The Podesta Emails

mrussel1

Free said:

benjs said:

Why is that when it's mentioned that Clinton has skeletons in her closet, the response is that she doesn't, because Trump does? Was Hitler good because Pol Pot was bad? Can't we just agree that they both have some egregious actions under their belts, and focus on the severity of their offences?

Seems reasonable doesn't it? But some Hillary supporters refuse to accept or acknowledge that she's anything less than perfect. This is why she's referred to as a queen.

Hi.. I like to just make shit up and apply it to other people.... Who the fuck calls her a queen? Oh I know. You fucking do. No one else does here. Not one person that supports her calls her that. But if you like to make shit up and then convince yourself it's true, knock yourself out.

Free

mrussel1 said:

Free said:

benjs said:

Why is that when it's mentioned that Clinton has skeletons in her closet, the response is that she doesn't, because Trump does? Was Hitler good because Pol Pot was bad? Can't we just agree that they both have some egregious actions under their belts, and focus on the severity of their offences?

Seems reasonable doesn't it? But some Hillary supporters refuse to accept or acknowledge that she's anything less than perfect. This is why she's referred to as a queen.

Hi.. I like to just make shit up and apply it to other people.... Who the fuck calls her a queen? Oh I know. You fucking do. No one else does here. Not one person that supports her calls her that. But if you like to make shit up and then convince yourself it's true, knock yourself out.

I wasn't even referring to you personally but whatev.

Several (not all) refuse to admit any of Hillary's faults.

Gern Blansten

Free said:

mrussel1 said:

Free said:

benjs said:

Why is that when it's mentioned that Clinton has skeletons in her closet, the response is that she doesn't, because Trump does? Was Hitler good because Pol Pot was bad? Can't we just agree that they both have some egregious actions under their belts, and focus on the severity of their offences?

Seems reasonable doesn't it? But some Hillary supporters refuse to accept or acknowledge that she's anything less than perfect. This is why she's referred to as a queen.

Hi.. I like to just make shit up and apply it to other people.... Who the fuck calls her a queen? Oh I know. You fucking do. No one else does here. Not one person that supports her calls her that. But if you like to make shit up and then convince yourself it's true, knock yourself out.

I wasn't even referring to you personally but whatev.

Several (not all) refuse to admit any of Hillary's faults.

Everyone has faults...why is it so important to you for anyone here to admit to Clinton's faults?

Compare Clinton's faults to Trump's faults and the answer is clear in my opinion. If your opinion differs then so be it.

rustneversleeps

pete rose

Free

Gern Blansten said:

Free said:

mrussel1 said:

Free said:

benjs said:

Why is that when it's mentioned that Clinton has skeletons in her closet, the response is that she doesn't, because Trump does? Was Hitler good because Pol Pot was bad? Can't we just agree that they both have some egregious actions under their belts, and focus on the severity of their offences?

Seems reasonable doesn't it? But some Hillary supporters refuse to accept or acknowledge that she's anything less than perfect. This is why she's referred to as a queen.

Hi.. I like to just make shit up and apply it to other people.... Who the fuck calls her a queen? Oh I know. You fucking do. No one else does here. Not one person that supports her calls her that. But if you like to make shit up and then convince yourself it's true, knock yourself out.

I wasn't even referring to you personally but whatev.

Several (not all) refuse to admit any of Hillary's faults.

Everyone has faults...why is it so important to you for anyone here to admit to Clinton's faults?

Compare Clinton's faults to Trump's faults and the answer is clear in my opinion. If your opinion differs then so be it.

rgambs

Free said:

mrussel1 said:

Free said:

benjs said:

Why is that when it's mentioned that Clinton has skeletons in her closet, the response is that she doesn't, because Trump does? Was Hitler good because Pol Pot was bad? Can't we just agree that they both have some egregious actions under their belts, and focus on the severity of their offences?

Seems reasonable doesn't it? But some Hillary supporters refuse to accept or acknowledge that she's anything less than perfect. This is why she's referred to as a queen.

Hi.. I like to just make shit up and apply it to other people.... Who the fuck calls her a queen? Oh I know. You fucking do. No one else does here. Not one person that supports her calls her that. But if you like to make shit up and then convince yourself it's true, knock yourself out.

I wasn't even referring to you personally but whatev.

Several (not all) refuse to admit any of Hillary's faults.

Who?
I have seen everyone acknowledge her faults.
Just because we don't lose our minds when we find out that she plays politics like any other politician, that doesn't mean we find her faultless.

mrussel1

rgambs said:

Free said:

mrussel1 said:

Free said:

benjs said:

Why is that when it's mentioned that Clinton has skeletons in her closet, the response is that she doesn't, because Trump does? Was Hitler good because Pol Pot was bad? Can't we just agree that they both have some egregious actions under their belts, and focus on the severity of their offences?

Seems reasonable doesn't it? But some Hillary supporters refuse to accept or acknowledge that she's anything less than perfect. This is why she's referred to as a queen.

Hi.. I like to just make shit up and apply it to other people.... Who the fuck calls her a queen? Oh I know. You fucking do. No one else does here. Not one person that supports her calls her that. But if you like to make shit up and then convince yourself it's true, knock yourself out.

I wasn't even referring to you personally but whatev.

Several (not all) refuse to admit any of Hillary's faults.

Who?
I have seen everyone acknowledge her faults.
Just because we don't lose our minds when we find out that she plays politics like any other politician, that doesn't mean we find her faultless.

And who the fuck calls her the Queen?

rustneversleeps

mrussel1 said:

rgambs said:

Free said:

mrussel1 said:

Free said:

benjs said:

Why is that when it's mentioned that Clinton has skeletons in her closet, the response is that she doesn't, because Trump does? Was Hitler good because Pol Pot was bad? Can't we just agree that they both have some egregious actions under their belts, and focus on the severity of their offences?

Seems reasonable doesn't it? But some Hillary supporters refuse to accept or acknowledge that she's anything less than perfect. This is why she's referred to as a queen.

Hi.. I like to just make shit up and apply it to other people.... Who the fuck calls her a queen? Oh I know. You fucking do. No one else does here. Not one person that supports her calls her that. But if you like to make shit up and then convince yourself it's true, knock yourself out.

I wasn't even referring to you personally but whatev.

Several (not all) refuse to admit any of Hillary's faults.

Who?
I have seen everyone acknowledge her faults.
Just because we don't lose our minds when we find out that she plays politics like any other politician, that doesn't mean we find her faultless.

And who the fuck calls her the Queen?

i think it was pete rose.

mrussel1

rustneversleeps said:

mrussel1 said:

rgambs said:

Free said:

mrussel1 said:

Free said:

benjs said:

Why is that when it's mentioned that Clinton has skeletons in her closet, the response is that she doesn't, because Trump does? Was Hitler good because Pol Pot was bad? Can't we just agree that they both have some egregious actions under their belts, and focus on the severity of their offences?

Seems reasonable doesn't it? But some Hillary supporters refuse to accept or acknowledge that she's anything less than perfect. This is why she's referred to as a queen.

Hi.. I like to just make shit up and apply it to other people.... Who the fuck calls her a queen? Oh I know. You fucking do. No one else does here. Not one person that supports her calls her that. But if you like to make shit up and then convince yourself it's true, knock yourself out.

I wasn't even referring to you personally but whatev.

Several (not all) refuse to admit any of Hillary's faults.

Who?
I have seen everyone acknowledge her faults.
Just because we don't lose our minds when we find out that she plays politics like any other politician, that doesn't mean we find her faultless.

And who the fuck calls her the Queen?

i think it was pete rose.

Are you being serious?

Pete Rose doesn't strike me as a Hillary supporter.

JC29856

Podesta links to Russia.
Podesta said he divested Russian investments, emails reveal he shifted them to his daughter.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/36678

JC29856

I don't think I've ever heard of 200,000 emails on a laptop let alone 650,000. Anyone else lend any perspective on 650k emails on a computer?

JC29856

Is there honor in winning when you've cheated? Hillary and Donna Brazile

There is a new email on the chain where Donna Brazile was caught helping Hillary cheat in the debate. She totally lied when she said she didn't send a question to Hillary in advance of the debate.

I rarely hear it. I'll send a few more. Though some questions Roland submitted

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AMZkDM2SpY This is what Donna said about this issue. Donna claimed she was "being persecuted" for being asked about leaking the question to Hillary so she could cheat.

Previously Donna was busted because this older part of the email: "Here's one that worries me about HRC. DEATH PENALTY 19 states and.. " The subject of Donna Brazile's email was:

subject: From time to time I get the questions in advance

Roland is Roland Martin, the guy who actually asked the questions about the death penalty, moderating. See this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3cVrJWPB-M

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/39807

Donna Brazile sending MORE questions to Hillary.

Subject: One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash

Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint.

Here is the Flint question Cooper asks:

... Tonight the Democratic candidates are here to answer questions about what they would do for Flint, as well as about other issues facing their country right now.

Each candidate has one minute for an opening statement, Senator Sanders is first. We begin with him. Senator Sanders?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3EJ7HXVHHQ&feature=youtu.be&t=18m19s video where the question is asked.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/38478

JC29856

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534

CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile

Boxes&Books

JC29856 said:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534

CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile

Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.

pjalive21

how long before people start turning on Clinton?

call this the conspiracy theorist in me but do you believe Abedin or Weiner himself saved those emails on purpose to use as leverage? I blame talk radio this morning for that theory

mrussel1

pjalive21 said:

how long before people start turning on Clinton?

call this the conspiracy theorist in me but do you believe Abedin or Weiner himself saved those emails on purpose to use as leverage? I blame talk radio this morning for that theory

You can learn a lot about what might happen in an alternate universe, when listening to talk radio in the morning.

pjhawks

JC29856 said:

I don't think I've ever heard of 200,000 emails on a laptop let alone 650,000. Anyone else lend any perspective on 650k emails on a computer?

i have almost 20,000 for this year on my office computer (received and sent) and i'm about a million times less important than the Secretary of State so I don't see that is it that far fetched especially if that is over a period of years.

Cliffy6745

This is just disgusting. How dare they!

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/38128

JC29856

pjhawks said:

JC29856 said:

I don't think I've ever heard of 200,000 emails on a laptop let alone 650,000. Anyone else lend any perspective on 650k emails on a computer?

i have almost 20,000 for this year on my office computer (received and sent) and i'm about a million times less important than the Secretary of State so I don't see that is it that far fetched especially if that is over a period of years.

Just to clarify, its wiener notebook not Hilliary.

JC29856

pjalive21 said:

how long before people start turning on Clinton?

call this the conspiracy theorist in me but do you believe Abedin or Weiner himself saved those emails on purpose to use as leverage? I blame talk radio this morning for that theory

I'm not certain these emails were on the computer hardrive, they could have been in a cloud or they could have come from NSA. The fbi investigators were none too happy when their boss decided not to indict.