FBI to reopen investigation of Clinton

josevolution

Still voting for Clinton !

Jason P

josevolution said:

Still voting for Clinton !

You still have the write-in option!

josevolution

Jason P said:

josevolution said:

Still voting for Clinton !

You still have the write-in option!

Nah it I'll be easy just go into booth and pull the lever for HC !

PJfanwillneverleave1

Jason P said:

My name is Danger. Carlos Danger.

Donald Trump once predicted that Anthony Weiner would 'tell the world' about Hillary Clinton's emails - a statement that has found renewed accuracy in light of the FBI's latest probe.
The GOP nominee tweeted in August last year: 'It came out that Huma Abedin knows all about Hillary's private illegal emails. Huma's PR husband, Anthony Weiner, will tell the world.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3885056/Donald-Trump-predicted-Anthony-Weiner-tell-world-Hillary-Clinton-s-emails.html

Free

ledvedderman said:

I've yet to see any news organization proclaim her the winner. They say she's ahead, but she is.
My mistake. You clearly have an amazing grasp on how elections work.

Kind of like AP didn't announce her the dem candidate the night before five states voted in the primaries?

And this :

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/trailguide/la-na-trailguide-updates-bookies-call-the-election-clinton-1476821912-htmlstory.html

rgambs

Free said:

ledvedderman said:

Free said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/clinton-tries-to-quell-resurgent-email-issue-late-in-presidential-race-1.3137418
After weeks of declaring the race "rigged" in favour of his opponent, he declared Friday he has "great respect" for the FBI and the Justice Department, now that they are "willing to have the courage to right the horrible mistake that they made" in concluding the investigation earlier.
As Clinton wrapped up her short comments to reporters Friday, she was asked whether she thought the new investigation would sink her campaign.
She walked away, responding only with a hearty laugh.

She knows it's already rigged, has been for a long time. All of this is nothing but a joke to her. Will see if she has the last laugh.

Except that it isn't rigged. What type of response would you expect her to give? If she says "yes" it hurts her get out the vote efforts and if she says "no", assholes who don't understand how elections work will say it's rigged.

ledvedderman said:

Free said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/clinton-tries-to-quell-resurgent-email-issue-late-in-presidential-race-1.3137418
After weeks of declaring the race "rigged" in favour of his opponent, he declared Friday he has "great respect" for the FBI and the Justice Department, now that they are "willing to have the courage to right the horrible mistake that they made" in concluding the investigation earlier.
As Clinton wrapped up her short comments to reporters Friday, she was asked whether she thought the new investigation would sink her campaign.
She walked away, responding only with a hearty laugh.

She knows it's already rigged, has been for a long time. All of this is nothing but a joke to her. Will see if she has the last laugh.

Except that it isn't rigged. What type of response would you expect her to give? If she says "yes" it hurts her get out the vote efforts and if she says "no", assholes who don't understand how elections work will say it's rigged.

oh, the drama. Sigh. The media has already started announcing her the winner. But it isn't rigged, of course not.

If more people vote for Trump, will she still win?

ledvedderman

Free said:

ledvedderman said:

I've yet to see any news organization proclaim her the winner. They say she's ahead, but she is.
My mistake. You clearly have an amazing grasp on how elections work.

Kind of like AP didn't announce her the dem candidate the night before five states voted in the primaries?

And this :

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/trailguide/la-na-trailguide-updates-bookies-call-the-election-clinton-1476821912-htmlstory.html

Wasn't there a lot of confusion around then as to how the delegates had lined up? I can see how they could make a pre-mature call mistake like that. It's a big mistake to make, but I could see how it happens. But, not to sound like a broken record, Bernie lost.

Free

https://www.google.com/amp/yournewswire.com/media-reports-rigged-on-election-night-to-proclaim-hillary-clinton-the-winner/amp/?client=safari

http://www.naturalnews.com/055702_election_night_rigged_results_media_fraud.html

Free

You're acting like a rigged election hasn't happened before. Like 2000 never happened.

ledvedderman

I'm saying that on the state level, elections aren't rigged. You have thousands of both democrats and republican elected officials whose very job and paycheck only continue if they run a fair election. If they don't, they'll be voted out. What the Supreme Court did in 2000 though? The fix was in there.

Free

ledvedderman said:

I'm saying that on the state level, elections aren't rigged. You have thousands of both democrats and republican elected officials whose very job and paycheck only continue if they run a fair election. If they don't, they'll be voted out. What the Supreme Court did in 2000 though? The fix was in there.

Someone doesn't know that with the use of superdelegates does. They buy the election.

rgambs

Free said:

ledvedderman said:

I'm saying that on the state level, elections aren't rigged. You have thousands of both democrats and republican elected officials whose very job and paycheck only continue if they run a fair election. If they don't, they'll be voted out. What the Supreme Court did in 2000 though? The fix was in there.

Someone doesn't know that with the use of superdelegates does. They buy the election.

You are blinded by your bias.

ledvedderman

Free said:

ledvedderman said:

I'm saying that on the state level, elections aren't rigged. You have thousands of both democrats and republican elected officials whose very job and paycheck only continue if they run a fair election. If they don't, they'll be voted out. What the Supreme Court did in 2000 though? The fix was in there.

Someone doesn't know that with the use of superdelegates does. They buy the election.

Bernie lost, bro. It's okay. I voted for him too. But he lost. But he had it lost before it even came to superdelegates. Don't like the rules? Do something to change them.

Free

rgambs said:

Free said:

ledvedderman said:

I'm saying that on the state level, elections aren't rigged. You have thousands of both democrats and republican elected officials whose very job and paycheck only continue if they run a fair election. If they don't, they'll be voted out. What the Supreme Court did in 2000 though? The fix was in there.

Someone doesn't know that with the use of superdelegates does. They buy the election.

You are blinded by your bias.

You are blinded by facts.

Free

You guys can't change the fact that superdelegates bought the election. Hillary knew that, and bought them early. All you're doing is denying reality.

ledvedderman

No. They didn't. They helped her secure the nomination but that has nothing to do with this election.
Superdelegates are part of the DNC process. Bernie could have won them over as well, but he didn't because he lost.

Free

What are you smoking? That is a delusion what you're saying, it couldn't be further from the truth. But I'm all for freedom, so you can think whatever you want, you live in a fantasy world.

http://billmoyers.com/story/secret-history-superdelegates/

Smellyman

Free said:

rgambs said:

Free said:

ledvedderman said:

I'm saying that on the state level, elections aren't rigged. You have thousands of both democrats and republican elected officials whose very job and paycheck only continue if they run a fair election. If they don't, they'll be voted out. What the Supreme Court did in 2000 though? The fix was in there.

Someone doesn't know that with the use of superdelegates does. They buy the election.

You are blinded by your bias.

You are blinded by facts.

haha.

yeah, don't let facts blind you.

el oh el

bootlegger10

PJ_Soul said:

bootlegger10 said:

oftenreading said:

bootlegger10 said:

ledvedderman said:

Oh come on. What about the family values conservatives preach about? Keeping the family together and whatnot.

I am not aware of any church that preaches for women to stay with their husband when the husband cheats, and especially when sexting 15 year olds.

You haven't heard of the Catholic church? It's fairly big, been around a while. And still doesn't agree with divorce.

Hillary is a supporter of husbands/employers having sex with interns in the home when their kids are home. Stop the distractions about churches and family values and suck it up that this is your candidate. You can't talk your way out of facts.

I am pretty sure she did not support that, lol. And throwing in the part about "kids in the home" is pretty bullshitty.

It is the truth and I am sure long before that they came to an understanding what their marriage was. And Chelsea was in the house. Talk about deplorable behavior, Hillary.

PJ_Soul

bootlegger10 said:

PJ_Soul said:

bootlegger10 said:

oftenreading said:

bootlegger10 said:

ledvedderman said:

Oh come on. What about the family values conservatives preach about? Keeping the family together and whatnot.

I am not aware of any church that preaches for women to stay with their husband when the husband cheats, and especially when sexting 15 year olds.

You haven't heard of the Catholic church? It's fairly big, been around a while. And still doesn't agree with divorce.

Hillary is a supporter of husbands/employers having sex with interns in the home when their kids are home. Stop the distractions about churches and family values and suck it up that this is your candidate. You can't talk your way out of facts.

I am pretty sure she did not support that, lol. And throwing in the part about "kids in the home" is pretty bullshitty.

It is the truth and I am sure long before that they came to an understanding what their marriage was. And Chelsea was in the house. Talk about deplorable behavior, Hillary.

It's the White House though. His offices there are really not considered to be where the kid is. You don't generally tend to discuss warn tactics when the kids are home either... it doesn't count in this scenario, lol. It's irrelevant.
And I am sure they had some measure of understanding about their relationship in their marriage but I think it's silly to suggest that Hillary was just fine with Bill doing what he did in the Oval Office. Come on man.