The Democratic Presidential Debates
Comments
-
mrussel1 said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:mrussel1 said:mcgruff10 said:mrussel1 said:Just checked in and looking at the gorgeous capital of our mixed economy, here in the Financial District. Granted it's not as pretty as Stalingrad, as I don't see any trains to Siberia filled with dissidents, but one can hope one day we'll achieve the Marxist dream that is so successful.
I wanted to take in a Rangers game, as im a huge hockey fan.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Spiritual_Chaos said:mrussel1 said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:mrussel1 said:mcgruff10 said:mrussel1 said:Just checked in and looking at the gorgeous capital of our mixed economy, here in the Financial District. Granted it's not as pretty as Stalingrad, as I don't see any trains to Siberia filled with dissidents, but one can hope one day we'll achieve the Marxist dream that is so successful.
I wanted to take in a Rangers game, as im a huge hockey fan.0 -
F Me In The Brain said:Lerxst1992 said:F Me In The Brain said:ecdanc said:F Me In The Brain said:mrussel1 said:what dreams said:@mrussel1 check out the 586 polling site and do a search for VA 2020. They have VA going to Trump by a few points no matter who he's up against.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/
Looks to me like they did....
It was as low as 64% the week of the election and the national average must be considered with their state averages to get a clearer understanding.
538 had the 3 tipping point states at 1% in 2016.Yes my runaway wording was wrong, I see that.Looking at their final 2016 forecast, though, only supports my question as to why I would care about their polling.With all items considered they stated that there was only a 10.5% chance that Clinton would win the popular vote but lose the electoral college.Polling and these sorts of things proved to be unreliable last go-around and I do not put any faith in them this time.
This is a very unfair portrayal of 538. If we look at their state analysis, which is how we pick presidents, the huge warning signs were there.
Further if we recall the facts and circumstances on the day these odds were set... it was the day after Comey cleared clinton of the supposed new evidence on Weiners computer.
IIRC Nate Silver explained at the time there wasn't enough time to poll this "exoneration " and they had alot of guesswork the final few days accounting for Comey's last minute exoneration.
#trumpisminvadesAMT
0 -
hedonist said:Spiritual_Chaos said:My predictions -- and I HAVE BEEN SO DAMN CORRECT LATELY IN THIS THREAD.
Elisabeth Warren will keep stealing the spotlight in the SC debate. Biden will in his live-or-die position perform really good. He will be on fire. Both taking support from Bernie.
Biden will overperform in SC. Bernie will underperform. And it will be the start of Bernie falling and Warren rising up again, and Biden taking back his no 1 spot in polls.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
This is patheticCooper: Do you know how all -- how much though? I mean, do you have a price tag for -- for all of this?Sanders: We do. I mean, you know, and -- and-- the price tag is -- it will be substantially less than letting the current system go. I think it's about $30 trillion.Cooper: That's just for "Medicare for All," you're talking about?Sanders: That's just "Medicare for All," yes.Cooper: Do you have -- a price tag for all of these things?Sanders: No, I don't. We try to -- no, you mentioned making public colleges and universities tuition free and canceling all student debt, that's correct. That's what I want to do. We pay for that through a modest tax on Wall Street speculation.Cooper: But you say you don't know what the total price is, but you know how it's gonna be paid for. How do you know it's gonna be paid for if you don't know how much the price is?Sanders: Well, I can't -- you know, I can't rattle off to you every nickel and every dime. But we have accounted for -- you -- you talked about "Medicare for All." We have options out there that will pay for it.
www.myspace.com0 -
mcgruff10 said:mrussel1 said:Just checked in and looking at the gorgeous capital of our mixed economy, here in the Financial District. Granted it's not as pretty as Stalingrad, as I don't see any trains to Siberia filled with dissidents, but one can hope one day we'll achieve the Marxist dream that is so successful.
0 -
Lerxst1992 said:F Me In The Brain said:Lerxst1992 said:F Me In The Brain said:ecdanc said:F Me In The Brain said:mrussel1 said:what dreams said:@mrussel1 check out the 586 polling site and do a search for VA 2020. They have VA going to Trump by a few points no matter who he's up against.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/
Looks to me like they did....
It was as low as 64% the week of the election and the national average must be considered with their state averages to get a clearer understanding.
538 had the 3 tipping point states at 1% in 2016.Yes my runaway wording was wrong, I see that.Looking at their final 2016 forecast, though, only supports my question as to why I would care about their polling.With all items considered they stated that there was only a 10.5% chance that Clinton would win the popular vote but lose the electoral college.Polling and these sorts of things proved to be unreliable last go-around and I do not put any faith in them this time.
This is a very unfair portrayal of 538. If we look at their state analysis, which is how we pick presidents, the huge warning signs were there.
Further if we recall the facts and circumstances on the day these odds were set... it was the day after Comey cleared clinton of the supposed new evidence on Weiners computer.
IIRC Nate Silver explained at the time there wasn't enough time to poll this "exoneration " and they had alot of guesswork the final few days accounting for Comey's last minute exoneration.
#trumpisminvadesAMTwww.myspace.com0 -
The Juggler said:This is patheticCooper: Do you know how all -- how much though? I mean, do you have a price tag for -- for all of this?Sanders: We do. I mean, you know, and -- and-- the price tag is -- it will be substantially less than letting the current system go. I think it's about $30 trillion.Cooper: That's just for "Medicare for All," you're talking about?Sanders: That's just "Medicare for All," yes.Cooper: Do you have -- a price tag for all of these things?Sanders: No, I don't. We try to -- no, you mentioned making public colleges and universities tuition free and canceling all student debt, that's correct. That's what I want to do. We pay for that through a modest tax on Wall Street speculation.Cooper: But you say you don't know what the total price is, but you know how it's gonna be paid for. How do you know it's gonna be paid for if you don't know how much the price is?Sanders: Well, I can't -- you know, I can't rattle off to you every nickel and every dime. But we have accounted for -- you -- you talked about "Medicare for All." We have options out there that will pay for it.
2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
ecdanc said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:mrussel1 said:mcgruff10 said:mrussel1 said:Just checked in and looking at the gorgeous capital of our mixed economy, here in the Financial District. Granted it's not as pretty as Stalingrad, as I don't see any trains to Siberia filled with dissidents, but one can hope one day we'll achieve the Marxist dream that is so successful.
0 -
Lerxst1992 said:F Me In The Brain said:Lerxst1992 said:F Me In The Brain said:ecdanc said:F Me In The Brain said:mrussel1 said:what dreams said:@mrussel1 check out the 586 polling site and do a search for VA 2020. They have VA going to Trump by a few points no matter who he's up against.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/
Looks to me like they did....
It was as low as 64% the week of the election and the national average must be considered with their state averages to get a clearer understanding.
538 had the 3 tipping point states at 1% in 2016.Yes my runaway wording was wrong, I see that.Looking at their final 2016 forecast, though, only supports my question as to why I would care about their polling.With all items considered they stated that there was only a 10.5% chance that Clinton would win the popular vote but lose the electoral college.Polling and these sorts of things proved to be unreliable last go-around and I do not put any faith in them this time.
This is a very unfair portrayal of 538. If we look at their state analysis, which is how we pick presidents, the huge warning signs were there.
Further if we recall the facts and circumstances on the day these odds were set... it was the day after Comey cleared clinton of the supposed new evidence on Weiners computer.
IIRC Nate Silver explained at the time there wasn't enough time to poll this "exoneration " and they had alot of guesswork the final few days accounting for Comey's last minute exoneration.
#trumpisminvadesAMTNot sure what the hashtag there is meant to imply, but trying to convince me to trust 538 or any other polling in what they show us now is a lost cause. I am glad that they are things that you like - and that there are others who get something from them.None of it matters with regard to the debates, the nominee, or the general election. I will vote for whomever opposes the large, orange, man in the Oval Office currently.The love he receives is the love that is saved0 -
The Juggler said:This is patheticCooper: Do you know how all -- how much though? I mean, do you have a price tag for -- for all of this?Sanders: We do. I mean, you know, and -- and-- the price tag is -- it will be substantially less than letting the current system go. I think it's about $30 trillion.Cooper: That's just for "Medicare for All," you're talking about?Sanders: That's just "Medicare for All," yes.Cooper: Do you have -- a price tag for all of these things?Sanders: No, I don't. We try to -- no, you mentioned making public colleges and universities tuition free and canceling all student debt, that's correct. That's what I want to do. We pay for that through a modest tax on Wall Street speculation.Cooper: But you say you don't know what the total price is, but you know how it's gonna be paid for. How do you know it's gonna be paid for if you don't know how much the price is?Sanders: Well, I can't -- you know, I can't rattle off to you every nickel and every dime. But we have accounted for -- you -- you talked about "Medicare for All." We have options out there that will pay for it.
And why does he start trying to have a balanced duscussion about Fidel Castro in an interview DURING A PRIMARY?!
What
the
hell
At least he’s not throwing support behind Bloomberg in the interview.Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
The Juggler said:This is patheticCooper: Do you know how all -- how much though? I mean, do you have a price tag for -- for all of this?Sanders: We do. I mean, you know, and -- and-- the price tag is -- it will be substantially less than letting the current system go. I think it's about $30 trillion.Cooper: That's just for "Medicare for All," you're talking about?Sanders: That's just "Medicare for All," yes.Cooper: Do you have -- a price tag for all of these things?Sanders: No, I don't. We try to -- no, you mentioned making public colleges and universities tuition free and canceling all student debt, that's correct. That's what I want to do. We pay for that through a modest tax on Wall Street speculation.Cooper: But you say you don't know what the total price is, but you know how it's gonna be paid for. How do you know it's gonna be paid for if you don't know how much the price is?Sanders: Well, I can't -- you know, I can't rattle off to you every nickel and every dime. But we have accounted for -- you -- you talked about "Medicare for All." We have options out there that will pay for it.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0
-
eddiec said:ecdanc said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:mrussel1 said:mcgruff10 said:mrussel1 said:Just checked in and looking at the gorgeous capital of our mixed economy, here in the Financial District. Granted it's not as pretty as Stalingrad, as I don't see any trains to Siberia filled with dissidents, but one can hope one day we'll achieve the Marxist dream that is so successful.
I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
mcgruff10 said:eddiec said:ecdanc said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:mcgruff10 said:ecdanc said:mrussel1 said:mcgruff10 said:mrussel1 said:Just checked in and looking at the gorgeous capital of our mixed economy, here in the Financial District. Granted it's not as pretty as Stalingrad, as I don't see any trains to Siberia filled with dissidents, but one can hope one day we'll achieve the Marxist dream that is so successful.0
-
mcgruff10 said:The Juggler said:This is patheticCooper: Do you know how all -- how much though? I mean, do you have a price tag for -- for all of this?Sanders: We do. I mean, you know, and -- and-- the price tag is -- it will be substantially less than letting the current system go. I think it's about $30 trillion.Cooper: That's just for "Medicare for All," you're talking about?Sanders: That's just "Medicare for All," yes.Cooper: Do you have -- a price tag for all of these things?Sanders: No, I don't. We try to -- no, you mentioned making public colleges and universities tuition free and canceling all student debt, that's correct. That's what I want to do. We pay for that through a modest tax on Wall Street speculation.Cooper: But you say you don't know what the total price is, but you know how it's gonna be paid for. How do you know it's gonna be paid for if you don't know how much the price is?Sanders: Well, I can't -- you know, I can't rattle off to you every nickel and every dime. But we have accounted for -- you -- you talked about "Medicare for All." We have options out there that will pay for it.0
-
Does anyone know who we write to if we think one of the moderators is racist?0
-
ecdanc said:Does anyone know who we write to if we think one of the moderators is racist?
2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
Ledbetterman10 said:ecdanc said:Does anyone know who we write to if we think one of the moderators is racist?0
-
eddiec said:mcgruff10 said:mrussel1 said:Just checked in and looking at the gorgeous capital of our mixed economy, here in the Financial District. Granted it's not as pretty as Stalingrad, as I don't see any trains to Siberia filled with dissidents, but one can hope one day we'll achieve the Marxist dream that is so successful.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help