Donald Trump

dignin

cincybearcat said:

dignin said:

tbergs said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

Hannity is reporting that as soon as tonight news of “no collision found” will be out as meuller’s investigation findings.   We already knew this but 18 months is a long time for nothing

Here's what he's talking about.

House GOP says no evidence of collusion as they end Russia probe

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/12/politics/house-republicans-russia-conclusions/index.html

This is the problem with roughly 50% (or more) of American voters. House GOP says no evidence of collusion and they take it to mean that Mueller has found no evidence of collusion too. Low info voters = win for the Republicans.

Well ... it works for the Dems too when they can get them to the polls. In fact if all low info voters actually voted, Dems would win in a landslide

So we agree that most Republicans are low info voters?

And I haven't seen the stats behind the claim that most low info non-voters are democrats. Can you post the evidence here?

Gern Blansten

Tillerson was a shitty Sec of State...

JimmyV

Gern Blansten said:

Tillerson was a shitty Sec of State...

Exactly. The next guy will likely be shitty too but it's not like Tillerson was Sally Yates.

dignin

Gern Blansten said:

Tillerson was a shitty Sec of State...

Sure was, and he was the A team. Can't wait to see what Mike "B Team" Pompeo brings to the table. According to Trump they think the same, I'm sure that will work out fantastic.

HughFreakingDillon

this is what I don't get.....good leaders, great leaders know to surround themselves with people that think differently than they do. different perspectives = informed decisions. 

my2hands

HughFreakingDillon said:

this is what I don't get.....good leaders, great leaders know to surround themselves with people that think differently than they do. different perspectives = informed decisions. 

Donald Trump is a goofball that doesn't belong anywhere near the oval office...

None of this should be surprising to anyone that hasn't been warped by years of sucking down foxnews bullshit propaganda 

stuckinline

HughFreakingDillon said:

this is what I don't get.....good leaders, great leaders know to surround themselves with people that think differently than they do. different perspectives = informed decisions. 

Trump is neither a good leader or a great leader, hence the s**tshow.

HughFreakingDillon

stuckinline said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

this is what I don't get.....good leaders, great leaders know to surround themselves with people that think differently than they do. different perspectives = informed decisions. 

Trump is neither a good leader or a great leader, hence the s**tshow.

I know he's not. I cannot grasp how someone so fucking inept rose to the highest office in the land. 

cincybearcat

dignin said:

cincybearcat said:

dignin said:

tbergs said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

Hannity is reporting that as soon as tonight news of “no collision found” will be out as meuller’s investigation findings.   We already knew this but 18 months is a long time for nothing

Here's what he's talking about.

House GOP says no evidence of collusion as they end Russia probe

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/12/politics/house-republicans-russia-conclusions/index.html

This is the problem with roughly 50% (or more) of American voters. House GOP says no evidence of collusion and they take it to mean that Mueller has found no evidence of collusion too. Low info voters = win for the Republicans.

Well ... it works for the Dems too when they can get them to the polls. In fact if all low info voters actually voted, Dems would win in a landslide

So we agree that most Republicans are low info voters?

And I haven't seen the stats behind the claim that most low info non-voters are democrats. Can you post the evidence here?

No, we don’t agree. That’s not what I said at all. Where are your stats to back that up?

Im better that a large % of non-voters are low info. And when the Dems mobilize that group, they gain a lot more votes than GOP.

HughFreakingDillon

cincybearcat said:

dignin said:

cincybearcat said:

dignin said:

tbergs said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

Hannity is reporting that as soon as tonight news of “no collision found” will be out as meuller’s investigation findings.   We already knew this but 18 months is a long time for nothing

Here's what he's talking about.

House GOP says no evidence of collusion as they end Russia probe

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/12/politics/house-republicans-russia-conclusions/index.html

This is the problem with roughly 50% (or more) of American voters. House GOP says no evidence of collusion and they take it to mean that Mueller has found no evidence of collusion too. Low info voters = win for the Republicans.

Well ... it works for the Dems too when they can get them to the polls. In fact if all low info voters actually voted, Dems would win in a landslide

So we agree that most Republicans are low info voters?

And I haven't seen the stats behind the claim that most low info non-voters are democrats. Can you post the evidence here?

No, we don’t agree. That’s not what I said at all. Where are your stats to back that up?

Im better that a large % of non-voters are low info. And when the Dems mobilize that group, they gain a lot more votes than GOP.

I'd like to see stats on that. 

dignin

cincybearcat said:

dignin said:

cincybearcat said:

dignin said:

tbergs said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

Hannity is reporting that as soon as tonight news of “no collision found” will be out as meuller’s investigation findings.   We already knew this but 18 months is a long time for nothing

Here's what he's talking about.

House GOP says no evidence of collusion as they end Russia probe

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/12/politics/house-republicans-russia-conclusions/index.html

This is the problem with roughly 50% (or more) of American voters. House GOP says no evidence of collusion and they take it to mean that Mueller has found no evidence of collusion too. Low info voters = win for the Republicans.

Well ... it works for the Dems too when they can get them to the polls. In fact if all low info voters actually voted, Dems would win in a landslide

So we agree that most Republicans are low info voters?

And I haven't seen the stats behind the claim that most low info non-voters are democrats. Can you post the evidence here?

No, we don’t agree. That’s not what I said at all. Where are your stats to back that up?

Im better that a large % of non-voters are low info. And when the Dems mobilize that group, they gain a lot more votes than GOP.

Trump and his continued popularity among Republicans is all the evidence anyone should need.

Still waiting for some evidence that low info non-voters are democrats.

PJ_Soul

The Juggler said:

Tillerson found out he was fired from Trump's tweet.

Donald Trump is a fucking coward.

Absolutely. It's so stunningly unprofessional and inappropriate and disrespectful. That's how the guy does business as the POTUS. Via fucking Twitter. It's also how he handles international affairs a lot of the time. Everyone should be really, really worried about this. Because if he does that in front of the whole world without shame, just imagine the shit he's pulling behind closed doors. It's terrifying.

tbergs

No need to argue over who has the most low info voters, they're everywhere and they only come out to vote when someone stokes their ire about how disenfranchised they are. It happens on both sides. It just so happens that this last time they voted for the worst candidate the GOP has ever endorsed.

OnWis97

So now he's fired  Undersecretary of State Steve Goldstein for contradicting the offical reason for Tillerson's dismissal.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/378133-top-tillerson-aide-fired-after-giving-contradicting-account-of-ouster

This dude is absolutely unraveling.

Thirty Bills Unpaid

OnWis97 said:

So now he's fired  Undersecretary of State Steve Goldstein for contradicting the offical reason for Tillerson's dismissal.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/378133-top-tillerson-aide-fired-after-giving-contradicting-account-of-ouster

This dude is absolutely unraveling.

Lol

cincybearcat

dignin said:

cincybearcat said:

dignin said:

cincybearcat said:

dignin said:

tbergs said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

Hannity is reporting that as soon as tonight news of “no collision found” will be out as meuller’s investigation findings.   We already knew this but 18 months is a long time for nothing

Here's what he's talking about.

House GOP says no evidence of collusion as they end Russia probe

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/12/politics/house-republicans-russia-conclusions/index.html

This is the problem with roughly 50% (or more) of American voters. House GOP says no evidence of collusion and they take it to mean that Mueller has found no evidence of collusion too. Low info voters = win for the Republicans.

Well ... it works for the Dems too when they can get them to the polls. In fact if all low info voters actually voted, Dems would win in a landslide

So we agree that most Republicans are low info voters?

And I haven't seen the stats behind the claim that most low info non-voters are democrats. Can you post the evidence here?

No, we don’t agree. That’s not what I said at all. Where are your stats to back that up?

Im better that a large % of non-voters are low info. And when the Dems mobilize that group, they gain a lot more votes than GOP.

Trump and his continued popularity among Republicans is all the evidence anyone should need.

Still waiting for some evidence that low info non-voters are democrats.

Well that's not evidence at all.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/20/opinion/voter-turnout-democrats-republicans.html

Perhaps you are not understanding what I'm saying.  I believe there are likely very similar low info voters %-wise in each party.  But there are more democrats/liberals sitting on the sidelines during a presidential election.  The Republicans get their low info voters to come out and vote the 1 or 2 issues they do know (abortion being 1).  If the Democrats can get their non voters to come out and vote the 1 or 2 issues that they actually know something about (see Obama election), they win.

JimmyV

Tillerson to speak on camera at 2pm. This could get interesting.

oftenreading

OnWis97 said:

So now he's fired  Undersecretary of State Steve Goldstein for contradicting the offical reason for Tillerson's dismissal.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/378133-top-tillerson-aide-fired-after-giving-contradicting-account-of-ouster

This dude is absolutely unraveling.

The comment about him being “much happier now” is eerily reminiscent of parents telling kids that the dog is being sent to a “nice home in the country”. 

But honestly, who wouldn’t be much happier out of that wreck of a White House?
 

i_lov_it

I can't stand Donald Trump just as much as those three ***Psychopaths*** sitting together at the end of World War two...

josevolution

JimmyV said:

Tillerson to speak on camera at 2pm. This could get interesting.

There is no way he’s throwing bafoon under the bus , he will state that he made this decision on his own ...