Donald Trump
Comments
-
judicial watch is on the list with...
newsmax
rt
infowars
B
breitbart
focksnooze
daily caller
daily stormer
ny post
etc etc0 -
Don’t you mean fruit from the poisonous tree? Judicial Watch is a partisan hack organization and a judge granted them a request to depose witnesses. Part of the checks and balances and every citizen should have such recourse. Wake me when their law suit results in indictments and convictions. Come to think of it, they’re like those libertarians that file liens on people. Because the lien was filed, doesn’t mean there’s merit to their claim. Plus, you’ll be lucky if the 4th string Team Trump Treason Administration state Department folks know how to open the file cabinet, never mind find the files.BS44325 said:Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News. But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional. That's over.BS44325 said:Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.0 -
For tiki torch, khakis and polo shirt manufacturers, sure.Tiki said:Like fascism is good...09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
I welcome any and all hearings to get at the truth and I’m glad to see you do as well.BS44325 said:Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.0 -
I care if something is from Fox News because I know they really can't be trusted to tell the true story. Sometimes they might manage it, but I'm sure never going to count on it. For all I know, whatever they report might be twisted somehow to suit their agenda or it might rely on "alternate facts" or something. Especially if it's related to Benghazi and Clinton emails! It's always better to post news from other more reliable sources.mrussel1 said:
I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News. But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional. That's over.BS44325 said:Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week!mrussel1 said:
I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News. But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional. That's over.BS44325 said:Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
It never hurts one to read the other side, it bullet proofs your arguments.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week!mrussel1 said:
I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News. But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional. That's over.BS44325 said:Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.0 -
I think most of us get a good dose of the other side, since it's unavoidable... but I don't believe it's wise to actually use them as a source to present a fact-based story.mrussel1 said:
It never hurts one to read the other side, it bullet proofs your arguments.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week!mrussel1 said:
I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News. But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional. That's over.BS44325 said:Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Did that story misrepresent or lie, or just intermix opinion? Because left wing sources do that in heavy dose as well, and they are posted here all the time. In fact, HuffPo is worse than Fox half the time. They are a total ragPJ_Soul said:
I think most of us get a good dose of the other side, since it's unavoidable... but I don't believe it's wise to actually use them as a source to present a fact-based story.mrussel1 said:
It never hurts one to read the other side, it bullet proofs your arguments.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week!mrussel1 said:
I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News. But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional. That's over.BS44325 said:Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.0 -
Source please.mrussel1 said:
Did that story misrepresent or lie, or just intermix opinion? Because left wing sources do that in heavy dose as well, and they are posted here all the time. In fact, HuffPo is worse than Fox half the time. They are a total ragPJ_Soul said:
I think most of us get a good dose of the other side, since it's unavoidable... but I don't believe it's wise to actually use them as a source to present a fact-based story.mrussel1 said:
It never hurts one to read the other side, it bullet proofs your arguments.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week!mrussel1 said:
I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News. But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional. That's over.BS44325 said:Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
You are unable to decipher both sarcasm and opinion? @me when you have something meaningful to say.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Source please.mrussel1 said:
Did that story misrepresent or lie, or just intermix opinion? Because left wing sources do that in heavy dose as well, and they are posted here all the time. In fact, HuffPo is worse than Fox half the time. They are a total ragPJ_Soul said:
I think most of us get a good dose of the other side, since it's unavoidable... but I don't believe it's wise to actually use them as a source to present a fact-based story.mrussel1 said:
It never hurts one to read the other side, it bullet proofs your arguments.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week!mrussel1 said:
I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News. But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional. That's over.BS44325 said:Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.0 -
@mrussel1 -- Hey dude, hitting you up looking for a source for you statement about HuffPo being worse than Fox (half the time - "in fact"). Nothing I've seen, heard or read on the subject seem to show this to be the case. Some clarification on the subject would be great. Thanks. XOXO.mrussel1 said:
You are unable to decipher both sarcasm and opinion? @me when you have something meaningful to say.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Source please.mrussel1 said:
Did that story misrepresent or lie, or just intermix opinion? Because left wing sources do that in heavy dose as well, and they are posted here all the time. In fact, HuffPo is worse than Fox half the time. They are a total ragPJ_Soul said:
I think most of us get a good dose of the other side, since it's unavoidable... but I don't believe it's wise to actually use them as a source to present a fact-based story.mrussel1 said:
It never hurts one to read the other side, it bullet proofs your arguments.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week!mrussel1 said:
I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News. But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional. That's over.BS44325 said:Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
“Manafort has nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Yea sure, but Team Mueller continues to think so.
https://apple.news/AOIiiuQWJTailkZjETOp2XA
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Think he just told you he was stating an opinion. Really cute with the XOXO.Spiritual_Chaos said:
@mrussel1 -- Hey dude, hitting you up looking for a source for you statement about HuffPo being worse than Fox (half the time - "in fact"). Nothing I've seen, heard or read on the subject seem to show this to be the case. Some clarification on the subject would be great. Thanks. XOXO.mrussel1 said:
You are unable to decipher both sarcasm and opinion? @me when you have something meaningful to say.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Source please.mrussel1 said:
Did that story misrepresent or lie, or just intermix opinion? Because left wing sources do that in heavy dose as well, and they are posted here all the time. In fact, HuffPo is worse than Fox half the time. They are a total ragPJ_Soul said:
I think most of us get a good dose of the other side, since it's unavoidable... but I don't believe it's wise to actually use them as a source to present a fact-based story.mrussel1 said:
It never hurts one to read the other side, it bullet proofs your arguments.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week!mrussel1 said:
I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News. But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional. That's over.BS44325 said:Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
I liked how Manaforts lawyer got screamed at when he was doing his statement on the verdict.Halifax2TheMax said:“Manafort has nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Yea sure, but Team Mueller continues to think so.
https://apple.news/AOIiiuQWJTailkZjETOp2XA"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Yeah that was great specially granpapi with the signSpiritual_Chaos said:
I liked how Manaforts lawyer got screamed at when he was doing his statement on the verdict.Halifax2TheMax said:“Manafort has nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Yea sure, but Team Mueller continues to think so.
https://apple.news/AOIiiuQWJTailkZjETOp2XAjesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
Don't be a troll. Contribute something meaningful. Your statement on the democratic page was idiotic, but no reason to double down.Spiritual_Chaos said:
@mrussel1 -- Hey dude, hitting you up looking for a source for you statement about HuffPo being worse than Fox (half the time - "in fact"). Nothing I've seen, heard or read on the subject seem to show this to be the case. Some clarification on the subject would be great. Thanks. XOXO.mrussel1 said:
You are unable to decipher both sarcasm and opinion? @me when you have something meaningful to say.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Source please.mrussel1 said:
Did that story misrepresent or lie, or just intermix opinion? Because left wing sources do that in heavy dose as well, and they are posted here all the time. In fact, HuffPo is worse than Fox half the time. They are a total ragPJ_Soul said:
I think most of us get a good dose of the other side, since it's unavoidable... but I don't believe it's wise to actually use them as a source to present a fact-based story.mrussel1 said:
It never hurts one to read the other side, it bullet proofs your arguments.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Yeah, I mean they do have a that anchor who tells the truth for one or two hours a few times per week!mrussel1 said:
I have no issues with you posting it or that it's from Fox News. But to think that this will amount to anything meaningful or a prosecution against HRC is delusional. That's over.BS44325 said:Your collective responses are so telling. Are any of you capable of introspection? Completely serious question. A federal judge ordered under oath depositions. It is irrelevant that Judicial Watch is the one requesting the depositions other then it allows you to look away under some type of “they’re conservative!” lens. And yes...Fox News reported it. But you can’t trust them because they reported a story on a judges order? As PJSoul correctly pointed out the Washington Post reported on this story as well. Nothing to “trust” or “not trust”. A judge is ordering unde oath depositions because members of the Obama State Department lied. You all constantly laugh “when is someone being locked up? Benghazi is stupid! But the emails!”. And what I’m pointing out is that the truth is coming. It is on it’s way. Look away if you don’t have the stomach. But don’t pretend it doesn’t exist. You will be forced to eat your vegetables.0 -
This is a sign guy.josevolution said:
Yeah that was great specially granpapi with the signSpiritual_Chaos said:
I liked how Manaforts lawyer got screamed at when he was doing his statement on the verdict.Halifax2TheMax said:“Manafort has nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Yea sure, but Team Mueller continues to think so.
https://apple.news/AOIiiuQWJTailkZjETOp2XA
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2019/03/13/paul-manaforts-sentencing-mystery-man-cryptic-sign-that-reads-this-is-sign/
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
haha!Halifax2TheMax said:
This is a sign guy.josevolution said:
Yeah that was great specially granpapi with the signSpiritual_Chaos said:
I liked how Manaforts lawyer got screamed at when he was doing his statement on the verdict.Halifax2TheMax said:“Manafort has nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Yea sure, but Team Mueller continues to think so.
https://apple.news/AOIiiuQWJTailkZjETOp2XA
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2019/03/13/paul-manaforts-sentencing-mystery-man-cryptic-sign-that-reads-this-is-sign/
Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 279 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help