Blank Discussion Topic

1180181183185186234

Comments

  • mrussel1 said:

    Did you even research it before posting?
    W/ in 2min the headlines are now stating 2005 returns.
    Radlibs are crazy (not you) maddow is using twitter like your POTUS.
    If you hate something don't you do it too.
    MSNBC - FAKE NEWS!
    What did I post that would constitute fake news?
    I have the tax returns for President Trump and I will post it at 10pm ET.
    Not my words, try harder.
    From her twitter
    BREAKING: We've got Trump tax returns. Tonight, 9pm ET. MSNBC.
    (Seriously).


    and 38 min later since all hell has broken loose

    What we've got is from 2005... the President's 1040 form... details to come tonight 9PM ET, MSNBC.

    click bait for suckers and libs.
    I think she will face some discipline for this.
    What discipline? From who?

    Will MSNBC be mad because she spiked viewership tonight? Wait until you see tonight's ratings. Bet they jumped
    So MSNBC spikes because of clickbait tonight?
    The execs won't like this.
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,648

    mrussel1 said:

    Did you even research it before posting?
    W/ in 2min the headlines are now stating 2005 returns.
    Radlibs are crazy (not you) maddow is using twitter like your POTUS.
    If you hate something don't you do it too.
    MSNBC - FAKE NEWS!
    What did I post that would constitute fake news?
    I have the tax returns for President Trump and I will post it at 10pm ET.
    Not my words, try harder.
    From her twitter
    BREAKING: We've got Trump tax returns. Tonight, 9pm ET. MSNBC.
    (Seriously).


    and 38 min later since all hell has broken loose

    What we've got is from 2005... the President's 1040 form... details to come tonight 9PM ET, MSNBC.

    click bait for suckers and libs.
    I think she will face some discipline for this.
    What discipline? From who?

    Will MSNBC be mad because she spiked viewership tonight? Wait until you see tonight's ratings. Bet they jumped
    So MSNBC spikes because of clickbait tonight?
    The execs won't like this.
    No because people are watching the show. Me thinks they like that. Just guessing.
  • PJfanwillneverleave1PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    edited March 2017

    Buuuuuuut she was honest in both tweets. How do you discipline someone who hasn't done anything wrong? There was nothing misleading and, even if there were, there would be no punishment. You need to learn how things work in America.

    I don't want to know how things work in America anymore because your President is supposedly the most unpopular in history, lost way more than Hillary yet won because a couple of people said he should win.
    No thanks.
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761

    Buuuuuuut she was honest in both tweets. How do you discipline someone who hasn't done anything wrong? There was nothing misleading and, even if there were, there would be no punishment. You need to learn how things work in America.

    I don't want to know how things work in America anymore because your President is supposedly the most unpopular in history, lost way more than Hillary yet won because a couple of people said he should win.
    No thanks.
    Damnit. I think you've got me beat there. Well done, guy.
  • IdrisIdris Posts: 2,317

    Still sitting out the second amendment questions, I see.

    ?
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    Holy crap! Trump paid taxes! Lots of taxes!
  • unsungunsung Posts: 9,487
    Rachel Maddow is looking extremely stupid.
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    Not nearly as much as he claims. But, then again, Trump lying isn't exactly groundbreaking news.
    I think that the thing to take away from this is, whether Trump releases them or someone leaks them- the returns will see the light of day. Politically speaking, if there's something bad in them, if Trump releases them and corrects the wrong- he could survive it. If it takes someone going rogue and leaking them and something bad is in it, I don't believe he can survive that. Moral of the story, do yourself a favor and release them and own up to whatever it is that worries you.
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124

    Not nearly as much as he claims. But, then again, Trump lying isn't exactly groundbreaking news.
    I think that the thing to take away from this is, whether Trump releases them or someone leaks them- the returns will see the light of day. Politically speaking, if there's something bad in them, if Trump releases them and corrects the wrong- he could survive it. If it takes someone going rogue and leaking them and something bad is in it, I don't believe he can survive that. Moral of the story, do yourself a favor and release them and own up to whatever it is that worries you.

    Pardon my ignorance as I don't file US taxes but which part of the forms does one put the "bad" stuff in?
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    BS44325 said:

    Not nearly as much as he claims. But, then again, Trump lying isn't exactly groundbreaking news.
    I think that the thing to take away from this is, whether Trump releases them or someone leaks them- the returns will see the light of day. Politically speaking, if there's something bad in them, if Trump releases them and corrects the wrong- he could survive it. If it takes someone going rogue and leaking them and something bad is in it, I don't believe he can survive that. Moral of the story, do yourself a favor and release them and own up to whatever it is that worries you.

    Pardon my ignorance as I don't file US taxes but which part of the forms does one put the "bad" stuff in?
    I'm no tax expert. I just file for myself. I don't own businesses or have massive debt, but I believe that one has to itemize their businesses and put where the loans come from/who else is part of the business. Again, pardon my ignorance this time, but I'm 99.9% certain that you have to itemize for your businesses.
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124

    BS44325 said:

    Not nearly as much as he claims. But, then again, Trump lying isn't exactly groundbreaking news.
    I think that the thing to take away from this is, whether Trump releases them or someone leaks them- the returns will see the light of day. Politically speaking, if there's something bad in them, if Trump releases them and corrects the wrong- he could survive it. If it takes someone going rogue and leaking them and something bad is in it, I don't believe he can survive that. Moral of the story, do yourself a favor and release them and own up to whatever it is that worries you.

    Pardon my ignorance as I don't file US taxes but which part of the forms does one put the "bad" stuff in?
    I'm no tax expert. I just file for myself. I don't own businesses or have massive debt, but I believe that one has to itemize their businesses and put where the loans come from/who else is part of the business. Again, pardon my ignorance this time, but I'm 99.9% certain that you have to itemize for your businesses.
    So is it that you expect to see "bad" loans? Or "bad" business associates? What is the "bad" that you are expecting to find? Other then percentage of overall tax paid and/or charitable givings and/or overall networth estimates I honestly have no idea what "bad" anybody expects to find? I'm pretty sure you won't find a personal loan from Vladimir Putin.
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    I have no idea what to expect. Honestly, the only reason I suspect there to be issues with him is that he's not releasing them for a reason. It doesn't pass the smell test.
    Obviously Putin's name won't come up. But business associates and oligarchs in Russia could show up. He does a lot of business with China.
    It just doesn't add up. It's like hiding your cell phone from your wife. You're obviously up to something you shouldn't be.
  • Merkin BallerMerkin Baller Posts: 11,429
    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    Not nearly as much as he claims. But, then again, Trump lying isn't exactly groundbreaking news.
    I think that the thing to take away from this is, whether Trump releases them or someone leaks them- the returns will see the light of day. Politically speaking, if there's something bad in them, if Trump releases them and corrects the wrong- he could survive it. If it takes someone going rogue and leaking them and something bad is in it, I don't believe he can survive that. Moral of the story, do yourself a favor and release them and own up to whatever it is that worries you.

    Pardon my ignorance as I don't file US taxes but which part of the forms does one put the "bad" stuff in?
    I'm no tax expert. I just file for myself. I don't own businesses or have massive debt, but I believe that one has to itemize their businesses and put where the loans come from/who else is part of the business. Again, pardon my ignorance this time, but I'm 99.9% certain that you have to itemize for your businesses.
    So is it that you expect to see "bad" loans? Or "bad" business associates? What is the "bad" that you are expecting to find? Other then percentage of overall tax paid and/or charitable givings and/or overall networth estimates I honestly have no idea what "bad" anybody expects to find? I'm pretty sure you won't find a personal loan from Vladimir Putin.
    If there's nothing to hide then why the bait & switch? He said if elected his taxes would be released, but then reneged, why? What does he have to hide?
  • bootlegger10bootlegger10 Posts: 15,921
    So did the White House leak the return and Maddow & Co. just played along for ratings?

    Sick of all the games right now and the media on both sides just playing right along.

    Shenanigans!!
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    edited March 2017

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    Not nearly as much as he claims. But, then again, Trump lying isn't exactly groundbreaking news.
    I think that the thing to take away from this is, whether Trump releases them or someone leaks them- the returns will see the light of day. Politically speaking, if there's something bad in them, if Trump releases them and corrects the wrong- he could survive it. If it takes someone going rogue and leaking them and something bad is in it, I don't believe he can survive that. Moral of the story, do yourself a favor and release them and own up to whatever it is that worries you.

    Pardon my ignorance as I don't file US taxes but which part of the forms does one put the "bad" stuff in?
    I'm no tax expert. I just file for myself. I don't own businesses or have massive debt, but I believe that one has to itemize their businesses and put where the loans come from/who else is part of the business. Again, pardon my ignorance this time, but I'm 99.9% certain that you have to itemize for your businesses.
    So is it that you expect to see "bad" loans? Or "bad" business associates? What is the "bad" that you are expecting to find? Other then percentage of overall tax paid and/or charitable givings and/or overall networth estimates I honestly have no idea what "bad" anybody expects to find? I'm pretty sure you won't find a personal loan from Vladimir Putin.
    If there's nothing to hide then why the bait & switch? He said if elected his taxes would be released, but then reneged, why? What does he have to hide?
    As I said before maybe there is something to hide and maybe there is nothing. He already won an election without releasing them so he disproved the original assumption that tax returns must be released to win. Now he can withhold them and drive his opposition insane. Look what just happened tonight. Hillary once claimed that Trump paid zero taxes and we end up finding out that in 2005 he paid a higher rate then NBC, Romney and Bernie Sanders. Sure Trump claimed massive legal deductions but he overall paid $38 mil which is absolutely nothing to sneeze at. The media via Maddow and the democratic opposition come off looking ridiculous by continuing to chase these returns.
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124

    So did the White House leak the return and Maddow & Co. just played along for ratings?

    Sick of all the games right now and the media on both sides just playing right along.

    Shenanigans!!

    Trump might have leaked these himself through another party and got Maddow to take the bait. Who knows? Maybe he did..n't do it? Or maybe he did? Like Hunter the Hungry pranking Connor4real...we're talking the best prankster of all time.
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,648
    There was nothing wrong with it as a story. Any network that got them would run it, even Fox maybe. But she overhyped it before and during the show.
  • bootlegger10bootlegger10 Posts: 15,921
    BS44325 said:

    So did the White House leak the return and Maddow & Co. just played along for ratings?

    Sick of all the games right now and the media on both sides just playing right along.

    Shenanigans!!

    Trump might have leaked these himself through another party and got Maddow to take the bait. Who knows? Maybe he did..n't do it? Or maybe he did? Like Hunter the Hungry pranking Connor4real...we're talking the best prankster of all time.
    It had (imo) to be leaked by a Trump associate to benefit the President.
  • Halifax2TheMaxHalifax2TheMax Posts: 38,964
    It took wiretapping out of the news cycle though didn't it. Would love to see 2006 to 2016, though. So, what's he hiding. Lots of money. Lots of laundered money. From Russia. With love.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • BentleyspopBentleyspop Posts: 10,748
    President Obama has admitted to the wiretapping....

    https://youtu.be/2LcP4R9_QkA
  • josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 29,448
    Those taxes are for 1 yr ok let's move on he's good to go it proves he's a upstanding tax paying citizen and always has no , i mean we really don't need to see from 2006 to now for what it's funny but HRC released her taxes all the way back to the 70's so did her husband when he was president..
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 29,448
    edited March 2017
    Post edited by josevolution on
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • ikiTikiT Posts: 11,055
    It's still about the FBI director's SENATE TESTIMONY on RUSSIA today at 230 ET.

    not this probably fake distraction leaked by the WH.
    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • ikiTikiT Posts: 11,055
    edited March 2017
    Didn't he take an enormous loss ($916 million because he's SO good at business) in 1995 that, according to reports, would have allowed him to not pay any taxes for 18 years after that? 2006? That was only 11 years later.

    Seems like what is known as "bullshit", not only inside, but outside the beltway.

    DISTRACTION

    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 29,448
    Tiki said:

    It's still about the FBI director's SENATE TESTIMONY on RUSSIA today at 230 ET.

    not this probably fake distraction leaked by the WH.

    Exactly those taxes were leaked by his administration to create a distraction keep your eye on the ball folks like Tiki is saying Russian influenced our elections !
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • ikiTikiT Posts: 11,055
    edited March 2017
    “I love the poorly educated!”—Donald Trump (2016)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpdt7omPoa0
    Post edited by ikiT on
    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,435
    See - Rachel Maddow is just a blowhard like Hannity and Limbaugh.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 29,448

    See - Rachel Maddow is just a blowhard like Hannity and Limbaugh.

    Ok I can agree do please tell us who will report on issues like this on a non by partisan basis , where can we get info like this surely not in faux&friends so here we are we're do we turn now ?
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • SmellymanSmellyman Posts: 4,524

    See - Rachel Maddow is just a blowhard like Hannity and Limbaugh.

    She is far left like they are far right. She uses pesky facts though. The latter don't need to use facts pandering to their audience.
This discussion has been closed.