He attempted to humanize a person (Milo) whose objective it is to de-humanize others. That's really not an admirable stance by any means. Maybe his gay friends were appalled that he would try to put this 'natural' face on someone that is trying to roll back rights that these men had fought for. Can you really blame the friends for not wanting to associate with him?
Yes. His friends turned out to be assholes. They weren't his "friends" after all. He wrote an article about a subject. That is what journalists do. The people who have a problem with that prove that they are the intolerant.
See, you had me. I thought you were an informed, reasonable poster. But after that post?!? No chance.
It should be an Internet mandate that if you are posting something negative about the intelligence of others, what you're posting better not have any sort of spelling or grammatical error anywhere. GF would have like 7 posts on this forum after all his years here.
Ok Maby that was a stretch to far. Sorry. I got fed up from being called low informed & racist from a different poster not you. Would you agree that there is a difference between a Democrat & a radical socialist Democrat? I wasn't around back then but from what I've read and heard I liked Kennedy. I like what I know about Harry Truman. Aside from Bill Clinton's personal life, I thought he was a decent Present. Bill Clinton had the economy rolling good and would actually listen to his constituents. I obviously didn't vote for Barack Obama, but when he got in, I was thrilled at least we had a black present. I thought that aspect of it was cool. Because I have none of those phobias that Hillary described. (I embrace all the races) I'm not totally anti Democrat. I thought Barack Obama (I'm checking my spelling more closely) had a great opportunity to be more like a MLK, present. If he would've tried to be more like that, I would've been much more supportive of him. That didn't work out in my opinion. Well hopefully you don't write me off now. I also think that Trump is NOT the end all be all either. By the way, Carly Fiorina was my first choice during the primaries, but that didn't work out either. Yes I voted for Trump, but if he starts acting like a dictator, I will hold his feet to the fire and become highly critical. We shall see.
That's an interesting point about Obama and MLK. Truth is, I think he could have been but the guy was forced to walk a fine line about acting "too black" to white people and acting "not black enough" to the black community. Being the first African American president was a blessing and a curse I'm sure.
His biggest problem is that he was an empty suit. Gave a great speech but that was about it. It had nothing to do with any fine line that you think he was "forced to walk".
Well give me a lifetime of Presidents that you consider empty suits. He did great things for this country and history will be very kind to him.
The truth? He claimed that Trig Palin was not in fact Sarah Palin's baby. Talk about birtherism! Clearly you are new to this game if you are just coming across Andrew Sullivan now. He is one of the father's of the blogosphere but he hasn't been a conservative for years.
See, you had me. I thought you were an informed, reasonable poster. But after that post?!? No chance.
It should be an Internet mandate that if you are posting something negative about the intelligence of others, what you're posting better not have any sort of spelling or grammatical error anywhere. GF would have like 7 posts on this forum after all his years here.
Ok Maby that was a stretch to far. Sorry. I got fed up from being called low informed & racist from a different poster not you. Would you agree that there is a difference between a Democrat & a radical socialist Democrat? I wasn't around back then but from what I've read and heard I liked Kennedy. I like what I know about Harry Truman. Aside from Bill Clinton's personal life, I thought he was a decent Present. Bill Clinton had the economy rolling good and would actually listen to his constituents. I obviously didn't vote for Barack Obama, but when he got in, I was thrilled at least we had a black present. I thought that aspect of it was cool. Because I have none of those phobias that Hillary described. (I embrace all the races) I'm not totally anti Democrat. I thought Barack Obama (I'm checking my spelling more closely) had a great opportunity to be more like a MLK, present. If he would've tried to be more like that, I would've been much more supportive of him. That didn't work out in my opinion. Well hopefully you don't write me off now. I also think that Trump is NOT the end all be all either. By the way, Carly Fiorina was my first choice during the primaries, but that didn't work out either. Yes I voted for Trump, but if he starts acting like a dictator, I will hold his feet to the fire and become highly critical. We shall see.
That's an interesting point about Obama and MLK. Truth is, I think he could have been but the guy was forced to walk a fine line about acting "too black" to white people and acting "not black enough" to the black community. Being the first African American president was a blessing and a curse I'm sure.
His biggest problem is that he was an empty suit. Gave a great speech but that was about it. It had nothing to do with any fine line that you think he was "forced to walk".
Well give me a lifetime of Presidents that you consider empty suits. He did great things for this country and history will be very kind to him.
History will remember him as the first African American president who sacrificed the entire democratic party on the alter of Obamacare which was eventually repealed and replaced during the Age of Trump that he ushered in. Oh yeah...he'll also be remembered for sitting on his hands during the Syrian genocide. You need more president's like that.
See, you had me. I thought you were an informed, reasonable poster. But after that post?!? No chance.
It should be an Internet mandate that if you are posting something negative about the intelligence of others, what you're posting better not have any sort of spelling or grammatical error anywhere. GF would have like 7 posts on this forum after all his years here.
Ok Maby that was a stretch to far. Sorry. I got fed up from being called low informed & racist from a different poster not you. Would you agree that there is a difference between a Democrat & a radical socialist Democrat? I wasn't around back then but from what I've read and heard I liked Kennedy. I like what I know about Harry Truman. Aside from Bill Clinton's personal life, I thought he was a decent Present. Bill Clinton had the economy rolling good and would actually listen to his constituents. I obviously didn't vote for Barack Obama, but when he got in, I was thrilled at least we had a black present. I thought that aspect of it was cool. Because I have none of those phobias that Hillary described. (I embrace all the races) I'm not totally anti Democrat. I thought Barack Obama (I'm checking my spelling more closely) had a great opportunity to be more like a MLK, present. If he would've tried to be more like that, I would've been much more supportive of him. That didn't work out in my opinion. Well hopefully you don't write me off now. I also think that Trump is NOT the end all be all either. By the way, Carly Fiorina was my first choice during the primaries, but that didn't work out either. Yes I voted for Trump, but if he starts acting like a dictator, I will hold his feet to the fire and become highly critical. We shall see.
That's an interesting point about Obama and MLK. Truth is, I think he could have been but the guy was forced to walk a fine line about acting "too black" to white people and acting "not black enough" to the black community. Being the first African American president was a blessing and a curse I'm sure.
His biggest problem is that he was an empty suit. Gave a great speech but that was about it. It had nothing to do with any fine line that you think he was "forced to walk".
Well give me a lifetime of Presidents that you consider empty suits. He did great things for this country and history will be very kind to him.
History will remember him as the first African American president who sacrificed the entire democratic party on the alter of Obamacare which was eventually repealed and replaced during the Age of Trump that he ushered in. Oh yeah...he'll also be remembered for sitting on his hands during the Syrian genocide. You need more president's like that.
Compared to kicking off a genocide, like Bush did, that's probably a little stronger. And Bush presided over the front side of the biggest financial crisis in 75 years and was like a cuckoo clock.. coming out to the podium every other day saying everything was okay, then recessing back in the clock.. Heckuva job, Bushie. Yeah.. I think history will be a little kinder to Obama than Bush.
He attempted to humanize a person (Milo) whose objective it is to de-humanize others. That's really not an admirable stance by any means. Maybe his gay friends were appalled that he would try to put this 'natural' face on someone that is trying to roll back rights that these men had fought for. Can you really blame the friends for not wanting to associate with him?
Yes. His friends turned out to be assholes. They weren't his "friends" after all. He wrote an article about a subject. That is what journalists do. The people who have a problem with that prove that they are the intolerant.
So as a friend you are obligated to stick with someone even if you think they are now complicit with a right wing hate monger? It's actually okay to be intolerant of intolerance.
The truth? He claimed that Trig Palin was not in fact Sarah Palin's baby. Talk about birtherism! Clearly you are new to this game if you are just coming across Andrew Sullivan now. He is one of the father's of the blogosphere but he hasn't been a conservative for years.
This policy strategist for the White House, Stephen Miller should never go on Sunday talk shows again. He's atrocious. It's not just that he is spewing pure crap but how he comes across is so, so terrible.
It sure ain't my country much to PJSoul's chagrin.
You're Canadian?
Didn't you notice that sticker I sent you came post marked from Canada?
Sorry brother I had so many stickers criss crossing the globe coming & going I didn't realize.
You sure do want American soldiers & taxpayers to do a lot of heavy lifting to make you feel better about the planet.
I don't mean this as an insult, I really don't, but it seems to me that the right wing in general seems to be overly paranoid & fearful. It comes across that you guys are afraid of everybody & everything. They talk tough, they act tough, but seem to be afraid of the world. America currently has enough nuclear weapons on hair trigger status to wipe every human off the planet. We spend more on the military than the next 10 countries combined. We have the most advanced air force, naval force, ground force, cyber, and space capabilities on the planet. We have cameras everywhere, warrantless meta data collection of phone calls, emails, and everything else. Erosion of rights and privacy. What is enough? What will make you feel safe? You really think you're way of life is at risk? Is China invading North America?
Meanwhile, it only took 19 guys with boxcutters planned in caves to turn the world upside down. So in the end, how valuable is your proposed military buildup, isolation, and saber rattling?
This policy strategist for the White House, Stephen Miller should never go on Sunday talk shows again. He's atrocious. It's not just that he is spewing pure crap but how he comes across is so, so terrible.
Congratulations Stephen Miller- on representing me this morning on the various Sunday morning shows. Great job!
See, you had me. I thought you were an informed, reasonable poster. But after that post?!? No chance.
It should be an Internet mandate that if you are posting something negative about the intelligence of others, what you're posting better not have any sort of spelling or grammatical error anywhere. GF would have like 7 posts on this forum after all his years here.
Ok Maby that was a stretch to far. Sorry. I got fed up from being called low informed & racist from a different poster not you. Would you agree that there is a difference between a Democrat & a radical socialist Democrat? I wasn't around back then but from what I've read and heard I liked Kennedy. I like what I know about Harry Truman. Aside from Bill Clinton's personal life, I thought he was a decent Present. Bill Clinton had the economy rolling good and would actually listen to his constituents. I obviously didn't vote for Barack Obama, but when he got in, I was thrilled at least we had a black present. I thought that aspect of it was cool. Because I have none of those phobias that Hillary described. (I embrace all the races) I'm not totally anti Democrat. I thought Barack Obama (I'm checking my spelling more closely) had a great opportunity to be more like a MLK, present. If he would've tried to be more like that, I would've been much more supportive of him. That didn't work out in my opinion. Well hopefully you don't write me off now. I also think that Trump is NOT the end all be all either. By the way, Carly Fiorina was my first choice during the primaries, but that didn't work out either. Yes I voted for Trump, but if he starts acting like a dictator, I will hold his feet to the fire and become highly critical. We shall see.
That's an interesting point about Obama and MLK. Truth is, I think he could have been but the guy was forced to walk a fine line about acting "too black" to white people and acting "not black enough" to the black community. Being the first African American president was a blessing and a curse I'm sure.
His biggest problem is that he was an empty suit. Gave a great speech but that was about it. It had nothing to do with any fine line that you think he was "forced to walk".
Coming from a Trump supporter, this is hilarious. Our secretary of energy went from a nuclear physicist to Rick Perry. The emperor has no suit. And you defend Milo? Finally showed your true colors like Unsung.
See, you had me. I thought you were an informed, reasonable poster. But after that post?!? No chance.
It should be an Internet mandate that if you are posting something negative about the intelligence of others, what you're posting better not have any sort of spelling or grammatical error anywhere. GF would have like 7 posts on this forum after all his years here.
Ok Maby that was a stretch to far. Sorry. I got fed up from being called low informed & racist from a different poster not you. Would you agree that there is a difference between a Democrat & a radical socialist Democrat? I wasn't around back then but from what I've read and heard I liked Kennedy. I like what I know about Harry Truman. Aside from Bill Clinton's personal life, I thought he was a decent Present. Bill Clinton had the economy rolling good and would actually listen to his constituents. I obviously didn't vote for Barack Obama, but when he got in, I was thrilled at least we had a black present. I thought that aspect of it was cool. Because I have none of those phobias that Hillary described. (I embrace all the races) I'm not totally anti Democrat. I thought Barack Obama (I'm checking my spelling more closely) had a great opportunity to be more like a MLK, present. If he would've tried to be more like that, I would've been much more supportive of him. That didn't work out in my opinion. Well hopefully you don't write me off now. I also think that Trump is NOT the end all be all either. By the way, Carly Fiorina was my first choice during the primaries, but that didn't work out either. Yes I voted for Trump, but if he starts acting like a dictator, I will hold his feet to the fire and become highly critical. We shall see.
That's an interesting point about Obama and MLK. Truth is, I think he could have been but the guy was forced to walk a fine line about acting "too black" to white people and acting "not black enough" to the black community. Being the first African American president was a blessing and a curse I'm sure.
His biggest problem is that he was an empty suit. Gave a great speech but that was about it. It had nothing to do with any fine line that you think he was "forced to walk".
Well give me a lifetime of Presidents that you consider empty suits. He did great things for this country and history will be very kind to him.
History will remember him as the first African American president who sacrificed the entire democratic party on the alter of Obamacare which was eventually repealed and replaced during the Age of Trump that he ushered in. Oh yeah...he'll also be remembered for sitting on his hands during the Syrian genocide. You need more president's like that.
Compared to kicking off a genocide, like Bush did, that's probably a little stronger. And Bush presided over the front side of the biggest financial crisis in 75 years and was like a cuckoo clock.. coming out to the podium every other day saying everything was okay, then recessing back in the clock.. Heckuva job, Bushie. Yeah.. I think history will be a little kinder to Obama than Bush.
Oh. I didn't realize we were doing a comparison. Bush's legacy doesn't make Obama's anymore sweet but feel free to dwell on it if it makes you feel better.
He attempted to humanize a person (Milo) whose objective it is to de-humanize others. That's really not an admirable stance by any means. Maybe his gay friends were appalled that he would try to put this 'natural' face on someone that is trying to roll back rights that these men had fought for. Can you really blame the friends for not wanting to associate with him?
Yes. His friends turned out to be assholes. They weren't his "friends" after all. He wrote an article about a subject. That is what journalists do. The people who have a problem with that prove that they are the intolerant.
So as a friend you are obligated to stick with someone even if you think they are now complicit with a right wing hate monger? It's actually okay to be intolerant of intolerance.
Ahhh...there it is..."complicity". I'm not sure you realize who the actual bigots are in this man's story. But this is larger picture of where we all are today...all of us who present the alternative view point are "complicit". This is why those who don't generally like Trump support him. We are tired of the progressive facism of thought. Even the more sane individuals such as yourself find ways to justify it. The left hates us and we are acting accordingly.
The truth? He claimed that Trig Palin was not in fact Sarah Palin's baby. Talk about birtherism! Clearly you are new to this game if you are just coming across Andrew Sullivan now. He is one of the father's of the blogosphere but he hasn't been a conservative for years.
He also has a history of believing in baby conspiracies. I have been reading Andrew Sullivan for years and I know full well his evolution on conservatism. As far as his support for LGBT rights it is about the same as Trump's which predated both Obama and Hillary Clinton. Trump was for gay marriage before it was cool.
Was it treason when Pelosi and Kerry met with Assad against the wishes of the Bush administration? Was Tulsi Gabbard's meeting with Assad treason? Personally I'm not sure where this Flynn situation will end up but we might want to clarify what is and isn't treason before charges are made.
It sure ain't my country much to PJSoul's chagrin.
You're Canadian?
Didn't you notice that sticker I sent you came post marked from Canada?
Sorry brother I had so many stickers criss crossing the globe coming & going I didn't realize.
You sure do want American soldiers & taxpayers to do a lot of heavy lifting to make you feel better about the planet.
I don't mean this as an insult, I really don't, but it seems to me that the right wing in general seems to be overly paranoid & fearful. It comes across that you guys are afraid of everybody & everything. They talk tough, they act tough, but seem to be afraid of the world. America currently has enough nuclear weapons on hair trigger status to wipe every human off the planet. We spend more on the military than the next 10 countries combined. We have the most advanced air force, naval force, ground force, cyber, and space capabilities on the planet. We have cameras everywhere, warrantless meta data collection of phone calls, emails, and everything else. Erosion of rights and privacy. What is enough? What will make you feel safe? You really think you're way of life is at risk? Is China invading North America?
Meanwhile, it only took 19 guys with boxcutters planned in caves to turn the world upside down. So in the end, how valuable is your proposed military buildup, isolation, and saber rattling?
See, you had me. I thought you were an informed, reasonable poster. But after that post?!? No chance.
It should be an Internet mandate that if you are posting something negative about the intelligence of others, what you're posting better not have any sort of spelling or grammatical error anywhere. GF would have like 7 posts on this forum after all his years here.
Ok Maby that was a stretch to far. Sorry. I got fed up from being called low informed & racist from a different poster not you. Would you agree that there is a difference between a Democrat & a radical socialist Democrat? I wasn't around back then but from what I've read and heard I liked Kennedy. I like what I know about Harry Truman. Aside from Bill Clinton's personal life, I thought he was a decent Present. Bill Clinton had the economy rolling good and would actually listen to his constituents. I obviously didn't vote for Barack Obama, but when he got in, I was thrilled at least we had a black present. I thought that aspect of it was cool. Because I have none of those phobias that Hillary described. (I embrace all the races) I'm not totally anti Democrat. I thought Barack Obama (I'm checking my spelling more closely) had a great opportunity to be more like a MLK, present. If he would've tried to be more like that, I would've been much more supportive of him. That didn't work out in my opinion. Well hopefully you don't write me off now. I also think that Trump is NOT the end all be all either. By the way, Carly Fiorina was my first choice during the primaries, but that didn't work out either. Yes I voted for Trump, but if he starts acting like a dictator, I will hold his feet to the fire and become highly critical. We shall see.
That's an interesting point about Obama and MLK. Truth is, I think he could have been but the guy was forced to walk a fine line about acting "too black" to white people and acting "not black enough" to the black community. Being the first African American president was a blessing and a curse I'm sure.
His biggest problem is that he was an empty suit. Gave a great speech but that was about it. It had nothing to do with any fine line that you think he was "forced to walk".
Coming from a Trump supporter, this is hilarious. Our secretary of energy went from a nuclear physicist to Rick Perry. The emperor has no suit. And you defend Milo? Finally showed your true colors like Unsung.
I defend the right to speech. Happy for those to be my true colours.
See, you had me. I thought you were an informed, reasonable poster. But after that post?!? No chance.
It should be an Internet mandate that if you are posting something negative about the intelligence of others, what you're posting better not have any sort of spelling or grammatical error anywhere. GF would have like 7 posts on this forum after all his years here.
Ok Maby that was a stretch to far. Sorry. I got fed up from being called low informed & racist from a different poster not you. Would you agree that there is a difference between a Democrat & a radical socialist Democrat? I wasn't around back then but from what I've read and heard I liked Kennedy. I like what I know about Harry Truman. Aside from Bill Clinton's personal life, I thought he was a decent Present. Bill Clinton had the economy rolling good and would actually listen to his constituents. I obviously didn't vote for Barack Obama, but when he got in, I was thrilled at least we had a black present. I thought that aspect of it was cool. Because I have none of those phobias that Hillary described. (I embrace all the races) I'm not totally anti Democrat. I thought Barack Obama (I'm checking my spelling more closely) had a great opportunity to be more like a MLK, present. If he would've tried to be more like that, I would've been much more supportive of him. That didn't work out in my opinion. Well hopefully you don't write me off now. I also think that Trump is NOT the end all be all either. By the way, Carly Fiorina was my first choice during the primaries, but that didn't work out either. Yes I voted for Trump, but if he starts acting like a dictator, I will hold his feet to the fire and become highly critical. We shall see.
That's an interesting point about Obama and MLK. Truth is, I think he could have been but the guy was forced to walk a fine line about acting "too black" to white people and acting "not black enough" to the black community. Being the first African American president was a blessing and a curse I'm sure.
His biggest problem is that he was an empty suit. Gave a great speech but that was about it. It had nothing to do with any fine line that you think he was "forced to walk".
Coming from a Trump supporter, this is hilarious. Our secretary of energy went from a nuclear physicist to Rick Perry. The emperor has no suit. And you defend Milo? Finally showed your true colors like Unsung.
I defend the right to speech. Happy for those to be my true colours.
Except if that speech involves the BDS movement. Or any criticism of Israel. Care to expound on why it's okay for government to not do business with a business that supports BDS, thus stifling the right to speech, of which you seem so proud are your true colors?
See, you had me. I thought you were an informed, reasonable poster. But after that post?!? No chance.
It should be an Internet mandate that if you are posting something negative about the intelligence of others, what you're posting better not have any sort of spelling or grammatical error anywhere. GF would have like 7 posts on this forum after all his years here.
Ok Maby that was a stretch to far. Sorry. I got fed up from being called low informed & racist from a different poster not you. Would you agree that there is a difference between a Democrat & a radical socialist Democrat? I wasn't around back then but from what I've read and heard I liked Kennedy. I like what I know about Harry Truman. Aside from Bill Clinton's personal life, I thought he was a decent Present. Bill Clinton had the economy rolling good and would actually listen to his constituents. I obviously didn't vote for Barack Obama, but when he got in, I was thrilled at least we had a black present. I thought that aspect of it was cool. Because I have none of those phobias that Hillary described. (I embrace all the races) I'm not totally anti Democrat. I thought Barack Obama (I'm checking my spelling more closely) had a great opportunity to be more like a MLK, present. If he would've tried to be more like that, I would've been much more supportive of him. That didn't work out in my opinion. Well hopefully you don't write me off now. I also think that Trump is NOT the end all be all either. By the way, Carly Fiorina was my first choice during the primaries, but that didn't work out either. Yes I voted for Trump, but if he starts acting like a dictator, I will hold his feet to the fire and become highly critical. We shall see.
That's an interesting point about Obama and MLK. Truth is, I think he could have been but the guy was forced to walk a fine line about acting "too black" to white people and acting "not black enough" to the black community. Being the first African American president was a blessing and a curse I'm sure.
No doubt !
So, the last 2 quoters think MLK is too black? What the hell does that even mean? Do you guys listen to yourselves?
I know. I know. That's not what you believe you said. However, he said had a chance to be like MLK and you intimated that would be acting too black (whatever the hell that means).
I bet you think you said - OTHER (not you, but some generic ALL) whites would deem that too black. But you didn't. Because while there is a minority that think that way possibly (and anyone is too many), it's not as many as you're trying to make it sound. Therefore, it's your thought and belief that you are conveying onto others.
It would have been nice if Obama considered how he was spending everyone's money. That would have been a good start. It's easy to give things away.
You like to attribute feelings to others. What I have found in life is most people act and react based on their own internal way of acting.
Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
Was it treason when Pelosi and Kerry met with Assad against the wishes of the Bush administration? Was Tulsi Gabbard's meeting with Assad treason? Personally I'm not sure where this Flynn situation will end up but we might want to clarify what is and isn't treason before charges are made.
False equivalency. Can't defend the Russian involvement so attack the other side. There is a whole lot of there, there and it'll come out. Follow the money. But keep making excuses for your blind loyalty.
He attempted to humanize a person (Milo) whose objective it is to de-humanize others. That's really not an admirable stance by any means. Maybe his gay friends were appalled that he would try to put this 'natural' face on someone that is trying to roll back rights that these men had fought for. Can you really blame the friends for not wanting to associate with him?
Yes. His friends turned out to be assholes. They weren't his "friends" after all. He wrote an article about a subject. That is what journalists do. The people who have a problem with that prove that they are the intolerant.
So as a friend you are obligated to stick with someone even if you think they are now complicit with a right wing hate monger? It's actually okay to be intolerant of intolerance.
Ahhh...there it is..."complicity". I'm not sure you realize who the actual bigots are in this man's story. But this is larger picture of where we all are today...all of us who present the alternative view point are "complicit". This is why those who don't generally like Trump support him. We are tired of the progressive facism of thought. Even the more sane individuals such as yourself find ways to justify it. The left hates us and we are acting accordingly.
It's not bigotry to dislike someone because of their beliefs. It is when it's race, creed, color, sex that is driving the feelings.
Comments
money.cnn.com/2017/02/12/media/andrew-sullivan-donald-trump-mental-health/index.html?sr=fbcnni021217andrew-sullivan-donald-trump-mental-health/index.html0330PMStoryLink&linkId=34411375
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-trump-lgbt-religious-freedom-pence-20170209-story.html
It's actually okay to be intolerant of intolerance.
psi.uba.ar/academica/carrerasdegrado/psicologia/sitios_catedras/practicas_profesionales/820_clinica_tr_personalidad_psicosis/material/dsm.pdf
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-russia-ties-michael-flynn-dossier-2017-2
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
Watch the video. He's so terrible. His personality is that of a hammer.
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=151&v=dLYfwprjtog
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I know. I know. That's not what you believe you said. However, he said had a chance to be like MLK and you intimated that would be acting too black (whatever the hell that means).
I bet you think you said - OTHER (not you, but some generic ALL) whites would deem that too black. But you didn't. Because while there is a minority that think that way possibly (and anyone is too many), it's not as many as you're trying to make it sound. Therefore, it's your thought and belief that you are conveying onto others.
It would have been nice if Obama considered how he was spending everyone's money. That would have been a good start. It's easy to give things away.
You like to attribute feelings to others. What I have found in life is most people act and react based on their own internal way of acting.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©