Donald Trump
Comments
-
Citation needed.cincybearcat said:
Cause it’s just a vote getting issue for both parties. It’s why the democrats never did anything worthwhile regarding immigration when they had control. Neither party cares, just wants voters to go to polls. If they fix the issue via compromise....how do they get their voters to the poll next time??!!OnWis97 said:I have a legit question about the wall. Is there a reason it never really had momentum until after the Dems took the House? Why didn’t they fund the wall when the GOP controlled everything?
When were the democrats in power? Obama may have been President (no asterisk). But the House was firmly Conservative Majority.
"The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president."
You don't remember that?
Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013
You don't remember that?Introduced by Schumer in the Senate and co-sponsored by the "Gang of Eight", a bipartisan group of U.S. Senators who wrote and negotiated the bill. The Senate passed the bill on 68-32 margin. The bill was not considered by United States House of Representatives and died in the 113th Congress.
You don't remember that?
Yet here you come again with this 'both sides are bad' narrative. It's still horseshit.0 -
That would be correct.OnWis97 said:
So there’s a 52% chance that 57% believe this.mcgruff10 said:
48% of statistics are made up.Halifax2TheMax said:57% of voters believe Russia has compromising information on Team Trump Treason. PTape.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
Of course not. Rah, rah both sides suck. Funny too seeing how the last major immigration reform bill was signed by Reagan in 1986. This is what happens when white nationalists take over the repub party.CM189191 said:
Citation needed.cincybearcat said:
Cause it’s just a vote getting issue for both parties. It’s why the democrats never did anything worthwhile regarding immigration when they had control. Neither party cares, just wants voters to go to polls. If they fix the issue via compromise....how do they get their voters to the poll next time??!!OnWis97 said:I have a legit question about the wall. Is there a reason it never really had momentum until after the Dems took the House? Why didn’t they fund the wall when the GOP controlled everything?
When were the democrats in power? Obama may have been President (no asterisk). But the House was firmly Conservative Majority.
"The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president."
You don't remember that?
Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013
You don't remember that?Introduced by Schumer in the Senate and co-sponsored by the "Gang of Eight", a bipartisan group of U.S. Senators who wrote and negotiated the bill. The Senate passed the bill on 68-32 margin. The bill was not considered by United States House of Representatives and died in the 113th Congress.
You don't remember that?
Yet here you come again with this 'both sides are bad' narrative. It's still horseshit.
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
And for the sake of argument: Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 made it out of Senate, was promoted by Bush, and killed again by the Conservative Majority in the House.CM189191 said:
Citation needed.cincybearcat said:
Cause it’s just a vote getting issue for both parties. It’s why the democrats never did anything worthwhile regarding immigration when they had control. Neither party cares, just wants voters to go to polls. If they fix the issue via compromise....how do they get their voters to the poll next time??!!OnWis97 said:I have a legit question about the wall. Is there a reason it never really had momentum until after the Dems took the House? Why didn’t they fund the wall when the GOP controlled everything?
When were the democrats in power? Obama may have been President (no asterisk). But the House was firmly Conservative Majority.
"The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president."
You don't remember that?
Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013
You don't remember that?Introduced by Schumer in the Senate and co-sponsored by the "Gang of Eight", a bipartisan group of U.S. Senators who wrote and negotiated the bill. The Senate passed the bill on 68-32 margin. The bill was not considered by United States House of Representatives and died in the 113th Congress.
You don't remember that?
Yet here you come again with this 'both sides are bad' narrative. It's still horseshit.
So here are 2 recent examples (3 including the current shitshow) where bipartisan bills were passed by the Senate, approved by the president, and killed by conservatives.
Time & time again conservatives have shown they are more interested in making this a wedge issue, rather than actually tackling solutions.0 -
It’s a white nationalist agenda.CM189191 said:
And for the sake of argument: Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 made it out of Senate, was promoted by Bush, and killed again by the Conservative Majority in the House.CM189191 said:
Citation needed.cincybearcat said:
Cause it’s just a vote getting issue for both parties. It’s why the democrats never did anything worthwhile regarding immigration when they had control. Neither party cares, just wants voters to go to polls. If they fix the issue via compromise....how do they get their voters to the poll next time??!!OnWis97 said:I have a legit question about the wall. Is there a reason it never really had momentum until after the Dems took the House? Why didn’t they fund the wall when the GOP controlled everything?
When were the democrats in power? Obama may have been President (no asterisk). But the House was firmly Conservative Majority.
"The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president."
You don't remember that?
Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013
You don't remember that?Introduced by Schumer in the Senate and co-sponsored by the "Gang of Eight", a bipartisan group of U.S. Senators who wrote and negotiated the bill. The Senate passed the bill on 68-32 margin. The bill was not considered by United States House of Representatives and died in the 113th Congress.
You don't remember that?
Yet here you come again with this 'both sides are bad' narrative. It's still horseshit.
So here are 2 recent examples (3 including the current shitshow) where bipartisan bills were passed by the Senate, approved by the president, and killed by conservatives.
Time & time again conservatives have shown they are more interested in making this a wedge issue, rather than actually tackling solutions.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
-
And a similar percentage believe Trump's dumb wall is not worth shutting the government down. The tide....it's a turning...Halifax2TheMax said:57% of voters believe Russia has compromising information on Team Trump Treason. PTape.www.myspace.com0 -
Nice work.CM189191 said:
And for the sake of argument: Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 made it out of Senate, was promoted by Bush, and killed again by the Conservative Majority in the House.CM189191 said:
Citation needed.cincybearcat said:
Cause it’s just a vote getting issue for both parties. It’s why the democrats never did anything worthwhile regarding immigration when they had control. Neither party cares, just wants voters to go to polls. If they fix the issue via compromise....how do they get their voters to the poll next time??!!OnWis97 said:I have a legit question about the wall. Is there a reason it never really had momentum until after the Dems took the House? Why didn’t they fund the wall when the GOP controlled everything?
When were the democrats in power? Obama may have been President (no asterisk). But the House was firmly Conservative Majority.
"The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president."
You don't remember that?
Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013
You don't remember that?Introduced by Schumer in the Senate and co-sponsored by the "Gang of Eight", a bipartisan group of U.S. Senators who wrote and negotiated the bill. The Senate passed the bill on 68-32 margin. The bill was not considered by United States House of Representatives and died in the 113th Congress.
You don't remember that?
Yet here you come again with this 'both sides are bad' narrative. It's still horseshit.
So here are 2 recent examples (3 including the current shitshow) where bipartisan bills were passed by the Senate, approved by the president, and killed by conservatives.
Time & time again conservatives have shown they are more interested in making this a wedge issue, rather than actually tackling solutions.
This is not a "both sides" issue.0 -
Here are the 22 house republicans who are cool with leaving NATO
www.myspace.com0 -
November 2008 for 2 years was the last time.CM189191 said:
Citation needed.cincybearcat said:
Cause it’s just a vote getting issue for both parties. It’s why the democrats never did anything worthwhile regarding immigration when they had control. Neither party cares, just wants voters to go to polls. If they fix the issue via compromise....how do they get their voters to the poll next time??!!OnWis97 said:I have a legit question about the wall. Is there a reason it never really had momentum until after the Dems took the House? Why didn’t they fund the wall when the GOP controlled everything?
When were the democrats in power? Obama may have been President (no asterisk). But the House was firmly Conservative Majority.
"The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president."
You don't remember that?
Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013
You don't remember that?Introduced by Schumer in the Senate and co-sponsored by the "Gang of Eight", a bipartisan group of U.S. Senators who wrote and negotiated the bill. The Senate passed the bill on 68-32 margin. The bill was not considered by United States House of Representatives and died in the 113th Congress.
You don't remember that?
Yet here you come again with this 'both sides are bad' narrative. It's still horseshit.
You know both sides can be bad on some things. It’s not like it’s always only 1 side. Your data is what is horseshit.
You prove my point, 1 side actually tried to do selmthjng when they know the other side can block it...for votes.hippiemom = goodness0 -
Well I disagree. Each have had their opportunity. The latest being the republicans who punted cause it was too hard and then use it as a politics tool for votes.dignin said:
Nice work.CM189191 said:
And for the sake of argument: Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 made it out of Senate, was promoted by Bush, and killed again by the Conservative Majority in the House.CM189191 said:
Citation needed.cincybearcat said:
Cause it’s just a vote getting issue for both parties. It’s why the democrats never did anything worthwhile regarding immigration when they had control. Neither party cares, just wants voters to go to polls. If they fix the issue via compromise....how do they get their voters to the poll next time??!!OnWis97 said:I have a legit question about the wall. Is there a reason it never really had momentum until after the Dems took the House? Why didn’t they fund the wall when the GOP controlled everything?
When were the democrats in power? Obama may have been President (no asterisk). But the House was firmly Conservative Majority.
"The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president."
You don't remember that?
Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013
You don't remember that?Introduced by Schumer in the Senate and co-sponsored by the "Gang of Eight", a bipartisan group of U.S. Senators who wrote and negotiated the bill. The Senate passed the bill on 68-32 margin. The bill was not considered by United States House of Representatives and died in the 113th Congress.
You don't remember that?
Yet here you come again with this 'both sides are bad' narrative. It's still horseshit.
So here are 2 recent examples (3 including the current shitshow) where bipartisan bills were passed by the Senate, approved by the president, and killed by conservatives.
Time & time again conservatives have shown they are more interested in making this a wedge issue, rather than actually tackling solutions.
This is not a "both sides" issue.hippiemom = goodness0 -
This might be like abortion. There are definitely conservatives who want Roe V Wade overturned and then abortion to be illegal in as many states as will make it so (or even nationally) but I think there are a lot who actually fear this because they care more about it as an issue that gets their voters energized.CM189191 said:
And for the sake of argument: Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 made it out of Senate, was promoted by Bush, and killed again by the Conservative Majority in the House.CM189191 said:
Citation needed.cincybearcat said:
Cause it’s just a vote getting issue for both parties. It’s why the democrats never did anything worthwhile regarding immigration when they had control. Neither party cares, just wants voters to go to polls. If they fix the issue via compromise....how do they get their voters to the poll next time??!!OnWis97 said:I have a legit question about the wall. Is there a reason it never really had momentum until after the Dems took the House? Why didn’t they fund the wall when the GOP controlled everything?
When were the democrats in power? Obama may have been President (no asterisk). But the House was firmly Conservative Majority.
"The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president."
You don't remember that?
Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013
You don't remember that?Introduced by Schumer in the Senate and co-sponsored by the "Gang of Eight", a bipartisan group of U.S. Senators who wrote and negotiated the bill. The Senate passed the bill on 68-32 margin. The bill was not considered by United States House of Representatives and died in the 113th Congress.
You don't remember that?
Yet here you come again with this 'both sides are bad' narrative. It's still horseshit.
So here are 2 recent examples (3 including the current shitshow) where bipartisan bills were passed by the Senate, approved by the president, and killed by conservatives.
Time & time again conservatives have shown they are more interested in making this a wedge issue, rather than actually tackling solutions.1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine 2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin 2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley 2025 Nashville (II)0 -
How the hell does google figure that these type of ads are befitting my Pearl Jam bootleg blog? I have to see if there's a way to control what is advertised on your blog.
Edit: Okay I fixed it. But still...why would Trump ads be automated on my Pearl Jam page in the first place? Weird.
Post edited by Ledbetterman10 on2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 -
As a Canadian I find it pretty fucking weird no matter what side you are on to wear hats or clothes for your political alliance. How odd.0
-
Yeah, except for parades and right around elections I haven't seen much of it in the US until the MAGA hat. Such an ugly freakin hat too, wtf?PJNB said:As a Canadian I find it pretty fucking weird no matter what side you are on to wear hats or clothes for your political alliance. How odd.hippiemom = goodness0 -
Google tracks your shopping interests and then the advertising banners on different sites feature items that might be of interest to you to try and entice you.Ledbetterman10 said:How the hell does google figure that these type of ads are befitting my Pearl Jam bootleg blog? I have to see if there's a way to control what is advertised on your blog.
Edit: Okay I fixed it. But still...why would Trump ads be automated on my Pearl Jam page in the first place? Weird.
So... when you looked at getting some Trump merch...
"My brain's a good brain!"0 -
Not just your shopping interests, but also what sites you visit, articles you read, etc.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
Google tracks your shopping interests and then the advertising banners on different sites feature items that might be of interest to you to try and entice you.Ledbetterman10 said:How the hell does google figure that these type of ads are befitting my Pearl Jam bootleg blog? I have to see if there's a way to control what is advertised on your blog.
Edit: Okay I fixed it. But still...why would Trump ads be automated on my Pearl Jam page in the first place? Weird.
So... when you looked at getting some Trump merch...I LOVE MUSIC.
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com0 -
Relax. He got it cause he searches a lot of sites for “dumbass brunettes”.mfc2006 said:
Not just your shopping interests, but also what sites you visit, articles you read, etc.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
Google tracks your shopping interests and then the advertising banners on different sites feature items that might be of interest to you to try and entice you.Ledbetterman10 said:How the hell does google figure that these type of ads are befitting my Pearl Jam bootleg blog? I have to see if there's a way to control what is advertised on your blog.
Edit: Okay I fixed it. But still...why would Trump ads be automated on my Pearl Jam page in the first place? Weird.
So... when you looked at getting some Trump merch...hippiemom = goodness0 -
I'm just hassling him a bit.mfc2006 said:
Not just your shopping interests, but also what sites you visit, articles you read, etc.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
Google tracks your shopping interests and then the advertising banners on different sites feature items that might be of interest to you to try and entice you.Ledbetterman10 said:How the hell does google figure that these type of ads are befitting my Pearl Jam bootleg blog? I have to see if there's a way to control what is advertised on your blog.
Edit: Okay I fixed it. But still...why would Trump ads be automated on my Pearl Jam page in the first place? Weird.
So... when you looked at getting some Trump merch...
"My brain's a good brain!"0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 279 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help