The Podesta Emails
Options
Comments
-
Is that what you think? That everyone that post anti-clinton post are only using right wing bait, whatever that means.Gern Blansten said:
"rational" anti-Clinton posts?tonifig8 said:
Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.HughFreakingDillon said:
maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.tonifig8 said:
These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.JC29856 said:
Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.PJ_Soul said:
No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.JC29856 said:
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".PJ_Soul said:
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.JC29856 said:
Yes legit, yesterday.tonifig8 said:
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"JC29856 said:http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534
CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".
How are we supposed to take you seriously when you use right wing bait as fact?
Show me where I'm using "right wing bait"... just one out of the 1000+ post I have.
Is this Right Wing Bait?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDpymmgPk70 0 -
How is massive cheating and rigging viaHughFreakingDillon said:
I have. and I'm getting sick and tired of the blatant generalization and false outrage.tonifig8 said:
Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.HughFreakingDillon said:
maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.tonifig8 said:
These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.JC29856 said:
Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.PJ_Soul said:
No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.JC29856 said:
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".PJ_Soul said:
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.JC29856 said:
Yes legit, yesterday.tonifig8 said:
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"JC29856 said:http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534
CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".
1. Changing rules regarding big money being donated to campaigns
2. Rigging the Democratic national convention against Bernie Sanders
3. Hiring damned DWS as special campaign manager
4. Manipulating election by using super delegates to win candidacy (and yeah after this year, superdelegates most likely will not be allowed anymore. They are already going through state review and getting rid of them. It is a democratic party loophole with that Republicans don't use.)
.."blatant generalization and false outrage."? That is just for examples, there are much more.0 -
Looks like the cheating and rigging has been going on in PA by fieldworks. Next Tuesday will be nasty ugly.Free said:
How is massive cheating and rigging viaHughFreakingDillon said:
I have. and I'm getting sick and tired of the blatant generalization and false outrage.tonifig8 said:
Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.HughFreakingDillon said:
maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.tonifig8 said:
These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.JC29856 said:
Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.PJ_Soul said:
No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.JC29856 said:
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".PJ_Soul said:
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.JC29856 said:
Yes legit, yesterday.tonifig8 said:
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"JC29856 said:http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534
CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".
1. Changing rules regarding big money being donated to campaigns
2. Rigging the Democratic national convention against Bernie Sanders
3. Hiring damned DWS as special campaign manager
4. Manipulating election by using super delegates to win candidacy (and yeah after this year, superdelegates most likely will not be allowed anymore. They are already going through state review and getting rid of them. It is a democratic party loophole with that Republicans don't use.)
.."blatant generalization and false outrage."? That is just for examples, there are much more.0 -
go back and read any of my (and anyone else's) 3 zillion responses to the same stuff you post. I've addressed all of what I know ad nauseum, but you just keep coming back with the same talking points. I don't need to go over this again.Free said:
How is massive cheating and rigging viaHughFreakingDillon said:
I have. and I'm getting sick and tired of the blatant generalization and false outrage.tonifig8 said:
Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.HughFreakingDillon said:
maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.tonifig8 said:
These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.JC29856 said:
Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.PJ_Soul said:
No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.JC29856 said:
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".PJ_Soul said:
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.JC29856 said:
Yes legit, yesterday.tonifig8 said:
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"JC29856 said:http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534
CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".
1. Changing rules regarding big money being donated to campaigns
2. Rigging the Democratic national convention against Bernie Sanders
3. Hiring damned DWS as special campaign manager
4. Manipulating election by using super delegates to win candidacy (and yeah after this year, superdelegates most likely will not be allowed anymore. They are already going through state review and getting rid of them. It is a democratic party loophole with that Republicans don't use.)
.."blatant generalization and false outrage."? That is just for examples, there are much more.
you are on a 4 point loop, all of which have been addressed time and again. time to change it up.
bernie lost. it sucks, but he lost. move on. the rest of us have. including him.Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall0 -
do something about it? what does that even mean?tonifig8 said:
then you should do something about it. But as you said in a previous post - be fair, responsible, and unbiased in your doing so.HughFreakingDillon said:
I have. and I'm getting sick and tired of the blatant generalization and false outrage.tonifig8 said:
Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.HughFreakingDillon said:
maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.tonifig8 said:
These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.JC29856 said:
Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.PJ_Soul said:
No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.JC29856 said:
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".PJ_Soul said:
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.JC29856 said:
Yes legit, yesterday.tonifig8 said:
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"JC29856 said:http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534
CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall0 -
No shit....he moved on and he supports Clinton. So does Warren. So does Obama. So does George HW Bush (supposedly)HughFreakingDillon said:
go back and read any of my (and anyone else's) 3 zillion responses to the same stuff you post. I've addressed all of what I know ad nauseum, but you just keep coming back with the same talking points. I don't need to go over this again.Free said:
How is massive cheating and rigging viaHughFreakingDillon said:
I have. and I'm getting sick and tired of the blatant generalization and false outrage.tonifig8 said:
Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.HughFreakingDillon said:
maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.tonifig8 said:
These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.JC29856 said:
Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.PJ_Soul said:
No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.JC29856 said:
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".PJ_Soul said:
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.JC29856 said:
Yes legit, yesterday.tonifig8 said:
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"JC29856 said:http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534
CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".
1. Changing rules regarding big money being donated to campaigns
2. Rigging the Democratic national convention against Bernie Sanders
3. Hiring damned DWS as special campaign manager
4. Manipulating election by using super delegates to win candidacy (and yeah after this year, superdelegates most likely will not be allowed anymore. They are already going through state review and getting rid of them. It is a democratic party loophole with that Republicans don't use.)
.."blatant generalization and false outrage."? That is just for examples, there are much more.
you are on a 4 point loop, all of which have been addressed time and again. time to change it up.
bernie lost. it sucks, but he lost. move on. the rest of us have. including him.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
and let me say this so it's clear: nothing hillary has been accused of is anywhere near the nastiness of the stuff trump has DONE and/or has been accused of. NOTHING.Free said:
How is massive cheating and rigging viaHughFreakingDillon said:
I have. and I'm getting sick and tired of the blatant generalization and false outrage.tonifig8 said:
Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.HughFreakingDillon said:
maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.tonifig8 said:
These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.JC29856 said:
Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.PJ_Soul said:
No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.JC29856 said:
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".PJ_Soul said:
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.JC29856 said:
Yes legit, yesterday.tonifig8 said:
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"JC29856 said:http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534
CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".
1. Changing rules regarding big money being donated to campaigns
2. Rigging the Democratic national convention against Bernie Sanders
3. Hiring damned DWS as special campaign manager
4. Manipulating election by using super delegates to win candidacy (and yeah after this year, superdelegates most likely will not be allowed anymore. They are already going through state review and getting rid of them. It is a democratic party loophole with that Republicans don't use.)
.."blatant generalization and false outrage."? That is just for examples, there are much more.
the choice is clear. you want a supposed liar or an admitted sexual predator in office?Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall0 -
See now you're just being crazy. For a second I thought you were being rational about your post. Clearly you're being biased and irrational.HughFreakingDillon said:
and let me say this so it's clear: nothing hillary has been accused of is anywhere near the nastiness of the stuff trump has DONE and/or has been accused of. NOTHING.Free said:
How is massive cheating and rigging viaHughFreakingDillon said:
I have. and I'm getting sick and tired of the blatant generalization and false outrage.tonifig8 said:
Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.HughFreakingDillon said:
maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.tonifig8 said:
These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.JC29856 said:
Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.PJ_Soul said:
No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.JC29856 said:
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".PJ_Soul said:
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.JC29856 said:
Yes legit, yesterday.tonifig8 said:
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"JC29856 said:http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534
CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".
1. Changing rules regarding big money being donated to campaigns
2. Rigging the Democratic national convention against Bernie Sanders
3. Hiring damned DWS as special campaign manager
4. Manipulating election by using super delegates to win candidacy (and yeah after this year, superdelegates most likely will not be allowed anymore. They are already going through state review and getting rid of them. It is a democratic party loophole with that Republicans don't use.)
.."blatant generalization and false outrage."? That is just for examples, there are much more.
the choice is clear. you want a supposed liar or an admitted sexual predator in office?0 -
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
tonifig8 said:
See now you're just being crazy. For a second I thought you were being rational about your post. Clearly you're being biased and irrational.HughFreakingDillon said:
and let me say this so it's clear: nothing hillary has been accused of is anywhere near the nastiness of the stuff trump has DONE and/or has been accused of. NOTHING.Free said:
How is massive cheating and rigging viaHughFreakingDillon said:
I have. and I'm getting sick and tired of the blatant generalization and false outrage.tonifig8 said:
Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.HughFreakingDillon said:
maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.tonifig8 said:
These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.JC29856 said:
Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.PJ_Soul said:
No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.JC29856 said:
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".PJ_Soul said:
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.JC29856 said:
Yes legit, yesterday.tonifig8 said:
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"JC29856 said:http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534
CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".
1. Changing rules regarding big money being donated to campaigns
2. Rigging the Democratic national convention against Bernie Sanders
3. Hiring damned DWS as special campaign manager
4. Manipulating election by using super delegates to win candidacy (and yeah after this year, superdelegates most likely will not be allowed anymore. They are already going through state review and getting rid of them. It is a democratic party loophole with that Republicans don't use.)
.."blatant generalization and false outrage."? That is just for examples, there are much more.
the choice is clear. you want a supposed liar or an admitted sexual predator in office?
Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall0 -
You're not suggesting that Trump is not a sexual predator, are you?tonifig8 said:
See now you're just being crazy. For a second I thought you were being rational about your post. Clearly you're being biased and irrational.HughFreakingDillon said:
and let me say this so it's clear: nothing hillary has been accused of is anywhere near the nastiness of the stuff trump has DONE and/or has been accused of. NOTHING.Free said:
How is massive cheating and rigging viaHughFreakingDillon said:
I have. and I'm getting sick and tired of the blatant generalization and false outrage.tonifig8 said:
Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.HughFreakingDillon said:
maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.tonifig8 said:
These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.JC29856 said:
Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.PJ_Soul said:
No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.JC29856 said:
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".PJ_Soul said:
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.JC29856 said:
Yes legit, yesterday.tonifig8 said:
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"JC29856 said:http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534
CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".
1. Changing rules regarding big money being donated to campaigns
2. Rigging the Democratic national convention against Bernie Sanders
3. Hiring damned DWS as special campaign manager
4. Manipulating election by using super delegates to win candidacy (and yeah after this year, superdelegates most likely will not be allowed anymore. They are already going through state review and getting rid of them. It is a democratic party loophole with that Republicans don't use.)
.."blatant generalization and false outrage."? That is just for examples, there are much more.
the choice is clear. you want a supposed liar or an admitted sexual predator in office?With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
so what you are telling me is that you'd be ok with, no, PREFER, to have a guy as POTUS who expresses his sexual dominance over females any time he sees fit and openly admits he's sexually attracted to his daughter, over someone who is no worse than any other person previously nominated for POTUS?tonifig8 said:
See now you're just being crazy. For a second I thought you were being rational about your post. Clearly you're being biased and irrational.HughFreakingDillon said:
and let me say this so it's clear: nothing hillary has been accused of is anywhere near the nastiness of the stuff trump has DONE and/or has been accused of. NOTHING.Free said:
How is massive cheating and rigging viaHughFreakingDillon said:
I have. and I'm getting sick and tired of the blatant generalization and false outrage.tonifig8 said:
Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.HughFreakingDillon said:
maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.tonifig8 said:
These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.JC29856 said:
Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.PJ_Soul said:
No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.JC29856 said:
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".PJ_Soul said:
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.JC29856 said:
Yes legit, yesterday.tonifig8 said:
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"JC29856 said:http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534
CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".
1. Changing rules regarding big money being donated to campaigns
2. Rigging the Democratic national convention against Bernie Sanders
3. Hiring damned DWS as special campaign manager
4. Manipulating election by using super delegates to win candidacy (and yeah after this year, superdelegates most likely will not be allowed anymore. They are already going through state review and getting rid of them. It is a democratic party loophole with that Republicans don't use.)
.."blatant generalization and false outrage."? That is just for examples, there are much more.
the choice is clear. you want a supposed liar or an admitted sexual predator in office?Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall0 -
Get off of talking about each other and get back to the topic at hand....please...or I'll have to do something to stop it. You're making the choice.Falling down,...not staying down0
-
The guy looked at a group of 10 year old girls and the only context he could place them in is to wonder when they would be fuckable. Plus all the lying, the fraud, the scamming that he sees as normal business, a man who can't find a single business associate to endorse him, who encouraged Russia to commit espionage... It shocks me that anyone is willing to have that kind of scum, that perverted, predatory slimeball who has absolutely NO idea how to lead a nation, in office over Hillary Clinton, who is just a regular, run of the mill, game-playing, untrustworthy politician with a shit load of experience, which we all know America can function just fine under. I just find this fucking mindblowing, and definitely irrational.Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0
-
We could post facts up the Yin Yang and you would just excuse and defend away... it's kind of pathetic to be that kind of an apologist and I know you're not an apologist Hugh, but you're doing their work for them. There is so much shit going on for Hillary and you guys just keep apologizing...HughFreakingDillon said:
go back and read any of my (and anyone else's) 3 zillion responses to the same stuff you post. I've addressed all of what I know ad nauseum, but you just keep coming back with the same talking points. I don't need to go over this again.Free said:
How is massive cheating and rigging viaHughFreakingDillon said:
I have. and I'm getting sick and tired of the blatant generalization and false outrage.tonifig8 said:
Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.HughFreakingDillon said:
maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.tonifig8 said:
These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.JC29856 said:
Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.PJ_Soul said:
No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.JC29856 said:
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".PJ_Soul said:
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.JC29856 said:
Yes legit, yesterday.tonifig8 said:
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"JC29856 said:http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534
CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".
1. Changing rules regarding big money being donated to campaigns
2. Rigging the Democratic national convention against Bernie Sanders
3. Hiring damned DWS as special campaign manager
4. Manipulating election by using super delegates to win candidacy (and yeah after this year, superdelegates most likely will not be allowed anymore. They are already going through state review and getting rid of them. It is a democratic party loophole with that Republicans don't use.)
.."blatant generalization and false outrage."? That is just for examples, there are much more.
you are on a 4 point loop, all of which have been addressed time and again. time to change it up.
bernie lost. it sucks, but he lost. move on. the rest of us have. including him.0 -
Only you would support an Orwellian society...Gern Blansten said:
No shit....he moved on and he supports Clinton. So does Warren. So does Obama. So does George HW Bush (supposedly)HughFreakingDillon said:
go back and read any of my (and anyone else's) 3 zillion responses to the same stuff you post. I've addressed all of what I know ad nauseum, but you just keep coming back with the same talking points. I don't need to go over this again.Free said:
How is massive cheating and rigging viaHughFreakingDillon said:
I have. and I'm getting sick and tired of the blatant generalization and false outrage.tonifig8 said:
Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.HughFreakingDillon said:
maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.tonifig8 said:
These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.JC29856 said:
Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.PJ_Soul said:
No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.JC29856 said:
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".PJ_Soul said:
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.JC29856 said:
Yes legit, yesterday.tonifig8 said:
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"JC29856 said:http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534
CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".
1. Changing rules regarding big money being donated to campaigns
2. Rigging the Democratic national convention against Bernie Sanders
3. Hiring damned DWS as special campaign manager
4. Manipulating election by using super delegates to win candidacy (and yeah after this year, superdelegates most likely will not be allowed anymore. They are already going through state review and getting rid of them. It is a democratic party loophole with that Republicans don't use.)
.."blatant generalization and false outrage."? That is just for examples, there are much more.
you are on a 4 point loop, all of which have been addressed time and again. time to change it up.
bernie lost. it sucks, but he lost. move on. the rest of us have. including him.0 -
Get off of talking about each other and get back to the topic at hand....please...or I'll have to do something to stop it. You're making the choice.
Falling down,...not staying down0 -
The problem is not the facts posted, it's the conclusions drawn from them.Free said:
We could post facts up the Yin Yang and you would just excuse and defend away... it's kind of pathetic to be that kind of an apologist and I know you're not an apologist Hugh, but you're doing their work for them. There is so much shit going on for Hillary and you guys just keep apologizing...HughFreakingDillon said:
go back and read any of my (and anyone else's) 3 zillion responses to the same stuff you post. I've addressed all of what I know ad nauseum, but you just keep coming back with the same talking points. I don't need to go over this again.Free said:
How is massive cheating and rigging viaHughFreakingDillon said:
I have. and I'm getting sick and tired of the blatant generalization and false outrage.tonifig8 said:
Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.HughFreakingDillon said:
maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.tonifig8 said:
These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.JC29856 said:
Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.PJ_Soul said:
No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.JC29856 said:
I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".PJ_Soul said:
I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.JC29856 said:
Yes legit, yesterday.tonifig8 said:
Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"JC29856 said:http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534
CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.
So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?
When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".
1. Changing rules regarding big money being donated to campaigns
2. Rigging the Democratic national convention against Bernie Sanders
3. Hiring damned DWS as special campaign manager
4. Manipulating election by using super delegates to win candidacy (and yeah after this year, superdelegates most likely will not be allowed anymore. They are already going through state review and getting rid of them. It is a democratic party loophole with that Republicans don't use.)
.."blatant generalization and false outrage."? That is just for examples, there are much more.
you are on a 4 point loop, all of which have been addressed time and again. time to change it up.
bernie lost. it sucks, but he lost. move on. the rest of us have. including him.
Superdelegates backing Clinton is not equal to a stolen election, and neither do any of the underhanded and shitty Clinton tactics equal a stolen election.
That is just a sore loser mentality. Sanders lost because people didn't vote for him, plain and simple. No amount of puling will explain that away.Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
yea but many of them are HumaJC29856 said:
Just to clarify, its wiener notebook not Hilliary.pjhawks said:
i have almost 20,000 for this year on my office computer (received and sent) and i'm about a million times less important than the Secretary of State so I don't see that is it that far fetched especially if that is over a period of years.JC29856 said:I don't think I've ever heard of 200,000 emails on a laptop let alone 650,000. Anyone else lend any perspective on 650k emails on a computer?
i agree 100%. it's seriously crazy to me that people would vote for Trump. I see signs in my neighborhood and I want to ask how those people can look their wives, mothers and daughters in the eye saying they want this man as President.PJ_Soul said:The guy looked at a group of 10 year old girls and the only context he could place them in is to wonder when they would be fuckable. Plus all the lying, the fraud, the scamming that he sees as normal business, a man who can't find a single business associate to endorse him, who encouraged Russia to commit espionage... It shocks me that anyone is willing to have that kind of scum, that perverted, predatory slimeball who has absolutely NO idea how to lead a nation, in office over Hillary Clinton, who is just a regular, run of the mill, game-playing, untrustworthy politician with a shit load of experience, which we all know America can function just fine under. I just find this fucking mindblowing, and definitely irrational.
0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJ9wNT21c_s
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help