Anyone following the Laura Ingraham story over the last couple of weeks will know the American right doesn't understand the first amendment, so why do you assume they get the second correct?
Also America 'deserving' guns ain't working out for you, try changing that?
Nice broad stroke right there. Who says America is “deserving” of guns? It is a constitutional right.
Not all gun ownership is protected by the 2A... Connecticut successfully banned sales of all AR 15 style weapons after Sandy Hook and it was held up and passed over by the SCOTUS...
I don't think this is talked about enough
This I know but it is still a constitutional right. Maryland also has an assault weapons ban upheld.
Anyone following the Laura Ingraham story over the last couple of weeks will know the American right doesn't understand the first amendment, so why do you assume they get the second correct?
Also America 'deserving' guns ain't working out for you, try changing that?
Nice broad stroke right there. Who says America is “deserving” of guns? It is a constitutional right.
The GOP is currently putting forward an amendment to the Constitution. This one requires that the budget be balanced, a particularly amusing irony, given the budget they just passed.
If if they can make one amendment, they could make another. In fact, once the Constitution had the first amendment, you completely lost the argument that the document is inviolable.
I never said it couldn’t be changed; the constitution is a living breathing document that can be amended at any time but it sure is tough to do so. Only 17 amendments have been added in over 200 years.
Anyone following the Laura Ingraham story over the last couple of weeks will know the American right doesn't understand the first amendment, so why do you assume they get the second correct?
Also America 'deserving' guns ain't working out for you, try changing that?
Nice broad stroke right there. Who says America is “deserving” of guns? It is a constitutional right.
Not all gun ownership is protected by the 2A... Connecticut successfully banned sales of all AR 15 style weapons after Sandy Hook and it was held up and passed over by the SCOTUS...
I don't think this is talked about enough
This I know but it is still a constitutional right. Maryland also has an assault weapons ban upheld.
ok, but saying "it's a constitutional right" is the same to me as my kid asking why they can't do something and me saying "because I said so". it's not really an answer. it's a non-answer.
there are valid reasons fo other ammendments, like free speech, voter equality, etc. those can be easily explained by all people. the right to bear arms is only justified by the ammendment itself, not the reason for the ammendment.
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
Anyone following the Laura Ingraham story over the last couple of weeks will know the American right doesn't understand the first amendment, so why do you assume they get the second correct?
Also America 'deserving' guns ain't working out for you, try changing that?
Nice broad stroke right there. Who says America is “deserving” of guns? It is a constitutional right.
Not all gun ownership is protected by the 2A... Connecticut successfully banned sales of all AR 15 style weapons after Sandy Hook and it was held up and passed over by the SCOTUS...
I don't think this is talked about enough
This I know but it is still a constitutional right. Maryland also has an assault weapons ban upheld.
ok, but saying "it's a constitutional right" is the same to me as my kid asking why they can't do something and me saying "because I said so". it's not really an answer. it's a non-answer.
there are valid reasons fo other ammendments, like free speech, voter equality, etc. those can be easily explained by all people. the right to bear arms is only justified by the ammendment itself, not the reason for the ammendment.
Which, we all should know, is grossly antiquated given the types of arms available today vs 200 years ago, and utterly irrelevant for the times.
Anyone following the Laura Ingraham story over the last couple of weeks will know the American right doesn't understand the first amendment, so why do you assume they get the second correct?
Also America 'deserving' guns ain't working out for you, try changing that?
Nice broad stroke right there. Who says America is “deserving” of guns? It is a constitutional right.
Not all gun ownership is protected by the 2A... Connecticut successfully banned sales of all AR 15 style weapons after Sandy Hook and it was held up and passed over by the SCOTUS...
I don't think this is talked about enough
This I know but it is still a constitutional right. Maryland also has an assault weapons ban upheld.
ok, but saying "it's a constitutional right" is the same to me as my kid asking why they can't do something and me saying "because I said so". it's not really an answer. it's a non-answer.
there are valid reasons fo other ammendments, like free speech, voter equality, etc. those can be easily explained by all people. the right to bear arms is only justified by the ammendment itself, not the reason for the ammendment.
Which, we all should know, is grossly antiquated given the types of arms available today vs 200 years ago, and utterly irrelevant for the times.
I disagree; one could argue the 1st amendment is antiquated as well since the internet was not around in the 1700's.
Anyone following the Laura Ingraham story over the last couple of weeks will know the American right doesn't understand the first amendment, so why do you assume they get the second correct?
Also America 'deserving' guns ain't working out for you, try changing that?
I don’t follow her story because I don’t like her. But what makes you think she’s the spokeswoman for the right?
Do you think that she’s not?
It's like when people say 'why don't Muslim leaders speak out against terrorism more and stand up to crazy fundamentalists'. The entire right wing mouthpieces are crazies at fox, breitbart, infowars and so much more psycho sources, but they won't speak out against them because that is actually what they watch and where they get their 'news'. Or internet memes.
So now your comparing Laura Ingraham to Muslim Terrorists? Why do we need to speak out against her? Does the left speak out against anything crazy they talk about on The View? They’ve said some weird stuff on that show, but t I don’t consider them spokeswomen for anyone. funny how you think all conservatives watch only fox and bow down to anyone on that channel. Not really accurate, when you consider that 3 million views is a big night for that program and roughly half the country is conservative.
Only about 40% of the country is conservative. (Hair splitting, I know)
0
brianlux
Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,309
I for one do not need a document to tell me what is right or wrong.
"Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!" -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
Anyone following the Laura Ingraham story over the last couple of weeks will know the American right doesn't understand the first amendment, so why do you assume they get the second correct?
Also America 'deserving' guns ain't working out for you, try changing that?
The left sometimes doesn’t understand the first amendment either:
Anyone following the Laura Ingraham story over the last couple of weeks will know the American right doesn't understand the first amendment, so why do you assume they get the second correct?
Also America 'deserving' guns ain't working out for you, try changing that?
The left sometimes doesn’t understand the first amendment either:
That's a crappy thing to tweet, but what about it demonstrates that "the left" doesn't understand the first amendment?
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
Anyone following the Laura Ingraham story over the last couple of weeks will know the American right doesn't understand the first amendment, so why do you assume they get the second correct?
Also America 'deserving' guns ain't working out for you, try changing that?
The left sometimes doesn’t understand the first amendment either:
That's a crappy thing to tweet, but what about it demonstrates that "the left" doesn't understand the first amendment?
Kev,Coat and Keys suggested the right doesn't understand the first amendment because of what Laura Ingraham said, seems like Joy did the same thing. I was just showing both sides do and say stupid things. And yeah it 's a pretty crappy thing to tweet.
Is it “responsible” for a “responsible” gun owner and NRA board member, Ted Shithead Nugent, to openly advocate for the shooting of dems onsite like rabid coyotes? Is that fucking “responsible” advocacy for gun rights? Further, where are all the “responsible” repubes and gun owners condemning such talk, on a mass media platform no less? Where are the “responsible” ones? The gun rights crowd and the NRA are the most irresponsible advocates out there. “Responsible” my fucking ass.
He's one asshole that ran his mouth. I' m not sure how he represents the masses.
I feel like the NRA definitely does represent the masses (as evidenced by the fact that voters vote for politicians who are controlled by the NRA), and Nugent is an NRA board member, so that would be how Nugent represents the masses, like it or not. American democracy at work!
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Anyone following the Laura Ingraham story over the last couple of weeks will know the American right doesn't understand the first amendment, so why do you assume they get the second correct?
Also America 'deserving' guns ain't working out for you, try changing that?
The left sometimes doesn’t understand the first amendment either:
That's a crappy thing to tweet, but what about it demonstrates that "the left" doesn't understand the first amendment?
Kev,Coat and Keys suggested the right doesn't understand the first amendment because of what Laura Ingraham said, seems like Joy did the same thing. I was just showing both sides do and say stupid things. And yeah it 's a pretty crappy thing to tweet.
No, I don't think that's what KCKs meant. I assumed s/he was referring to the reaction of the right.
Just on the face of it, I don't see any connection to the first amendment with Behar's tweet. Seems a complete non sequitur.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
Anyone following the Laura Ingraham story over the last couple of weeks will know the American right doesn't understand the first amendment, so why do you assume they get the second correct?
Also America 'deserving' guns ain't working out for you, try changing that?
Nice broad stroke right there. Who says America is “deserving” of guns? It is a constitutional right.
Not all gun ownership is protected by the 2A... Connecticut successfully banned sales of all AR 15 style weapons after Sandy Hook and it was held up and passed over by the SCOTUS...
I don't think this is talked about enough
This I know but it is still a constitutional right. Maryland also has an assault weapons ban upheld.
ok, but saying "it's a constitutional right" is the same to me as my kid asking why they can't do something and me saying "because I said so". it's not really an answer. it's a non-answer.
there are valid reasons fo other ammendments, like free speech, voter equality, etc. those can be easily explained by all people. the right to bear arms is only justified by the ammendment itself, not the reason for the ammendment.
Which, we all should know, is grossly antiquated given the types of arms available today vs 200 years ago, and utterly irrelevant for the times.
I disagree; one could argue the 1st amendment is antiquated as well since the internet was not around in the 1700's.
what does the first ammendment have to do with the internet?
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
Anyone following the Laura Ingraham story over the last couple of weeks will know the American right doesn't understand the first amendment, so why do you assume they get the second correct?
Also America 'deserving' guns ain't working out for you, try changing that?
The left sometimes doesn’t understand the first amendment either:
That's a crappy thing to tweet, but what about it demonstrates that "the left" doesn't understand the first amendment?
It was a "crappy" think to tweet just for herself I guess. More stupid than crappy really ... I mean... it's honest. I think a LOT of people would be glad if they woke up to the news of Trump's death (just saying Kat, not wishing death upon anyone here! ). I guess it's just a matter of attitude. I have noticed that a lot of people are conditioned to get really offended any time someone says anything about hoping someone is dead. They think it's just horrific. But since such thoughts have literally no impact on anything, and it's just thoughts, I personally don't find it offensive. I also think people have such thoughts (not just about Trump) a lot more often than they are willing to admit. I also think that plenty of people will feign offense because that is what they're supposed to do, when inside they really were kinda thinking the same thing. But anyway, anyone is an idiot for tweeting anything about the POTUS dying. It never goes well. One has to wonder how Joy Behar thought that was anything other than a terrible idea.
Post edited by PJ_Soul on
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Anyone following the Laura Ingraham story over the last couple of weeks will know the American right doesn't understand the first amendment, so why do you assume they get the second correct?
Also America 'deserving' guns ain't working out for you, try changing that?
The left sometimes doesn’t understand the first amendment either:
That's a crappy thing to tweet, but what about it demonstrates that "the left" doesn't understand the first amendment?
It was a "crappy" think to tweet just for herself I guess. More stupid than crappy really ... I mean... it's honest. I think a LOT of people would be glad if they woke up to the news of Trump's death (just saying Kat, not wishing death upon anyone here! ). I guess it's just a matter of attitude. I have noticed that a lot of people are conditioned to get really offended any time someone says anything about hoping someone is dead. They think it's just horrific. But since such thoughts have literally no impact on anything, and it's just thoughts, I personally don't find it offensive. I also think people have such thoughts (not just about Trump) a lot more often than they are willing to admit. I also think that plenty of people will feign offense because that is what they're supposed to do, when inside they really were kinda thinking the same thing. But anyway, anyone is an idiot for tweeting anything about the POTUS dying. It never goes well. One has to wonder how Joy Behar thought that was anything other than a terrible idea.
Well, you know.... part of a civilized society is that we don't voice every thought that pops into our heads, justified or not.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
Anyone following the Laura Ingraham story over the last couple of weeks will know the American right doesn't understand the first amendment, so why do you assume they get the second correct?
Also America 'deserving' guns ain't working out for you, try changing that?
The left sometimes doesn’t understand the first amendment either:
That's a crappy thing to tweet, but what about it demonstrates that "the left" doesn't understand the first amendment?
It was a "crappy" think to tweet just for herself I guess. More stupid than crappy really ... I mean... it's honest. I think a LOT of people would be glad if they woke up to the news of Trump's death (just saying Kat, not wishing death upon anyone here! ). I guess it's just a matter of attitude. I have noticed that a lot of people are conditioned to get really offended any time someone says anything about hoping someone is dead. They think it's just horrific. But since such thoughts have literally no impact on anything, and it's just thoughts, I personally don't find it offensive. I also think people have such thoughts (not just about Trump) a lot more often than they are willing to admit. I also think that plenty of people will feign offense because that is what they're supposed to do, when inside they really were kinda thinking the same thing. But anyway, anyone is an idiot for tweeting anything about the POTUS dying. It never goes well. One has to wonder how Joy Behar thought that was anything other than a terrible idea.
Well, you know.... part of a civilized society is that we don't voice every thought that pops into our heads, justified or not.
Fine, but that doesn't mean everyone has to pretend to be offended by it.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Anyone following the Laura Ingraham story over the last couple of weeks will know the American right doesn't understand the first amendment, so why do you assume they get the second correct?
Also America 'deserving' guns ain't working out for you, try changing that?
The left sometimes doesn’t understand the first amendment either:
That's a crappy thing to tweet, but what about it demonstrates that "the left" doesn't understand the first amendment?
It was a "crappy" think to tweet just for herself I guess. More stupid than crappy really ... I mean... it's honest. I think a LOT of people would be glad if they woke up to the news of Trump's death (just saying Kat, not wishing death upon anyone here! ). I guess it's just a matter of attitude. I have noticed that a lot of people are conditioned to get really offended any time someone says anything about hoping someone is dead. They think it's just horrific. But since such thoughts have literally no impact on anything, and it's just thoughts, I personally don't find it offensive. I also think people have such thoughts (not just about Trump) a lot more often than they are willing to admit. I also think that plenty of people will feign offense because that is what they're supposed to do, when inside they really were kinda thinking the same thing. But anyway, anyone is an idiot for tweeting anything about the POTUS dying. It never goes well. One has to wonder how Joy Behar thought that was anything other than a terrible idea.
Well, you know.... part of a civilized society is that we don't voice every thought that pops into our heads, justified or not.
Fine, but that doesn't mean everyone has to pretend to be offended by it.
I agree. I have been skewered in the past by voicing my truth about someone who has passed away. not that I wished for their death, just that I....um.....wasn't particularly saddened by it.
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
0
brianlux
Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,309
Excuse my ignorance in the matter but, regarding images of tweets we see fairly often in these threads, how do we know they are real. I mean, they can be easily faked, right? I'm guessing it happens often. Yes? No?
"Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!" -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
Excuse my ignorance in the matter but, regarding images of tweets we see fairly often in these threads, how do we know they are real. I mean, they can be easily faked, right? I'm guessing it happens often. Yes? No?
All it takes to confirm they're real is to go on Twitter and check if the Tweet exists. And if it's been deleted, there are plenty of mainstream media sources that you can trust about whether or not a Tweet is real. But good job Brian for asking, because as it turns out, this Tweet was NOT real... I forgot to check! But my comments about these kinds of comments still stands.
Post edited by PJ_Soul on
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Excuse my ignorance in the matter but, regarding images of tweets we see fairly often in these threads, how do we know they are real. I mean, they can be easily faked, right? I'm guessing it happens often. Yes? No?
All it takes to confirm they're real is to go on Twitter and check if the Tweet exists. And if it's been deleted, there are plenty of mainstream media sources that you can trust about whether or not a Tweet is real. But good job Brian for asking, because as it turns out, this Tweet was NOT real... I forgot to check! But my comments about these kinds of comments still stands.
It's the skeptic in me! I stand by Lou Reed's words: "You can't believe half of what you see and none of what you hear."
Not to distract too much from the subject at hand (because, lord knows, we rarely have threads about guns on AMT), but I get the feeling that one result of social media and internet "news" is that we are living in a world fraught with false information. Sometimes I have to ask, WTF is really going on in the world? Is it all smoke an mirrors and deception?
Oh how wearisome to be such a cynic! Sorry!
"Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!" -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
"Try to not spook the horse."
-Neil Young
0
brianlux
Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,309
Oh, and not meaning to dis your comments at all Alison!
"Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!" -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
Excuse my ignorance in the matter but, regarding images of tweets we see fairly often in these threads, how do we know they are real. I mean, they can be easily faked, right? I'm guessing it happens often. Yes? No?
All it takes to confirm they're real is to go on Twitter and check if the Tweet exists. And if it's been deleted, there are plenty of mainstream media sources that you can trust about whether or not a Tweet is real. But good job Brian for asking, because as it turns out, this Tweet was NOT real... I forgot to check! But my comments about these kinds of comments still stands.
It's the skeptic in me! I stand by Lou Reed's words: "You can't believe half of what you see and none of what you hear."
Not to distract too much from the subject at hand (because, lord knows, we rarely have threads about guns on AMT), but I get the feeling that one result of social media and internet "news" is that we are living in a world fraught with false information. Sometimes I have to ask, WTF is really going on in the world? Is it all smoke an mirrors and deception?
Oh how wearisome to be such a cynic! Sorry!
Well, yeah. I think the fact that we're living in a world fraught with false information is one of the biggest stories of our time, right? Fake news is a very real thing... Not Trump's fake news. His fake news is real news, lol. But actual fake news is rampant, and there is almost always a sinister purpose behind it... just like that fake tweet most of us just fell for (at least it made us think about a valid issue I guess). And *ahem!* That's 2 L's to you Brian!
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Anyone following the Laura Ingraham story over the last couple of weeks will know the American right doesn't understand the first amendment, so why do you assume they get the second correct?
Also America 'deserving' guns ain't working out for you, try changing that?
The left sometimes doesn’t understand the first amendment either:
That's a crappy thing to tweet, but what about it demonstrates that "the left" doesn't understand the first amendment?
It was a "crappy" think to tweet just for herself I guess. More stupid than crappy really ... I mean... it's honest. I think a LOT of people would be glad if they woke up to the news of Trump's death (just saying Kat, not wishing death upon anyone here! ). I guess it's just a matter of attitude. I have noticed that a lot of people are conditioned to get really offended any time someone says anything about hoping someone is dead. They think it's just horrific. But since such thoughts have literally no impact on anything, and it's just thoughts, I personally don't find it offensive. I also think people have such thoughts (not just about Trump) a lot more often than they are willing to admit. I also think that plenty of people will feign offense because that is what they're supposed to do, when inside they really were kinda thinking the same thing. But anyway, anyone is an idiot for tweeting anything about the POTUS dying. It never goes well. One has to wonder how Joy Behar thought that was anything other than a terrible idea.
Well, you know.... part of a civilized society is that we don't voice every thought that pops into our heads, justified or not.
Fine, but that doesn't mean everyone has to pretend to be offended by it.
I agree. I have been skewered in the past by voicing my truth about someone who has passed away. not that I wished for their death, just that I....um.....wasn't particularly saddened by it.
I think there's a difference between not being saddened by the news that someone died, and saying "hey, I hope this person I don't like dies!" In my opinion, that's in pretty poor taste, no matter who it is.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
Excuse my ignorance in the matter but, regarding images of tweets we see fairly often in these threads, how do we know they are real. I mean, they can be easily faked, right? I'm guessing it happens often. Yes? No?
All it takes to confirm they're real is to go on Twitter and check if the Tweet exists. And if it's been deleted, there are plenty of mainstream media sources that you can trust about whether or not a Tweet is real. But good job Brian for asking, because as it turns out, this Tweet was NOT real... I forgot to check! But my comments about these kinds of comments still stands.
It's the skeptic in me! I stand by Lou Reed's words: "You can't believe half of what you see and none of what you hear."
Not to distract too much from the subject at hand (because, lord knows, we rarely have threads about guns on AMT), but I get the feeling that one result of social media and internet "news" is that we are living in a world fraught with false information. Sometimes I have to ask, WTF is really going on in the world? Is it all smoke an mirrors and deception?
Oh how wearisome to be such a cynic! Sorry!
Well, yeah. I think the fact that we're living in a world fraught with false information is one of the biggest stories of our time, right? Fake news is a very real thing... Not Trump's fake news. His fake news is real news, lol. But actual fake news is rampant, and there is almost always a sinister purpose behind it... just like that fake tweet most of us just fell for (at least it made us think about a valid issue I guess). And *ahem!* That's 2 L's to you Brian!
Spelling was never my strong suit, Allison, Sorry!
"Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!" -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
Anyone following the Laura Ingraham story over the last couple of weeks will know the American right doesn't understand the first amendment, so why do you assume they get the second correct?
Also America 'deserving' guns ain't working out for you, try changing that?
The left sometimes doesn’t understand the first amendment either:
That's a crappy thing to tweet, but what about it demonstrates that "the left" doesn't understand the first amendment?
It was a "crappy" think to tweet just for herself I guess. More stupid than crappy really ... I mean... it's honest. I think a LOT of people would be glad if they woke up to the news of Trump's death (just saying Kat, not wishing death upon anyone here! ). I guess it's just a matter of attitude. I have noticed that a lot of people are conditioned to get really offended any time someone says anything about hoping someone is dead. They think it's just horrific. But since such thoughts have literally no impact on anything, and it's just thoughts, I personally don't find it offensive. I also think people have such thoughts (not just about Trump) a lot more often than they are willing to admit. I also think that plenty of people will feign offense because that is what they're supposed to do, when inside they really were kinda thinking the same thing. But anyway, anyone is an idiot for tweeting anything about the POTUS dying. It never goes well. One has to wonder how Joy Behar thought that was anything other than a terrible idea.
Well, you know.... part of a civilized society is that we don't voice every thought that pops into our heads, justified or not.
Fine, but that doesn't mean everyone has to pretend to be offended by it.
I agree. I have been skewered in the past by voicing my truth about someone who has passed away. not that I wished for their death, just that I....um.....wasn't particularly saddened by it.
I think there's a difference between not being saddened by the news that someone died, and saying "hey, I hope this person I don't like dies!" In my opinion, that's in pretty poor taste, no matter who it is.
Yeah, but why should it matter if it's in poor taste? So what? It's the same with everyone being offended all the time... SO WHAT?
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Comments
there are valid reasons fo other ammendments, like free speech, voter equality, etc. those can be easily explained by all people. the right to bear arms is only justified by the ammendment itself, not the reason for the ammendment.
-EV 8/14/93
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
That's a crappy thing to tweet, but what about it demonstrates that "the left" doesn't understand the first amendment?
No, I don't think that's what KCKs meant. I assumed s/he was referring to the reaction of the right.
Just on the face of it, I don't see any connection to the first amendment with Behar's tweet. Seems a complete non sequitur.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/fruzsinaeordogh/2018/03/31/hoggs-advertising-boycott-is-not-suppressing-ingrahams-free-speech/#4beb8d7f3921
-EV 8/14/93
Well, you know.... part of a civilized society is that we don't voice every thought that pops into our heads, justified or not.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
-EV 8/14/93
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
But my comments about these kinds of comments still stands.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/joy-behar-trump-tower-fire/
Not to distract too much from the subject at hand (because, lord knows, we rarely have threads about guns on AMT), but I get the feeling that one result of social media and internet "news" is that we are living in a world fraught with false information. Sometimes I have to ask, WTF is really going on in the world? Is it all smoke an mirrors and deception?
Oh how wearisome to be such a cynic! Sorry!
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
And *ahem!* That's 2 L's to you Brian!
I think there's a difference between not being saddened by the news that someone died, and saying "hey, I hope this person I don't like dies!" In my opinion, that's in pretty poor taste, no matter who it is.
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"