Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez

15681011101

Comments

  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    my2hands said:
    Wtf is she talking about taking pictures of backsides and dark hates light? Because someone mentioned she has nice clothes? Thats misogyny now? 

    Is this what politics has become, fucking tweeter beefs and social media garbage? 

    I wish her luck and thick skin, pushing a Democratic Socialist agenda isn't gonna be easy 
    How many tweets have their been of a newly elected repub man and his wardrobe?
    Context. It has nothing to do with her being a woman, it's about her now public financial issue and the tweeter trying to infer she has money for nice clothes so why cant she afford an apartment, which obviously is silly. Not defending the tweeter at all, just think its ridiculous thst this is news, that we try to make every little thing into some scandal, or label it as quickly as we can as racism, or misogyny, or whatever. 

    Hope she picks her battles better than this moving forward 
  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 39,025
    edited November 2018
    my2hands said:
    Wtf is she talking about taking pictures of backsides and dark hates light? Because someone mentioned she has nice clothes? Thats misogyny now? 

    Is this what politics has become, fucking tweeter beefs and social media garbage? 

    I wish her luck and thick skin, pushing a Democratic Socialist agenda isn't gonna be easy 
    How many tweets have their been of a newly elected repub man and his wardrobe?
    I'm pointing out towards women.  It is always about their clothes.

    A guy in a suit is a guy in a suit unless he's Gotti.  That guy had some suits.


    Dave Letterman had some suits as well. And it’s always about their “appearance.” She should troll them by wearing a burlap sack to the office. Or a head to toe, face covered burqha. And the only male politician I can readily recall being criticized for what they wore was Obama and his tan suit. Oh, the outrage!
    Post edited by Halifax2TheMax on
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Hi!Hi! Posts: 3,095

    A guy in a suit is a guy in a suit unless he's Gotti.  That guy had some suits.


    Just better not be a tan suit.

    Detroit 2000, Detroit 2003 1-2, Grand Rapids VFC 2004, Philly 2005, Grand Rapids 2006, Detroit 2006, Cleveland 2006, Lollapalooza 2007, Detroit Eddie Solo 2011, Detroit 2014, Chicago 2016 1-2, Chicago 2018 1-2, Ohana Encore 2021 1-2, Chicago Eddie/Earthlings 2022 1-2, Nashville 2022, St. Louis 2022

  • my2hands said:
    Wtf is she talking about taking pictures of backsides and dark hates light? Because someone mentioned she has nice clothes? Thats misogyny now? 

    Is this what politics has become, fucking tweeter beefs and social media garbage? 

    I wish her luck and thick skin, pushing a Democratic Socialist agenda isn't gonna be easy 
    How many tweets have their been of a newly elected repub man and his wardrobe?
    I'm pointing out towards women.  It is always about their clothes.

    A guy in a suit is a guy in a suit unless he's Gotti.  That guy had some suits.


    Dave Letterman had some suits as well. And it’s always about their “appearance.” She should troll them by wearing a burlap sack to the office. Or a head to toe, face covered burqha. And the only male politician I can readily recall being criticized for what they wore was Obama and his tan suit. Oh, the outrage!
    You should research women and clothes in politics.  There has been many an article about it.

    My thoughts?

    Who gives a shit.
  • my2hands said:
    Wtf is she talking about taking pictures of backsides and dark hates light? Because someone mentioned she has nice clothes? Thats misogyny now? 

    Is this what politics has become, fucking tweeter beefs and social media garbage? 

    I wish her luck and thick skin, pushing a Democratic Socialist agenda isn't gonna be easy 
    How many tweets have their been of a newly elected repub man and his wardrobe?
    I'm pointing out towards women.  It is always about their clothes.

    A guy in a suit is a guy in a suit unless he's Gotti.  That guy had some suits.


    Dave Letterman had some suits as well. And it’s always about their “appearance.” She should troll them by wearing a burlap sack to the office. Or a head to toe, face covered burqha. And the only male politician I can readily recall being criticized for what they wore was Obama and his tan suit. Oh, the outrage!
    You should research women and clothes in politics.  There has been many an article about it.

    My thoughts?

    Who gives a shit.
    My thoughts as well but it’s hilarious to see repubs get so “outraged” or derisive over such trivial matters. They know they’re losing the message war.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Hi!Hi! Posts: 3,095

    Detroit 2000, Detroit 2003 1-2, Grand Rapids VFC 2004, Philly 2005, Grand Rapids 2006, Detroit 2006, Cleveland 2006, Lollapalooza 2007, Detroit Eddie Solo 2011, Detroit 2014, Chicago 2016 1-2, Chicago 2018 1-2, Ohana Encore 2021 1-2, Chicago Eddie/Earthlings 2022 1-2, Nashville 2022, St. Louis 2022

  • mace1229mace1229 Posts: 9,367
    If you Google search the words "Trump wardrobe" you can find dozens of negative articles about Donald and the first lady's clothing. For her theres a lot of positive ones too, but for Donald it is pretty much all negative.
    I just don't see how this is a race, gender, political issue. Lots of people are criticized for what they wear.
  • mace1229 said:
    If you Google search the words "Trump wardrobe" you can find dozens of negative articles about Donald and the first lady's clothing. For her theres a lot of positive ones too, but for Donald it is pretty much all negative.
    I just don't see how this is a race, gender, political issue. Lots of people are criticized for what they wear.
    Prêt-à-porter

    Ready to wear
  • Spiritual_ChaosSpiritual_Chaos Posts: 30,525
    edited November 2018
    my2hands said:
    my2hands said:
    Wtf is she talking about taking pictures of backsides and dark hates light? Because someone mentioned she has nice clothes? Thats misogyny now? 

    Is this what politics has become, fucking tweeter beefs and social media garbage? 

    I wish her luck and thick skin, pushing a Democratic Socialist agenda isn't gonna be easy 
    How many tweets have their been of a newly elected repub man and his wardrobe?
    Context. It has nothing to do with her being a woman, it's about her now public financial issue and the tweeter trying to infer she has money for nice clothes so why cant she afford an apartment, which obviously is silly. Not defending the tweeter at all, just think its ridiculous thst this is news, that we try to make every little thing into some scandal, or label it as quickly as we can as racism, or misogyny, or whatever. 

    Hope she picks her battles better than this moving forward 
    I hope she attacks everyone trying to mock or belittle her. 


    Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • CM189191CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    mace1229 said:
    If you Google search the words "Trump wardrobe" you can find dozens of negative articles about Donald and the first lady's clothing. For her theres a lot of positive ones too, but for Donald it is pretty much all negative.
    I just don't see how this is a race, gender, political issue. Lots of people are criticized for what they wear.
    Counterpoint: tRUmps own a clothing line & melenia was a model

    Criticizing their fashion shouldn't be off limits for them. 
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    my2hands said:
    my2hands said:
    Wtf is she talking about taking pictures of backsides and dark hates light? Because someone mentioned she has nice clothes? Thats misogyny now? 

    Is this what politics has become, fucking tweeter beefs and social media garbage? 

    I wish her luck and thick skin, pushing a Democratic Socialist agenda isn't gonna be easy 
    How many tweets have their been of a newly elected repub man and his wardrobe?
    Context. It has nothing to do with her being a woman, it's about her now public financial issue and the tweeter trying to infer she has money for nice clothes so why cant she afford an apartment, which obviously is silly. Not defending the tweeter at all, just think its ridiculous thst this is news, that we try to make every little thing into some scandal, or label it as quickly as we can as racism, or misogyny, or whatever. 

    Hope she picks her battles better than this moving forward 
    I hope she attacks everyone trying to mock or belittle her. 


    Am i allowed to say i think she is attractive?
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,445
    my2hands said:
    my2hands said:
    my2hands said:
    Wtf is she talking about taking pictures of backsides and dark hates light? Because someone mentioned she has nice clothes? Thats misogyny now? 

    Is this what politics has become, fucking tweeter beefs and social media garbage? 

    I wish her luck and thick skin, pushing a Democratic Socialist agenda isn't gonna be easy 
    How many tweets have their been of a newly elected repub man and his wardrobe?
    Context. It has nothing to do with her being a woman, it's about her now public financial issue and the tweeter trying to infer she has money for nice clothes so why cant she afford an apartment, which obviously is silly. Not defending the tweeter at all, just think its ridiculous thst this is news, that we try to make every little thing into some scandal, or label it as quickly as we can as racism, or misogyny, or whatever. 

    Hope she picks her battles better than this moving forward 
    I hope she attacks everyone trying to mock or belittle her. 


    Am i allowed to say i think she is attractive?
    Stop drinking 
    hippiemom = goodness
  • my2hands said:
    my2hands said:
    my2hands said:
    Wtf is she talking about taking pictures of backsides and dark hates light? Because someone mentioned she has nice clothes? Thats misogyny now? 

    Is this what politics has become, fucking tweeter beefs and social media garbage? 

    I wish her luck and thick skin, pushing a Democratic Socialist agenda isn't gonna be easy 
    How many tweets have their been of a newly elected repub man and his wardrobe?
    Context. It has nothing to do with her being a woman, it's about her now public financial issue and the tweeter trying to infer she has money for nice clothes so why cant she afford an apartment, which obviously is silly. Not defending the tweeter at all, just think its ridiculous thst this is news, that we try to make every little thing into some scandal, or label it as quickly as we can as racism, or misogyny, or whatever. 

    Hope she picks her battles better than this moving forward 
    I hope she attacks everyone trying to mock or belittle her. 


    Am i allowed to say i think she is attractive?
    Why wouldn't you?


    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • mickeyratmickeyrat Posts: 38,592
    edited November 2018

    my2hands said:
    dignin said:
    my2hands said:
    It’s funny,   A Democrat brings thousands of high paying jobs to a city area and people still complain.   Think of all the people who own properties in that area that just became millionaires!   Yes, some were already, but many were not,  why does everything have to be that if it helps 1 rich person it’s bad.  Does anyone realize anything that happens, the rich are going to get richer.  So, ignore the noise and ask yourself - will a lot of less rich be helped by this?   Governor Cuomo seems to think so.  Unless, that is, he’s in on it too!

    You get that people making $125k/yr pay a lot in taxes.  Right?  And what at least in theory can he done  with those tax dollars?     And what about the hardworking janitors and cleaning people and other service industry that will crop up around this new HQ?  Those jobs don’t count because there will be people making more?   (Not to mention all the construction jobs that just got created for the next 5-10 years).

    She’s in over her head.  If she wants to just pay for healthcare, this is how you do it.  Give people jobs with access to healthcare, and collect more taxes to pay for those that don’t.  She reminds me of my nephews and nieces BEFORE they went to college.  Interesting how their views changed once they started working and had real jobs. 

    And not to put words in his mouth, but this is what Jason P is referring to.  She should chase Amazon away so a nice midwestern town can reap the benefits.   

    So, to recount Queens’ newly minted Rep thinks - Jobs bad.  Paying for healthcare easy.  Yes, we get what we deserve indeed.
    Have to admit i pretty much agree with this
    Haha. One of the leftist posters here.
    Yeah, chasing away Amazon and jobs doesn't seem like a great idea to me, call me crazy
    Bending to the will of capitalism is why the US is a banana-republic compared to other countries when it comes to workers rights, minimum wage etc.

    So you are crazy. Or is having the inability to see the full and sane picture of things.
    The US is not even close to a banana republic???
    Ummm, the US HAS ALWAYS worked towards corporate interests. Bullshit wars have been contrived on behalf of corporate America. The term banana republic was coined after such intervention.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • CM189191CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    CM189191 said:
    is no one going to address the elephant in the room?!
    my2hands said:
    Am i allowed to say i think she is attractive?
    finally!
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Posts: 49,951
    CM189191 said:
    CM189191 said:
    is no one going to address the elephant in the room?!
    my2hands said:
    Am i allowed to say i think she is attractive?
    finally!
    :lol:
    I'm not quite sure if she is or not. I think the media keeps very purposefully only using photos that make her look manic (really she's just an enthusiastic happy person, and they pick the worst possible photos, and it's pissing me off). I'd love to see a photo where she just looks normal, like I'm sure she usually looks, as opposed to where she's in mid-word, mouth gaping, with her eyes popping out of her head. And yes, I do think this is a form of editorial sexism.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • jeffbrjeffbr Posts: 7,177
    PJ_Soul said:
    CM189191 said:
    CM189191 said:
    is no one going to address the elephant in the room?!
    my2hands said:
    Am i allowed to say i think she is attractive?
    finally!
    :lol:
    I'm not quite sure if she is or not. I think the media keeps very purposefully only using photos that make her look manic (really she's just an enthusiastic happy person, and they pick the worst possible photos, and it's pissing me off). I'd love to see a photo where she just looks normal, like I'm sure she usually looks, as opposed to where she's in mid-word, mouth gaping, with her eyes popping out of her head. And yes, I do think this is a form of editorial sexism.
    Agreed. There's too much of this:


    And not enough of this:



    She's a young, smart, motivated person with passion for her beliefs. I'm sure I disagree with her on some things, but I do like seeing people engaged, and am impressed that someone under 30, regardless of background, gender, party, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation is stepping up to make a difference.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    *swoons to picture 3*
  • jeffbr said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    CM189191 said:
    CM189191 said:
    is no one going to address the elephant in the room?!
    my2hands said:
    Am i allowed to say i think she is attractive?
    finally!
    :lol:
    I'm not quite sure if she is or not. I think the media keeps very purposefully only using photos that make her look manic (really she's just an enthusiastic happy person, and they pick the worst possible photos, and it's pissing me off). I'd love to see a photo where she just looks normal, like I'm sure she usually looks, as opposed to where she's in mid-word, mouth gaping, with her eyes popping out of her head. And yes, I do think this is a form of editorial sexism.
    Agreed. There's too much of this:


    And not enough of this:



    She's a young, smart, motivated person with passion for her beliefs. I'm sure I disagree with her on some things, but I do like seeing people engaged, and am impressed that someone under 30, regardless of background, gender, party, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation is stepping up to make a difference.
    Three pics that strike fear in the hearts of repubs.
     
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,445
    jeffbr said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    CM189191 said:
    CM189191 said:
    is no one going to address the elephant in the room?!
    my2hands said:
    Am i allowed to say i think she is attractive?
    finally!
    :lol:
    I'm not quite sure if she is or not. I think the media keeps very purposefully only using photos that make her look manic (really she's just an enthusiastic happy person, and they pick the worst possible photos, and it's pissing me off). I'd love to see a photo where she just looks normal, like I'm sure she usually looks, as opposed to where she's in mid-word, mouth gaping, with her eyes popping out of her head. And yes, I do think this is a form of editorial sexism.
    Agreed. There's too much of this:


    And not enough of this:



    She's a young, smart, motivated person with passion for her beliefs. I'm sure I disagree with her on some things, but I do like seeing people engaged, and am impressed that someone under 30, regardless of background, gender, party, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation is stepping up to make a difference.
    Three pics that strike fear in the hearts of repubs.
     
     Only 1 that does for me. She does crazy eyes like a serial killer.


    hippiemom = goodness
  • fifefife Posts: 3,327
    Oh God I hope we don't get a thread called "  pictures of Alexandra looking hot"  anyway, continue on
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,445
    fife said:
    Oh God I hope we don't get a thread called "  pictures of Alexandra looking hot"  anyway, continue on
    Short thread 
    hippiemom = goodness
  • CM189191CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    jeffbr said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    CM189191 said:
    CM189191 said:
    is no one going to address the elephant in the room?!
    my2hands said:
    Am i allowed to say i think she is attractive?
    finally!
    :lol:
    I'm not quite sure if she is or not. I think the media keeps very purposefully only using photos that make her look manic (really she's just an enthusiastic happy person, and they pick the worst possible photos, and it's pissing me off). I'd love to see a photo where she just looks normal, like I'm sure she usually looks, as opposed to where she's in mid-word, mouth gaping, with her eyes popping out of her head. And yes, I do think this is a form of editorial sexism.
    Agreed. There's too much of this:


    And not enough of this:



    She's a young, smart, motivated person with passion for her beliefs. I'm sure I disagree with her on some things, but I do like seeing people engaged, and am impressed that someone under 30, regardless of background, gender, party, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation is stepping up to make a difference.
    Three pics that strike fear in the hearts of repubs.
     
     Only 1 that does for me. She does crazy eyes like a serial killer.



  • rgambsrgambs Posts: 13,576
    jeffbr said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    CM189191 said:
    CM189191 said:
    is no one going to address the elephant in the room?!
    my2hands said:
    Am i allowed to say i think she is attractive?
    finally!
    :lol:
    I'm not quite sure if she is or not. I think the media keeps very purposefully only using photos that make her look manic (really she's just an enthusiastic happy person, and they pick the worst possible photos, and it's pissing me off). I'd love to see a photo where she just looks normal, like I'm sure she usually looks, as opposed to where she's in mid-word, mouth gaping, with her eyes popping out of her head. And yes, I do think this is a form of editorial sexism.
    Agreed. There's too much of this:


    And not enough of this:



    She's a young, smart, motivated person with passion for her beliefs. I'm sure I disagree with her on some things, but I do like seeing people engaged, and am impressed that someone under 30, regardless of background, gender, party, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation is stepping up to make a difference.
    Three pics that strike fear in the hearts of repubs.
     
     Only 1 that does for me. She does crazy eyes like a serial killer.


    fife said:
    Oh God I hope we don't get a thread called "  pictures of Alexandra looking hot"  anyway, continue on
    Short thread 
    Hahaha I call bullshit.  Internet tough talk.
    If this woman worked in your workplace she'd easily be one of the most beautiful women around and you'd be every bit as aware of it as anyone else.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • rgambsrgambs Posts: 13,576
    This reminds me of The Office, when the whole office debates whether Hilary Swank is "hot or not".  Bunch of Kevin's, Stanleys, and Merediths arguing "hot or not" about someone who is so far out of their league lol
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,445
    rgambs said:
    jeffbr said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    CM189191 said:
    CM189191 said:
    is no one going to address the elephant in the room?!
    my2hands said:
    Am i allowed to say i think she is attractive?
    finally!
    :lol:
    I'm not quite sure if she is or not. I think the media keeps very purposefully only using photos that make her look manic (really she's just an enthusiastic happy person, and they pick the worst possible photos, and it's pissing me off). I'd love to see a photo where she just looks normal, like I'm sure she usually looks, as opposed to where she's in mid-word, mouth gaping, with her eyes popping out of her head. And yes, I do think this is a form of editorial sexism.
    Agreed. There's too much of this:


    And not enough of this:



    She's a young, smart, motivated person with passion for her beliefs. I'm sure I disagree with her on some things, but I do like seeing people engaged, and am impressed that someone under 30, regardless of background, gender, party, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation is stepping up to make a difference.
    Three pics that strike fear in the hearts of repubs.
     
     Only 1 that does for me. She does crazy eyes like a serial killer.


    fife said:
    Oh God I hope we don't get a thread called "  pictures of Alexandra looking hot"  anyway, continue on
    Short thread 
    Hahaha I call bullshit.  Internet tough talk.
    If this woman worked in your workplace she'd easily be one of the most beautiful women around and you'd be every bit as aware of it as anyone else.
    You haven’t been to my workplace.

    and once you’ve seen the crazy eyes you know she isn’t worth the trouble :)

    hippiemom = goodness
  • PJ_Soul said:
    CM189191 said:
    CM189191 said:
    is no one going to address the elephant in the room?!
    my2hands said:
    Am i allowed to say i think she is attractive?
    finally!
    :lol:
    I'm not quite sure if she is or not. I think the media keeps very purposefully only using photos that make her look manic (really she's just an enthusiastic happy person, and they pick the worst possible photos, and it's pissing me off). I'd love to see a photo where she just looks normal, like I'm sure she usually looks, as opposed to where she's in mid-word, mouth gaping, with her eyes popping out of her head. And yes, I do think this is a form of editorial sexism.
    SHE'S GORGEOUS. which, fortunately or unfortunately, goes a long way in politics. 

    ted cruz is an outlier. 
    new album "Cigarettes" out Spring 2025!

    www.headstonesband.com




  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,445
    PJ_Soul said:
    CM189191 said:
    CM189191 said:
    is no one going to address the elephant in the room?!
    my2hands said:
    Am i allowed to say i think she is attractive?
    finally!
    :lol:
    I'm not quite sure if she is or not. I think the media keeps very purposefully only using photos that make her look manic (really she's just an enthusiastic happy person, and they pick the worst possible photos, and it's pissing me off). I'd love to see a photo where she just looks normal, like I'm sure she usually looks, as opposed to where she's in mid-word, mouth gaping, with her eyes popping out of her head. And yes, I do think this is a form of editorial sexism.
    SHE'S GORGEOUS. which, fortunately or unfortunately, goes a long way in politics. 

    ted cruz is an outlier. 
    In that his good looks haven’t carried him far? You love yourself some Cruz.


    hippiemom = goodness
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,038
    Ted "Handsome" Cruz

    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    He is 100% dropping a duece
Sign In or Register to comment.