Team Mueller (and Their Report)

1…910121415…33

Comments

  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    CM189191 said:
    dignin said:
    CM189191 said:
    Kat said:
    dignin said:
    Kat said:
    I expect a whitewash in the on-going cover-up and hope I'm proved wrong. 
    Have a great week, everyone.

    There is little doubt.
    It'll be the Barr report of the Mueller report. I still think I'm in Bizarro World. 


    Did he say that? I thought he said he was working with Mueller. I doubt he's just letting Mueller do the redactions by himself, if so why not just release the initial Mueller overviews? All seems pretty redundant.
    I was under the impression the various Mueller overviews were geared towards specific audiences.  

    Congress needs to be aware of this, the Treasury should look here, the FBI should investigate that, and so on...

    Barr referred to the report as self redacting.  As in the report (ie Mueller) have specific instructions as to what needs to be redacted, and they were assisting in that process.


    Okay, I see. But I'm going to remain skeptical given some of the actions of Barr (spying reference, the 4 page summary, his history, the 18 page job application) and the leaked murmurs of discontent coming from members from Mueller's team.
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    dignin said:
    CM189191 said:
    dignin said:
    CM189191 said:
    Kat said:
    dignin said:
    Kat said:
    I expect a whitewash in the on-going cover-up and hope I'm proved wrong. 
    Have a great week, everyone.

    There is little doubt.
    It'll be the Barr report of the Mueller report. I still think I'm in Bizarro World. 


    Did he say that? I thought he said he was working with Mueller. I doubt he's just letting Mueller do the redactions by himself, if so why not just release the initial Mueller overviews? All seems pretty redundant.
    I was under the impression the various Mueller overviews were geared towards specific audiences.  

    Congress needs to be aware of this, the Treasury should look here, the FBI should investigate that, and so on...

    Barr referred to the report as self redacting.  As in the report (ie Mueller) have specific instructions as to what needs to be redacted, and they were assisting in that process.


    Okay, I see. But I'm going to remain skeptical given some of the actions of Barr (spying reference, the 4 page summary, his history, the 18 page job application) and the leaked murmurs of discontent coming from members from Mueller's team.
    Don't get me wrong.  I'm a little skeptical too.  I wanted to see the whole report, unredacted, yesterday.

    However, it's looking more and more like quite a few members of Congress are getting wrapped up in this investigation.  

    I don't want Nunes, turtle, et al, to see the report either.  At least not until it's entered as evidence in their respective trials. 
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    CM189191 said:
    dignin said:
    CM189191 said:
    dignin said:
    CM189191 said:
    Kat said:
    dignin said:
    Kat said:
    I expect a whitewash in the on-going cover-up and hope I'm proved wrong. 
    Have a great week, everyone.

    There is little doubt.
    It'll be the Barr report of the Mueller report. I still think I'm in Bizarro World. 


    Did he say that? I thought he said he was working with Mueller. I doubt he's just letting Mueller do the redactions by himself, if so why not just release the initial Mueller overviews? All seems pretty redundant.
    I was under the impression the various Mueller overviews were geared towards specific audiences.  

    Congress needs to be aware of this, the Treasury should look here, the FBI should investigate that, and so on...

    Barr referred to the report as self redacting.  As in the report (ie Mueller) have specific instructions as to what needs to be redacted, and they were assisting in that process.


    Okay, I see. But I'm going to remain skeptical given some of the actions of Barr (spying reference, the 4 page summary, his history, the 18 page job application) and the leaked murmurs of discontent coming from members from Mueller's team.
      

    I don't want Nunes, turtle, et al, to see the report either.  At least not until it's entered as evidence in their respective trials. 
    If there is any justice in this world.
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,113
    edited April 2019
    It's so quiet in here.
    Post edited by mcgruff10 on
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    why the edit from the pic you posted?
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,105
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    It takes a minimum of 26 days to read 448 pages.

    14 ongoing investigations.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,576
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    So are you of the thought that now that he’s been exonerated the nation should just let everything go ? You do believe he’s been cleared no ?
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,113
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    why the edit from the pic you posted?
    Damn my bad.  Can we finally move on?
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    mcgruff10 said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    why the edit from the pic you posted?
    Damn my bad.  Can we finally move on?
    Collusion isn't the only item to be looked at. but yes, I think we can at least cross collusion of the list. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,105
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    why the edit from the pic you posted?
    Damn my bad.  Can we finally move on?
    Collusion isn't the only item to be looked at. but yes, I think we can at least cross collusion of the list. 
    As legally defined to bring criminal charges.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    Halifax2TheMax said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    why the edit from the pic you posted?
    Damn my bad.  Can we finally move on?
    Collusion isn't the only item to be looked at. but yes, I think we can at least cross collusion of the list. 
    As legally defined to bring criminal charges.
    yeah, and?
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • RoleModelsinBlood31
    RoleModelsinBlood31 Austin TX Posts: 6,239
    I’m outraged!
    I'm like an opening band for your mom.
  • Kat
    Kat Posts: 4,956
    So Manafort giving campaign information to Kalimnik(sp) about campaign plans and battleground states, etc., isn't conspiracy with Russia? How does that work exactly?

    Falling down,...not staying down
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,576
    RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
    I’m outraged!
    What happened? 
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • tbergs
    tbergs Posts: 10,401
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    People are waiting for direction on their reaction from Hannity and Tapper.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • tbergs
    tbergs Posts: 10,401
    josevolution said:
    RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
    I’m outraged!
    What happened? 
    He has TDS.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,105
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    Halifax2TheMax said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    why the edit from the pic you posted?
    Damn my bad.  Can we finally move on?
    Collusion isn't the only item to be looked at. but yes, I think we can at least cross collusion of the list. 
    As legally defined to bring criminal charges.
    yeah, and?
    Congress may have a different opinion of whether "colluding" with a foreign power to throw an election, lie about it and attempt to obstruct justice rises to a "high crime & misdemeanor." 
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • OnWis97
    OnWis97 St. Paul, MN Posts: 5,610
    Halifax2TheMax said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    Halifax2TheMax said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    why the edit from the pic you posted?
    Damn my bad.  Can we finally move on?
    Collusion isn't the only item to be looked at. but yes, I think we can at least cross collusion of the list. 
    As legally defined to bring criminal charges.
    yeah, and?
    Congress may have a different opinion of whether "colluding" with a foreign power to throw an election, lie about it and attempt to obstruct justice rises to a "high crime & misdemeanor." 
    I don't think so.
    1995 Milwaukee     1998 Alpine, Alpine     2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston     2004 Boston, Boston     2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty)     2011 Alpine, Alpine     
    2013 Wrigley     2014 St. Paul     2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley     2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley     2021 Asbury Park     2022 St Louis     2023 Austin, Austin
    2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,113
    Halifax2TheMax said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    Halifax2TheMax said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    It's so quiet in here.
    why the edit from the pic you posted?
    Damn my bad.  Can we finally move on?
    Collusion isn't the only item to be looked at. but yes, I think we can at least cross collusion of the list. 
    As legally defined to bring criminal charges.
    yeah, and?
    Congress may have a different opinion of whether "colluding" with a foreign power to throw an election, lie about it and attempt to obstruct justice rises to a "high crime & misdemeanor." 
    Just stop. 
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • njnancy
    njnancy Posts: 5,096
    Mueller wrote in his report that the investigation was hampered by repeated lying by witnesses and lack of cooperation by the President, esp in his lack of candor in his written answers (30 I don't recall as answers) and he needed to meet with Trump but that was not allowed by his lawyers and Mueller decided that it would take too long to fight subpoenas through the courts - it would considerably delay the report. So there were many important questions that were never answered leaving Mueller without Trump's answers in person which, as is evidenced by our communication on social media, is a much better way to assess information, truthfulness and intonation. 

    They also refused to answer written questions about conspiracy (collusion is not a legal term). 

    So he laid out what he had and believed it was going to Congress. He did not direct Barr to make a decision, nor was it appropriate for Barr to do so. 

    This is the second lie that Barr spun in his news conference this morning - the White House was fully cooperative. 

Categories