The Podesta Emails

JC29856

tonifig8 said:

JC29856 said:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534

CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile

Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.

Yes legit, yesterday.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.

So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?

PJ_Soul

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

JC29856 said:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534

CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile

Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.

Yes legit, yesterday.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.

So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?

I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.

JC29856

I wonder if real charities like breast cancer research or animal welfare institute have long chain email discussions about what to call their receipts? Is it a donation, a contribution, a sponsorship, an endowment? Do they go back and fourth on using attendance fees or membership fees or fellowships?

JC29856

PJ_Soul said:

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

JC29856 said:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534

CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile

Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.

Yes legit, yesterday.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.

So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?

I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.

I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".

PJ_Soul

JC29856 said:

PJ_Soul said:

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

JC29856 said:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534

CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile

Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.

Yes legit, yesterday.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.

So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?

I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.

I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".

No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.

JC29856

PJ_Soul said:

JC29856 said:

PJ_Soul said:

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

JC29856 said:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534

CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile

Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.

Yes legit, yesterday.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.

So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?

I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.

I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".

No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.

Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.

When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".

pjalive21

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/white-house-james-comey-clinton-fbi-230540

got to give Obama credit, he didn't flip flop

JC29856

Eric Schmidt Google exec

Key is the development of a single record for a voter that aggregates all
that is known about them. In 2016 smart phones will be used to identify,
meet, and update profiles on the voter.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37262

"...for every tool they lend us, a loss of independence..."

JC29856

Last week, WikiLeaks dropped a 2011 memo by top Bill Clinton aide Doug Band that lays bare Team Clinton’s sordid financial dealings when Hillary Clinton was secretary of State.

Band describes how the Clinton Foundation served as a conduit for what he called “Bill Clinton Inc.” — the former president’s for-profit arm. Other documents show State Department involvement.
The result is an unsavory mix of charity work, profiteering, and pay-to-play politics that potentially reaches the highest levels of US foreign policy and screams for IRS and Department of Justice reviews.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/303663-bill-and-hillary-partners-in-crime-literally

Boxes&Books

JC29856 said:

PJ_Soul said:

JC29856 said:

PJ_Soul said:

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

JC29856 said:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534

CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile

Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.

Yes legit, yesterday.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.

So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?

I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.

I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".

No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.

Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.

When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".

These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.

JC29856

Clinton received a congressional subpoena on March 4, 2015

Emails from March 2nd and 3rd...but we are going to have to dump all those emails so better to do so sooner than later..

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/41841


“Did you have any idea of the depth of this story?” Podesta asked campaign manager Robby Mook late on March 2, 2015, the day the New York Times revealed that Clinton had exclusively used a private account as secretary.

“Nope,” Mook replied early the next day. “We brought up the existence of emails in [research] this summer but were told that everything was taken care of.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/fbi-to-conduct-new-investigation-of-emails-from-clintons-private-server/2016/10/28/0b1e9468-9d31-11e6-9980-50913d68eacb_story.html

JC29856

Sorry to interrupt your Sunday. We have confirmation from interview and other records that the Clinton Foundation received a subpeona from the State IG requesting documents and document preservation. Would you have a moment to chat about this. We want to be careful with this and get it right.

2/7/16
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/41855

Boxes&Books

What Did She Learn?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBT58Om9DXE

JC29856

tonifig8 said:

What Did She Learn?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBT58Om9DXE

She learned it's more convenient:
To use 13 devices instead of 1, 2 or 3
To use gmail instead of government issued email
To use 6 email accounts instead of 1 or 2

Boxes&Books

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

What Did She Learn?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBT58Om9DXE

She learned it's more convenient:
To use 13 devices instead of 1, 2 or 3
To use gmail instead of government issued email
To use 6 email accounts instead of 1 or 2

I think you miss understood the question. I was asking about Hillary Clinton not Chapo Guzman.

HughFreakingDillon

tonifig8 said:

JC29856 said:

PJ_Soul said:

JC29856 said:

PJ_Soul said:

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

JC29856 said:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534

CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile

Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.

Yes legit, yesterday.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.

So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?

I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.

I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".

No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.

Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.

When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".

These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.

maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.

Boxes&Books

HughFreakingDillon said:

tonifig8 said:

JC29856 said:

PJ_Soul said:

JC29856 said:

PJ_Soul said:

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

JC29856 said:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534

CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile

Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.

Yes legit, yesterday.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.

So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?

I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.

I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".

No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.

Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.

When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".

These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.

maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.

Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.

HughFreakingDillon

tonifig8 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

tonifig8 said:

JC29856 said:

PJ_Soul said:

JC29856 said:

PJ_Soul said:

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

JC29856 said:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534

CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile

Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.

Yes legit, yesterday.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.

So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?

I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.

I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".

No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.

Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.

When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".

These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.

maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.

Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.

I have. and I'm getting sick and tired of the blatant generalization and false outrage.

Gern Blansten

tonifig8 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

tonifig8 said:

JC29856 said:

PJ_Soul said:

JC29856 said:

PJ_Soul said:

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

JC29856 said:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534

CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile

Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.

Yes legit, yesterday.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.

So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?

I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.

I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".

No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.

Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.

When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".

These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.

maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.

Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.

"rational" anti-Clinton posts?

How are we supposed to take you seriously when you use right wing bait as fact?

Boxes&Books

HughFreakingDillon said:

tonifig8 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

tonifig8 said:

JC29856 said:

PJ_Soul said:

JC29856 said:

PJ_Soul said:

JC29856 said:

tonifig8 said:

JC29856 said:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/cnn-severs-ties-with-donna-brazile-230534

CLINTON NARRATIVE NETWORK fall "person" Brazile

Is that recent tweet by Dona Brazile legit? The one that states, "Please God, Let this end soon"
I don't have twitter.....I'm assuming it's fake. Nonetheless, it's still hilarious.

Yes legit, yesterday.
Cnn said this: cnn never gave Brazile access to questions pre material attendee list background information or meetings in advance of town halls or debates.

So, Brazile obtained the questions "illegally", "stole" them or CNN is lying. I wonder if cnn will bother investigating how Brazile received the questions in advance? I wonder if they consider it interfering with elections?

I don't know, but either way, I don't see how Hillary Clinton is to blame. I haven't seen anything showing that she requested the info.

I don't think anyone is blaming Hilliary, huma testified that all of the devices that contained emails were turned over, which the fbi learned isn't the case. The speculation is that there are emails contained on weiners notebook that were NOT turned over to investigators and that some may have been emails that were deleted "the 33,000".

No, I'm talking about the debate questions that were supposedly passed on to Hillary's campaign.

Oh! Your making a distinction between Hilliary personally requesting the info versus her campaign seeking the info and her using it.

When Arod tells his cousin he wants to get bigger and stronger and his cousin gets him steroids and he using them, it's not really on Arod because he never said "go get me steroids".

These clintonites keep making excuses. The fact that Clinton used this info is completely irrelevant to them- it's the fault of others, not Clinton. Never is it Clinton's. It's astonishing the amount of excuses we read on here. The denial factor is off the charts.

maybe start addressing whomever it is you are referring to, and not the entire group as a whole. one person says they don't care about something, and out of your mouth "they" don't care or "all of them make excuses". it's getting stupid.

Go through the other thread (now closed) or this one. Look for rational anti-Clinton post/comments - check the replies. You'll get to the bottom of stupid real quick. Better yet- check out the policy discussion(s). It's not that difficult. Even stupid can do it.

I have. and I'm getting sick and tired of the blatant generalization and false outrage.

then you should do something about it. But as you said in a previous post - be fair, responsible, and unbiased in your doing so.