Marjorie Taylor Greene

Halifax2TheMax

Maggie Three Names is at it again. I mean, what else is she going to come up with? Secession, impeaching Brandon for visiting Ukraine on, wait for it, President's Day and now this? She cray-cray, yo! Time to very slow walk any federal dollars to her district. Maybe even skip allocation all together. Maybe close those military bases in her district and state. Last I checked, Georgia is not a border state. Sorry, we've misplaced your social security payment and medicaid reimbursement due to a computer glitch affecting your district for some reason. But your congressional representative is working on it, giver her a call for a status update. Goodbye.

MTG Proposes Banning Blue State Americans From Voting for 5 Years After Moving to a Red State

Fresh off her widely-panned tweet calling for a “national divorce,” Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) is proposing a temporary voting ban on Democrats who move to red states.

Monday, Greene sparked fury by calling for a national divorce, citing irreconcilable differences between states.

Tuesday, she appeared on The Charlie Kirk Show to elaborate on her idea and explain how she would keep red and blue states separated. A clip from their conversation began to circulate on Twitter via Jason Campbell.

“A national divorce is not a civil war. It’s actually separating by red states and blue states and making state rights and state power a lot stronger than it is right now,” Greene said.

“It would be shrinking the federal government, for example, we can take education. Well, if we have a national divorce, there’s no need for the Department of Education. Red states and Blue States would be in control of the education in each state,” she explained. Greene also tweeted out her proposal in a lengthy thread.

Greene suggested that for red states, parents would be in charge of the education curriculum, and “LGBTQ Woke Teachers” would be fired.

She also clarified that she was not arguing for separate nations, but rather the Department of Defense would protect national borders “so that each state could exist how it chooses to exist.”

Kirk pushed back, saying, “I don’t think the left would ever stop. I don’t think they’ll ever stop trying to invade our states or our county. So how do we stop them?”

“Well, I think that, you know, red states could choose, how they allow people to vote in their states,” Greene said.

“What I think would be something that some red states could propose is, well, okay, if Democrat voters choose to flee these blue states where they cannot tolerate the living conditions, they don’t want their children taught these horrible things and they really change their mind on the types of policies that they support,” Greene raged.

“Well, once they move to a red state, guess what? Maybe you don’t get to vote for five years,” Greene concluded, suggesting to disenfranchise her fellow Americans over their political views.

“You can live there, you can work there, but you don’t get to bring your values that you basically created in the blue states you came from by voting for Democrat leaders and Democrat policies,” she said.

Greene previously offered a similar proposal in December 2021, writing on Twitter, “Brainwashed people that move from CA and NY really need a cooling off period.”

Watch above via The Charlie Kirk Show.

The post MTG Proposes Banning Blue State Americans From Voting for 5 Years After Moving to a Red State first appeared on Mediaite.

MTG Proposes Banning Blue State Americans From Voting for 5 Years After Moving to a Red State (msn.com)

mrussel1

Wow, she's a deep thinker. 

Gern Blansten

Same old shit from the GOP whenever they retake power

1. seceding from the union
2. national sales tax ("fair" tax)

The Juggler

What an unimaginable idiot. 

Go Beavers

I lost 7 IQ points reading that. 

OnWis97

Why not? It's not like she'll suffer any consequences from it. Only good can come to her. She'll continue to be re-elected, find her way onto the GQP presidential ticket, be the next Senator from Georgia, or make a boatload of money on one of their wacky "news" networks.

The Juggler

OnWis97 said:

Why not? It's not like she'll suffer any consequences from it. Only good can come to her. She'll continue to be re-elected, find her way onto the GQP presidential ticket, be the next Senator from Georgia, or make a boatload of money on one of their wacky "news" networks.

I don't think so...she's not winning any national or statewide elections. My calculator could win re election in her district if it had an R next to it.

Dems would be thrilled to see her on the ticket. Running against dopes like her is how they kept the senate and almost the house last year.

Wobbie

she said Biden going to Ukraine is why “Americans hate Joe Biden”.

no, marge, we hate you.

static111

Halifax2TheMax said:

Maggie Three Names is at it again. I mean, what else is she going to come up with? Secession, impeaching Brandon for visiting Ukraine on, wait for it, President's Day and now this? She cray-cray, yo! Time to very slow walk any federal dollars to her district. Maybe even skip allocation all together. Maybe close those military bases in her district and state. Last I checked, Georgia is not a border state. Sorry, we've misplaced your social security payment and medicaid reimbursement due to a computer glitch affecting your district for some reason. But your congressional representative is working on it, giver her a call for a status update. Goodbye.

MTG Proposes Banning Blue State Americans From Voting for 5 Years After Moving to a Red State

Fresh off her widely-panned tweet calling for a “national divorce,” Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) is proposing a temporary voting ban on Democrats who move to red states.

Monday, Greene sparked fury by calling for a national divorce, citing irreconcilable differences between states.

Tuesday, she appeared on The Charlie Kirk Show to elaborate on her idea and explain how she would keep red and blue states separated. A clip from their conversation began to circulate on Twitter via Jason Campbell.

“A national divorce is not a civil war. It’s actually separating by red states and blue states and making state rights and state power a lot stronger than it is right now,” Greene said.

“It would be shrinking the federal government, for example, we can take education. Well, if we have a national divorce, there’s no need for the Department of Education. Red states and Blue States would be in control of the education in each state,” she explained. Greene also tweeted out her proposal in a lengthy thread.

Greene suggested that for red states, parents would be in charge of the education curriculum, and “LGBTQ Woke Teachers” would be fired.

She also clarified that she was not arguing for separate nations, but rather the Department of Defense would protect national borders “so that each state could exist how it chooses to exist.”

Kirk pushed back, saying, “I don’t think the left would ever stop. I don’t think they’ll ever stop trying to invade our states or our county. So how do we stop them?”

“Well, I think that, you know, red states could choose, how they allow people to vote in their states,” Greene said.

“What I think would be something that some red states could propose is, well, okay, if Democrat voters choose to flee these blue states where they cannot tolerate the living conditions, they don’t want their children taught these horrible things and they really change their mind on the types of policies that they support,” Greene raged.

“Well, once they move to a red state, guess what? Maybe you don’t get to vote for five years,” Greene concluded, suggesting to disenfranchise her fellow Americans over their political views.

“You can live there, you can work there, but you don’t get to bring your values that you basically created in the blue states you came from by voting for Democrat leaders and Democrat policies,” she said.

Greene previously offered a similar proposal in December 2021, writing on Twitter, “Brainwashed people that move from CA and NY really need a cooling off period.”

Watch above via The Charlie Kirk Show.

The post MTG Proposes Banning Blue State Americans From Voting for 5 Years After Moving to a Red State first appeared on Mediaite.

MTG Proposes Banning Blue State Americans From Voting for 5 Years After Moving to a Red State (msn.com)

So taxation without representation is the new Republican platform?  Should go over well.

Gern Blansten

https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/marjorie-taylor-greene-national-divorce-proposal-utah-governor-response-evil

GOP Governor of Utah weighs in....we need more of this

Poncier

The Juggler said:

What an unimaginable idiot. 

She has to be one of the stupidest people to ever hold national office.

mickeyrat

Poncier said:

The Juggler said:

What an unimaginable idiot. 

She has to be one of the stupidest people to ever hold national office.

President and Vice-president are national offices.

you cant call a representative of one portion of one state a national office

mrussel1

mickeyrat said:

Poncier said:

The Juggler said:

What an unimaginable idiot. 

She has to be one of the stupidest people to ever hold national office.

President and Vice-president are national offices.

you cant call a representative of one portion of one state a national office

Pretty sure he means federal office. 

Poncier

mickeyrat said:

Poncier said:

The Juggler said:

What an unimaginable idiot. 

She has to be one of the stupidest people to ever hold national office.

President and Vice-president are national offices.

you cant call a representative of one portion of one state a national office

mrussel1 said:

mickeyrat said:

Poncier said:

The Juggler said:

What an unimaginable idiot. 

She has to be one of the stupidest people to ever hold national office.

President and Vice-president are national offices.

you cant call a representative of one portion of one state a national office

Pretty sure he means federal office. 

Exactly. Don't get hung up on semantics Mick, you know what I meant. Federal office. Something above local and state level cause I'm sure some real nincompoops have been elected dog catcher in some places.
This woman has a seat in Congress, and she's a combination of batshit crazy and mind numbingly stupid. The type of stupid that can't be grown in a peach tree dish in the Gazpacho police's secret Jewish space laser lab.

mickeyrat

Poncier said:

mickeyrat said:

Poncier said:

The Juggler said:

What an unimaginable idiot. 

She has to be one of the stupidest people to ever hold national office.

President and Vice-president are national offices.

you cant call a representative of one portion of one state a national office

mrussel1 said:

mickeyrat said:

Poncier said:

The Juggler said:

What an unimaginable idiot. 

She has to be one of the stupidest people to ever hold national office.

President and Vice-president are national offices.

you cant call a representative of one portion of one state a national office

Pretty sure he means federal office. 

Exactly. Don't get hung up on semantics Mick, you know what I meant. Federal office. Something above local and state level cause I'm sure some real nincompoops have been elected dog catcher in some places.
This woman has a seat in Congress, and she's a combination of batshit crazy and mind numbingly stupid. The type of stupid that can't be grown in a peach tree dish in the Gazpacho police's secret Jewish space laser lab.

its a character flaw. in high school a nickname was technical bastard. some things you cant outgrow....

true story

gimmesometruth27

she represents one single district and she is telling a hundred million of us how we should live. how about she do what the gop has been telling us to do for years? to leave. she can gtfo of the country.

benjs

Hear me out for a second - but are we sure she's not on meth?

Poncier

mickeyrat said:

Poncier said:

mickeyrat said:

Poncier said:

The Juggler said:

What an unimaginable idiot. 

She has to be one of the stupidest people to ever hold national office.

President and Vice-president are national offices.

you cant call a representative of one portion of one state a national office

mrussel1 said:

mickeyrat said:

Poncier said:

The Juggler said:

What an unimaginable idiot. 

She has to be one of the stupidest people to ever hold national office.

President and Vice-president are national offices.

you cant call a representative of one portion of one state a national office

Pretty sure he means federal office. 

Exactly. Don't get hung up on semantics Mick, you know what I meant. Federal office. Something above local and state level cause I'm sure some real nincompoops have been elected dog catcher in some places.
This woman has a seat in Congress, and she's a combination of batshit crazy and mind numbingly stupid. The type of stupid that can't be grown in a peach tree dish in the Gazpacho police's secret Jewish space laser lab.

its a character flaw. in high school a nickname was technical bastard. some things you cant outgrow....

true story

Ha. That's funny as i was referred to as "Technical Tim" back in the day. So I get it.

The Juggler

Technically, looks like we got a couple of nerds amongst us, folks. 

mickeyrat

The Juggler said:

Technically, looks like we got a couple of nerds amongst us, folks. 

no, I was just an asshole......