Options

Titanic Sub

13

Comments

  • Options
    brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 40,766
    Poncier said:
    I hate that phrase "died doing what he loved".
    It's moronic.

    Yeah, same here.  I'd rather live doing what I love, and at some point not a single fucking clue that I just died. I mean seriously, how many mountain climbers who have fallen do their death yelled, "Yippee!  I'm doing what I love!" as they were plummeting down a mountain side?  In the extras to the incredibly amazing film "Meru", Jon Krakauer talks about how absolutely fucked up it is for a mountaineer to die while climbing.  He really nailed it. 
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • Options
    mickeyratmickeyrat up my ass, like Chadwick was up his Posts: 35,918

     
    Previous passengers recall ill-fated Titan: 'I 100% knew this was going to happen'
    By Holly Ramer, Ben Finley
    Today

    Talk to someone who rode on the Titan submersible, and they're likely to mention a technological glitch: the propulsion system failed or communications with people on the surface cut out. Maybe there were problems balancing weights on board.

    They are also likely to mention Stockton Rush, the OceanGate Expeditions CEO who died on the fatal trip this week. He has been described by past passengers as both a meticulous planner and an overconfident pioneer.

    In the wake of the Titan's fatal implosion near the Titanic shipwreck on Sunday, some people who embarked on the company's deep-sea expeditions described experiences that foreshadowed the tragedy and look back on their decision to dive as "a bit naive.”

    But others expressed confidence and said that they felt they were "in good hands" nearly 13,000 feet (3,962 meters) below the ocean's surface.

    ‘LIKE PLAYING RUSSIAN ROULETTE’

    “I 100% knew this was going to happen,” said Brian Weed, a camera operator for the Discovery Channel’s “Expedition Unknown” show, who has felt sick to his stomach since the sub's disappearance Sunday.

    Weed went on a Titan test dive in May 2021 in Washington state's Puget Sound as it prepared for its first expeditions to the sunken Titanic. Weed and his colleagues were preparing to join OceanGate Expeditions to film the famous shipwreck later that summer.

    They quickly encountered problems: The propulsion system stopped working. The computers failed to respond. Communications shut down.

    Rush, the OceanGate CEO, tried rebooting and troubleshooting the vessel on its touch screens.

    “You could tell that he was flustered and not really happy with the performance,” Weed said. “But he was trying to make light of it, trying to make excuses.”

    They were barely 100 feet (30 meters) deep in calm water, which begged the question: “How is this thing going to go to 12,500 feet — and do we want to be on board?" Weed said.

    Following the aborted trip, the production company hired a consultant with the U.S. Navy to vet the Titan.

    He provided a mostly favorable report, but warned that there wasn't enough research on the Titan's carbon-fiber hull, Weed said. There also was an engineering concern that the hull would not maintain its effectiveness over the course of multiple dives.

    Weed said Rush was a charismatic salesman who really believed in the submersible's technology — and was willing to put his life on the line for it.

    “It was looking more and more like we weren’t going to be the first guys down to film the Titanic — we were going to be maybe the 10th," Weed said of the possible Titan expedition. “I felt like every time (the vessel) goes down, it’s going to get weaker and weaker. And that’s a little bit like playing Russian roulette.”

    For work projects, Weed has swum with sharks, rappelled into remote caves and snowshoed through Siberia. But he and his colleagues pulled out of the dive to the Titanic.

    “I didn’t have a good feeling about it,” he said. “It was a really hard choice to make.”

    ‘I ALWAYS FELT I WAS IN GOOD HANDS’

    Mike Reiss, a writer for “The Simpsons” television show, said he had positive experiences on the dives he made with OceanGate, including to the Titanic wreck site.

    “When my wife first came to me with this (idea), I said to her, 'Well, this sounds like a fun way to get killed,'" Reiss said. "I knew (the risks) going in there. I always felt I was in good hands.”

    Reiss said he went on three trips with OceanGate in waters near New York City — and that the company took safety seriously.

    "Mostly it was just breathtaking how well it all went," Reiss said of his 2022 dive to the Titanic. “It’s a 10-hour trip. And I went from sea level to two and a half miles down, and then back to sea level. And at no time did the pressure change in my ears. I didn’t get the same feeling I get in the New York elevator. To me that’s a remarkable achievement.”

    Reiss said he was in a “different state of mind” on the expedition because he was so engaged.

    “You’re never hungry. You’re never thirsty. They have a bathroom on board. It has never been used," he said. "You just become a different kind of person. You even know you could die and it doesn’t bother you.”

    Reiss said he did notice some issues with the Titan, although he wasn’t sure everything was a glitch.

    For instance, the communications didn't always work, like a cellphone losing service. The Titan’s compass also started “acting frantically” when they got to the ocean floor near the sunken Titanic.

    “I don’t know if that’s an equipment failure or because magnetism is different two and a half miles down,” he said.

    ‘THE FATAL FLAW IS WHAT HE WILL BE REMEMBERED FOR’

    Arnie Weissmann, editor in chief of Travel Weekly, never rode in the Titan despite spending a week aboard its support ship in late May, waiting for the weather to clear. He briefly climbed into the submersible, but the dive was ultimately canceled.

    Wind, fog and waves were the stated reasons, but Weissmann wondered whether the submersible’s readiness was also a factor.

    Over cigars one night, Rush told Weissmann that he got the carbon fiber for the Titan’s hull at a big discount because it was past its shelf-life for use in airplanes, Weissmann said. But Rush reassured him it was safe.

    “I really felt there were two Stockton Rushes,” Weissman said. “There was the one who was a good team leader and efficient and getting the work done. And there was this cocky, self-assured, others be damned, ‘I’m going to do it my way’ sort of guy. And that’s the one I saw when we went out the back of the boat and had our cigars.”

    But he also was a strong leader, said Weissmann, who recalled Rush leading lengthy planning meetings and urging anyone who was interested to read a book called “The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right” that he left in the ship's lounge. If a repair was complex, Weissmann said Rush would tell those assigned to it to pause for five minutes after completing it to make sure it was done correctly.

    The Titan submersible was touted for its unconventional design. After its catastrophic underwater implosion that killed five people, the question remains, was the design destined for disaster? (June 23) (AP Video/Production: Rodrique Ngowi)

    Looking back, Weissmann believes Rush had a fatal flaw: overconfidence in his engineering skills and the perception that he was a pioneer in an area that others weren't because they were sticking to the rules.

    “But in the end, for sure, the fatal flaw is what he will be remembered for — even though he was a three-dimensional human being like everybody else,” Weissmann said.

    ‘I WAS A BIT NAIVE’

    Arthur Loibl, a retired businessman and adventurer from Germany, was among OceanGate's first customers to dive to the sunken ocean liner.

    “You have to be a little bit crazy to do this sort of thing,” he said.

    His submersible mates included Rush, French diver and Titanic expert Paul-Henri Nargeolet and two passengers from England.

    “Imagine a metal tube a few meters long with a sheet of metal for a floor. You can’t stand. You can’t kneel. Everyone is sitting close to or on top of each other,” Loibl said. “You can’t be claustrophobic.”

    During the 2.5-hour descent and ascent, the lights were turned off to conserve energy, he said, with the only illumination coming from a fluorescent glow stick.

    The dive was repeatedly delayed to fix a problem with the battery and the balancing weights. In total, the voyage took 10.5 hours.

    He described Rush as a tinkerer who tried to make do with what was available to carry out the dives, but in hindsight, he said, “it was a bit dubious.”

    “I was a bit naive, looking back now,” Loibl said.


    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • Options
    Gern BlanstenGern Blansten Your Mom's Posts: 17,989
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
  • Options
    tempo_n_groovetempo_n_groove Posts: 39,082
    The Coast Guard is going to investigate and see if regulations should be put in place for submersibles.
  • Options
    bootlegger10bootlegger10 Posts: 15,552
    The Coast Guard is going to investigate and see if regulations should be put in place for submersibles.
    Probably should but as long as only a danger to the people on board, stupid is as stupid does.  And no public funds should be spent saving anyone.
  • Options
    benjsbenjs Toronto, ON Posts: 8,941
    The Coast Guard is going to investigate and see if regulations should be put in place for submersibles.
    Probably should but as long as only a danger to the people on board, stupid is as stupid does.  And no public funds should be spent saving anyone.
    I agree about your last point. Outrageous that an unregulated toy for rich folks has to cost the public millions for a rescue mission.
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • Options
    tempo_n_groovetempo_n_groove Posts: 39,082
    The Coast Guard is going to investigate and see if regulations should be put in place for submersibles.
    Probably should but as long as only a danger to the people on board, stupid is as stupid does.  And no public funds should be spent saving anyone.
    benjs said:
    The Coast Guard is going to investigate and see if regulations should be put in place for submersibles.
    Probably should but as long as only a danger to the people on board, stupid is as stupid does.  And no public funds should be spent saving anyone.
    I agree about your last point. Outrageous that an unregulated toy for rich folks has to cost the public millions for a rescue mission.
    Bad take.  That is what they are there for, no matter what the situation is.
  • Options
    HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 35,853
    people of all backgrounds get rescued for doing stupid shit all the time. I agree with Tempo on that. 
    Flight Risk out NOW!

    www.headstonesband.com




  • Options
    Merkin BallerMerkin Baller Posts: 10,517
    people of all backgrounds get rescued for doing stupid shit all the time. I agree with Tempo on that. 
    Yeah, I'm with you guys. I certainly understand the attitude, these people put themselves in the position, etc, but like Tempo said... this is what they are there for. 

    I'm glad no one got hurt in the rescue efforts. 
  • Options
    tempo_n_groovetempo_n_groove Posts: 39,082
    Something the government has done in the past is send out a bill to people.  It's very rare but they have for people doing stupid shit.
  • Options
    gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 22,181
    people of all backgrounds get rescued for doing stupid shit all the time. I agree with Tempo on that. 
    yeah a year or two ago some kid was messing around on little round top at gettysburg and they fell down in between the rocks and had to be rescued. happens all the time. just not to the magnitude of rich folks taking a tube down to one of the most inhospitable places on the planet.
    There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self.- Hemingway

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • Options
    HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 35,853
    people of all backgrounds get rescued for doing stupid shit all the time. I agree with Tempo on that. 
    yeah a year or two ago some kid was messing around on little round top at gettysburg and they fell down in between the rocks and had to be rescued. happens all the time. just not to the magnitude of rich folks taking a tube down to one of the most inhospitable places on the planet.
    hikers and climbers get rescued off the side off cliffs all the time in super remote areas. I don't have issues with this. 
    Flight Risk out NOW!

    www.headstonesband.com




  • Options
    Gern BlanstenGern Blansten Your Mom's Posts: 17,989
    It's an odd situation but they about have to respond. It's great training if nothing else.

    I'm just glad that no one got killed during the response. That would be even more tragic.
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
  • Options
    gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 22,181
    It's an odd situation but they about have to respond. It's great training if nothing else.

    I'm just glad that no one got killed during the response. That would be even more tragic.
    this is why i called the billionaires selfish in my first post on this topic. i would have been livid if someone died searching for these people.
    There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self.- Hemingway

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • Options
    mace1229mace1229 Posts: 9,020
    benjs said:
    The Coast Guard is going to investigate and see if regulations should be put in place for submersibles.
    Probably should but as long as only a danger to the people on board, stupid is as stupid does.  And no public funds should be spent saving anyone.
    I agree about your last point. Outrageous that an unregulated toy for rich folks has to cost the public millions for a rescue mission.
    Most rescue missions are the result of something stupid. Shouldnt matter if they are rich or poor. How many people are rescued because they went rafting unprepared, or hiking, or any other of hundreds of activities that is relatively cheap. That’s what rescue services are there for.
    Now, should we fine people who are rescued and we’re just being dumb? Maybe.
  • Options
    mace1229mace1229 Posts: 9,020
    people of all backgrounds get rescued for doing stupid shit all the time. I agree with Tempo on that. 
    Exactly. Didn’t see the other responses before I responded. But exactly how I feel. I imagine it’s probably pretty rare someone needs rescued who was being smart and prepared.
  • Options
    Gern BlanstenGern Blansten Your Mom's Posts: 17,989
    Reminds me of the movie Everest....great movie if you haven't seen it.

    I read Krakauer's book prior to seeing it and it was pretty accurate.
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
  • Options
    OnWis97OnWis97 St. Paul, MN Posts: 4,829
    It does seem like there is additional piling on because the people in need of rescue are billionaires. We pay taxes for a lot of rescue services (fire, police, etc.) and if all goes well, we won't need to "cash in." So I am not going to lose any sleep about money being spent trying to rescue people.

    That said, this point matters, too...


    this is why i called the billionaires selfish in my first post on this topic. i would have been livid if someone died searching for these people.
    ...We also pay for the expertise of those in charge of the rescues, which includes weighing the risks to the rescuers themselves and I'm not sure whether extra pressure to save these "important people" existed, but I'm glad nobody else died in the effort.
    1995 Milwaukee     1998 Alpine, Alpine     2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston     2004 Boston, Boston     2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty)     2011 Alpine, Alpine     
    2013 Wrigley     2014 St. Paul     2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley     2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley     2021 Asbury Park     2022 St Louis     2023 Austin, Austin
  • Options
    benjsbenjs Toronto, ON Posts: 8,941
    mace1229 said:
    benjs said:
    The Coast Guard is going to investigate and see if regulations should be put in place for submersibles.
    Probably should but as long as only a danger to the people on board, stupid is as stupid does.  And no public funds should be spent saving anyone.
    I agree about your last point. Outrageous that an unregulated toy for rich folks has to cost the public millions for a rescue mission.
    Most rescue missions are the result of something stupid. Shouldnt matter if they are rich or poor. How many people are rescued because they went rafting unprepared, or hiking, or any other of hundreds of activities that is relatively cheap. That’s what rescue services are there for.
    Now, should we fine people who are rescued and we’re just being dumb? Maybe.
    Fair - it was in bad taste to bring up wealth, and you're right - my suggestion would've left innocent people dead for the sin of having faith in a company. Maybe a better suggestion would be that the manufacturer of the vehicle be the company that foots the bill. 
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • Options
    HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 35,853
    benjs said:
    mace1229 said:
    benjs said:
    The Coast Guard is going to investigate and see if regulations should be put in place for submersibles.
    Probably should but as long as only a danger to the people on board, stupid is as stupid does.  And no public funds should be spent saving anyone.
    I agree about your last point. Outrageous that an unregulated toy for rich folks has to cost the public millions for a rescue mission.
    Most rescue missions are the result of something stupid. Shouldnt matter if they are rich or poor. How many people are rescued because they went rafting unprepared, or hiking, or any other of hundreds of activities that is relatively cheap. That’s what rescue services are there for.
    Now, should we fine people who are rescued and we’re just being dumb? Maybe.
    Fair - it was in bad taste to bring up wealth, and you're right - my suggestion would've left innocent people dead for the sin of having faith in a company. Maybe a better suggestion would be that the manufacturer of the vehicle be the company that foots the bill. 
    I was just about to post that Ben, agree wholeheartedly with that one. 
    Flight Risk out NOW!

    www.headstonesband.com




  • Options
    Gern BlanstenGern Blansten Your Mom's Posts: 17,989
    I'm curious if more will come out about the CEO being desperate for cash or something. Kind of an "if this works all our problems are solved" situation.
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
  • Options
    mickeyratmickeyrat up my ass, like Chadwick was up his Posts: 35,918
    heard audio of the mother of the 19 yr old. what was initially reported was false. that came from an aunt who hadnt been in contact for some time.  the wife/mother was supposed to go but the son was excited. sooo now she mourns both.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • Options
    gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 22,181
    OnWis97 said:
    It does seem like there is additional piling on because the people in need of rescue are billionaires. We pay taxes for a lot of rescue services (fire, police, etc.) and if all goes well, we won't need to "cash in." So I am not going to lose any sleep about money being spent trying to rescue people.

    That said, this point matters, too...


    this is why i called the billionaires selfish in my first post on this topic. i would have been livid if someone died searching for these people.
    ...We also pay for the expertise of those in charge of the rescues, which includes weighing the risks to the rescuers themselves and I'm not sure whether extra pressure to save these "important people" existed, but I'm glad nobody else died in the effort.
    10 bucks said you paid a higher tax rate than said billionaires though.
    There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self.- Hemingway

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • Options
    mace1229mace1229 Posts: 9,020
    It's an odd situation but they about have to respond. It's great training if nothing else.

    I'm just glad that no one got killed during the response. That would be even more tragic.
    this is why i called the billionaires selfish in my first post on this topic. i would have been livid if someone died searching for these people.
    Was there much of a risk of anyone dying? No one was using other subs to dive down and look for them. It was all by plane or boat. And some remote unmanned robotic subs. I doubt any of the rescuers were in any real danger, if a plane suffered a mechanical failure and crashed looking for them it was going to the next time it was out anyway.
    Ive thought for a very long time we should fine people for their stupidity though. Time and resources are wasted by so many stupid people taking unnecessary risks. Billionaires, or their heirs in this case, can cover the cost of a rescue attempt.
  • Options
    mickeyratmickeyrat up my ass, like Chadwick was up his Posts: 35,918
    edited June 2023
    unmanned rov at the ocean floor. And I would imagine the early part of the search included Sono buoys dropped it varying depths

    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • Options
    mickeyratmickeyrat up my ass, like Chadwick was up his Posts: 35,918
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • Options
    mace1229mace1229 Posts: 9,020
    mickeyrat said:
    unmanned rov at the ocean floor. And I would imagine the early part of the search included Sono buoys dropped it varying depths

    Yeah, I remember one of the coast guard briefings they said they were dropping sonar buoys every few miles and had detected nothing the first few days. Then thats where the strange, possibly banging, noises were detected day 3 or 4. One reason they believe it imploded when they lost contact was because no implosion sound was detected on those buoys later. Although that’s kind of assumed anyway I think.
  • Options
    gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 22,181
    mace1229 said:
    It's an odd situation but they about have to respond. It's great training if nothing else.

    I'm just glad that no one got killed during the response. That would be even more tragic.
    this is why i called the billionaires selfish in my first post on this topic. i would have been livid if someone died searching for these people.
    Was there much of a risk of anyone dying? No one was using other subs to dive down and look for them. It was all by plane or boat. And some remote unmanned robotic subs. I doubt any of the rescuers were in any real danger, if a plane suffered a mechanical failure and crashed looking for them it was going to the next time it was out anyway.
    Ive thought for a very long time we should fine people for their stupidity though. Time and resources are wasted by so many stupid people taking unnecessary risks. Billionaires, or their heirs in this case, can cover the cost of a rescue attempt.
    at the time this was going on i did not know about the risk of anybody else dying. i was saying that if someone did die i would be livid. i did not know if there were going to be people out there on boats with a manned sub going underwater looking for them.

    i think my concerns were valid. especially knowing now that they knew those people died soon after submerging and losing contact and they still spent 4 days out there looking for them.
    There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self.- Hemingway

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • Options
    mace1229mace1229 Posts: 9,020
    mace1229 said:
    It's an odd situation but they about have to respond. It's great training if nothing else.

    I'm just glad that no one got killed during the response. That would be even more tragic.
    this is why i called the billionaires selfish in my first post on this topic. i would have been livid if someone died searching for these people.
    Was there much of a risk of anyone dying? No one was using other subs to dive down and look for them. It was all by plane or boat. And some remote unmanned robotic subs. I doubt any of the rescuers were in any real danger, if a plane suffered a mechanical failure and crashed looking for them it was going to the next time it was out anyway.
    Ive thought for a very long time we should fine people for their stupidity though. Time and resources are wasted by so many stupid people taking unnecessary risks. Billionaires, or their heirs in this case, can cover the cost of a rescue attempt.
    at the time this was going on i did not know about the risk of anybody else dying. i was saying that if someone did die i would be livid. i did not know if there were going to be people out there on boats with a manned sub going underwater looking for them.

    i think my concerns were valid. especially knowing now that they knew those people died soon after submerging and losing contact and they still spent 4 days out there looking for them.
    I agree. But I was pretty certain from the beginning these people had no chance of survival and they wouldn’t risk further loss of life.
    The chances of them losing communications but floating safely at the surface seemed very small. And the chances of them being intact at the bottom seemed even less likely since it was designed to float if something did go wrong. And even if they were alive at the bottom, they’d have about 2-3 days to attempt a rescue. Every time the media asked the coast guard if that was even possible in that time frame he wouldn’t answer. Probably couldn’t even get the equipment there in time, let alone complete any rescue attempt.

    The one really dumb thing about this design too was it could only be opened from the outside. So if it did surface and drift off course, they would still run out of air and die if not rescued in the 96 hours.
  • Options
    Gern BlanstenGern Blansten Your Mom's Posts: 17,989
    mace1229 said:
    mace1229 said:
    It's an odd situation but they about have to respond. It's great training if nothing else.

    I'm just glad that no one got killed during the response. That would be even more tragic.
    this is why i called the billionaires selfish in my first post on this topic. i would have been livid if someone died searching for these people.
    Was there much of a risk of anyone dying? No one was using other subs to dive down and look for them. It was all by plane or boat. And some remote unmanned robotic subs. I doubt any of the rescuers were in any real danger, if a plane suffered a mechanical failure and crashed looking for them it was going to the next time it was out anyway.
    Ive thought for a very long time we should fine people for their stupidity though. Time and resources are wasted by so many stupid people taking unnecessary risks. Billionaires, or their heirs in this case, can cover the cost of a rescue attempt.
    at the time this was going on i did not know about the risk of anybody else dying. i was saying that if someone did die i would be livid. i did not know if there were going to be people out there on boats with a manned sub going underwater looking for them.

    i think my concerns were valid. especially knowing now that they knew those people died soon after submerging and losing contact and they still spent 4 days out there looking for them.
    I agree. But I was pretty certain from the beginning these people had no chance of survival and they wouldn’t risk further loss of life.
    The chances of them losing communications but floating safely at the surface seemed very small. And the chances of them being intact at the bottom seemed even less likely since it was designed to float if something did go wrong. And even if they were alive at the bottom, they’d have about 2-3 days to attempt a rescue. Every time the media asked the coast guard if that was even possible in that time frame he wouldn’t answer. Probably couldn’t even get the equipment there in time, let alone complete any rescue attempt.

    The one really dumb thing about this design too was it could only be opened from the outside. So if it did surface and drift off course, they would still run out of air and die if not rescued in the 96 hours.
    Everything about it was just stupid...totally fucked up operation. I still can't believe people paid for that shit.
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Sign In or Register to comment.