The Podesta Emails

1181921232445

Comments

  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    edited October 2016
    Great speech about secrecy by JFK in 1961, if you don't know much about him other then his assassination, he had serious issues with war the Fed reserve and world banks.

    https://www.jfklibrary.org/Research/Research-Aids/JFK-Speeches/American-Newspaper-Publishers-Association_19610427.aspx
  • Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books Posts: 2,672
    edited October 2016
    JC29856 said:

    Julian Assange's internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party. We have activated the appropriate contingency plans.

    pre-commitment 1: John Kerry 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809

    pre-commitment 2: Ecuador
    eae5c9b064ed649ba468f0800abf8b56ae5cfe355b93b1ce90a1b92a48a9ab72

    pre-commitment 3: UK FCO f33a6de5c627e3270ed3e02f62cd0c857467a780cf6123d2172d80d02a072f74


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commitment_scheme

    JC, does this mean they shut the site down, because it's not down. I saw the message on Twitter, I read the Wikipedia link. Could you elaborate just a little on this. What does John K. , Ecuador, UK FCo have to do with it?
    I say we respond with donations? Reach out to people and get a shit load of people to give a small donation- like we would do with Sanders.
    Thoughts?
    Thanks man...

    edit: just read this http://bigstory.ap.org/article/6f997f97c5f140a29f385ea05f1b642c/wikileaks-assanges-internet-link-severed-state-actor

    Post edited by Boxes&Books on
  • pjalive21pjalive21 Posts: 2,818
    tonifig8 said:

    JC29856 said:

    Julian Assange's internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party. We have activated the appropriate contingency plans.

    pre-commitment 1: John Kerry 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809

    pre-commitment 2: Ecuador
    eae5c9b064ed649ba468f0800abf8b56ae5cfe355b93b1ce90a1b92a48a9ab72

    pre-commitment 3: UK FCO f33a6de5c627e3270ed3e02f62cd0c857467a780cf6123d2172d80d02a072f74


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commitment_scheme

    JC, does this mean they shut the site down, because it's not down. I saw the message on Twitter, I read the Wikipedia link. Could you elaborate just a little on this. What does John K. , Ecuador, UK FCo have to do with it?
    I say we respond with donations? Reach out to people and get a shit load of people to give a small donation- like we would do with Sanders.
    Thoughts?
    Thanks man...

    edit: just read this http://bigstory.ap.org/article/6f997f97c5f140a29f385ea05f1b642c/wikileaks-assanges-internet-link-severed-state-actor

    There were "rumors" that those triggered tweets were released because Assange was killed, but WikiLeaks posted that he was alive and well....needless to say this is interesting
  • Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books Posts: 2,672
    pjalive21 said:

    tonifig8 said:

    JC29856 said:

    Julian Assange's internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party. We have activated the appropriate contingency plans.

    pre-commitment 1: John Kerry 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809

    pre-commitment 2: Ecuador
    eae5c9b064ed649ba468f0800abf8b56ae5cfe355b93b1ce90a1b92a48a9ab72

    pre-commitment 3: UK FCO f33a6de5c627e3270ed3e02f62cd0c857467a780cf6123d2172d80d02a072f74


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commitment_scheme

    JC, does this mean they shut the site down, because it's not down. I saw the message on Twitter, I read the Wikipedia link. Could you elaborate just a little on this. What does John K. , Ecuador, UK FCo have to do with it?
    I say we respond with donations? Reach out to people and get a shit load of people to give a small donation- like we would do with Sanders.
    Thoughts?
    Thanks man...

    edit: just read this http://bigstory.ap.org/article/6f997f97c5f140a29f385ea05f1b642c/wikileaks-assanges-internet-link-severed-state-actor

    There were "rumors" that those triggered tweets were released because Assange was killed, but WikiLeaks posted that he was alive and well....needless to say this is interesting
    Why do they all of a sudden want to silence him?

    Still with Her!
  • pjhawkspjhawks Posts: 12,417
    tonifig8 said:

    pjalive21 said:

    tonifig8 said:

    JC29856 said:

    Julian Assange's internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party. We have activated the appropriate contingency plans.

    pre-commitment 1: John Kerry 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809

    pre-commitment 2: Ecuador
    eae5c9b064ed649ba468f0800abf8b56ae5cfe355b93b1ce90a1b92a48a9ab72

    pre-commitment 3: UK FCO f33a6de5c627e3270ed3e02f62cd0c857467a780cf6123d2172d80d02a072f74


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commitment_scheme

    JC, does this mean they shut the site down, because it's not down. I saw the message on Twitter, I read the Wikipedia link. Could you elaborate just a little on this. What does John K. , Ecuador, UK FCo have to do with it?
    I say we respond with donations? Reach out to people and get a shit load of people to give a small donation- like we would do with Sanders.
    Thoughts?
    Thanks man...

    edit: just read this http://bigstory.ap.org/article/6f997f97c5f140a29f385ea05f1b642c/wikileaks-assanges-internet-link-severed-state-actor

    There were "rumors" that those triggered tweets were released because Assange was killed, but WikiLeaks posted that he was alive and well....needless to say this is interesting
    Why do they all of a sudden want to silence him?

    Still with Her!
    maybe because he is accused of rape and wanted by the swedish authorities?
  • Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books Posts: 2,672
    edited October 2016
    pjhawks said:

    tonifig8 said:

    pjalive21 said:

    tonifig8 said:

    JC29856 said:

    Julian Assange's internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party. We have activated the appropriate contingency plans.

    pre-commitment 1: John Kerry 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809

    pre-commitment 2: Ecuador
    eae5c9b064ed649ba468f0800abf8b56ae5cfe355b93b1ce90a1b92a48a9ab72

    pre-commitment 3: UK FCO f33a6de5c627e3270ed3e02f62cd0c857467a780cf6123d2172d80d02a072f74


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commitment_scheme

    JC, does this mean they shut the site down, because it's not down. I saw the message on Twitter, I read the Wikipedia link. Could you elaborate just a little on this. What does John K. , Ecuador, UK FCo have to do with it?
    I say we respond with donations? Reach out to people and get a shit load of people to give a small donation- like we would do with Sanders.
    Thoughts?
    Thanks man...

    edit: just read this http://bigstory.ap.org/article/6f997f97c5f140a29f385ea05f1b642c/wikileaks-assanges-internet-link-severed-state-actor

    There were "rumors" that those triggered tweets were released because Assange was killed, but WikiLeaks posted that he was alive and well....needless to say this is interesting
    Why do they all of a sudden want to silence him?

    Still with Her!
    maybe because he is accused of rape and wanted by the swedish authorities?
    Oh fuck! That's right! Now I get it. This alleged rape happened years ago... And now they are finally acting on it? Shit they must have been really backed up.

    Still with Her!
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    tonifig8 said:

    JC29856 said:

    Julian Assange's internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party. We have activated the appropriate contingency plans.

    pre-commitment 1: John Kerry 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809

    pre-commitment 2: Ecuador
    eae5c9b064ed649ba468f0800abf8b56ae5cfe355b93b1ce90a1b92a48a9ab72

    pre-commitment 3: UK FCO f33a6de5c627e3270ed3e02f62cd0c857467a780cf6123d2172d80d02a072f74


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commitment_scheme

    JC, does this mean they shut the site down, because it's not down. I saw the message on Twitter, I read the Wikipedia link. Could you elaborate just a little on this. What does John K. , Ecuador, UK FCo have to do with it?
    I say we respond with donations? Reach out to people and get a shit load of people to give a small donation- like we would do with Sanders.
    Thoughts?
    Thanks man...

    edit: just read this http://bigstory.ap.org/article/6f997f97c5f140a29f385ea05f1b642c/wikileaks-assanges-internet-link-severed-state-actor

    Someone within the UK cut off internet access to assange, basically pulled the plug on him. There are other ways wikileaks can communicate but not Assange directly without internet.
    About the hash tweet:
    Could be a number of things, if you're not familiar with IT and how Assange set up his contingency plans it's difficult to explain.
    Assange has to code in every 12 or 24 hours in order to not set off a string of contingencies which make public "all he has", those hash tweets verify that the information that was made public was not edited or altered when checked against what was released. I'm not sure why he only tweeted 3 on Kerry Ecuador and UK FCO, unless twitter is withholding the other tweets. Right now the Ecuador embassy will not say a word about the internet to Assange or whether or not Assange is still there or alive.
  • rgambsrgambs Posts: 13,576
    tonifig8 said:

    dignin said:

    I appreciate the determination JC has going through all of this, but I have to agree with others, this seems much ado about nothing. Anyone with even a remote understanding of how politics are done can see this is all par for the course.

    Maybe in the coming days there will be something more condemning and of interest. We will see.

    This comment is good for the clintonites, but not the rest of us.
    :dizzy:
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books Posts: 2,672
    edited October 2016
    JC29856 said:

    tonifig8 said:

    JC29856 said:

    Julian Assange's internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party. We have activated the appropriate contingency plans.

    pre-commitment 1: John Kerry 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809

    pre-commitment 2: Ecuador
    eae5c9b064ed649ba468f0800abf8b56ae5cfe355b93b1ce90a1b92a48a9ab72

    pre-commitment 3: UK FCO f33a6de5c627e3270ed3e02f62cd0c857467a780cf6123d2172d80d02a072f74


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commitment_scheme

    JC, does this mean they shut the site down, because it's not down. I saw the message on Twitter, I read the Wikipedia link. Could you elaborate just a little on this. What does John K. , Ecuador, UK FCo have to do with it?
    I say we respond with donations? Reach out to people and get a shit load of people to give a small donation- like we would do with Sanders.
    Thoughts?
    Thanks man...

    edit: just read this http://bigstory.ap.org/article/6f997f97c5f140a29f385ea05f1b642c/wikileaks-assanges-internet-link-severed-state-actor

    Someone within the UK cut off internet access to assange, basically pulled the plug on him. There are other ways wikileaks can communicate but not Assange directly without internet.
    About the hash tweet:
    Could be a number of things, if you're not familiar with IT and how Assange set up his contingency plans it's difficult to explain.
    Assange has to code in every 12 or 24 hours in order to not set off a string of contingencies which make public "all he has", those hash tweets verify that the information that was made public was not edited or altered when checked against what was released. I'm not sure why he only tweeted 3 on Kerry Ecuador and UK FCO, unless twitter is withholding the other tweets. Right now the Ecuador embassy will not say a word about the internet to Assange or whether or not Assange is still there or alive.
    Thanks for the reply. I got a bunch of info on this already. Some crazy shit man. I guess there was a rumor of him also being killed.
    Apparently they want him dead because he has been accused of raping some women in another country. So now they want him dead and are cutting his internet access....

    starting up a donation campaign. Let's respond.
    Post edited by Boxes&Books on
  • Gern BlanstenGern Blansten Posts: 19,426
    tonifig8 said:

    JC29856 said:

    tonifig8 said:

    JC29856 said:

    Julian Assange's internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party. We have activated the appropriate contingency plans.

    pre-commitment 1: John Kerry 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809

    pre-commitment 2: Ecuador
    eae5c9b064ed649ba468f0800abf8b56ae5cfe355b93b1ce90a1b92a48a9ab72

    pre-commitment 3: UK FCO f33a6de5c627e3270ed3e02f62cd0c857467a780cf6123d2172d80d02a072f74


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commitment_scheme

    JC, does this mean they shut the site down, because it's not down. I saw the message on Twitter, I read the Wikipedia link. Could you elaborate just a little on this. What does John K. , Ecuador, UK FCo have to do with it?
    I say we respond with donations? Reach out to people and get a shit load of people to give a small donation- like we would do with Sanders.
    Thoughts?
    Thanks man...

    edit: just read this http://bigstory.ap.org/article/6f997f97c5f140a29f385ea05f1b642c/wikileaks-assanges-internet-link-severed-state-actor

    Someone within the UK cut off internet access to assange, basically pulled the plug on him. There are other ways wikileaks can communicate but not Assange directly without internet.
    About the hash tweet:
    Could be a number of things, if you're not familiar with IT and how Assange set up his contingency plans it's difficult to explain.
    Assange has to code in every 12 or 24 hours in order to not set off a string of contingencies which make public "all he has", those hash tweets verify that the information that was made public was not edited or altered when checked against what was released. I'm not sure why he only tweeted 3 on Kerry Ecuador and UK FCO, unless twitter is withholding the other tweets. Right now the Ecuador embassy will not say a word about the internet to Assange or whether or not Assange is still there or alive.
    Thanks for the reply. I got a bunch of info on this already. Some crazy shit man. I guess there was a rumor of him also being killed.
    Apparently they want him dead because he has been accused of rapping some women in another country. So now they want him dead and are cutting his internet access....

    starting up a donation campaign. Let's respond.
    so much for free speech...can't even rap at someone
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
  • Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books Posts: 2,672

    tonifig8 said:

    JC29856 said:

    tonifig8 said:

    JC29856 said:

    Julian Assange's internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party. We have activated the appropriate contingency plans.

    pre-commitment 1: John Kerry 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809

    pre-commitment 2: Ecuador
    eae5c9b064ed649ba468f0800abf8b56ae5cfe355b93b1ce90a1b92a48a9ab72

    pre-commitment 3: UK FCO f33a6de5c627e3270ed3e02f62cd0c857467a780cf6123d2172d80d02a072f74


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commitment_scheme

    JC, does this mean they shut the site down, because it's not down. I saw the message on Twitter, I read the Wikipedia link. Could you elaborate just a little on this. What does John K. , Ecuador, UK FCo have to do with it?
    I say we respond with donations? Reach out to people and get a shit load of people to give a small donation- like we would do with Sanders.
    Thoughts?
    Thanks man...

    edit: just read this http://bigstory.ap.org/article/6f997f97c5f140a29f385ea05f1b642c/wikileaks-assanges-internet-link-severed-state-actor

    Someone within the UK cut off internet access to assange, basically pulled the plug on him. There are other ways wikileaks can communicate but not Assange directly without internet.
    About the hash tweet:
    Could be a number of things, if you're not familiar with IT and how Assange set up his contingency plans it's difficult to explain.
    Assange has to code in every 12 or 24 hours in order to not set off a string of contingencies which make public "all he has", those hash tweets verify that the information that was made public was not edited or altered when checked against what was released. I'm not sure why he only tweeted 3 on Kerry Ecuador and UK FCO, unless twitter is withholding the other tweets. Right now the Ecuador embassy will not say a word about the internet to Assange or whether or not Assange is still there or alive.
    Thanks for the reply. I got a bunch of info on this already. Some crazy shit man. I guess there was a rumor of him also being killed.
    Apparently they want him dead because he has been accused of rapping some women in another country. So now they want him dead and are cutting his internet access....

    starting up a donation campaign. Let's respond.
    so much for free speech...can't even rap at someone
    oh man that's a good one. Here let me correct myself.
    Way to protect the queen. You're doing an awesome job, germ
  • Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books Posts: 2,672
    Expand the surveillance state
  • Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books Posts: 2,672
    JC, do you have the leak that talks about the mole inside Sanders campaign? I believe she was in contact with the Clinton people throughout the primaries. Any info on this? I think her name is Sarah
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Assange has vowed not to be taken, he may have committed suicide when it was obvious "they" were coming for him. The dead man switch will allegedly unleash the trove of information including videos staring Hilliary and her campaign staff, Hilliary's deleted emails that purportedly implicate the highest level and on down and the plots to extradite and or kill Assange. The files are tagged INACTITP which is a acronym for its not a conspiracy theory if theres proof.
    If true Im not sure why the US would allow someone the time and resources to carry this out.
  • Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books Posts: 2,672

    State Department's Kennedy pressured FBI to unclassify Clinton emails: FBI documents

    Undersecretary of State Patrick Kennedy pressured the FBI to unclassify certain emails from Hillary Clinton's private server that were previously deemed classified, according to FBI documents released Monday that cited redacted sources.
    In the documents, an unnamed person interviewed by the FBI said Kennedy contacted the FBI to ask for the change in classification in "exchange for a 'quid pro quo.'"
    Whether or not Clinton sent classified emails from her private server that could have jeopardized national security has become a key issue ahead of the U.S. presidential election on Nov. 8, when Clinton will face Republican nominee Donald Trump.
    (Reporting by Julia Edwards, Editing by Franklin Paul)
  • Gern BlanstenGern Blansten Posts: 19,426
    JC29856 said:

    Assange has vowed not to be taken, he may have committed suicide when it was obvious "they" were coming for him. The dead man switch will allegedly unleash the trove of information including videos staring Hilliary and her campaign staff, Hilliary's deleted emails that purportedly implicate the highest level and on down and the plots to extradite and or kill Assange. The files are tagged INACTITP which is a acronym for its not a conspiracy theory if theres proof.
    If true Im not sure why the US would allow someone the time and resources to carry this out.

    The rooster crows at midnight.

    John has a long mustache.
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Posts: 49,888
    edited October 2016
    tonifig8 said:

    dignin said:

    tonifig8 said:

    dignin said:

    I appreciate the determination JC has going through all of this, but I have to agree with others, this seems much ado about nothing. Anyone with even a remote understanding of how politics are done can see this is all par for the course.

    Maybe in the coming days there will be something more condemning and of interest. We will see.

    This comment is good for the clintonites, but not the rest of us.
    Hey, a guy has to make a living. You know, since I'm on the Clinton campaign payroll.

    I would like to add that she has been fundraising and polling so well these days, I've gotten a raise! Hope all the rest of you got your raise as well!
    What does you working for Clinton have anything to do with my comment? Clintonites are fearless and devoted sheep that will surrender for their queen. Not employes, well I guess employes are sort of the same, except they get paid.

    She's spent well over 8 million and counting on social media- who knows who her staff is. I just recognize the clintonites.
    I'm not a Clintonite, but still agree that the emails so far are much ado about nothing, as digin so aptly put it. I don't see why anti-Clintonites would be any more interested in the emails so far. Again as digin said, we're all on tenterhooks waiting for something interesting to come out... but so far, these emails seem more like spam in this thread, and not information that is worth page after page of posts for everyone to filter through. Just a link to all of the emails would be sufficient, no? So that we can all just go and see for ourselves? (no, I'm not telling you what to do - just offering my viewpoint).
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Gern BlanstenGern Blansten Posts: 19,426
    PJ_Soul said:

    tonifig8 said:

    dignin said:

    tonifig8 said:

    dignin said:

    I appreciate the determination JC has going through all of this, but I have to agree with others, this seems much ado about nothing. Anyone with even a remote understanding of how politics are done can see this is all par for the course.

    Maybe in the coming days there will be something more condemning and of interest. We will see.

    This comment is good for the clintonites, but not the rest of us.
    Hey, a guy has to make a living. You know, since I'm on the Clinton campaign payroll.

    I would like to add that she has been fundraising and polling so well these days, I've gotten a raise! Hope all the rest of you got your raise as well!
    What does you working for Clinton have anything to do with my comment? Clintonites are fearless and devoted sheep that will surrender for their queen. Not employes, well I guess employes are sort of the same, except they get paid.

    She's spent well over 8 million and counting on social media- who knows who her staff is. I just recognize the clintonites.
    I'm not a Clintonite, but still agree that the emails so far as much ado about nothing, as digin so aptly put it. I don't see why anti-Clintonites would be any more interested in the emails so far. Again as digin said, we're all on tenterhooks waiting for something interesting to come out... but so far, these emails seem more like spam in this thread, and not information that is worth page after page of posts for everyone to filter through. Just a link to all of the emails would be sufficient, no? So that we can all just go and see for ourselves? (no, I'm not telling you what to do - just offering my viewpoint).
    Exactly....or just wait for a legitimate news organization to report on something interesting
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Posts: 49,888
    edited October 2016
    pjalive21 said:
    Both articles say that she DIDN'T know about the foreign donors, and I don't see anything that makes those working for her dirty, as far as this particular topic goes.... It seems that it was all on the up and up. There must be some explanation as to why you posted two articles with a comment that literally contradicts what the articles say. What am I missing here?
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Boxes&BooksBoxes&Books Posts: 2,672
    PJ_Soul said:

    tonifig8 said:

    dignin said:

    tonifig8 said:

    dignin said:

    I appreciate the determination JC has going through all of this, but I have to agree with others, this seems much ado about nothing. Anyone with even a remote understanding of how politics are done can see this is all par for the course.

    Maybe in the coming days there will be something more condemning and of interest. We will see.

    This comment is good for the clintonites, but not the rest of us.
    Hey, a guy has to make a living. You know, since I'm on the Clinton campaign payroll.

    I would like to add that she has been fundraising and polling so well these days, I've gotten a raise! Hope all the rest of you got your raise as well!
    What does you working for Clinton have anything to do with my comment? Clintonites are fearless and devoted sheep that will surrender for their queen. Not employes, well I guess employes are sort of the same, except they get paid.

    She's spent well over 8 million and counting on social media- who knows who her staff is. I just recognize the clintonites.
    I'm not a Clintonite, but still agree that the emails so far as much ado about nothing, as digin so aptly put it. I don't see why anti-Clintonites would be any more interested in the emails so far. Again as digin said, we're all on tenterhooks waiting for something interesting to come out... but so far, these emails seem more like spam in this thread, and not information that is worth page after page of posts for everyone to filter through. Just a link to all of the emails would be sufficient, no? So that we can all just go and see for ourselves? (no, I'm not telling you what to do - just offering my viewpoint).
    Much to do about nothing? Are you delusional? Did you know that Dona Brazile had given the clinton camp one of the debate questions in advance? The emails are a tremendous source of information. Damaging information. And I've seen you guys attack republicans for far less damaging words. Clinton, if elected, will be impeached- zero doubt about that.
    Now you guys can wait around all day for the mainstream media to report on anything relevant. All I've seen is trump trump trump trump.....

    The media has done a terrible job- Shit CNN still hasn't even covered the latest Wikileaks news... give me a break.

    You have your opinion and that's great. More power to you. I hope Canada doesn't end up with such a horrible crooked candidate, such as we're dealing with here in the States.
    Enough said, no need for me to waste your time or for you to waste mine.
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    tonifig8 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    tonifig8 said:

    dignin said:

    tonifig8 said:

    dignin said:

    I appreciate the determination JC has going through all of this, but I have to agree with others, this seems much ado about nothing. Anyone with even a remote understanding of how politics are done can see this is all par for the course.

    Maybe in the coming days there will be something more condemning and of interest. We will see.

    This comment is good for the clintonites, but not the rest of us.
    Hey, a guy has to make a living. You know, since I'm on the Clinton campaign payroll.

    I would like to add that she has been fundraising and polling so well these days, I've gotten a raise! Hope all the rest of you got your raise as well!
    What does you working for Clinton have anything to do with my comment? Clintonites are fearless and devoted sheep that will surrender for their queen. Not employes, well I guess employes are sort of the same, except they get paid.

    She's spent well over 8 million and counting on social media- who knows who her staff is. I just recognize the clintonites.
    I'm not a Clintonite, but still agree that the emails so far as much ado about nothing, as digin so aptly put it. I don't see why anti-Clintonites would be any more interested in the emails so far. Again as digin said, we're all on tenterhooks waiting for something interesting to come out... but so far, these emails seem more like spam in this thread, and not information that is worth page after page of posts for everyone to filter through. Just a link to all of the emails would be sufficient, no? So that we can all just go and see for ourselves? (no, I'm not telling you what to do - just offering my viewpoint).
    Much to do about nothing? Are you delusional? Did you know that Dona Brazile had given the clinton camp one of the debate questions in advance? The emails are a tremendous source of information. Damaging information. And I've seen you guys attack republicans for far less damaging words. Clinton, if elected, will be impeached- zero doubt about that.
    Now you guys can wait around all day for the mainstream media to report on anything relevant. All I've seen is trump trump trump trump.....

    The media has done a terrible job- Shit CNN still hasn't even covered the latest Wikileaks news... give me a break.

    You have your opinion and that's great. More power to you. I hope Canada doesn't end up with such a horrible crooked candidate, such as we're dealing with here in the States.
    Enough said, no need for me to waste your time or for you to waste mine.
    In wind pissing!
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Posts: 49,888
    edited October 2016
    tonifig8 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    tonifig8 said:

    dignin said:

    tonifig8 said:

    dignin said:

    I appreciate the determination JC has going through all of this, but I have to agree with others, this seems much ado about nothing. Anyone with even a remote understanding of how politics are done can see this is all par for the course.

    Maybe in the coming days there will be something more condemning and of interest. We will see.

    This comment is good for the clintonites, but not the rest of us.
    Hey, a guy has to make a living. You know, since I'm on the Clinton campaign payroll.

    I would like to add that she has been fundraising and polling so well these days, I've gotten a raise! Hope all the rest of you got your raise as well!
    What does you working for Clinton have anything to do with my comment? Clintonites are fearless and devoted sheep that will surrender for their queen. Not employes, well I guess employes are sort of the same, except they get paid.

    She's spent well over 8 million and counting on social media- who knows who her staff is. I just recognize the clintonites.
    I'm not a Clintonite, but still agree that the emails so far as much ado about nothing, as digin so aptly put it. I don't see why anti-Clintonites would be any more interested in the emails so far. Again as digin said, we're all on tenterhooks waiting for something interesting to come out... but so far, these emails seem more like spam in this thread, and not information that is worth page after page of posts for everyone to filter through. Just a link to all of the emails would be sufficient, no? So that we can all just go and see for ourselves? (no, I'm not telling you what to do - just offering my viewpoint).
    Much to do about nothing? Are you delusional? Did you know that Dona Brazile had given the clinton camp one of the debate questions in advance? The emails are a tremendous source of information. Damaging information. And I've seen you guys attack republicans for far less damaging words. Clinton, if elected, will be impeached- zero doubt about that.
    Now you guys can wait around all day for the mainstream media to report on anything relevant. All I've seen is trump trump trump trump.....

    The media has done a terrible job- Shit CNN still hasn't even covered the latest Wikileaks news... give me a break.

    You have your opinion and that's great. More power to you. I hope Canada doesn't end up with such a horrible crooked candidate, such as we're dealing with here in the States.
    Enough said, no need for me to waste your time or for you to waste mine.
    As far as Clinton herself goes, I haven't really seen anything that actually hurts Hillary yet. Now if there were an email from Clinton asking Dona Brazile to give her the questions ahead of time, then I would be scandalized. (btw, I should think that ANY candidate already has a very solid opinion about the DP and how they convey that to people. I don't think the possibility of Hillary being told about that question ahead of time had any impact whatsoever, but do agree that Brazile shouldn't have sent that email.... but these leaks aren't meant to act as evidence against Brazile, right? I think what I'm doing is simply quite objectively considering RELEVANCY TO HILLARY CLINTON when I read these emails. So far, they are all just a bunch of private emails between staffers and what not, and they are all just discussing campaign politics as usual - I don't think a single thing they said (so far) was out of the ordinary within a campaign. Plus Clinton likely had no clue most of what was being discussed was being discussed. I just don't find any of this damning against Clinton at all. Not delusional, I think just logical. But I will certainly let everyone know when I do see an email that I find scandalizing. I would think that if one existed we would have seen it by now, unless Assange is a lot more immature than I thought.... and he does seem like a douchebag at best. It's possible he's holding on to something juicy until right before the election just for shits and giggles.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Posts: 49,888
    JC29856 said:
    Yes, we did already know all that. I certainly don't like how the US handles the middle east and haven't for years and years. I'm definitely concerned about where it's all going to go in the future.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Posts: 49,888
    JC29856 said:
    What that doesn't seem to mention is that those emails were deemed classified retroactively anyhow. They weren't classified when they were sent. They went through them after the fact - I assume a team was assigned to read them and decide what should have been deemed classified but had been - and then assigned the label to them. Sounds to me like there is some disagreement about how the term was applied retroactively to some of the emails. Could be a case of an overeager evaluator and/or a genuine disagreement about the classifications. Perhaps this Kennedy felt that marking certain emails as classified wasn't necessarily appropriate and thought this could be clarified with a quid pro quo about the emails in question.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    PJ_Soul said:

    JC29856 said:
    What that doesn't seem to mention is that those emails were deemed classified retroactively anyhow. They weren't classified when they were sent. They went through them after the fact - I assume a team was assigned to read them and decide what should have been deemed classified but had been - and then assigned the label to them. Sounds to me like there is some disagreement about how the term was applied retroactively to some of the emails. Could be a case of an overeager evaluator and/or a genuine disagreement about the classifications. Perhaps this Kennedy felt that marking certain emails as classified wasn't necessarily appropriate and thought this could be clarified with a quid pro quo about the emails in question.
    I don't see where it says docs were emailed then marked classified. I do see in the fbi report that says the email was marked classified and Kennedy wanted it changed. How does one retrospectively mark a sent email classified?
This discussion has been closed.