Donald Trump

cincybearcat

ikiT said:

You left out Amy Klobuchar and Julian Castro and Tulsi Gabbard and Tom Steyer.  

AND Cory Booker and Kamala Harris.

I'm pretty sure John Delaney AND Tim Ryan are still running.  Marianne Williamson, too.

They should consolidate, platform up, and organize already.  Take it to him.

Yes I just picked a few

Smellyman

The letter to Erdogan is one of the most insane things I have read.  He went full twitter mode with more characters and thought this was a good letter?  Dude is insane and as articulate as a 4th grader. 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/16/trump-letter-erdogan-turkey-invasion

Gern Blansten

yeah and reports are that Erdogan threw it in the trash....so the tough guy approach didn't work at all

"I will call you later"....seriously?  What a fucking stupid thing to put in a letter

OnWis97

I've never ready a professional (i.e., job-related) letter, memo, email, etc. written like that.  Not everyone is a great writer, but this is clearly written by someone who has never really had to put a lot of effort into professional communication.  A lifetime of being surrounded by sycophants who do your bidding is probably the cause.  

ikiT

I will call you later.

PJNB

Smellyman said:

The letter to Erdogan is one of the most insane things I have read.  He went full twitter mode with more characters and thought this was a good letter?  Dude is insane and as articulate as a 4th grader. 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/16/trump-letter-erdogan-turkey-invasion

The world looks at Trump as a joke. Right in the bin. 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-50080737

tempo_n_groove

ikiT said:

I will call you later.

Don't be a tough guy.

HughFreakingDillon

Smellyman said:

Don't let the bullies bully you H2M.

#IStandWithH2M

LOL

HughFreakingDillon

Halifax2TheMax said:

benjs said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

cincybearcat said:

Jesus Christ when did it become ok to label other poster with labels like sex ist when you disagree with them? 

If you disagree you get a label. You get the “false equivalency” junk, you get all kinds of the words of the day. 

It’s clear some are ok with minor crimes as long as it’s their team. I get it, it’s frustrating. Id be tempted. But it’s not right. Hugh is correct and from what I’ve seen on this forums is far from a sexist. So just stop the nonsense labels.

When is it okay to label posters as advocating for violence when the person who posted did nothing of the sort and then accuse them of hiding behind something. Yea it’s fucking old when certain posters complain about the same shit they themselves do and whine about it. There’s a difference between disagreeing and coming across as sexist. That’s lost on some however.

Shall I repost all the “labels” I’ve been labeled? 

i know I'm 6 pages late, but this is hilarious:

Halifax2TheMax said:
"And no I’m not advocating violence, just pointing out that sometimes violence is necessary to enact the change you want to see"

I'm not going to keep arguing your sexist bullshit because that's exactly what it is, and it seems many here agree that you're totally off  base with that.  I guess the crazy notion of voting for someone based on merit and not gender is sexist to some. or was it because I found AOC to be annoying or something of the like (which I later actually changed my mind on)? I don't know. 

Maybe AOC an Omar are sexist now too since they are endorsing Sanders instead of Warren? 

Regarding AOC, you slammed her not on policy, and as you are an admitted father of daughters, I found your slam sexist and offensive because the way you slammed her, seemed to be solely on her gender and in a way that seemed her gender was the only thing responsible. My response to your post was something along the lines, “is that how you would talk to your daughters or would you have the same expectations of them as women?” And you threw a hissy fit and accused me of making you out to be some unfit parent or some shit. And then there was your deleted post. That’s hilarious because you're the one who brought it back up, after claiming the virtues of the ignore feature.

Regarding violence, as a privileged white male, I don’t feel the need to advocate for or act violently for the change I want to see. I can’t say that for others, particularly oppressed minorities. You seem to have difficulty drawing distinctions between top down advocacy for violence, Team Trump Treason style, his minions and their lack of condemnation of same and bottom up, organic or not, what has been deemed, on here anyway, “the left.” One is authoritarian and “state” sanctioned and the other is "knuckle heads" acting up. Again, you claimed both sides are the same or that by doing so, they would be. And yes, sometimes violence perpetrated by the downtrodden and oppressed is necessary for things to change. Particularly when peaceful and lawful means have resulted in zero change. Those MAGA hats elicit a pretty strong emotional response from me but not one that would lead me to swipe it off someone's head, spit in their face or otherwise do anything violent or intimidating. I can't say the same for someone who had a family member beaten in a Charlottesville parking garage or detained or their relative kids separated at the border or their pussy grabbed. To think violence isn't sometimes necessary, or justified, is to ignore history. I can understand the distinction, can you?

AOC and Omar are throwing their support behind the candidate that most closely aligns with their beliefs. Or maybe its sexists?

I said I found her annoying on twitter. THAT. WAS. IT. and you took that all the way to me being sexist, which, as we know, is absolute bullshit. and how many months ago was that? jesus, come up with some new material.

I also don't give a fuck what gender you are when I vote. man better than woman? I vote man. woman better than man? I vote woman. voting for a woman based on nothing but her gender is sexism. chachi. 

what deleted post? sorry, I don't keep forum notes. 

I didn't have a "hissy" fit. I took issue with you taking a jab at me (and coming from the biggest "you disagree with me so I'm going to call you names/labels" whiner on the forum, that's rich). yes, I have mentioned I have daughters. That doesn't give you carte blanche to start making personal statements about them or me. I was annoyed, yes, but I don't get triggered by your bullshit anymore. 

never claimed both sides are the same. never. never as much as implied it. but keep saying it. someday you might get your wish and it will magically make it true. I didn't get an attendance sheet, but I haven't heard of any of the people there at that rally committing assault had been, or had family members, in charlottesville. 

violence is only necessary when personally threatened with such. Not just because someone is wearing shitty read hats. 

Triggered, bahahahajhahahaha! New material? You’re the one who resurrected the past. Lol! Have a great evening! 

As far as I can see, you only come here to have fun at other peoples' expense. It's pathetic and counter-productive, and I don't understand your MO at all. 

“You only come here to have fun at other peoples’ expense?” No, I come here to express my opinions and to disagree with those opinions I disagree with. As much as some posters want to project onto me, I’m not questioning their parenthood skills, calling them names, trying to get them “in trouble with the principal,” nor do I control what they type or how they express themselves. I’m posting my opinion about their opinion and other news of the day. Tough if they don’t like or disagree with it. I too “read between the lines,” make note of the passive aggressiveness and snark and veiled comments, such as “chachi.” (A Happy Days put down, LOL).

As if, I’m the only one who comes here “to have fun at other peoples’ expense?” Maybe I come here to just post on the internet, as someone so eloquently put it? So many seem to have me all figured out that maybe they should be in psychiatry, if they’re not already?

that's what all of us, presumably, are here for; to discuss. I have no issue with disagreeing with people. It happens all the time. the issue I take is the personal attacks and labels you assign to people who challenge you. you do it constantly, whether you admit it or not. you only get away with it because of your politics.

who doesn't love chachi? LOL Scott Baio, not so much. 

but hey, that's just my "bs opinion". 

Bentleyspop

mickeyrat said:

  https://mobile.twitter.com/ndrew_lawrence/status/1184647737050062848?s=21&fbclid=IwAR3zKzkW76ErqYJJaMwBRzT2Iywt3peDqu8UvXZ0FpdMJ7JPK-FiV0fOIC8

https://twitter.com/ndrew_lawrence/status/1184647737050062848?s=19

Gern Blansten

I can't say I ever thought tRump would do the G7 at his own property....this is a giant "fuck you" to everyone

Kat

Any bets on who might be a no show?

The Juggler

Smellyman said:

The letter to Erdogan is one of the most insane things I have read.  He went full twitter mode with more characters and thought this was a good letter?  Dude is insane and as articulate as a 4th grader. 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/16/trump-letter-erdogan-turkey-invasion

He's a fourth grade letter writer.

tempo_n_groove

The Juggler said:

Smellyman said:

The letter to Erdogan is one of the most insane things I have read.  He went full twitter mode with more characters and thought this was a good letter?  Dude is insane and as articulate as a 4th grader. 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/16/trump-letter-erdogan-turkey-invasion

He's a fourth grade letter writer.

His punctuation is perfect!  That isn't taught until at least 5th grade, right?

ikiT

I told you Mike Pence would straighten all of this out.

The Juggler

"Civilization is very happy." 

ikiT

https://www.c-span.org/video/?465417-1/vice-president-pence-announces-us-turkey-reach-ceasefire-agreement-syria

ikiT

Seems like bullshit, but what do I know?
I will call you later.

ikiT

Mmmm the Soviets...

https://twitter.com/GOPChairwoman/status/1184631855745818624

mrussel1

Quite a day

1. Mulvaney admits quid pro quo
2. G7 corruption
3. Sundland further reinforces the corruption in testimony
4. US cedes territory and bases to Turkey. US gets nothing. 
5. Perry resigns