#46 President Joe Biden

1151152154156157355

Comments

  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 48,888
    edited March 2022
    When done crying over losing the 2020 election, perhaps they can catch up on some reading material


    www.myspace.com
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 41,978
    When done crying over losing the 2020 election, perhaps they can catch up on some reading material



    Haha!  Love it!  Post of the month!
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 48,888

    www.myspace.com
  • JB16057JB16057 Posts: 1,269

    FLASHBACK: 16% of Biden voters would have voted differently if Hunter Biden laptop story was not suppressed by media, big tech

    A poll previously put out by the Media Research Center showed that fully 16 percent of voters who were unaware of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal would have switched their minds and not voted for Joe Biden for president, had they known about it at the time.



  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 48,888
    JB16057 said:

    FLASHBACK: 16% of Biden voters would have voted differently if Hunter Biden laptop story was not suppressed by media, big tech

    A poll previously put out by the Media Research Center showed that fully 16 percent of voters who were unaware of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal would have switched their minds and not voted for Joe Biden for president, had they known about it at the time.



    GUYS-----be careful clicking this link. As soon as I did (big mistake), I had numerous spammy pop ups infecting my computer. 




    How long do you think it will be before these people's eyes have fully flushed the tears away from that 2020 loss? 


    www.myspace.com
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,659
    JB16057 said:

    FLASHBACK: 16% of Biden voters would have voted differently if Hunter Biden laptop story was not suppressed by media, big tech

    A poll previously put out by the Media Research Center showed that fully 16 percent of voters who were unaware of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal would have switched their minds and not voted for Joe Biden for president, had they known about it at the time.



    Media Research Group?  These guys https://www.mrc.org/  Seriously?  You are quoting polling from them.  Let me know who conducted the poll, the cross tabs and the questions, then we can debate the merits of it.  If we quoted an online poll from Daily Kos, how much credibility would you give it?

    This thread is a fucking joke. 
  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 38,969
    Beat me to it but it’s nice to know the poster’s sources and where they’re spending time.

    The CMI promoted its mission through editorials and research reports. Among its viewpoints include opposition to the Fairness Doctrine[3] and same-sex marriage.[4] In March 2007, the CMI published a "National Cultural Values Survey" and concluded from its results that most Americans perceived a decline in moral values.[5] One study released by the organization in June 2007 claimed that television viewing time correlated directly with one's liberal attitude, even possibly degrading to moral attitudes.[6]

    The nonprofit MRC has received financial support primarily from Robert Mercer,[7] but with several other conservative-leaning sources, including the BradleyScaifeOlinCastle RockCarthage and JM foundations, as well as ExxonMobil.[8][9][10] It has been described as "one of the most active and best-funded, and yet least known" arms of the modern conservative movement in the United States.[11] The organization rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, and criticizes media coverage that reflects the scientific consensus.[9][12]

    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • JB16057JB16057 Posts: 1,269
    mrussel1 said:
    JB16057 said:

    FLASHBACK: 16% of Biden voters would have voted differently if Hunter Biden laptop story was not suppressed by media, big tech

    A poll previously put out by the Media Research Center showed that fully 16 percent of voters who were unaware of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal would have switched their minds and not voted for Joe Biden for president, had they known about it at the time.



    Media Research Group?  These guys https://www.mrc.org/  Seriously?  You are quoting polling from them.  Let me know who conducted the poll, the cross tabs and the questions, then we can debate the merits of it.  If we quoted an online poll from Daily Kos, how much credibility would you give it?

    This thread is a fucking joke. 
    Hahaha.... I bet it's all Russian disinformation, right?

    I'd give it as much credibility as I do this message board. How many people here believed the laptop was Russian disinformation? There were plenty that fell for that big lie.

    Come to think of it, maybe it was a blessing in disguise. Trump got ousted just in time for shit to really hit the fan and now Biden is taking the brunt hit of it all. Don't worry, I'm sure he'll do better since he has 2 years left..... right?
  • JB16057JB16057 Posts: 1,269
    Beat me to it but it’s nice to know the poster’s sources and where they’re spending time.

    The CMI promoted its mission through editorials and research reports. Among its viewpoints include opposition to the Fairness Doctrine[3] and same-sex marriage.[4] In March 2007, the CMI published a "National Cultural Values Survey" and concluded from its results that most Americans perceived a decline in moral values.[5] One study released by the organization in June 2007 claimed that television viewing time correlated directly with one's liberal attitude, even possibly degrading to moral attitudes.[6]

    The nonprofit MRC has received financial support primarily from Robert Mercer,[7] but with several other conservative-leaning sources, including the BradleyScaifeOlinCastle RockCarthage and JM foundations, as well as ExxonMobil.[8][9][10] It has been described as "one of the most active and best-funded, and yet least known" arms of the modern conservative movement in the United States.[11] The organization rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, and criticizes media coverage that reflects the scientific consensus.[9][12]

    You and I are wasting our time on this message board. If that doesn't explain a lot, I don't know what would.

  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,659
    JB16057 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    JB16057 said:

    FLASHBACK: 16% of Biden voters would have voted differently if Hunter Biden laptop story was not suppressed by media, big tech

    A poll previously put out by the Media Research Center showed that fully 16 percent of voters who were unaware of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal would have switched their minds and not voted for Joe Biden for president, had they known about it at the time.



    Media Research Group?  These guys https://www.mrc.org/  Seriously?  You are quoting polling from them.  Let me know who conducted the poll, the cross tabs and the questions, then we can debate the merits of it.  If we quoted an online poll from Daily Kos, how much credibility would you give it?

    This thread is a fucking joke. 
    Hahaha.... I bet it's all Russian disinformation, right?

    I'd give it as much credibility as I do this message board. How many people here believed the laptop was Russian disinformation? There were plenty that fell for that big lie.

    Come to think of it, maybe it was a blessing in disguise. Trump got ousted just in time for shit to really hit the fan and now Biden is taking the brunt hit of it all. Don't worry, I'm sure he'll do better since he has 2 years left..... right?
    No, Christ.  Polling is a science.  Online polls are not science and jabrone groups doing their own polls isn't scientific either.  It's not disinformation, it's propaganda.  And that's fine.  You can read that shit if you want, but it only makes you less effective in in your debates. 
  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 48,888
    edited March 2022
    And for those unfamiliar with Robert Mercer (perhaps the person who posted the link), his millions pumped into the Trump campaign got him to the finish line in 2016. Not quite an unbiased source. But, yeah, tell us again how the mainstream media is fake news. Good grief.


    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/27/the-reclusive-hedge-fund-tycoon-behind-the-trump-presidency


    Post edited by The Juggler on
    www.myspace.com
  • JB16057JB16057 Posts: 1,269
    And for those unfamiliar with Robert Mercer (perhaps the person who posted the link), his millions pumped into the Trump campaign got him to the finish line in 2016. Not quite an unbiased source. But, yeah, tell us again how the mainstream media is fake news. Good grief.


    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/27/the-reclusive-hedge-fund-tycoon-behind-the-trump-presidency


    But but but Trump!!
     
  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 38,969
    JB16057 said:
    Beat me to it but it’s nice to know the poster’s sources and where they’re spending time.

    The CMI promoted its mission through editorials and research reports. Among its viewpoints include opposition to the Fairness Doctrine[3] and same-sex marriage.[4] In March 2007, the CMI published a "National Cultural Values Survey" and concluded from its results that most Americans perceived a decline in moral values.[5] One study released by the organization in June 2007 claimed that television viewing time correlated directly with one's liberal attitude, even possibly degrading to moral attitudes.[6]

    The nonprofit MRC has received financial support primarily from Robert Mercer,[7] but with several other conservative-leaning sources, including the BradleyScaifeOlinCastle RockCarthage and JM foundations, as well as ExxonMobil.[8][9][10] It has been described as "one of the most active and best-funded, and yet least known" arms of the modern conservative movement in the United States.[11] The organization rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, and criticizes media coverage that reflects the scientific consensus.[9][12]

    You and I are wasting our time on this message board. If that doesn't explain a lot, I don't know what would.

    Funny that you still haven’t answered any pertinent questions. Again, what was a lie in President Biden’s statement that you posted? What are the “gigs and gigs” of proof? If the media hadn’t reported on Hunter Biden’s laptop, why do I consistently find WaPo, CNN, NYT, USA Today articles with datelines of September/October 2020?
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • JB16057JB16057 Posts: 1,269
    JB16057 said:
    Beat me to it but it’s nice to know the poster’s sources and where they’re spending time.

    The CMI promoted its mission through editorials and research reports. Among its viewpoints include opposition to the Fairness Doctrine[3] and same-sex marriage.[4] In March 2007, the CMI published a "National Cultural Values Survey" and concluded from its results that most Americans perceived a decline in moral values.[5] One study released by the organization in June 2007 claimed that television viewing time correlated directly with one's liberal attitude, even possibly degrading to moral attitudes.[6]

    The nonprofit MRC has received financial support primarily from Robert Mercer,[7] but with several other conservative-leaning sources, including the BradleyScaifeOlinCastle RockCarthage and JM foundations, as well as ExxonMobil.[8][9][10] It has been described as "one of the most active and best-funded, and yet least known" arms of the modern conservative movement in the United States.[11] The organization rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, and criticizes media coverage that reflects the scientific consensus.[9][12]

    You and I are wasting our time on this message board. If that doesn't explain a lot, I don't know what would.

    Funny that you still haven’t answered any pertinent questions. Again, what was a lie in President Biden’s statement that you posted? What are the “gigs and gigs” of proof? If the media hadn’t reported on Hunter Biden’s laptop, why do I consistently find WaPo, CNN, NYT, USA Today articles with datelines of September/October 2020?
    I'll tell you when you prove to me there is a P tape.
  • JB16057JB16057 Posts: 1,269

    I think it is funny that this message board only agrees with polls that fit their political spectrum much like most of you believe the laptop was Russian disinformation.
  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 48,888
    JB16057 said:
    And for those unfamiliar with Robert Mercer (perhaps the person who posted the link), his millions pumped into the Trump campaign got him to the finish line in 2016. Not quite an unbiased source. But, yeah, tell us again how the mainstream media is fake news. Good grief.


    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/27/the-reclusive-hedge-fund-tycoon-behind-the-trump-presidency


    But but but Trump!!
     
    You are the one who posted that link. I think you're confused again. 
    www.myspace.com
  • JB16057JB16057 Posts: 1,269
    JB16057 said:
    And for those unfamiliar with Robert Mercer (perhaps the person who posted the link), his millions pumped into the Trump campaign got him to the finish line in 2016. Not quite an unbiased source. But, yeah, tell us again how the mainstream media is fake news. Good grief.


    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/27/the-reclusive-hedge-fund-tycoon-behind-the-trump-presidency


    But but but Trump!!
     
    You are the one who posted that link. I think you're confused again. 

    But but but Trump!!!!
  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 48,888
    JB16057 said:
    JB16057 said:
    And for those unfamiliar with Robert Mercer (perhaps the person who posted the link), his millions pumped into the Trump campaign got him to the finish line in 2016. Not quite an unbiased source. But, yeah, tell us again how the mainstream media is fake news. Good grief.


    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/27/the-reclusive-hedge-fund-tycoon-behind-the-trump-presidency


    But but but Trump!!
     
    You are the one who posted that link. I think you're confused again. 

    But but but Trump!!!!
    Okay. I honestly don't think you even know what I am talking about, nor do you care. 
    www.myspace.com
  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 38,969
    JB16057 said:
    JB16057 said:
    Beat me to it but it’s nice to know the poster’s sources and where they’re spending time.

    The CMI promoted its mission through editorials and research reports. Among its viewpoints include opposition to the Fairness Doctrine[3] and same-sex marriage.[4] In March 2007, the CMI published a "National Cultural Values Survey" and concluded from its results that most Americans perceived a decline in moral values.[5] One study released by the organization in June 2007 claimed that television viewing time correlated directly with one's liberal attitude, even possibly degrading to moral attitudes.[6]

    The nonprofit MRC has received financial support primarily from Robert Mercer,[7] but with several other conservative-leaning sources, including the BradleyScaifeOlinCastle RockCarthage and JM foundations, as well as ExxonMobil.[8][9][10] It has been described as "one of the most active and best-funded, and yet least known" arms of the modern conservative movement in the United States.[11] The organization rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, and criticizes media coverage that reflects the scientific consensus.[9][12]

    You and I are wasting our time on this message board. If that doesn't explain a lot, I don't know what would.

    Funny that you still haven’t answered any pertinent questions. Again, what was a lie in President Biden’s statement that you posted? What are the “gigs and gigs” of proof? If the media hadn’t reported on Hunter Biden’s laptop, why do I consistently find WaPo, CNN, NYT, USA Today articles with datelines of September/October 2020?
    I'll tell you when you prove to me there is a P tape.
    Read the Team Mueller report, specifically the footnotes.

    #THEPTAPEISREAL

    I’m going to have that printed on a t-shirt and wear it on tour. What do you think, in red, white and blue? Maybe with a byline, “My Tape Bleeds Yellow.”
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,659
    JB16057 said:

    I think it is funny that this message board only agrees with polls that fit their political spectrum much like most of you believe the laptop was Russian disinformation.
    Rasmussen is a legitimate, but leans right poll.  It oversamples the R population and its 2020 tracking poll was well off regarding the general election.  Regardless, it's not a POS like the one you quoted, but even in this poll 52% thought the media was 'hiding' it or whatever.  With 1000 people surveyed, I guarantee you the MOE is 3-4%.  So knowing it's weighed heavily AND the result is in the MOE, what are you really drawing from posting this link?  What's your point?
  • JB16057JB16057 Posts: 1,269
    JB16057 said:
    JB16057 said:
    And for those unfamiliar with Robert Mercer (perhaps the person who posted the link), his millions pumped into the Trump campaign got him to the finish line in 2016. Not quite an unbiased source. But, yeah, tell us again how the mainstream media is fake news. Good grief.


    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/27/the-reclusive-hedge-fund-tycoon-behind-the-trump-presidency


    But but but Trump!!
     
    You are the one who posted that link. I think you're confused again. 

    But but but Trump!!!!
    Okay. I honestly don't think you even know what I am talking about, nor do you care. 
    You don't like a taste of your own medicine? That's too bad! But but but.....

  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 48,888
    JB16057 said:
    JB16057 said:
    JB16057 said:
    And for those unfamiliar with Robert Mercer (perhaps the person who posted the link), his millions pumped into the Trump campaign got him to the finish line in 2016. Not quite an unbiased source. But, yeah, tell us again how the mainstream media is fake news. Good grief.


    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/27/the-reclusive-hedge-fund-tycoon-behind-the-trump-presidency


    But but but Trump!!
     
    You are the one who posted that link. I think you're confused again. 

    But but but Trump!!!!
    Okay. I honestly don't think you even know what I am talking about, nor do you care. 
    You don't like a taste of your own medicine? That's too bad! But but but.....

    My gosh. Are you okay? You posted a link for us to click on that mentioned a poll ran by MRC, who happens to be owned by one of Trump's biggest donors. So you brought him into this conversation... unknowingly, apparently.
    www.myspace.com
  • JB16057JB16057 Posts: 1,269
    mrussel1 said:
    JB16057 said:

    I think it is funny that this message board only agrees with polls that fit their political spectrum much like most of you believe the laptop was Russian disinformation.
    Rasmussen is a legitimate, but leans right poll.  It oversamples the R population and its 2020 tracking poll was well off regarding the general election.  Regardless, it's not a POS like the one you quoted, but even in this poll 52% thought the media was 'hiding' it or whatever.  With 1000 people surveyed, I guarantee you the MOE is 3-4%.  So knowing it's weighed heavily AND the result is in the MOE, what are you really drawing from posting this link?  What's your point?
    Hiding it or whatever?

    Like I said, PLEASE, double down on this! It's only going to hurt Biden with more and more people not thinking this is a big deal.

    My point is that Americans are waking up and it's too bad many didn't realize that Hunter's laptop was legit until only last week. You don't like the polling I link to? I don't care. Find me a poll that is in favor of Joe Biden! Oh wait, you can't......


  • tbergstbergs Posts: 9,793
    Whataboutism and twisted logic. A Trump supporter is arguing about facts, truth and justice....haha!
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • JB16057JB16057 Posts: 1,269
    JB16057 said:
    JB16057 said:
    JB16057 said:
    And for those unfamiliar with Robert Mercer (perhaps the person who posted the link), his millions pumped into the Trump campaign got him to the finish line in 2016. Not quite an unbiased source. But, yeah, tell us again how the mainstream media is fake news. Good grief.


    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/27/the-reclusive-hedge-fund-tycoon-behind-the-trump-presidency


    But but but Trump!!
     
    You are the one who posted that link. I think you're confused again. 

    But but but Trump!!!!
    Okay. I honestly don't think you even know what I am talking about, nor do you care. 
    You don't like a taste of your own medicine? That's too bad! But but but.....

    My gosh. Are you okay? You posted a link for us to click on that mentioned a poll ran by MRC, who happens to be owned by one of Trump's biggest donors. So you brought him into this conversation... unknowingly, apparently.
    Ok. Then move on.....

  • tbergstbergs Posts: 9,793
    JB16057 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    JB16057 said:

    I think it is funny that this message board only agrees with polls that fit their political spectrum much like most of you believe the laptop was Russian disinformation.
    Rasmussen is a legitimate, but leans right poll.  It oversamples the R population and its 2020 tracking poll was well off regarding the general election.  Regardless, it's not a POS like the one you quoted, but even in this poll 52% thought the media was 'hiding' it or whatever.  With 1000 people surveyed, I guarantee you the MOE is 3-4%.  So knowing it's weighed heavily AND the result is in the MOE, what are you really drawing from posting this link?  What's your point?
    Hiding it or whatever?

    Like I said, PLEASE, double down on this! It's only going to hurt Biden with more and more people not thinking this is a big deal.

    My point is that Americans are waking up and it's too bad many didn't realize that Hunter's laptop was legit until only last week. You don't like the polling I link to? I don't care. Find me a poll that is in favor of Joe Biden! Oh wait, you can't......


    Why does this hurt Biden? Who will switch votes because of this? Do you really believe Hunter's laptop is the tipping point for someone voting Trump or Biden in 2020? If so, you actually believe anyone not on life support in a vegetative state would now vote Trump over Biden because of, wait for it, concerns about Biden lying? Wowee.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 38,969
    JB16057 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    JB16057 said:

    I think it is funny that this message board only agrees with polls that fit their political spectrum much like most of you believe the laptop was Russian disinformation.
    Rasmussen is a legitimate, but leans right poll.  It oversamples the R population and its 2020 tracking poll was well off regarding the general election.  Regardless, it's not a POS like the one you quoted, but even in this poll 52% thought the media was 'hiding' it or whatever.  With 1000 people surveyed, I guarantee you the MOE is 3-4%.  So knowing it's weighed heavily AND the result is in the MOE, what are you really drawing from posting this link?  What's your point?
    Hiding it or whatever?

    Like I said, PLEASE, double down on this! It's only going to hurt Biden with more and more people not thinking this is a big deal.

    My point is that Americans are waking up and it's too bad many didn't realize that Hunter's laptop was legit until only last week. You don't like the polling I link to? I don't care. Find me a poll that is in favor of Joe Biden! Oh wait, you can't......


    Ummm, no. They’re getting dumber by the minute and are still asleep. Shhhhhhhh.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,659
    edited March 2022
    JB16057 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    JB16057 said:

    I think it is funny that this message board only agrees with polls that fit their political spectrum much like most of you believe the laptop was Russian disinformation.
    Rasmussen is a legitimate, but leans right poll.  It oversamples the R population and its 2020 tracking poll was well off regarding the general election.  Regardless, it's not a POS like the one you quoted, but even in this poll 52% thought the media was 'hiding' it or whatever.  With 1000 people surveyed, I guarantee you the MOE is 3-4%.  So knowing it's weighed heavily AND the result is in the MOE, what are you really drawing from posting this link?  What's your point?
    Hiding it or whatever?

    Like I said, PLEASE, double down on this! It's only going to hurt Biden with more and more people not thinking this is a big deal.

    My point is that Americans are waking up and it's too bad many didn't realize that Hunter's laptop was legit until only last week. You don't like the polling I link to? I don't care. Find me a poll that is in favor of Joe Biden! Oh wait, you can't......


    Hiding it or whatever = whatever the phraseology that was used.  

    Dude.. no swing voter fucking cares about Hunter Biden.  No one.  If you are just a normal person that isn't on Team D or Team R every single vote, you don't give a shit about this.  It doesn't affect your life.  You're living in a bubble if you think this somehow moves the needle in 2024.  It's ridiculous.  It's just more right wing red meat. 

    What evidence do you have that "Americans are waking up" to Hunter Biden.  Please post something.  If you think Joe's approval ratings are linked to Hunter Biden in the least, then you are completely demented. 
  • JB16057JB16057 Posts: 1,269
    mrussel1 said:
    JB16057 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    JB16057 said:

    I think it is funny that this message board only agrees with polls that fit their political spectrum much like most of you believe the laptop was Russian disinformation.
    Rasmussen is a legitimate, but leans right poll.  It oversamples the R population and its 2020 tracking poll was well off regarding the general election.  Regardless, it's not a POS like the one you quoted, but even in this poll 52% thought the media was 'hiding' it or whatever.  With 1000 people surveyed, I guarantee you the MOE is 3-4%.  So knowing it's weighed heavily AND the result is in the MOE, what are you really drawing from posting this link?  What's your point?
    Hiding it or whatever?

    Like I said, PLEASE, double down on this! It's only going to hurt Biden with more and more people not thinking this is a big deal.

    My point is that Americans are waking up and it's too bad many didn't realize that Hunter's laptop was legit until only last week. You don't like the polling I link to? I don't care. Find me a poll that is in favor of Joe Biden! Oh wait, you can't......


    Hiding it or whatever = whatever the phraseology that was used.  

    Dude.. no swing voter fucking cares about Hunter Biden.  No one.  If you are just a normal person that isn't on Team D or Team R every single vote, you don't give a shit about this.  It doesn't affect your life.  You're living in a bubble if you think this somehow moves the needle in 2024.  It's ridiculous.  It's just more right wing red meat. 

    What evidence do you have that "Americans are waking up" to Hunter Biden.  Please post something.  If you think Joe's approval ratings are linked to Hunter Biden in the least, then you are completely demented. 
    I guess we'll find out.....

  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 48,888
    If the Republicans want to run on the 2020 election for the 2020 midterms, by all means, please do so. Will give the dems a fighting chance. lol
    www.myspace.com
Sign In or Register to comment.