Options

Russia's Influence On The American Election

199100102104105108

Comments

  • Options
    my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy.  The cyber theft is serious.  I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails,  but members of his campaign would likely be,  including Stone.  You don't find that appalling and serious?
    So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?

    If that's it, this is all a fail
  • Options
    my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    dignin said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Guess you’re all caught up in the 6 corporations that control 90% of the media and not reading the source documents, like Manafort’s sentencing memo? And social media can’t possibly sway an election.
    The hypocrisy is pretty funny. 

    2hands, good for a laugh.
    You seem to have a beef with me Canadian...

    Where is the hypocrisy?

    Any comment on the fruits of the investigation, or lack thereof? Or just trolling me as usual?
  • Options
    For old times sake 

    “There was no collusion.”
    ”I don’t know any Russians.”
    ”I have nothing to hide.”
    ”I’ll sit down and talk to anyone.”
    ”We do everything by the book.”
    “Only the guilty plea the fifth.”
    “Very legal, very cool.”

    Follow the money, from Russia with love and a PTape, all the way to impeachment.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Options
    mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 28,811
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy.  The cyber theft is serious.  I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails,  but members of his campaign would likely be,  including Stone.  You don't find that appalling and serious?
    So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?

    If that's it, this is all a fail
    Talking and coordinating are very different.  You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy.  Second,  you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted.   Third,  you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel. 
  • Options
    my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Guess you’re all caught up in the 6 corporations that control 90% of the media and not reading the source documents, like Manafort’s sentencing memo? And social media can’t possibly sway an election.
    The sentencing for crimes that have nothing to do with Trump? That sentencing?

    Don't even start with the GOP platform change going into the convention, nobody cares and the people that do already know about it, forgot about it, and wont be voting Trump in 2020 anyway
  • Options
    my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy.  The cyber theft is serious.  I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails,  but members of his campaign would likely be,  including Stone.  You don't find that appalling and serious?
    So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?

    If that's it, this is all a fail
    Talking and coordinating are very different.  You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy.  Second,  you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted.   Third,  you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel. 
    I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their team

    Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest 

    I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
  • Options
    my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    For old times sake 

    “There was no collusion.”
    ”I don’t know any Russians.”
    ”I have nothing to hide.”
    ”I’ll sit down and talk to anyone.”
    ”We do everything by the book.”
    “Only the guilty plea the fifth.”
    “Very legal, very cool.”

    Follow the money, from Russia with love and a PTape, all the way to impeachment.
    All of that means nothing... and actually, when there is no collusion, it is going to mean A LOT for Trump going into 2020
  • Options
    my2hands said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Guess you’re all caught up in the 6 corporations that control 90% of the media and not reading the source documents, like Manafort’s sentencing memo? And social media can’t possibly sway an election.
    The sentencing for crimes that have nothing to do with Trump? That sentencing?

    Don't even start with the GOP platform change going into the convention, nobody cares and the people that do already know about it, forgot about it, and wont be voting Trump in 2020 anyway
    “Nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Pauley Manafort is just some passing schmoe? I mean, I know it’s complicated and kind of boring when the talking heads aren’t screaming about it and it is difficult to remember all the connected dots and all but this ain’t over until Team Mueller, and by extension the dem house say it’s over. Your desires mean squat in that equation.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Options
    mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 28,811
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy.  The cyber theft is serious.  I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails,  but members of his campaign would likely be,  including Stone.  You don't find that appalling and serious?
    So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?

    If that's it, this is all a fail
    Talking and coordinating are very different.  You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy.  Second,  you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted.   Third,  you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel. 
    I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their team

    Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest 

    I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
    So if there's evidence that the campaign coordinated with wiki to time the release of the emails,  and that's a criminal conspiracy,  but... there isn't evidence that Trump personally knew,  you think it's a wasted investigation? Let's assume Don jr. Is implicated.  So same... fail? 

    If so,  then any hope you had was misguided from the start. I never had any hope that he personally would be able to be indicted on campaign conspiracy.  It's his entire staff, and the political damage that would result as a consequence. 
  • Options
    The JugglerThe Juggler Behind that bush over there. Posts: 47,470
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy.  The cyber theft is serious.  I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails,  but members of his campaign would likely be,  including Stone.  You don't find that appalling and serious?
    So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?

    If that's it, this is all a fail
    Talking and coordinating are very different.  You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy.  Second,  you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted.   Third,  you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel. 
    I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their team

    Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest 

    I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
    If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation. 


    chinese-happy.jpg
  • Options
    my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    my2hands said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Guess you’re all caught up in the 6 corporations that control 90% of the media and not reading the source documents, like Manafort’s sentencing memo? And social media can’t possibly sway an election.
    The sentencing for crimes that have nothing to do with Trump? That sentencing?

    Don't even start with the GOP platform change going into the convention, nobody cares and the people that do already know about it, forgot about it, and wont be voting Trump in 2020 anyway
    “Nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Pauley Manafort is just some passing schmoe? I mean, I know it’s complicated and kind of boring when the talking heads aren’t screaming about it and it is difficult to remember all the connected dots and all but this ain’t over until Team Mueller, and by extension the dem house say it’s over. Your desires mean squat in that equation.
    95% of America has no idea who Manafort is... you do realize that dont you?

    All this Mueller shit is in a bubble and only the people that already hate Trump give a shit... unless there is a smoking gun implication of the POTUS, this is ALL going to backfire

    Dont shoot the messenger 


  • Options
    Meltdown99Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOAtz8xWM0w

    Are American the most paranoid people's on planet earth?  Might be.
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • Options
    my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy.  The cyber theft is serious.  I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails,  but members of his campaign would likely be,  including Stone.  You don't find that appalling and serious?
    So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?

    If that's it, this is all a fail
    Talking and coordinating are very different.  You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy.  Second,  you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted.   Third,  you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel. 
    I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their team

    Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest 

    I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
    So if there's evidence that the campaign coordinated with wiki to time the release of the emails,  and that's a criminal conspiracy,  but... there isn't evidence that Trump personally knew,  you think it's a wasted investigation? Let's assume Don jr. Is implicated.  So same... fail? 

    If so,  then any hope you had was misguided from the start. I never had any hope that he personally would be able to be indicted on campaign conspiracy.  It's his entire staff, and the political damage that would result as a consequence. 
    Jr would be close enough that it would resonate with the general public, so then it may not be a fail.... but anything short of a family member showing direct collusion, is a fail

    You knew going into it that this wouldn't show trump was engaged in collusion or influence of Russia? I'm pretty sure that what everyone was hoping for, and that is how it has been built up in the public eye, so yes anything short of that is a fail and strengthens Trump and the GOP going into 2020
  • Options
    my2hands said:
    my2hands said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Guess you’re all caught up in the 6 corporations that control 90% of the media and not reading the source documents, like Manafort’s sentencing memo? And social media can’t possibly sway an election.
    The sentencing for crimes that have nothing to do with Trump? That sentencing?

    Don't even start with the GOP platform change going into the convention, nobody cares and the people that do already know about it, forgot about it, and wont be voting Trump in 2020 anyway
    “Nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Pauley Manafort is just some passing schmoe? I mean, I know it’s complicated and kind of boring when the talking heads aren’t screaming about it and it is difficult to remember all the connected dots and all but this ain’t over until Team Mueller, and by extension the dem house say it’s over. Your desires mean squat in that equation.
    95% of America has no idea who Manafort is... you do realize that dont you?

    All this Mueller shit is in a bubble and only the people that already hate Trump give a shit... unless there is a smoking gun implication of the POTUS, this is ALL going to backfire

    Dont shoot the messenger 


    Backfire? It’s not some campaign strategy. It’s an investigation into potential law breaking by Team Trump Treason and his associates. It’s not a game. If Team Trump Treason is innocent, he’ll be vindicated and has nothing to worry about. If not, he’ll be indicted and charged, whether now or when he leaves office. My gut tells me he’s guilty but we’ll see, right?
     
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Options
    my2hands said:
    my2hands said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Guess you’re all caught up in the 6 corporations that control 90% of the media and not reading the source documents, like Manafort’s sentencing memo? And social media can’t possibly sway an election.
    The sentencing for crimes that have nothing to do with Trump? That sentencing?

    Don't even start with the GOP platform change going into the convention, nobody cares and the people that do already know about it, forgot about it, and wont be voting Trump in 2020 anyway
    “Nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Pauley Manafort is just some passing schmoe? I mean, I know it’s complicated and kind of boring when the talking heads aren’t screaming about it and it is difficult to remember all the connected dots and all but this ain’t over until Team Mueller, and by extension the dem house say it’s over. Your desires mean squat in that equation.
    95% of America has no idea who Manafort is... you do realize that dont you?

    All this Mueller shit is in a bubble and only the people that already hate Trump give a shit... unless there is a smoking gun implication of the POTUS, this is ALL going to backfire

    Dont shoot the messenger 


    Yea, sure. And so what? What does that change?
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Options
    mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 28,811
    my2hands said:
    my2hands said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Guess you’re all caught up in the 6 corporations that control 90% of the media and not reading the source documents, like Manafort’s sentencing memo? And social media can’t possibly sway an election.
    The sentencing for crimes that have nothing to do with Trump? That sentencing?

    Don't even start with the GOP platform change going into the convention, nobody cares and the people that do already know about it, forgot about it, and wont be voting Trump in 2020 anyway
    “Nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Pauley Manafort is just some passing schmoe? I mean, I know it’s complicated and kind of boring when the talking heads aren’t screaming about it and it is difficult to remember all the connected dots and all but this ain’t over until Team Mueller, and by extension the dem house say it’s over. Your desires mean squat in that equation.
    95% of America has no idea who Manafort is... you do realize that dont you?

    All this Mueller shit is in a bubble and only the people that already hate Trump give a shit... unless there is a smoking gun implication of the POTUS, this is ALL going to backfire

    Dont shoot the messenger 


    95%? You sure about that number?
  • Options
    mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 28,811
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy.  The cyber theft is serious.  I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails,  but members of his campaign would likely be,  including Stone.  You don't find that appalling and serious?
    So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?

    If that's it, this is all a fail
    Talking and coordinating are very different.  You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy.  Second,  you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted.   Third,  you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel. 
    I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their team

    Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest 

    I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
    So if there's evidence that the campaign coordinated with wiki to time the release of the emails,  and that's a criminal conspiracy,  but... there isn't evidence that Trump personally knew,  you think it's a wasted investigation? Let's assume Don jr. Is implicated.  So same... fail? 

    If so,  then any hope you had was misguided from the start. I never had any hope that he personally would be able to be indicted on campaign conspiracy.  It's his entire staff, and the political damage that would result as a consequence. 
    Jr would be close enough that it would resonate with the general public, so then it may not be a fail.... but anything short of a family member showing direct collusion, is a fail

    You knew going into it that this wouldn't show trump was engaged in collusion or influence of Russia? I'm pretty sure that what everyone was hoping for, and that is how it has been built up in the public eye, so yes anything short of that is a fail and strengthens Trump and the GOP going into 2020
    I didn't say I knew,  but I didn't think it likely. His crimes are probably more typical white collar,  from his business dealings.  The fact that he communicates like Paulie from Goodfellas eliminated a true smoking gun from him personally.  I do believe his campaign conspired and if the report doesn't detail that, then I'll be disappointed. 

    But I disagree that anything less strengthens them.  He is damaged regardless, particularly with moderates.  This is based on the existing indictments,  rhetoric,  policy,  shutdown,  etc  He has only shrunk his support in the past two years 
  • Options
    dignindignin Posts: 9,304
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy.  The cyber theft is serious.  I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails,  but members of his campaign would likely be,  including Stone.  You don't find that appalling and serious?
    So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?

    If that's it, this is all a fail
    Talking and coordinating are very different.  You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy.  Second,  you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted.   Third,  you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel. 
    I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their team

    Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest 

    I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
    If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation. 


    Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.

    And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.
  • Options
    oftenreadingoftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,844
    my2hands said:
    my2hands said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Guess you’re all caught up in the 6 corporations that control 90% of the media and not reading the source documents, like Manafort’s sentencing memo? And social media can’t possibly sway an election.
    The sentencing for crimes that have nothing to do with Trump? That sentencing?

    Don't even start with the GOP platform change going into the convention, nobody cares and the people that do already know about it, forgot about it, and wont be voting Trump in 2020 anyway
    “Nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Pauley Manafort is just some passing schmoe? I mean, I know it’s complicated and kind of boring when the talking heads aren’t screaming about it and it is difficult to remember all the connected dots and all but this ain’t over until Team Mueller, and by extension the dem house say it’s over. Your desires mean squat in that equation.
    95% of America has no idea who Manafort is... you do realize that dont you?

    All this Mueller shit is in a bubble and only the people that already hate Trump give a shit... unless there is a smoking gun implication of the POTUS, this is ALL going to backfire

    Dont shoot the messenger 


    95% have no idea who Manafort is, and yet simultaneously the whole country is being brainwashed by 6 major news organizations.... most of whom have extensively covered Manafort’s doings and trial. 
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • Options
    Lerxst1992Lerxst1992 Posts: 6,227
    my2hands said:
    Yeah, the only one that matters...

    Honestly, what do they have with those indictments? It's all ticky-tack bs like porn star payments or completely unrelated to the campaign/Trump.... this has been built up in the public eye and so far, I'm not seeing the money shot... he will come out of this untouched and it will play right into his hand in 2020... 

    Stormy payoffs? Nobody cares
    Roger talked to Wikileaks? So what
    What else so far?

    The left leaning media like MSNBC is already saying a short report is a good report, and that it could lead to MORE investigations... hilarious, they are already preparing people for the soft landing that they have bupkus on Trump

    This was built up to show direct COLLUSION between Trump campaign and Russia, and that maybe Trump was compromised and beholden to Putin.... well, if they dont produce a smoking gun showing that then this is a total fail and plays into the Trump narrative and works to his benefit in 2020

    I think that is why Halifax is quiet, this is beginning to look like a flop


    You know all the indictments are related to lying about russian collusion?

    Do you recall the GOP and media firestorm when WJC spent five minutes on a plane with the AG? How that was the Democrats sabotoging the Hillary investigations? 

    Can you imagine if Obama fired the AG? And replaced with two AG appointments who literally interviewed publicly by stating they are against the Hilary investigation and would work to shut it down if they were AG?

    Could you imagine if the roles were reversed? Heck, all the Rs thought Hillary belonged in jail for an improper server for cryin out loud. How silly.
  • Options
    The JugglerThe Juggler Behind that bush over there. Posts: 47,470
    dignin said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy.  The cyber theft is serious.  I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails,  but members of his campaign would likely be,  including Stone.  You don't find that appalling and serious?
    So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?

    If that's it, this is all a fail
    Talking and coordinating are very different.  You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy.  Second,  you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted.   Third,  you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel. 
    I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their team

    Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest 

    I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
    If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation. 


    Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.

    And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.
    Just a strange series of posts...
    chinese-happy.jpg
  • Options
    cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,156
    This thread got a lot more entertaining
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Options
    my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    Look at the AMT bubble cabal get their shorts in a bunch and posse up... bwahahahaha.... look guys, someone is not blindly buying this report will destroy Trump, we better get him! It's entertaining 

    Where's the fucking impeachments you guys were all saying was coming??? *crickets*

    When is this report going to touch the POTUS and show he's a Russian stooge? *crickets*

    So far you have goofball Roger Stone, two fucking years for that? What else, please enlighten me gifted ones! 

    The left of center and moderate media is already hedging their bet and it seems obvious... Fox and the GOP will soon be doing a victory lap and ya'll will still be in here acting like Trumps days are numbered lol

    By the way, I remember when progressives and the left LOVED Wikileaks... remember those days? Or has TDS fully kicked in now lol
  • Options
    my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    edited February 2019
    dignin said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy.  The cyber theft is serious.  I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails,  but members of his campaign would likely be,  including Stone.  You don't find that appalling and serious?
    So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?

    If that's it, this is all a fail
    Talking and coordinating are very different.  You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy.  Second,  you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted.   Third,  you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel. 
    I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their team

    Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest 

    I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
    If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation. 


    Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.

    And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.
    I'm way out of my depth? You're an f'ing Canadian obsessed with American politics and have a Trump avatar... c'mon now poser, you don't really give AF, it's just entertainment to you... you don't add squat here, you just seem to follow me around and make wise ass comments in between nodding in agreement with the echo chamber

    And you can use my name, no need to be a coward when you talk smack

    Let me show you how to do it, nice and direct.... do you have a problem with me digning? If so, speak up 

    That goes for almost ALL of you.... you turn into a bunch of pricks when someone dare not agree or go with the bullshit echo chamber in here... you gang up, you talk shit, and you literally circle that person and try to bully them... been watching it, tried to call you guys out on it,  but now it's time to not play so nice... and it's always the same clowns... here's my advice, get off my jock... 

    Disagree with me respectfully, or keep it moving... otherwise I'm calling your ass out


    Post edited by my2hands on
  • Options
    my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    dignin said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy.  The cyber theft is serious.  I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails,  but members of his campaign would likely be,  including Stone.  You don't find that appalling and serious?
    So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?

    If that's it, this is all a fail
    Talking and coordinating are very different.  You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy.  Second,  you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted.   Third,  you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel. 
    I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their team

    Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest 

    I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
    If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation. 


    Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.

    And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.
    Just a strange series of posts...
    You voted for W twice, beat it
  • Options
    my2hands said:
    dignin said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy.  The cyber theft is serious.  I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails,  but members of his campaign would likely be,  including Stone.  You don't find that appalling and serious?
    So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?

    If that's it, this is all a fail
    Talking and coordinating are very different.  You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy.  Second,  you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted.   Third,  you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel. 
    I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their team

    Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest 

    I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
    If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation. 


    Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.

    And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.
    I'm way out of my depth? You're an f'ing Canadian obsessed with American politics and have a Trump avatar... c'mon now poser, you don't really give AF, it's just entertainment to you... you don't add squat here, you just seem to follow me around and make wise ass comments in between nodding in agreement with the echo chamber

    And you can use my name, no need to be a coward when you talk smack

    Let me show you how to do it, nice and direct.... do you have a problem with me signing? If so, speak up 

    That goes for almost ALL of you.... you turn into a bunch of pricks when someone dare not agree or go with the bullshit echo chamber in here... you gang up, you talk shit, and you literally circle that person and try to bully them... been watching it, tried to call you guys out on it,  but now it's time to not play so nice... and it's always the same clowns... here's my advice, get off my jock... 

    Disagree with me respectfully, or keep it moving... otherwise I'm calling your ass out


    I’m not buying what you’re selling, sale denied. Okay, say you’re right. So what?
     
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Options
    mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 28,811
    my2hands said:
    dignin said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy.  The cyber theft is serious.  I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails,  but members of his campaign would likely be,  including Stone.  You don't find that appalling and serious?
    So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?

    If that's it, this is all a fail
    Talking and coordinating are very different.  You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy.  Second,  you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted.   Third,  you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel. 
    I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their team

    Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest 

    I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
    If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation. 


    Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.

    And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.
    I'm way out of my depth? You're an f'ing Canadian obsessed with American politics and have a Trump avatar... c'mon now poser, you don't really give AF, it's just entertainment to you... you don't add squat here, you just seem to follow me around and make wise ass comments in between nodding in agreement with the echo chamber

    And you can use my name, no need to be a coward when you talk smack

    Let me show you how to do it, nice and direct.... do you have a problem with me digning? If so, speak up 

    That goes for almost ALL of you.... you turn into a bunch of pricks when someone dare not agree or go with the bullshit echo chamber in here... you gang up, you talk shit, and you literally circle that person and try to bully them... been watching it, tried to call you guys out on it,  but now it's time to not play so nice... and it's always the same clowns... here's my advice, get off my jock... 

    Disagree with me respectfully, or keep it moving... otherwise I'm calling your ass out


    I am fascinated with this direction as well.  
  • Options
    cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,156
    my2hands said:
    dignin said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy.  The cyber theft is serious.  I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails,  but members of his campaign would likely be,  including Stone.  You don't find that appalling and serious?
    So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?

    If that's it, this is all a fail
    Talking and coordinating are very different.  You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy.  Second,  you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted.   Third,  you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel. 
    I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their team

    Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest 

    I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
    If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation. 


    Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.

    And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.
    I'm way out of my depth? You're an f'ing Canadian obsessed with American politics and have a Trump avatar... c'mon now poser, you don't really give AF, it's just entertainment to you... you don't add squat here, you just seem to follow me around and make wise ass comments in between nodding in agreement with the echo chamber

    And you can use my name, no need to be a coward when you talk smack

    Let me show you how to do it, nice and direct.... do you have a problem with me digning? If so, speak up 

    That goes for almost ALL of you.... you turn into a bunch of pricks when someone dare not agree or go with the bullshit echo chamber in here... you gang up, you talk shit, and you literally circle that person and try to bully them... been watching it, tried to call you guys out on it,  but now it's time to not play so nice... and it's always the same clowns... here's my advice, get off my jock... 

    Disagree with me respectfully, or keep it moving... otherwise I'm calling your ass out


    The circling and attacking is spot on. 
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Options
    my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    edited February 2019
    my2hands said:
    dignin said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy.  The cyber theft is serious.  I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails,  but members of his campaign would likely be,  including Stone.  You don't find that appalling and serious?
    So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?

    If that's it, this is all a fail
    Talking and coordinating are very different.  You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy.  Second,  you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted.   Third,  you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel. 
    I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their team

    Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest 

    I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
    If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation. 


    Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.

    And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.
    I'm way out of my depth? You're an f'ing Canadian obsessed with American politics and have a Trump avatar... c'mon now poser, you don't really give AF, it's just entertainment to you... you don't add squat here, you just seem to follow me around and make wise ass comments in between nodding in agreement with the echo chamber

    And you can use my name, no need to be a coward when you talk smack

    Let me show you how to do it, nice and direct.... do you have a problem with me signing? If so, speak up 

    That goes for almost ALL of you.... you turn into a bunch of pricks when someone dare not agree or go with the bullshit echo chamber in here... you gang up, you talk shit, and you literally circle that person and try to bully them... been watching it, tried to call you guys out on it,  but now it's time to not play so nice... and it's always the same clowns... here's my advice, get off my jock... 

    Disagree with me respectfully, or keep it moving... otherwise I'm calling your ass out


    I’m not buying what you’re selling, sale denied. Okay, say you’re right. So what?
     
    He claims victory... is on the ballot in 2020 clean... and has a chance at re-election

    All the eggs have been put into the Mueller basket, and it's just not going to resonate with the average voter unless it sticks to Trump in a real way... and will likely energize the GOP heading into the election... 

    That's what
    Post edited by my2hands on
  • Options
    mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 28,811
    my2hands said:
    my2hands said:
    dignin said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    mrussel1 said:
    my2hands said:
    Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.


    Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the lines 

    If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
    Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy.  The cyber theft is serious.  I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails,  but members of his campaign would likely be,  including Stone.  You don't find that appalling and serious?
    So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?

    If that's it, this is all a fail
    Talking and coordinating are very different.  You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy.  Second,  you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted.   Third,  you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel. 
    I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their team

    Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest 

    I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
    If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation. 


    Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.

    And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.
    I'm way out of my depth? You're an f'ing Canadian obsessed with American politics and have a Trump avatar... c'mon now poser, you don't really give AF, it's just entertainment to you... you don't add squat here, you just seem to follow me around and make wise ass comments in between nodding in agreement with the echo chamber

    And you can use my name, no need to be a coward when you talk smack

    Let me show you how to do it, nice and direct.... do you have a problem with me signing? If so, speak up 

    That goes for almost ALL of you.... you turn into a bunch of pricks when someone dare not agree or go with the bullshit echo chamber in here... you gang up, you talk shit, and you literally circle that person and try to bully them... been watching it, tried to call you guys out on it,  but now it's time to not play so nice... and it's always the same clowns... here's my advice, get off my jock... 

    Disagree with me respectfully, or keep it moving... otherwise I'm calling your ass out


    I’m not buying what you’re selling, sale denied. Okay, say you’re right. So what?
     
    He claims victory... is on the ballot in 2020 clean... and has a chance at re-election

    All the eggs have been put into the Mueller basket, and it's just not going to resonate with the average voter... and will likely energize the GOP heading into the election... 

    That's what
    I disagree.  Pelosi never argued impeachment and has aggressively kept the caucus in line about it.  She remembers the 90s. Democrats won't run on Russia. They didn't at the midterms. The danger right now is the party being painted as too socialist.  That's a much graver concern than a weak Mueller report. 
Sign In or Register to comment.