I have a question about guns

123578

Comments

  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 9,085
    Sorry that got all jacked up- supposed to say I have no reason not to believe
    There’s no coup, no deep state, and Mueller the republican isn’t finished with his wholly justifiable investigation.  
  • dignindignin Posts: 9,336
    mace1229 said:
    dignin said:
    mace1229 said:
    mace1229 said:
    mace1229 said:
    mace1229 said:
    I didn't say juvenile crime is on the rise. Just that some of the factors that contribute to crime are (and actually, some of them are on a slight decline, but no where near where they were 30 or 40 years ago). There are lots of other factors of course.
    Every source about homes I've ever seen always state poverty and broken homes are more common with crimes.
    These are the first 3 Google searches with broken homes, all state it as a contributing factor in crime. I don't think I've ever heard anyone actually deny a connection between the two before.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/8109184/Children-from-broken-homes-nine-times-more-likely-to-commit-crimes.html

    https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201308/poverty-broken-homes-violence-the-making-gang-member

    https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/report/the-real-root-causes-violent-crime-the-breakdown-marriage-family-and
    There’s definitely a correllation, but I guess I’m wondering about What people’s next step in their thinking is. To me what’s important is how kids and parent’s are successful in a single parent home, because obviously this happens. The kid’s success can depend a lot on whether or not they’re in poverty, access to resources and opportunity, and having other quality relationships where they feel connected. 

    What irks me is that often a conservative looks at the single parent home statistic from a good ol days myth perspective and start coming down on feminist ideals and encourage outdated gender roles in some attempt to maintain the traditional nuclear family. 

    I don't think conservatives look down on feminist ideas. Half of the group you're referring to are women. I think many do look down on bad decisions. They look down on the dead-beat dads and the 20-something single mom with 6 kids and no way to support them. But I would disagree that they look down the feminist ideas.It is very difficult financially to have a stay-at-home-mom these days, and most conservative households have working moms.
    There’s a large group, that includes conservative women, who reject the feminist label because of what they associate with it. It includes being pro-choice, but they also see it as a direct attack on the family. This is all woven into conservative Christianity. It a reason a lot of Republicans rail against public assistance. They claim the government is trying to replace the family. They associate a lot of societal ills with single parent households, so naturally this is just another way we liberals are destroying the country. 

    And while the majority of women are left or lean left, the majority of white women voted for trump. 
    I agree with that bolded part. 
    I don't think a large portion of conservatives however rail against public assistance for that reason. I don't have any data to back this it, its just my opinion that most are against excessive government assistance, because so many of us know multiple people who refuse jobs to stay on unemployment, survive off welfare so there's no motivation to get a job. Obviously that isn't everyone, or even most. I couldn't find any reliable data on nhow many on unemployment turn down jobs because those numbers are not recorded. But I know several close friends who took them exactly 2 years to find a job when unemployment was raised to 2 years, I know several friends in management who couldn't fill positions in 2008 when the crash happened because no one would accept the job when unemployment paid so well. Its not about fearing the government is replacement the family, its not wanting to help those who don't want to help themselves. 


    In NYS, unemployment doesnt cover minimum wage.

    Does that "data" impact your opinion?
    Yeah, I’m pretty doubtful about that, too. 

    And I think two different issues are being conflated in mace’s post. “Unemployment insurance” generally refers to a program that the employee has paid into and is then eligible for after losing a job through no fault of their own, like being laid off. In Canada it’s a certain percentage of your prior salary with a pretty low cap, so not particularly lucrative. However, social assistance, which is more what conservatives generally rail against, is so low that basically no one is chosing to stay on it if they had any chance of working. Here in BC the basic social assistance payment monthly is hundreds of dollars below just the lowest monthly rental properties, let alone other costs. 
    Why would unemployment not covering minimum wage change my opinion? Seems unrelated to my comment. My comment was conservatives aren't against helping people, but are against excessive handouts.
    And from my understanding, unemployment is based off of previous wages.
    Does no one else really not know anyone who has taken advantage of the system? every time this topic comes up on other threads I see many posts similar to that of "so low that basically no one is chosing to stay on it." That is 100% not true. I'm not saying the majority do, but there are definitely plenty who do. I know I said unemployment as an example, but I was referring to all forms of assistance.
    My ex-girlfriend's father and 2 very close friends from college all took 2 years to find a job when unemployment was increased to 2 years. They all 3 rarely applied to jobs and turned down others because why work 40 hours a week to make 3k, when you can go to the beach every day and hang out and make $1800?
    I had a roommate who was on disability and got $900 every 2 weeks. Her disability was ADD and was very capable of working. She turned down jobs because she would lose disability of she got hired. In fact, she took jobs all the time that paid cash because she didn't have to report that. My wife was a big sister, he little sister lived with her mom and grandma, all who openly stated why should they try to work when the government pays for their housing and food? It was so obvious even the daughter at 10 and 12 years old was saying thing slike she doesn;t need school or jobs because the government will pay her like her mom. The situation was very much like the movie "Precious" if you've never seen it, that homelife definitely does exist.
    A lot of the times these situations people will chose to work part time so they can still qualify for benefits, or take cash jobs so they don't report them.
    Don't get me wrong, many or most getting assistance need it, but am I really the only one who believes there are people who take advantage of free money?

    Conservatives, worried about someone who games the system for a few thousand but can then vote for a guy who has been gaming the system for millions.
    Thank you for adding thoughtful input that advanced the conversation.

    I thought my comment was thoughtful and did advance the conversation, you just didn't like it because it pointed to your hypocrisy. 


  • LongestRoadLongestRoad Posts: 477
    edited April 2018
    I just heard on the radio that grand theft auto the last version, has brought in 6 billion dollars in revenue.  Who's playing? 
    Add a kid that has a mental illness and or being bullied. 
    Post edited by LongestRoad on
  • PJPOWERPJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    edited April 2018
    I just heard on the radio that grand theft auto the last version, has brought in 6 billion dollars in revenue.  Who's playing? 
    Add a kid that has a mental illness and or being bullied. 
    When I was counseling children, there were several instances of young kiddos trying to act out what they had seen in violent movies and video games.  It may not be the sole cause of gun violence, but does predispose some children to aggressive behaviors.  The younger they are when playing/viewing some of these, the worse the case.
    https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/get-psyched/201201/do-violent-video-games-increase-aggression
    Post edited by PJPOWER on
  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 48,908
    Do other countries not have video games?
    www.myspace.com
  • josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 29,532
    There’s 327 million people in our country.  In 1950 there was like 150 million.  Double all your crazies and whackos and get rid of the use of asylums by instead feeding them pills.  You’re going to have a lot of deranged dangerous motherfuckers walking the streets.

    we actually have more prisoners/population than back then, but I subscribe to the “there’s a shitload of crazy people these days” school of thought.

    166,000 prison population in 1950 = .1% of total population

    2,217,000 prisoners in 2013, total population 316mil= .7% incarcerated
    how many guns in circulation ? not AR'S just guns i bet a whole lot ..
    https://www.bustle.com/p/how-many-guns-are-there-in-america-the-statistics-are-staggering-2746615
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • SmellymanSmellyman Posts: 4,524

    Do other countries not have video games?
    LOL
  • LongestRoadLongestRoad Posts: 477
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 48,908
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    okay....
    www.myspace.com
  • oftenreadingoftenreading Posts: 12,845
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • Thoughts_ArriveThoughts_Arrive Posts: 15,165
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    And Glorified G.
    Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/2014
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,027
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    These games are healthy for budding young patriots.  It teaches them the importance of WINNING!  I think every parent should get their kids the entire Grand Theft Auto series and play it with them and every time they win a game, give them a tire iron and for every ten wins, a brand new fire arm and then set them loose. 
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • LongestRoadLongestRoad Posts: 477
    edited April 2018
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    Basically, it's training them. Guns aren't killing people everyday. People are. 
    Post edited by LongestRoad on
  • KC138045KC138045 Posts: 2,716
    edited April 2018
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    Basically, it's training them. Guns aren't killing people everyday. People are. 
    I really hope you don't believe video games are training people.  If that was true I'd be playing in the NFL because of all the Madden I've played.  I also played Mortal Combat as a kid and it didn't train me to become a Ninja  and rip out peoples spines. Violent video games do not turn kids into murderers.  

    If a child believes they can take what happens in a video game out into the real world then there are bigger issues there than what video games they're playing.
    Post edited by KC138045 on
    Columbus-2000
    Columbus-2003
    Cincinnati-2006
    Columbus-2010
    Wrigley-2013
    Cincinnati-2014
    Lexington-2016
    Wrigley 1 & 2-2018
  • HesCalledDyerHesCalledDyer Posts: 16,435
    edited April 2018
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    Basically, it's training them. Guns aren't killing people everyday. People are. 
    The whole "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" argument is stale, antiquated, misleading, inaccurate, and nothing but a deflection on the real issue.
  • The JugglerThe Juggler Posts: 48,908
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    Basically, it's training them. Guns aren't killing people everyday. People are. 

    This only happens in the United States apparently. Crazy.
    www.myspace.com
  • HesCalledDyerHesCalledDyer Posts: 16,435
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    Basically, it's training them. Guns aren't killing people everyday. People are. 

    This only happens in the United States apparently. Crazy.
    Right? Funny how Japan, Germany, Spain, France, UK, Canada, Italy, Australia, S. Korea all play the same video games but don't have near the gun violence the US does.  I wonder why?
  • If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    Basically, it's training them. Guns aren't killing people everyday. People are. 

    This only happens in the United States apparently. Crazy.
    I played Contra incessantly. 

    then when I took my bazooka out on the town I couldn't figure out why I couldn't stay alive by yelling out "up up down down left right left right B A select start" every time I got shot. 
    new album "Cigarettes" out Spring 2025!

    www.headstonesband.com




  • dignindignin Posts: 9,336
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    Basically, it's training them. Guns aren't killing people everyday. People are. 

    This only happens in the United States apparently. Crazy.
    I played Contra incessantly. 

    then when I took my bazooka out on the town I couldn't figure out why I couldn't stay alive by yelling out "up up down down left right left right B A select start" every time I got shot. 
    That's because you needed to do that before you left the house....then you are good to go with infinite lives. Trust me.
  • mace1229mace1229 Posts: 9,367
    KC138045 said:
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    Basically, it's training them. Guns aren't killing people everyday. People are. 
    I really hope you don't believe video games are training people.  If that was true I'd be playing in the NFL because of all the Madden I've played.  I also played Mortal Combat as a kid and it didn't train me to become a Ninja  and rip out peoples spines. Violent video games do not turn kids into murderers.  

    If a child believes they can take what happens in a video game out into the real world then there are bigger issues there than what video games they're playing.
    That's your problem. If you really wanted to train to fight you should have played Street Fighter 2. Everyone knows that.
  • KC138045KC138045 Posts: 2,716
    mace1229 said:
    KC138045 said:
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    Basically, it's training them. Guns aren't killing people everyday. People are. 
    I really hope you don't believe video games are training people.  If that was true I'd be playing in the NFL because of all the Madden I've played.  I also played Mortal Combat as a kid and it didn't train me to become a Ninja  and rip out peoples spines. Violent video games do not turn kids into murderers.  

    If a child believes they can take what happens in a video game out into the real world then there are bigger issues there than what video games they're playing.
    That's your problem. If you really wanted to train to fight you should have played Street Fighter 2. Everyone knows that.
    Damn it now you tell me.  I am pretty great at jumping off stairs onto the top of flag poles and sliding down thanks to Mario Brothers.
    Columbus-2000
    Columbus-2003
    Cincinnati-2006
    Columbus-2010
    Wrigley-2013
    Cincinnati-2014
    Lexington-2016
    Wrigley 1 & 2-2018
  • oftenreadingoftenreading Posts: 12,845
    KC138045 said:
    mace1229 said:
    KC138045 said:
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    Basically, it's training them. Guns aren't killing people everyday. People are. 
    I really hope you don't believe video games are training people.  If that was true I'd be playing in the NFL because of all the Madden I've played.  I also played Mortal Combat as a kid and it didn't train me to become a Ninja  and rip out peoples spines. Violent video games do not turn kids into murderers.  

    If a child believes they can take what happens in a video game out into the real world then there are bigger issues there than what video games they're playing.
    That's your problem. If you really wanted to train to fight you should have played Street Fighter 2. Everyone knows that.
    Damn it now you tell me.  I am pretty great at jumping off stairs onto the top of flag poles and sliding down thanks to Mario Brothers.

    So, now you're a fire fighter?
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • HesCalledDyerHesCalledDyer Posts: 16,435
    edited April 2018
    KC138045 said:
    mace1229 said:
    KC138045 said:
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    Basically, it's training them. Guns aren't killing people everyday. People are. 
    I really hope you don't believe video games are training people.  If that was true I'd be playing in the NFL because of all the Madden I've played.  I also played Mortal Combat as a kid and it didn't train me to become a Ninja  and rip out peoples spines. Violent video games do not turn kids into murderers.  

    If a child believes they can take what happens in a video game out into the real world then there are bigger issues there than what video games they're playing.
    That's your problem. If you really wanted to train to fight you should have played Street Fighter 2. Everyone knows that.
    Damn it now you tell me.  I am pretty great at jumping off stairs onto the top of flag poles and sliding down thanks to Mario Brothers.
    I'm pretty decent at finding my way through dungeons and defeating a monster at the end by hitting it in the eye with a tool I found hidden along the way.  You should see all the princesses I've saved. It's funny though bc they all have the same fucking name. I ask one of them if they want to see my legendary blade and they all say yes.
  • KC138045 said:
    mace1229 said:
    KC138045 said:
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    Basically, it's training them. Guns aren't killing people everyday. People are. 
    I really hope you don't believe video games are training people.  If that was true I'd be playing in the NFL because of all the Madden I've played.  I also played Mortal Combat as a kid and it didn't train me to become a Ninja  and rip out peoples spines. Violent video games do not turn kids into murderers.  

    If a child believes they can take what happens in a video game out into the real world then there are bigger issues there than what video games they're playing.
    That's your problem. If you really wanted to train to fight you should have played Street Fighter 2. Everyone knows that.
    Damn it now you tell me.  I am pretty great at jumping off stairs onto the top of flag poles and sliding down thanks to Mario Brothers.
    it's how I beat up cars on weekends. 
    new album "Cigarettes" out Spring 2025!

    www.headstonesband.com




  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Posts: 49,950

    KC138045 said:
    mace1229 said:
    KC138045 said:
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    Basically, it's training them. Guns aren't killing people everyday. People are. 
    I really hope you don't believe video games are training people.  If that was true I'd be playing in the NFL because of all the Madden I've played.  I also played Mortal Combat as a kid and it didn't train me to become a Ninja  and rip out peoples spines. Violent video games do not turn kids into murderers.  

    If a child believes they can take what happens in a video game out into the real world then there are bigger issues there than what video games they're playing.
    That's your problem. If you really wanted to train to fight you should have played Street Fighter 2. Everyone knows that.
    Damn it now you tell me.  I am pretty great at jumping off stairs onto the top of flag poles and sliding down thanks to Mario Brothers.
    All I ever really mastered was a StarFox barrel roll. :loser:
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • LongestRoadLongestRoad Posts: 477
    KC138045 said:
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    Basically, it's training them. Guns aren't killing people everyday. People are. 
    I really hope you don't believe video games are training people.  If that was true I'd be playing in the NFL because of all the Madden I've played.  I also played Mortal Combat as a kid and it didn't train me to become a Ninja  and rip out peoples spines. Violent video games do not turn kids into murderers.  

    If a child believes they can take what happens in a video game out into the real world then there are bigger issues there than what video games they're playing.

    KC138045 said:
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    Basically, it's training them. Guns aren't killing people everyday. People are. 
    I really hope you don't believe video games are training people.  If that was true I'd be playing in the NFL because of all the Madden I've played.  I also played Mortal Combat as a kid and it didn't train me to become a Ninja  and rip out peoples spines. Violent video games do not turn kids into murderers.  

    If a child believes they can take what happens in a video game out into the real world then there are bigger issues there than what video games they're playing.
    There are bigger issues for some. That's what I and someone else said in previous posts. Everyone that has a gun isnt going out and killing people. Everyone thats playing violent video games and watching violence on tv isn't going out and killing people but people are desensitized  to violence from it.
  • mcgruff10mcgruff10 Posts: 28,496
    KC138045 said:
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    Basically, it's training them. Guns aren't killing people everyday. People are. 
    I really hope you don't believe video games are training people.  If that was true I'd be playing in the NFL because of all the Madden I've played.  I also played Mortal Combat as a kid and it didn't train me to become a Ninja  and rip out peoples spines. Violent video games do not turn kids into murderers.  

    If a child believes they can take what happens in a video game out into the real world then there are bigger issues there than what video games they're playing.

    KC138045 said:
    If you're against guns, surely you must be against anything that has to do with guns including video games etc. 
    Sure, because people are killed by video games every day. 
    Basically, it's training them. Guns aren't killing people everyday. People are. 
    I really hope you don't believe video games are training people.  If that was true I'd be playing in the NFL because of all the Madden I've played.  I also played Mortal Combat as a kid and it didn't train me to become a Ninja  and rip out peoples spines. Violent video games do not turn kids into murderers.  

    If a child believes they can take what happens in a video game out into the real world then there are bigger issues there than what video games they're playing.
    There are bigger issues for some. That's what I and someone else said in previous posts. Everyone that has a gun isnt going out and killing people. Everyone thats playing violent video games and watching violence on tv isn't going out and killing people but people are desensitized  to violence from it.
    From my guess about 12 ar-15's out of 3,000,000 were used in mass shootings yet everyone wants to ban them.  We are talking about 0.000004% of all ar-15's in circulation.  I really think 99.99% of gun owners are responsible but for some reason the majority of people on this forum like to constantly bring up examples showing the opposite.
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Posts: 49,950
    I don't think anyone here has ever tried to suggest that the majority of gun owners are irresponsible.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • mcgruff10mcgruff10 Posts: 28,496
    PJ_Soul said:
    I don't think anyone here has ever tried to suggest that the majority of gun owners are irresponsible.
    I didn't say that, I said the majority of people here on the boards like to show gun owners being irresponsible.  
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 9,085
    edited April 2018
    PJ_Soul said:
    I don't think anyone here has ever tried to suggest that the majority of gun owners are irresponsible.
    I have a hard time getting a pro-gun person define what responsible gun ownersip and handling means. 
Sign In or Register to comment.