    2003: Uniondale, MSG x2 | 2004: Reading | 2005: Gorge, Vancouver, Philly | 2006: East Rutherford x2, Gorge x2, Camden 1, Hartford | 2008: MSG x2, VA Beach | 2009: Philly x3 | 2010: MSG x2, Bristow | 2011: Alpine Valley x2 | 2012: MIA Philly | 2013: Wrigley, Charlottesville, Brooklyn 2 | 2014: Milan, Amsterdam 1 | 2016: MSG x2, Fenway x2, Wrigley 2 | 2018: Rome, Krakow, Berlin, Wrigley 2 | 2021: Sea Hear Now | 2022: San Diego, LA x2, MSG, Camden, Nashville, St. Louis, Denver | 2023: St. Paul 1, Chicago x2, Fort Worth x2, Austin 2 | 2024: Las Vegas 1, Seattle x2, Indy, MSG x2, Philly x2, Baltimore, Ohana 2 2025: Florida x2, Atlanta x2, Pittsburgh x2
  • hendrix78
    hendrix78 Posts: 507
    The Hall of Fame doesn't seem to give much love to prog rock bands. I could be wrong, but I don't think King Crimson is in there either. They defeintiely should be.
  • The RnRHOF sorta blows. Rush should be in, and so should the Meters.
  • PissBottleMan
    PissBottleMan Union City, TN Posts: 4,155
    cause they suck :-\

    Like them or not (and I side on the argument that they're overplayed on commercial radio)...they are an extremely influential band.

    Most drummers I talk with almost always cite Neil Peart as an influence.

    I've also been told that they have a lot of great albums. Personally, it doesn't click with me, but I can't deny their place in rock history.

    PBM
    "We paced ourselves and we didn't rush through it and we tried to be as creative as our collective minds would let us be over some course of time instead of just trying to rush through a record"

    Wishlist Foundation: http://wishlistfoundation.org
  • augustwest
    augustwest Posts: 739
    cause they suck :-\

    and of course we know that you are the true authority on things that suck...
  • pjoasisrule
    pjoasisrule Posts: 3,412
    They would be a disgrace to the rock and roll hall of fame. Absolutely dreadful band and those screeching woman vocals do not help at all.
    Alpine Valley 2000
    Summerfest 2006

    "Why would they come to our concert just to boo us?" -Lisa Simpson
  • PissBottleMan
    PissBottleMan Union City, TN Posts: 4,155
    those screeching woman vocals do not help at all.

    If that is the criteria, then there should be a recount on Patti Smith. ;)

    PBM
    "We paced ourselves and we didn't rush through it and we tried to be as creative as our collective minds would let us be over some course of time instead of just trying to rush through a record"

    Wishlist Foundation: http://wishlistfoundation.org
  • gabers
    gabers Posts: 2,787
    I think Rush should be a no brainer for the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. They've achieved both huge critical and commercial success. While I'll admit they're not for everyone, they've achieved much more than some who are already in. I'm going to use my fall back here:

    If Percy Sledge got in...
  • kenshunt
    kenshunt London, Ontario, Canada Posts: 2,863
    There Canadian and we always get dissed lol, no i really think there time will come.
    London 2005
    Toronto 2011 night 2
    Hamilton 2011
    London 2013
  • DiRtyFranK38
    DiRtyFranK38 Posts: 3,131
    Rush will definitely be in with time. though people don't like them because they are very different and "proggy" and geddy's voice isn't the best, there is no denying that this band reeeeks with talent. to produce concept albums with such texture, force, and odd lyrics from 3 men is amazing. they also put on a killer show.
    2006: Hartford
    2008: MSG 1, Hartford, Mansfield 2, Ed Solo NYC 1
    2009: London (O2), Philly 1, 2, 3, & 4
    2010: Hartford, Boston, MSG 1 & 2
    2011: Ed Solo Hartford
    2012: Philly (MIA Fest)
    2013: Worcester 2, Brooklyn 1 & 2, Hartford
  • tybird
    tybird Posts: 17,388
    hendrix78 wrote:
    The Hall of Fame doesn't seem to give much love to prog rock bands. I could be wrong, but I don't think King Crimson is in there either. They defeintiely should be.
    No King Crimson.........No Yes.....No Rush.....I don't believe that Genesis or even Peter Gabriel are in the hall........seriously, this is a joke. Part of the reason is the fat poof that runs Rolling Stone hates that type of music, and he pretty much runs the hall now that Ahmet has passed. He was his idea to pass over the Dave Clark Five to get a rap act in the hall.
    All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a thousand enemies, and whenever they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you, digger, listener, runner, prince with the swift warning. Be cunning and full of tricks and your people shall never be destroyed.
  • mr bungle
    mr bungle Posts: 1,425
    I'm pretty sure that AC/DC are not in yet either (correct me if i'm wrong) talk about horse shit... Rush definitely should be in.
  • PissBottleMan
    PissBottleMan Union City, TN Posts: 4,155
    mr bungle wrote:
    I'm pretty sure that AC/DC are not in yet either (correct me if i'm wrong) talk about horse shit... Rush definitely should be in.

    It appears that AC/DC were inducted in 2003.

    PBM
    "We paced ourselves and we didn't rush through it and we tried to be as creative as our collective minds would let us be over some course of time instead of just trying to rush through a record"

    Wishlist Foundation: http://wishlistfoundation.org
  • Them-Bones
    Them-Bones Posts: 518
    It took those idiots almost 20 years to induct Sabbath, but c'mon they inducted Grand Master Flash before Rush, what the fuck
    "If my thoughts, dreams, could be seen, they'd probably put my head, in a guillotine, but it's alright ma, it's life and life only."
  • Brisk.
    Brisk. Posts: 11,581
    I dont know you tell me
  • direwolf74
    direwolf74 Posts: 1,622
    I can't stand Rush, but I do agree that they deserve to be in the RRHOF. They were inducted into the Canadian Music Hall of Fame a few years back, so at least their own country gave them some props.
    "I try my best to chug, stomp, weep, whisper, moan, wheeze, scat, blurt, rage, whine, and seduce. With my voice I can sound like a girl, the boogieman, a Theremin, a cherry bomb, a clown, a doctor, a murderer. I can be tribal. Ironic. Or disturbed. My voice is really my instrument."

    -Tom Waits