Donald Trump

1…15991600160216041605…2954

Comments

  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,410
    judicial watch is on the list with...

    newsmax
    rt
    infowars
    B
    breitbart
    focksnooze 
    daily caller
    daily stormer
    ny post
    etc etc
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,149
    BS44325 said:
    Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.
    Don’t you mean fruit from the poisonous tree? Judicial Watch is a partisan hack organization and a judge granted them a request to depose witnesses. Part of the checks and balances and every citizen should have such recourse. Wake me when their law suit results in indictments and convictions. Come to think of it, they’re like those libertarians that file liens on people. Because the lien was filed, doesn’t mean there’s merit to their claim. Plus, you’ll be lucky if the 4th string Team Trump Treason Administration state Department folks know how to open the file cabinet, never mind find the files.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    BS44325 said:
    Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.
    I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News.  But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional.  That's over.  
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,149
    Tiki said:
    Like fascism is good...
    For tiki torch, khakis and polo shirt manufacturers, sure.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,549
    BS44325 said:
    Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.
    I welcome any and all hearings to get at the truth and I’m glad to see you do as well. 
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,667
    edited March 2019
    mrussel1 said:
    BS44325 said:
    Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.
    I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News.  But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional.  That's over.  
    I care if something is from Fox News because I know they really can't be trusted to tell the true story. Sometimes they might manage it, but I'm sure never going to count on it. For all I know, whatever they report might be twisted somehow to suit their agenda or it might rely on "alternate facts" or something. Especially if it's related to Benghazi and Clinton emails! It's always better to post news from other more reliable sources.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,470
    mrussel1 said:
    BS44325 said:
    Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.
    I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News.  But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional.  That's over.  
    Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week! 
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mrussel1 said:
    BS44325 said:
    Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.
    I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News.  But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional.  That's over.  
    Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week! 
    It never hurts one to read the other side, it bullet proofs your arguments.  
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,667
    mrussel1 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mrussel1 said:
    BS44325 said:
    Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.
    I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News.  But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional.  That's over.  
    Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week! 
    It never hurts one to read the other side, it bullet proofs your arguments.  
    I think most of us get a good dose of the other side, since it's unavoidable... but I don't believe it's wise to actually use them as a source to present a fact-based story.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    PJ_Soul said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mrussel1 said:
    BS44325 said:
    Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.
    I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News.  But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional.  That's over.  
    Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week! 
    It never hurts one to read the other side, it bullet proofs your arguments.  
    I think most of us get a good dose of the other side, since it's unavoidable... but I don't believe it's wise to actually use them as a source to present a fact-based story.
    Did that story misrepresent or lie, or just intermix opinion? Because left wing sources do that in heavy dose as well,  and they are posted here all the time.  In fact,  HuffPo is worse than Fox half the time.  They are a total rag 
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,470
    mrussel1 said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mrussel1 said:
    BS44325 said:
    Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.
    I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News.  But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional.  That's over.  
    Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week! 
    It never hurts one to read the other side, it bullet proofs your arguments.  
    I think most of us get a good dose of the other side, since it's unavoidable... but I don't believe it's wise to actually use them as a source to present a fact-based story.
    Did that story misrepresent or lie, or just intermix opinion? Because left wing sources do that in heavy dose as well,  and they are posted here all the time.  In fact,  HuffPo is worse than Fox half the time.  They are a total rag 
    Source please.
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mrussel1 said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mrussel1 said:
    BS44325 said:
    Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.
    I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News.  But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional.  That's over.  
    Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week! 
    It never hurts one to read the other side, it bullet proofs your arguments.  
    I think most of us get a good dose of the other side, since it's unavoidable... but I don't believe it's wise to actually use them as a source to present a fact-based story.
    Did that story misrepresent or lie, or just intermix opinion? Because left wing sources do that in heavy dose as well,  and they are posted here all the time.  In fact,  HuffPo is worse than Fox half the time.  They are a total rag 
    Source please.
    You are unable to decipher both sarcasm and opinion? @me when you have something meaningful to say. 
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,470
    edited March 2019
    mrussel1 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mrussel1 said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mrussel1 said:
    BS44325 said:
    Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.
    I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News.  But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional.  That's over.  
    Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week! 
    It never hurts one to read the other side, it bullet proofs your arguments.  
    I think most of us get a good dose of the other side, since it's unavoidable... but I don't believe it's wise to actually use them as a source to present a fact-based story.
    Did that story misrepresent or lie, or just intermix opinion? Because left wing sources do that in heavy dose as well,  and they are posted here all the time.  In fact,  HuffPo is worse than Fox half the time.  They are a total rag 
    Source please.
    You are unable to decipher both sarcasm and opinion? @me when you have something meaningful to say. 
    @mrussel1 -- Hey dude, hitting you up looking for a source for you statement about HuffPo being worse than Fox (half the time - "in fact"). Nothing I've seen, heard or read on the subject seem to show this to be the case. Some clarification on the subject would be great. Thanks. XOXO.
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,149
    “Manafort has nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Yea sure, but Team Mueller continues to think so.

    https://apple.news/AOIiiuQWJTailkZjETOp2XA
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • benjs
    benjs Toronto, ON Posts: 9,367
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mrussel1 said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mrussel1 said:
    BS44325 said:
    Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.
    I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News.  But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional.  That's over.  
    Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week! 
    It never hurts one to read the other side, it bullet proofs your arguments.  
    I think most of us get a good dose of the other side, since it's unavoidable... but I don't believe it's wise to actually use them as a source to present a fact-based story.
    Did that story misrepresent or lie, or just intermix opinion? Because left wing sources do that in heavy dose as well,  and they are posted here all the time.  In fact,  HuffPo is worse than Fox half the time.  They are a total rag 
    Source please.
    You are unable to decipher both sarcasm and opinion? @me when you have something meaningful to say. 
    @mrussel1 -- Hey dude, hitting you up looking for a source for you statement about HuffPo being worse than Fox (half the time - "in fact"). Nothing I've seen, heard or read on the subject seem to show this to be the case. Some clarification on the subject would be great. Thanks. XOXO.
    Think he just told you he was stating an opinion. Really cute with the XOXO.
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,470
    Halifax2TheMax said:
    “Manafort has nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Yea sure, but Team Mueller continues to think so.

    https://apple.news/AOIiiuQWJTailkZjETOp2XA
    I liked how Manaforts lawyer got screamed at when he was doing his statement on the verdict. 
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,589
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    Halifax2TheMax said:
    “Manafort has nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Yea sure, but Team Mueller continues to think so.

    https://apple.news/AOIiiuQWJTailkZjETOp2XA
    I liked how Manaforts lawyer got screamed at when he was doing his statement on the verdict. 
    Yeah that was great specially granpapi with the sign 
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mrussel1 said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mrussel1 said:
    BS44325 said:
    Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.
    I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News.  But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional.  That's over.  
    Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week! 
    It never hurts one to read the other side, it bullet proofs your arguments.  
    I think most of us get a good dose of the other side, since it's unavoidable... but I don't believe it's wise to actually use them as a source to present a fact-based story.
    Did that story misrepresent or lie, or just intermix opinion? Because left wing sources do that in heavy dose as well,  and they are posted here all the time.  In fact,  HuffPo is worse than Fox half the time.  They are a total rag 
    Source please.
    You are unable to decipher both sarcasm and opinion? @me when you have something meaningful to say. 
    @mrussel1 -- Hey dude, hitting you up looking for a source for you statement about HuffPo being worse than Fox (half the time - "in fact"). Nothing I've seen, heard or read on the subject seem to show this to be the case. Some clarification on the subject would be great. Thanks. XOXO.
    Don't be a troll.  Contribute something meaningful.  Your statement on the democratic page was idiotic,  but no reason to double down. 
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,149
    josevolution said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    Halifax2TheMax said:
    “Manafort has nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Yea sure, but Team Mueller continues to think so.

    https://apple.news/AOIiiuQWJTailkZjETOp2XA
    I liked how Manaforts lawyer got screamed at when he was doing his statement on the verdict. 
    Yeah that was great specially granpapi with the sign 
    This is a sign guy.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2019/03/13/paul-manaforts-sentencing-mystery-man-cryptic-sign-that-reads-this-is-sign/
     
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,470
    edited March 2019
    Halifax2TheMax said:
    josevolution said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    Halifax2TheMax said:
    “Manafort has nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Yea sure, but Team Mueller continues to think so.

    https://apple.news/AOIiiuQWJTailkZjETOp2XA
    I liked how Manaforts lawyer got screamed at when he was doing his statement on the verdict. 
    Yeah that was great specially granpapi with the sign 
    This is a sign guy.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2019/03/13/paul-manaforts-sentencing-mystery-man-cryptic-sign-that-reads-this-is-sign/
     
    haha!
    Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
This discussion has been closed.

Categories