In all honesty... this incident might be the most troubling of all for a number of reasons.
All sides do it... everything is a politcal prop... everything is scripted... everything is controlled... this is far from a Trump issue
Ahhhh, no.
Bullshit. You think the people that stand behind Obama, HRC, or Bernie are not hand selected for very specific reasons? You think they would let a guy with a MAGA hat stand behind HRC on the trail while giving a speech? Yeah, ok lol. That person would be removed quicker than this guy was, no question.
Both sides are very mindful of optics and political props
Mindful of optics is one thing. Removing someone for making facial expressions is another. In the 9-10 years of Obama campaigning or giving speeches, link me to one instance where an attendee was removed. Further, if I recall, he was routinely heckled, would pause before continuing and at least one time implored the crowd to stop booing and let the person finish. Both sides are not the same.
how many rallies did obama speak at where there were visible people behind him?
Dunno. More than 5 but less than 10,000?
my point is you can't really compare the two, as I don't recall obama speaking from anywhere during his presidency but a podium with no one behind him.
however, I think had HRC won, and there was a MAGA hat behind her, she may have brought it to the attention of everyone and said something like "all viewpoints are welcome at my speaches/rallies". I don't think they would have been removed.
Lol, yeah sure. She was the most calculated, guarded and least spontaneous candidate ever. Everything about HRC has been coordinated, planned, and controlled since Little Rock
In all honesty... this incident might be the most troubling of all for a number of reasons.
All sides do it... everything is a politcal prop... everything is scripted... everything is controlled... this is far from a Trump issue
Ahhhh, no.
Bullshit. You think the people that stand behind Obama, HRC, or Bernie are not hand selected for very specific reasons? You think they would let a guy with a MAGA hat stand behind HRC on the trail while giving a speech? Yeah, ok lol. That person would be removed quicker than this guy was, no question.
Both sides are very mindful of optics and political props
Mindful of optics is one thing. Removing someone for making facial expressions is another. In the 9-10 years of Obama campaigning or giving speeches, link me to one instance where an attendee was removed. Further, if I recall, he was routinely heckled, would pause before continuing and at least one time implored the crowd to stop booing and let the person finish. Both sides are not the same.
how many rallies did obama speak at where there were visible people behind him?
Dunno. More than 5 but less than 10,000?
my point is you can't really compare the two, as I don't recall obama speaking from anywhere during his presidency but a podium with no one behind him.
however, I think had HRC won, and there was a MAGA hat behind her, she may have brought it to the attention of everyone and said something like "all viewpoints are welcome at my speaches/rallies". I don't think they would have been removed.
Lol, yeah sure. She was the most calculated, guarded and least spontaneous candidate ever. Everything about HRC has been coordinated, planned, and controlled since Little Rock
Let's not fool ourselves now
I'm not claiming she was dynamic. I'm saying I think she handled situations like this with grace and integrity and diffused confrontation to show she was the bigger person.
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
In all honesty... this incident might be the most troubling of all for a number of reasons.
All sides do it... everything is a politcal prop... everything is scripted... everything is controlled... this is far from a Trump issue
Ahhhh, no.
Bullshit. You think the people that stand behind Obama, HRC, or Bernie are not hand selected for very specific reasons? You think they would let a guy with a MAGA hat stand behind HRC on the trail while giving a speech? Yeah, ok lol. That person would be removed quicker than this guy was, no question.
Both sides are very mindful of optics and political props
Mindful of optics is one thing. Removing someone for making facial expressions is another. In the 9-10 years of Obama campaigning or giving speeches, link me to one instance where an attendee was removed. Further, if I recall, he was routinely heckled, would pause before continuing and at least one time implored the crowd to stop booing and let the person finish. Both sides are not the same.
how many rallies did obama speak at where there were visible people behind him?
Dunno. More than 5 but less than 10,000?
my point is you can't really compare the two, as I don't recall obama speaking from anywhere during his presidency but a podium with no one behind him.
however, I think had HRC won, and there was a MAGA hat behind her, she may have brought it to the attention of everyone and said something like "all viewpoints are welcome at my speaches/rallies". I don't think they would have been removed.
Lol, yeah sure. She was the most calculated, guarded and least spontaneous candidate ever. Everything about HRC has been coordinated, planned, and controlled since Little Rock
Let's not fool ourselves now
I'm not claiming she was dynamic. I'm saying I think she handled situations like this with grace and integrity and diffused confrontation to show she was the bigger person.
And her handlers/team would have removed this guy, likely faster that team trump treason did
In all honesty... this incident might be the most troubling of all for a number of reasons.
All sides do it... everything is a politcal prop... everything is scripted... everything is controlled... this is far from a Trump issue
Ahhhh, no.
Bullshit. You think the people that stand behind Obama, HRC, or Bernie are not hand selected for very specific reasons? You think they would let a guy with a MAGA hat stand behind HRC on the trail while giving a speech? Yeah, ok lol. That person would be removed quicker than this guy was, no question.
Both sides are very mindful of optics and political props
Mindful of optics is one thing. Removing someone for making facial expressions is another. In the 9-10 years of Obama campaigning or giving speeches, link me to one instance where an attendee was removed. Further, if I recall, he was routinely heckled, would pause before continuing and at least one time implored the crowd to stop booing and let the person finish. Both sides are not the same.
how many rallies did obama speak at where there were visible people behind him?
Dunno. More than 5 but less than 10,000?
my point is you can't really compare the two, as I don't recall obama speaking from anywhere during his presidency but a podium with no one behind him.
however, I think had HRC won, and there was a MAGA hat behind her, she may have brought it to the attention of everyone and said something like "all viewpoints are welcome at my speaches/rallies". I don't think they would have been removed.
Lol, yeah sure. She was the most calculated, guarded and least spontaneous candidate ever. Everything about HRC has been coordinated, planned, and controlled since Little Rock
Let's not fool ourselves now
I'm not claiming she was dynamic. I'm saying I think she handled situations like this with grace and integrity and diffused confrontation to show she was the bigger person.
And her handlers/team would have removed this guy, likely faster that team trump treason did
I disagree. unless the person had been causing a disturbance. they likely just would have used a different camera angle, getting the MAGA guy out of the shot.
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
The Liar-in-Chief is a lying piece of shit. If you support him in any way, shape, or form then be ready for karma not being your friend.
Here’s video of @realDonaldTrump claiming he helped look for survivors & clear rubble on 9/11. He didn't. He was lying. #NeverForget https://t.co/gvc3MsbaJZ
The Liar-in-Chief is a lying piece of shit. If you support him in any way, shape, or form then be ready for karma not being your friend.
Here’s video of @realDonaldTrump claiming he helped look for survivors & clear rubble on 9/11. He didn't. He was lying. #NeverForget https://t.co/gvc3MsbaJZ
President Donald Trump began the 17th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks by tweeting about the FBI, claims of possible collusion between his presidential campaign and Russia, and former Attorney General Eric Holder.
The tweets, apparently rehashing reports on Fox Business Network and Fox News, came as the president was traveling to a scheduled appearance at the Flight 93 memorial in Shanksville, Pa. — the site where one of the planes hijacked on Sept. 11, 2001, crashed into a field.
The Liar-in-Chief is a lying piece of shit. If you support him in any way, shape, or form then be ready for karma not being your friend.
Here’s video of @realDonaldTrump claiming he helped look for survivors & clear rubble on 9/11. He didn't. He was lying. #NeverForget https://t.co/gvc3MsbaJZ
This hunk of shit has lied so many times I forgot about this ridiculous lie. There are lies buried under the heap of lies this weak armed tub of goo has told.
I agree with the poster above: if you still support this shithead... you're a fool. No question. Pure and simple.
President Donald Trump began the 17th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks by tweeting about the FBI, claims of possible collusion between his presidential campaign and Russia, and former Attorney General Eric Holder.
The tweets, apparently rehashing reports on Fox Business Network and Fox News, came as the president was traveling to a scheduled appearance at the Flight 93 memorial in Shanksville, Pa. — the site where one of the planes hijacked on Sept. 11, 2001, crashed into a field.
The Liar-in-Chief is a lying piece of shit. If you support him in any way, shape, or form then be ready for karma not being your friend.
Here’s video of @realDonaldTrump claiming he helped look for survivors & clear rubble on 9/11. He didn't. He was lying. #NeverForget https://t.co/gvc3MsbaJZ
Wow, your 2 hands are fast. And like you said, not "exactly" the same. Inside the White House versus facial expressions, not even heckling, at a campaign style event in an arena. Both sides are not the same. Link me to someone being tossed or forced to move from behind either Obama or Clinton in an arena, gymnasium or conference center, ballroom, etc. The White House is a completely different type of venue. Further, link me to where Clinton or Obama encouraged physical violence on the heckler.
Remember the Trump camp is PAYING people to attend these things too. Has anyone else done that???
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Wow, your 2 hands are fast. And like you said, not "exactly" the same. Inside the White House versus facial expressions, not even heckling, at a campaign style event in an arena. Both sides are not the same. Link me to someone being tossed or forced to move from behind either Obama or Clinton in an arena, gymnasium or conference center, ballroom, etc. The White House is a completely different type of venue. Further, link me to where Clinton or Obama encouraged physical violence on the heckler.
Remember the Trump camp is PAYING people to attend these things too. Has anyone else done that???
Rob Ford and his brother Doug used to hand out $20 bills to the poor and poorly educated during election campaigns. How the hell did they getaway with buying votes!
Well, his words on the day and no mention of him being out there digging in the rubble, looking for survivors. He's safe in his apartment in Trump Tower.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
Comments
Let's not fool ourselves now
EVERY day.
-EV 8/14/93
-EV 8/14/93
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/10/politics/cnn-poll-trump-approval-independents/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
If you support him in any way, shape, or form then be ready for karma not being your friend.
Here’s video of @realDonaldTrump claiming he helped look for survivors & clear rubble on 9/11. He didn't. He was lying. #NeverForget https://t.co/gvc3MsbaJZ
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I'll finish
...then 4 months later he founded Giuliani Partners, he would go on and make millions on security consulting. Rudy is a true venture opportunist!
President Donald Trump began the 17th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks by tweeting about the FBI, claims of possible collusion between his presidential campaign and Russia, and former Attorney General Eric Holder.
The tweets, apparently rehashing reports on Fox Business Network and Fox News, came as the president was traveling to a scheduled appearance at the Flight 93 memorial in Shanksville, Pa. — the site where one of the planes hijacked on Sept. 11, 2001, crashed into a field.
POS
https://youtu.be/PcKlPhFIE7w
This hunk of shit has lied so many times I forgot about this ridiculous lie. There are lies buried under the heap of lies this weak armed tub of goo has told.
I agree with the poster above: if you still support this shithead... you're a fool. No question. Pure and simple.
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com
-EV 8/14/93
How the hell did they getaway with buying votes!
‘And now it’s the tallest’: Trump, in otherwise somber interview on 9/11, couldn’t help touting one of his buildings
"Wow, that's insensitive,” recalls one of the anchors interviewing Trump on the day the World Trade Center was destroyed.
By Timothy Bella • Read more »
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
-EV 8/14/93
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Twitter Eviscerates Trump For Extremely Minimal ‘17 Years’ 9/11 Tweet
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-911-tweet_us_5b97d95ae4b0511db3e6737f