well, my teammate tested positive last night and is quarantined for 14 days. i may have to cover her accounts the next 2 weeks. she is making an end of year push to hit her quota, so this is really bad timing for her. fortunately for me i have not been around her for about 3 weeks, so i am safe for now. knocks wood...
my manager, who is a covid downplayer/denier/bigtime trumper that thought this was going away on nov 4, called this morning and said that his son and daughter in law are both positive. they picked it up from the gym last week.
well, my teammate tested positive last night and is quarantined for 14 days. i may have to cover her accounts the next 2 weeks. she is making an end of year push to hit her quota, so this is really bad timing for her. fortunately for me i have not been around her for about 3 weeks, so i am safe for now. knocks wood...
my manager, who is a covid downplayer/denier/bigtime trumper that thought this was going away on nov 4, called this morning and said that his son and daughter in law are both positive. they picked it up from the gym last week.
A panel of scientific advisers yesterday released its initial guidelines for who should receive the first coronavirus vaccines — recommendations that will influence states’ policies across the country.
The obvious question on many people’s minds is: When can I expect to be vaccinated? While there is still a lot of uncertainty, it’s possible to lay out a rough expected timeline. I’ve done so below, with help from public health experts and colleagues who are covering the virus.
December: Health care workers and nursing home residents will likely be the first people to receive the vaccine, as the panel recommended.
Up to 40 million doses could be available to Americans before the end of this year, from a combination of Pfizer’s and Moderna’s vaccines. That would be enough to vaccinate the three million people who live in long-term-care facilities, as well as most of the country’s 21 million health care workers.
January: Keep in mind that both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines require a second dose a few weeks later to be effective. So an initial batch of 40 million doses would be enough to vaccinate only 20 million people.
By early next year, Pfizer and Moderna are likely to be able to ship about 70 million doses per month, Moncef Slaoui, a top federal vaccine official, told The Washington Post yesterday. People will likely receive the shots at doctor’s offices, hospitals and pharmacies, as well as at specially created clinics in some places, my colleague Katie Thomas says.
February and March: The next priority groups are likely to be people over the age of 65 (and especially those over 75); people with medical conditions that put them at risk of death if infected; and essential workers, like those in education, food, transportation and law enforcement.
One exception to this second wave of vaccine recipients may be people who have already had the virus, making them immune from it for at least some period of time.
If other companies in addition to Pfizer and Moderna receive approval for their vaccines, the total number shipped each month could reach 150 million by March, Slaoui said.
April, May and June: The most likely scenario is that even people who don’t qualify as a priority — like healthy, nonessential workers younger than 65 — will begin receiving the vaccine by the spring. The vast majority of Americans could be vaccinated by early summer.
Once that happens, life will still not immediately return to normal, partly because the vaccines are not 100 percent effective. “There will still be risks to people,” as Caitlin Rivers, a Johns Hopkins epidemiologist, told me.
But those risks will be small compared with today’s risks. Treatments continue to improve, reducing the death rate for people who get the virus. And widespread vaccination will sharply reduce the spread, helping protect even people for whom a vaccine is ineffective. Rivers predicted that social gatherings will again be common and largely safe by the summer.
All things considered, the spring isn’t that far away, which is yet another reason for people to make extra efforts to avoid unnecessary risks — like eating inside restaurants and gathering indoors with friends — for the next few months.
What questions do you still have about the vaccines? Tell us here, and we’ll answer some of them in an upcoming newsletter.
A panel of scientific advisers yesterday released its initial guidelines for who should receive the first coronavirus vaccines — recommendations that will influence states’ policies across the country.
The obvious question on many people’s minds is: When can I expect to be vaccinated? While there is still a lot of uncertainty, it’s possible to lay out a rough expected timeline. I’ve done so below, with help from public health experts and colleagues who are covering the virus.
December: Health care workers and nursing home residents will likely be the first people to receive the vaccine, as the panel recommended.
Up to 40 million doses could be available to Americans before the end of this year, from a combination of Pfizer’s and Moderna’s vaccines. That would be enough to vaccinate the three million people who live in long-term-care facilities, as well as most of the country’s 21 million health care workers.
January: Keep in mind that both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines require a second dose a few weeks later to be effective. So an initial batch of 40 million doses would be enough to vaccinate only 20 million people.
By early next year, Pfizer and Moderna are likely to be able to ship about 70 million doses per month, Moncef Slaoui, a top federal vaccine official, told The Washington Post yesterday. People will likely receive the shots at doctor’s offices, hospitals and pharmacies, as well as at specially created clinics in some places, my colleague Katie Thomas says.
February and March: The next priority groups are likely to be people over the age of 65 (and especially those over 75); people with medical conditions that put them at risk of death if infected; and essential workers, like those in education, food, transportation and law enforcement.
One exception to this second wave of vaccine recipients may be people who have already had the virus, making them immune from it for at least some period of time.
If other companies in addition to Pfizer and Moderna receive approval for their vaccines, the total number shipped each month could reach 150 million by March, Slaoui said.
April, May and June: The most likely scenario is that even people who don’t qualify as a priority — like healthy, nonessential workers younger than 65 — will begin receiving the vaccine by the spring. The vast majority of Americans could be vaccinated by early summer.
Once that happens, life will still not immediately return to normal, partly because the vaccines are not 100 percent effective. “There will still be risks to people,” as Caitlin Rivers, a Johns Hopkins epidemiologist, told me.
But those risks will be small compared with today’s risks. Treatments continue to improve, reducing the death rate for people who get the virus. And widespread vaccination will sharply reduce the spread, helping protect even people for whom a vaccine is ineffective. Rivers predicted that social gatherings will again be common and largely safe by the summer.
All things considered, the spring isn’t that far away, which is yet another reason for people to make extra efforts to avoid unnecessary risks — like eating inside restaurants and gathering indoors with friends — for the next few months.
What questions do you still have about the vaccines? Tell us here, and we’ll answer some of them in an upcoming newsletter.
From the NYT email blast
To heck with this -- makes far too much sense -- I MUST travel for both Christmas and NYE, and I MUST interact with lots of people in the meantime. This whole thing is a fucking sham anyway. We know it was in place just to get rid of God's Chosen One, Donald J. Trump.
I have not seen some family members in almost a year -- we couldn't possibly wait any longer. Where is our freedom?
Oh yeah - also, it is too cold to go to church services outside. I MUST go and participate -- don't you understand that religion comes before everything else? The good book tells us!
How many extra people have to die because of bullshit like the list of nonsense above?
I don't get a vote, but I would follow a different path than this proposal.
Curious what path you would go?
The recommendations seem pretty common sense to me.
It's what I expected and it's certainly not a bad path.
I would protect health care workers (especially nursing homes) 1st just as they are. I would not just protect people based on age and pre-existing conditions though. Some of those people have a great ability to stay isolated. I would be protecting those that have to go out and about 1st.
I get how it might look heartless to say that granny should wait a few more months to see family...but there are people that really do need to work...teachers, employees at specific manufacturing jobs (more than just food), kids that go to school....etc. I know they are at less risk of a severe outcome, but they are the ones that can cause the spread. Granny at home or in the nursing home isn't causing the spread...and can be protected in a different manner.
Heck - my mom has a condition that puts her at great risk. So does my brother. I think my brother who is in his 40's and has to go to dialysis 3 days a week should get it before my mom does who is retired and while mentally taxing, can stay at home. And I think people that work and kids that go to school should get it.
This path doesn't surprise me, and it's reasonable. But clearly they focused almost solely on the potential outcome if someone gets it and less on who is more likely to get it and spread it (other than healthcare workers).
I don't get a vote, but I would follow a different path than this proposal.
Curious what path you would go?
The recommendations seem pretty common sense to me.
It's what I expected and it's certainly not a bad path.
I would protect health care workers (especially nursing homes) 1st just as they are. I would not just protect people based on age and pre-existing conditions though. Some of those people have a great ability to stay isolated. I would be protecting those that have to go out and about 1st.
I get how it might look heartless to say that granny should wait a few more months to see family...but there are people that really do need to work...teachers, employees at specific manufacturing jobs (more than just food), kids that go to school....etc. I know they are at less risk of a severe outcome, but they are the ones that can cause the spread. Granny at home or in the nursing home isn't causing the spread...and can be protected in a different manner.
Heck - my mom has a condition that puts her at great risk. So does my brother. I think my brother who is in his 40's and has to go to dialysis 3 days a week should get it before my mom does who is retired and while mentally taxing, can stay at home. And I think people that work and kids that go to school should get it.
This path doesn't surprise me, and it's reasonable. But clearly they focused almost solely on the potential outcome if someone gets it and less on who is more likely to get it and spread it (other than healthcare workers).
Interesting, and I get it. I think you have to look at it logistically too. They only have so many doses and infrastructure in place to give out vaccines. So as they ramp up I don't think they could give the vaccine to the much larger populations you suggest that early. Gonna have to iron out all the distribution kinks on the earlier smaller groups of people.
I don't get a vote, but I would follow a different path than this proposal.
Curious what path you would go?
The recommendations seem pretty common sense to me.
It's what I expected and it's certainly not a bad path.
I would protect health care workers (especially nursing homes) 1st just as they are. I would not just protect people based on age and pre-existing conditions though. Some of those people have a great ability to stay isolated. I would be protecting those that have to go out and about 1st.
I get how it might look heartless to say that granny should wait a few more months to see family...but there are people that really do need to work...teachers, employees at specific manufacturing jobs (more than just food), kids that go to school....etc. I know they are at less risk of a severe outcome, but they are the ones that can cause the spread. Granny at home or in the nursing home isn't causing the spread...and can be protected in a different manner.
Heck - my mom has a condition that puts her at great risk. So does my brother. I think my brother who is in his 40's and has to go to dialysis 3 days a week should get it before my mom does who is retired and while mentally taxing, can stay at home. And I think people that work and kids that go to school should get it.
This path doesn't surprise me, and it's reasonable. But clearly they focused almost solely on the potential outcome if someone gets it and less on who is more likely to get it and spread it (other than healthcare workers).
Interesting, and I get it. I think you have to look at it logistically too. They only have so many doses and infrastructure in place to give out vaccines. So as they ramp up I don't think they could give the vaccine to the much larger populations you suggest that early. Gonna have to iron out all the distribution kinks on the earlier smaller groups of people.
That is true, distribution could be something to fine tune as you say. Could be a very valid reason for the plan. I would like to see the risk assessment they used to determine their path forward as it always should include severity but also probability and other factors as well.
So you need two shots with mModerna needing a two week gap between the shots and Pfizer needing a 1 week gap wait. On top of that it takes 28 days for both for it to become effective so there is essentially over a month to a month and a half wait after your first shot so become immune.
Still 650 deaths today and a 19 year old no underlying conditions. Ive just seen our vaccine roll out plan and basically i will be last to get it in a years time
brixton 93
astoria 06
albany 06
hartford 06
reading 06
barcelona 06
paris 06
wembley 07
dusseldorf 07
nijmegen 07
this song is meant to be called i got shit,itshould be called i got shit tickets-hartford 06 -
Our local school district just announce despite a peak in cases, we will be returning to in person in January. At the same time they removed all covid data from their website, the data they used to determine if they remained open or not and they data that said to finally close 2 weeks ago. Seems a little shady to make this announcement and at the exact same time remove all data they have using to make decisions. You can still find the data on the county website, but they've been bragging about transparency since July since this was about the only district that did open, and focused on a few key points rather than a sea of numbers.
This is from Colorado but is close to a lot of what the other states will be using.
Phase 3 is expected to start in April.
Also Cuomo just said that 170K shots will be delivered by Dec 15th for New York.
So children under age 18 don't get the vaccine? Hopefully that's just in Colorado.
Children are close to a year away from being vaccinated I believe in Europe and NA. Very little testing has been done so far with the U18 group. This brings up the question then if we are in need of proof of vaccination to travel or enjoy "normal" things where does that leave us adults that have children that want to do these things as well?
grades 7-12 are going full remote after xmas break for 2 weeks.
K-6 have the option. the teacher's union is flipping out.
on one hand, I know they are doing this because they know people are going to get together over the holidays. but at the same time, they're kind of giving people a pass to do so. rock and a hard place, i guess.
I hope BC gets more stay at home options. Currently we'd have to go down several stages before the K-6 get online options. We haven't dropped any stages since September.
Comments
I'm sorry to hear that. Very sad. Stay well!
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/belgiums-shops-were-shut-as-a-coronavirus-shock-tactic-2x9wklf7v
Prague Krakow Berlin 2018. Berlin 2022
EV, Taormina 1+2 2017.
I wish i was the souvenir you kept your house key on..
Prague Krakow Berlin 2018. Berlin 2022
EV, Taormina 1+2 2017.
I wish i was the souvenir you kept your house key on..
astoria 06
albany 06
hartford 06
reading 06
barcelona 06
paris 06
wembley 07
dusseldorf 07
nijmegen 07
this song is meant to be called i got shit,itshould be called i got shit tickets-hartford 06 -
Yes, everyone, stay safe!
Its a sad age to live in.
astoria 06
albany 06
hartford 06
reading 06
barcelona 06
paris 06
wembley 07
dusseldorf 07
nijmegen 07
this song is meant to be called i got shit,itshould be called i got shit tickets-hartford 06 -
https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/02/politics/what-matters-december-1/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
The recommendations seem pretty common sense to me.
I would protect health care workers (especially nursing homes) 1st just as they are. I would not just protect people based on age and pre-existing conditions though. Some of those people have a great ability to stay isolated. I would be protecting those that have to go out and about 1st.
I get how it might look heartless to say that granny should wait a few more months to see family...but there are people that really do need to work...teachers, employees at specific manufacturing jobs (more than just food), kids that go to school....etc. I know they are at less risk of a severe outcome, but they are the ones that can cause the spread. Granny at home or in the nursing home isn't causing the spread...and can be protected in a different manner.
Heck - my mom has a condition that puts her at great risk. So does my brother. I think my brother who is in his 40's and has to go to dialysis 3 days a week should get it before my mom does who is retired and while mentally taxing, can stay at home. And I think people that work and kids that go to school should get it.
This path doesn't surprise me, and it's reasonable. But clearly they focused almost solely on the potential outcome if someone gets it and less on who is more likely to get it and spread it (other than healthcare workers).
This is from Colorado but is close to a lot of what the other states will be using.
Phase 3 is expected to start in April.
Also Cuomo just said that 170K shots will be delivered by Dec 15th for New York.
Hopefully that's just in Colorado.
Ive just seen our vaccine roll out plan and basically i will be last to get it in a years time
astoria 06
albany 06
hartford 06
reading 06
barcelona 06
paris 06
wembley 07
dusseldorf 07
nijmegen 07
this song is meant to be called i got shit,itshould be called i got shit tickets-hartford 06 -
You can still find the data on the county website, but they've been bragging about transparency since July since this was about the only district that did open, and focused on a few key points rather than a sea of numbers.
astoria 06
albany 06
hartford 06
reading 06
barcelona 06
paris 06
wembley 07
dusseldorf 07
nijmegen 07
this song is meant to be called i got shit,itshould be called i got shit tickets-hartford 06 -
So... to lighten things up...
... here in Okanagan's interior we're spiking in style... 420.
K-6 have the option. the teacher's union is flipping out.
on one hand, I know they are doing this because they know people are going to get together over the holidays. but at the same time, they're kind of giving people a pass to do so. rock and a hard place, i guess.
www.headstonesband.com