How do you know it hasn’t reachoed the president yet? Are you privy to the 400,000 documents, 36 electronic devices, read all 15 search warrants, reviewed the 2,000 documents labeled hot?
What’s stuck is two guilty pleas and cooperating witnesses. Have you listened to the tapes Papadopoulos has made? What about the Team Trump Treason Tower Tapes? Have you listened to those?
The volume of materials helps Team Mueller, the only entity where it really ultimately matters.
really...all that to say lying to Feds and 10 years ago tax fraud. Wolf and Maddow promised you collusion, I'm just trying to breakerfall!
One more question before I go, if there existed a direct line between TRUMP and Putin/Russia wouldn't NSA have know a year ago? Shouldn't we know by now without the Team Mueller investigation? If direct treasonous communication between TRUMP Putin/Russia Russia Russia why the need for "back channels" (Manafort, Flynn, Papadop, Sessions, JR, Jared, Hicks, Assange, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc)? (Phils drum kit)
Another question, not that I expect you to give a straight forward answer or any kind of answer that makes sense, if Team Trump Treason had no collusion with Russia, Russia,Russia and there’s nothing to hide, why the lies, retractions, revisions, changing stories, inconsistencies and Fox News coverups?
3 easy steps 1.Collusion! 2.Proof? 3.Why lie?
As predicted. But yes, why #3? Team Trump Treason has repeatedly said that he has nothing to hide, that he has no business with or in Russia and that there was no collusion. So why did Team Trump Treason lie? Are they also investors in Comet Pizza? Franchisees? Opening a branch in Alabama with Roy Moore?
How do you know it hasn’t reachoed the president yet? Are you privy to the 400,000 documents, 36 electronic devices, read all 15 search warrants, reviewed the 2,000 documents labeled hot?
What’s stuck is two guilty pleas and cooperating witnesses. Have you listened to the tapes Papadopoulos has made? What about the Team Trump Treason Tower Tapes? Have you listened to those?
The volume of materials helps Team Mueller, the only entity where it really ultimately matters.
really...all that to say lying to Feds and 10 years ago tax fraud. Wolf and Maddow promised you collusion, I'm just trying to breakerfall!
One more question before I go, if there existed a direct line between TRUMP and Putin/Russia wouldn't NSA have know a year ago? Shouldn't we know by now without the Team Mueller investigation? If direct treasonous communication between TRUMP Putin/Russia Russia Russia why the need for "back channels" (Manafort, Flynn, Papadop, Sessions, JR, Jared, Hicks, Assange, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc)? (Phils drum kit)
Another question, not that I expect you to give a straight forward answer or any kind of answer that makes sense, if Team Trump Treason had no collusion with Russia, Russia,Russia and there’s nothing to hide, why the lies, retractions, revisions, changing stories, inconsistencies and Fox News coverups?
3 easy steps 1.Collusion! 2.Proof? 3.Why lie?
Let’s say you ran a company that’s being accused of corruption and you know your not guilty wouldn’t you want an investigation to prove your not guilty? Then why is it that at every turn the current administration has tried to derail such an investigation..
How do you know it hasn’t reachoed the president yet? Are you privy to the 400,000 documents, 36 electronic devices, read all 15 search warrants, reviewed the 2,000 documents labeled hot?
What’s stuck is two guilty pleas and cooperating witnesses. Have you listened to the tapes Papadopoulos has made? What about the Team Trump Treason Tower Tapes? Have you listened to those?
The volume of materials helps Team Mueller, the only entity where it really ultimately matters.
really...all that to say lying to Feds and 10 years ago tax fraud. Wolf and Maddow promised you collusion, I'm just trying to breakerfall!
One more question before I go, if there existed a direct line between TRUMP and Putin/Russia wouldn't NSA have know a year ago? Shouldn't we know by now without the Team Mueller investigation? If direct treasonous communication between TRUMP Putin/Russia Russia Russia why the need for "back channels" (Manafort, Flynn, Papadop, Sessions, JR, Jared, Hicks, Assange, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc)? (Phils drum kit)
Another question, not that I expect you to give a straight forward answer or any kind of answer that makes sense, if Team Trump Treason had no collusion with Russia, Russia,Russia and there’s nothing to hide, why the lies, retractions, revisions, changing stories, inconsistencies and Fox News coverups?
3 easy steps 1.Collusion! 2.Proof? 3.Why lie?
Let’s say you ran a company that’s being accused of corruption and you know your not guilty wouldn’t you want an investigation to prove your not guilty? Then why is it that at every turn the current administration has tried to derail such an investigation..
If you or anyone else ever need a governmental agency to prove your innocence KYAG! I wouldn't even want a public defender on my side let alone a justice department investigation. BTW- I think you have it bassackwards
I really hope we will get to the bottom of all of this, I hope we can get the truth but given how compromised teamMueller is, my hope is dashed.
Connecting dots: recused, stepped down, demoted, ties to, former adviser of, married to, cheating with, represented, on behalf of, donated to, campaigned for, personal attorney for and on and on.
TEAM MUELLER
Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr was recently demoted, reportedly due to contacts with the author of the dossier, Christopher Steele. Other FBI and DOJ officials are embroiled in controversies over ties to the Clinton campaign or to anti-Trump communications. One of those figures is Peter Strzok, the No. 2 official in the FBI’s counterintelligence division who played a key role in the Clinton and Trump investigations. He was removed for anti-Trump, pro-Clinton statements.
400,000 documents, 36 electronic devices, 15 search warrants, 2,000 documents with stickies on them, 2 State's witnesses and 2 defendants under indictment, charged and under house arrest awaiting trial. Go Team Mueller!
400,000 documents, 36 electronic devices, 15 search warrants, 2,000 documents with stickies on them, 2 State's witnesses and 2 defendants under indictment, charged and under house arrest awaiting trial. Go Team Mueller!
Still betting the first pardon will be issued sometime between now and midnight EST on New Year's Eve. Does he fire Mueller at the same time? The current iteration of the GOP will go along for the ride regardless.
No more name-calling. If someone is a troll, we'll handle it and we'll know it when we see it. Don't discuss other members, just discuss the topics, thank you.
Strange, if it's a retraction, why does it read as (and state that it's) a correction? I wonder if your 'underground' news sites ever get anything wrong and admit it. If they did, would you stop looking there too? If they don't, do you assume they are hiding corrections, or do you assume that they have a perfect track record?
curious how 3 sources got the date wrong, the same wrong date wrong? also curious the retractions and corrections are always one way! all these major monopolized media grouos are doing is giving trump fake news ammo. currently, they can no longer afford to be wrong.
btw, you're becoming too much like most others on here with your extremism, I point out four fake news bombshells in a week and you ask for "perfect track records". others I let go and not bother mentioning, since I appreciate your comments I'll point this out so you don't become like the others. #herdmentality
pretty good source! why verify the information if it's coming from the ranking member of the Intel committee? makes sense now.
Strange, if it's a retraction, why does it read as (and state that it's) a correction? I wonder if your 'underground' news sites ever get anything wrong and admit it. If they did, would you stop looking there too? If they don't, do you assume they are hiding corrections, or do you assume that they have a perfect track record?
curious how 3 sources got the date wrong, the same wrong date wrong? also curious the retractions and corrections are always one way! all these major monopolized media grouos are doing is giving trump fake news ammo. currently, they can no longer afford to be wrong.
btw, you're becoming too much like most others on here with your extremism, I point out four fake news bombshells in a week and you ask for "perfect track records". others I let go and not bother mentioning, since I appreciate your comments I'll point this out so you don't become like the others. #herdmentality
pretty good source! why verify the information if it's coming from the ranking member of the Intel committee? makes sense now.
It'd have been nice if you quoted my response to you and responded to that, rather than quoting yourself and responding to that.
So that I understand - the Wall Street Journal's reporting is not worthy of trust, unless the Wall Street Journal is stating not to trust a competitor's reporting. Is that about it?
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
Strange, if it's a retraction, why does it read as (and state that it's) a correction? I wonder if your 'underground' news sites ever get anything wrong and admit it. If they did, would you stop looking there too? If they don't, do you assume they are hiding corrections, or do you assume that they have a perfect track record?
curious how 3 sources got the date wrong, the same wrong date wrong? also curious the retractions and corrections are always one way! all these major monopolized media grouos are doing is giving trump fake news ammo. currently, they can no longer afford to be wrong.
btw, you're becoming too much like most others on here with your extremism, I point out four fake news bombshells in a week and you ask for "perfect track records". others I let go and not bother mentioning, since I appreciate your comments I'll point this out so you don't become like the others. #herdmentality
pretty good source! why verify the information if it's coming from the ranking member of the Intel committee? makes sense now.
It'd have been nice if you quoted my response to you and responded to that, rather than quoting yourself and responding to that.
So that I understand - the Wall Street Journal's reporting is not worthy of trust, unless the Wall Street Journal is stating not to trust a competitor's reporting. Is that about it?
no, Schiff happens! GG does a good job explaining it. watch. as usual he mentions other strong arguments against monopolized media.
Media or Cult? CNN Buries a Massive Russiagate Gaffe
Instead of explaining how it reported a false story on Russiagate, CNN brought on neocon David Frum to defend it. Max Blumenthal says that's a "window into a cult created around Russiagate."
Media or Cult? CNN Buries a Massive Russiagate Gaffe
Instead of explaining how it reported a false story on Russiagate, CNN brought on neocon David Frum to defend it. Max Blumenthal says that's a "window into a cult created around Russiagate."
#Schiffhappens
400,000 documents, 2,000 of them with stickies, 36 electronic devices, 4 indicted individuals, 2 state witnesses post guilty pleas and morel risotto in a treason tree.
Media or Cult? CNN Buries a Massive Russiagate Gaffe
Instead of explaining how it reported a false story on Russiagate, CNN brought on neocon David Frum to defend it. Max Blumenthal says that's a "window into a cult created around Russiagate."
#Schiffhappens
SEN. MARK WARNER, D-VA.: Intelligence community assessment accurately characterized the extent of Russian activities in the 2016 election and its conclusion that Russian intelligence agencies were responsible for the hacking and leaking of information and using misinformation to influence our elections? Simple yes or no would suffice.
ROBERT CARDILLO, DIRECTOR, NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY: I do. Yes, sir.
STEWART: Yes, Senator.
ROGERS: Yes I do.
DAN COATS, DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE : Yes I do.
just an fbi agent displaying his political opinions. he is allowed to have an opinion
"I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy's
office" -- an apparent reference to Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe --
"that there's no way he gets elected -- but I'm afraid we can't take
that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die
before you're 40 . . . . "
just an fbi agent displaying his political opinions. he is allowed to have an opinion
"I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy's
office" -- an apparent reference to Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe --
"that there's no way he gets elected -- but I'm afraid we can't take
that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die
before you're 40 . . . . "
Comments
Speculation is health reasons.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/07/michael-flynn-judge-sentencing-287001
Rudolf!
http://www.fisc.uscourts.gov/current-membership
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I wouldn't even want a public defender on my side let alone a justice department investigation.
BTW- I think you have it bassackwards
Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr was recently demoted, reportedly due to contacts with the author of the dossier, Christopher Steele. Other FBI and DOJ officials are embroiled in controversies over ties to the Clinton campaign or to anti-Trump communications. One of those figures is Peter Strzok, the No. 2 official in the FBI’s counterintelligence division who played a key role in the Clinton and Trump investigations. He was removed for anti-Trump, pro-Clinton statements.
http://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/364175-time-for-congress-to-enhance-its-contempt-authority
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Jailed Russian hacker: I hacked Democrats 'under the command' of Russian intelligence agents
http://www.businessinsider.com/russian-hacker-democrats-dnc-intelligence-2017-12https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/is-cnn-protecting-adam-schiff-1513030251
So that I understand - the Wall Street Journal's reporting is not worthy of trust, unless the Wall Street Journal is stating not to trust a competitor's reporting. Is that about it?
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
as usual he mentions other strong arguments against monopolized media.
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/glenn-greenwald-calls-out-the-disinformation-from-fox-news-on-fox-news/amp/
2017 Lie of the Year: Russian election interference is a 'made-up story'
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/dec/12/2017-lie-year-russian-election-interference-made-s/Media or Cult? CNN Buries a Massive Russiagate Gaffe
Instead of explaining how it reported a false story on Russiagate, CNN brought on neocon David Frum to defend it. Max Blumenthal says that's a "window into a cult created around Russiagate."
#Schiffhappens
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
SEN. MARK WARNER, D-VA.: Intelligence community assessment accurately characterized the extent of Russian activities in the 2016 election and its conclusion that Russian intelligence agencies were responsible for the hacking and leaking of information and using misinformation to influence our elections? Simple yes or no would suffice.
ROBERT CARDILLO, DIRECTOR, NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY: I do. Yes, sir.
STEWART: Yes, Senator.
ROGERS: Yes I do.
DAN COATS, DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE : Yes I do.
MIKE POMPEO, DIRECTOR, CIA: Yes.
MCCABE: Yes.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
"I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy's office" -- an apparent reference to Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe -- "that there's no way he gets elected -- but I'm afraid we can't take that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40 . . . . "
I see you received your latest talking points.