Since Assange's release of emails, 538 has only gone up in favor of Hillary, currently around 87% chance she'll be elected overwhelming. Julien must be doing a slow chew of his silpancho.
Short of Hillary murdering someone she will win.
Let me clarify, if Hillary killed a Republican than she would still win because the ends justify the means for liberals.
Phony environmental groups. A cabinet position will be filled by someone that is concerned with UFOs aliens and space war.
The militarization of space has been happening for decades... space as a new theater of war is very real... I believe there is a treaty signed years ago to prevent it but governments are simply hiding the research and budgets... NASA is researching more than freeze dried ice cream my friend
Since Assange's release of emails, 538 has only gone up in favor of Hillary, currently around 87% chance she'll be elected overwhelming. Julien must be doing a slow chew of his silpancho.
Short of Hillary murdering someone she will win.
Let me clarify, if Hillary killed a Republican than she would still win because the ends justify the means for liberals.
But she already has murdered someone. 12 or so to be exact.
If this is the stuff they are willing to say over email, then I can't imagine the sh*t they only talk about over the phone or in person.
Well we know for a fact that when they meet on tarmacs they discuss grandchildren- it was confirmed by Germ. Someone else around here said that Lynch is an honorable person therefore it must be so. Im pretty sure I can source that individual if need be.
So the wiki source claims to have hacked all of podestas devices and mac. Claims to have hacked 2 more Clinton advisors, that the 5 releases only amount to about 10% in volume. Lol.
FBI says hackers are Russian, I'm saying Canadian...we'll see. Podesta emailed a relative his icloud password and the can of worms was opened!
Just your average Clinton campaign illegally coordinating with their Super PACS against federal election law.
In May of 2015, CTR separated from its parent organization, American Bridge, and became its own SuperPAC. This structure allows CTR to retain its independence but coordinate directly and strategically with the Hillary campaign.
Hmmmmmm. . . When I click on that link, I get a seating chart for an event. What am I missing? What's up with commentary on an illegal SuperPAC when the link involves no such thing? Genuinely interested in your interpretation of the seating chart..
Edit: never mind, saw the attachments, just can't read them on my phone. Will read another time.
What's shocking is the political naitivity on these boards. Lee Atwater ring a bell? How about Adlai Stevenson? Or South Carolina primary? Watergate? Iran/Contra? Invasion of Panama? How about 22 million missing emails from government servers? Turd Blossom the "political" genius? Or maybe a nation knowingly lied to and deceived into war? Florida and Ohio voting irregularities? Remember the Maine?
Where was your outrage then or your knowledge of political history?
Haha...this might be my favourite post ever... "Where was your outrage then?" Pretty sure most of us were born after Watergate buddy but if even if some of us were alive I'm pretty sure the AMT wasn't.
What's shocking is the political naitivity on these boards. Lee Atwater ring a bell? How about Adlai Stevenson? Or South Carolina primary? Watergate? Iran/Contra? Invasion of Panama? How about 22 million missing emails from government servers? Turd Blossom the "political" genius? Or maybe a nation knowingly lied to and deceived into war? Florida and Ohio voting irregularities? Remember the Maine?
Where was your outrage then or your knowledge of political history?
Haha...this might be my favourite post ever... "Where was your outrage then?" Pretty sure most of us were born after Watergate buddy but if even if some of us were alive I'm pretty sure the AMT wasn't.
Context from the intercept article: "The party held meetings with donors such as Goldman Sachs and General Electric and carefully compiled their concerns, even when they whined about core progressive goals." https://theintercept.com/2016/10/11/warren-goldman-dccc/
"Late last night, laura graham called me as she couldn't reach my brother or her shrink. She was on staten island in her car parked a few feet from the waters edge with her foot on the gas pedal and the car in park. She called me to tell me the stress of all of this office crap with wjc and cvc as well as that of her family had driven her to the edge and she couldn't take it anymore.... ..Bruce said the stress of specifically the office had caused his very serious health issues as you both know. But I'm sure chelsea is more concerned with a mostly false story in the distinguished ny post about mf global and teneo not her role in what happened to laura/bruce, what she is doing to the organization or the several of stories that have appeared in the ny post about her father and a multitude of women over the years."
"As evidenced by the Republican-orchestrated testimony at the hearing on Weds, there is a generally strong, albeit probably not correct consensus among scientists and policy people that GMO's are safe. Hillary is right that this consensus has resulted almost entirely from industry-funded research and as Kirsten Gillibrand pointed out in the Hearing, our own FDA merely rubber stamps or affirms the chemical company's findings, rather than conduct their own independent research. But politically as she tries to expand her base, it is not the most solid answer for her because she unfortunately can sound like she is catering to the "fuzzy science" left if she is not careful"
By "renting voter and donor information lists" from the Hillary 2008 campaign to other organizations they control (HillPAC for example), and funneling money back into the campaign to cancel the debt.
"Less than 100 people - NO cell phones, NO press. Over 100 people YES cell phones, and ONE print pooler will be escorted in for her remarks only and then escorted out. NO tv cameras. "..."Huma spoke to HRC and she agreed with this plan"
Clinton knew using her blackberry was not secure or permitted
Clinton knew using a Blackberry, especially overseas was NOT secure. She did it anyway. She even emailed Obama while she was overseas
In June 2014 Elizabeth Warren had an organizational meeting scheduled with Clinton's campaign chair, Podesta, her campaign manager Mook and others. Remember Clinton did not announce her candidacy until April 2015. Between the date of this meeting and the prior organizational efforts (that clearly show she was running for president by June 2014, at the latest), Clinton gave many paid speeches on Wall Street and to other corporations. This is prohibited. The reason is because that money must be reported as a campaign contributions and limited to avoid pay for play. Warren refused to endorse Bernie during the primary. Perhaps it was because she was colluding with Clinton.
Philippe Reines is upset that Moveon.org wants Elizabeth Warren to run in 2016. He want "Hollywood friends" to intervene. "I don't know who funds them, but don't we have Hollywood friends with ties to MoveOn who can tell them to cool it?"
Just your average Clinton campaign illegally coordinating with their Super PACS against federal election law.
In May of 2015, CTR separated from its parent organization, American Bridge, and became its own SuperPAC. This structure allows CTR to retain its independence but coordinate directly and strategically with the Hillary campaign.
Hmmmmmm. . . When I click on that link, I get a seating chart for an event. What am I missing? What's up with commentary on an illegal SuperPAC when the link involves no such thing? Genuinely interested in your interpretation of the seating chart..
Edit: never mind, saw the attachments, just can't read them on my phone. Will read another time.
Beside the obvious coordination with super pacs other possible FEC violations but emails reveal the campaign did seek advice of council on ways to skirt the laws.
Paid speeches listed in Wikileaks Podesta emails: Nexenta, 8/28/14 Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd in San Diego, 9/04/14 Deutsche Bank, 10/7/14 tinePublic – Saskatoon, CA, 1/21/15 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927
The announcement is a formality - paying staff and accepting money is what matters. I guess she could claim she wasn't paying the campaign staff she had assembled but we all know that's bullshit.
Candidates "must register with the FEC once you (or persons acting on your behalf) receive contributions or make expenditures in excess of $5,000."
"After registration, candidate's campaign committees must file quarterly reports to disclose all of their receipts and disbursements."
unsung
I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
She has to be the most corrupt candidate to ever. It's sad that anyone would support her, sort of reinforces the belief that these people can't be negotiated with.
She has to be the most corrupt candidate to ever. It's sad that anyone would support her, sort of reinforces the belief that these people can't be negotiated with.
It says so much about America today.
0
Options
unsung
I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
Well, look at it this way, it's not sustainable. It'll change eventually.
She has to be the most corrupt candidate to ever. It's sad that anyone would support her, sort of reinforces the belief that these people can't be negotiated with.
Don forget to add they are in complete denial...these email dumps, no matter who the candidate is are telling and unreal how many people are downplaying whats in them...just validity to a corrupt machine
I'm not a Clinton supporter. Some of the revelations in these hacked emails are outrageous...yet I find myself not exactly outraged by them. I think because in large part it just confirms what I've long believed about Hillary Clinton, that she is a deeply flawed career politician who first and foremost stands for getting elected. Whatever it takes, she will do. Whatever it takes, the people around her will do. While that does make it hard to get excited for her Presidency, it doesn't really make her unique in American politics. I would wager there are any number of politicians who would carry themselves in the exact same way if given the chance.
I'm not a Clinton supporter. Some of the revelations in these hacked emails are outrageous...yet I find myself not exactly outraged by them. I think because in large part it just confirms what I've long believed about Hillary Clinton, that she is a deeply flawed career politician who first and foremost stands for getting elected. Whatever it takes, she will do. Whatever it takes, the people around her will do. While that does make it hard to get excited for her Presidency, it doesn't really make her unique in American politics. I would wager there are any number of politicians who would carry themselves in the exact same way if given the chance.
I have a hard time being outraged until we review ALL politicians emails.....in this case their campaign associates emails. It's not fair to just single out Hillary and no one else.
Let's see Bannon's emails from Trump's campaign and compare.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
She has to be the most corrupt candidate to ever. It's sad that anyone would support her, sort of reinforces the belief that these people can't be negotiated with.
Don forget to add they are in complete denial...these email dumps, no matter who the candidate is are telling and unreal how many people are downplaying whats in them...just validity to a corrupt machine
So until you saw these you had no idea that people communicated behind the scenes about things that help their chances?
Do you want to buy a bridge? I've got a few for sale.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
I'm not a Clinton supporter. Some of the revelations in these hacked emails are outrageous...yet I find myself not exactly outraged by them. I think because in large part it just confirms what I've long believed about Hillary Clinton, that she is a deeply flawed career politician who first and foremost stands for getting elected. Whatever it takes, she will do. Whatever it takes, the people around her will do. While that does make it hard to get excited for her Presidency, it doesn't really make her unique in American politics. I would wager there are any number of politicians who would carry themselves in the exact same way if given the chance.
I have a hard time being outraged until we review ALL politicians emails.....in this case their campaign associates emails. It's not fair to just single out Hillary and no one else.
Let's see Bannon's emails from Trump's campaign and compare.
And Turd Blossom's and Cheney's and the energy executives on Cheney's committee and the 22 million emails that went missing after the WMDs weren't found.
Why would Clinton step down for stuff other people said? You're acting like those emails were written by her.
There are Hilliary emails in the leaks. You can search the emails with hr#@ or hrod#@. It appears as thou personally she prefers rodham and Clinton publicly.
Everyone else's emails are probably more important the hers. Imagine the process it would take to vet just one of her emails. 1. Determine if it's her words or the script sent to her by a donor. 2. If her words determine whether it comes from her personally or her publicly. A. If personally determine why she making the statement by researching the subject matter against her donors agenda B. If publicly determine if true, a lie or a "false statement". If publicly untrue: 2a. Determine if an intentional lie 2b. Determine if just a false statement
Comments
Let me clarify, if Hillary killed a Republican than she would still win because the ends justify the means for liberals.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
My apologies, but I'm not getting the reasoning behind bumping so much with this type of not-ting. I welcome your thoughts beyond that.
Podesta emailed a relative his icloud password and the can of worms was opened!
Edit: never mind, saw the attachments, just can't read them on my phone. Will read another time.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3387
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/10/12/john-podestas-accounts-reportedly-compromised-after-password-found-in-wikileaks-dump/
hahaha... Still with Her
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/10/12/vote-trump-tweeted-podestas-twitter-account-after-hack/91974772/
"the established (settlement) blocs that under the Clinton parameters would be in Israel after any negotiation."
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/346
Goldman Sachs and Other Multinationals Met with the DNC about Policy
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3121465-BRL-MEETING-NOTES-COMPILATION.html
Context from the intercept article: "The party held meetings with donors such as Goldman Sachs and General Electric and carefully compiled their concerns, even when they whined about core progressive goals." https://theintercept.com/2016/10/11/warren-goldman-dccc/
Suicide attempt by Clinton Foundation COO https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3332
"Late last night, laura graham called me as she couldn't reach my brother or her shrink. She was on staten island in her car parked a few feet from the waters edge with her foot on the gas pedal and the car in park. She called me to tell me the stress of all of this office crap with wjc and cvc as well as that of her family had driven her to the edge and she couldn't take it anymore.... ..Bruce said the stress of specifically the office had caused his very serious health issues as you both know. But I'm sure chelsea is more concerned with a mostly false story in the distinguished ny post about mf global and teneo not her role in what happened to laura/bruce, what she is doing to the organization or the several of stories that have appeared in the ny post about her father and a multitude of women over the years."
GMO'S
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3012
"As evidenced by the Republican-orchestrated testimony at the hearing on Weds, there is a generally strong, albeit probably not correct consensus among scientists and policy people that GMO's are safe. Hillary is right that this consensus has resulted almost entirely from industry-funded research and as Kirsten Gillibrand pointed out in the Hearing, our own FDA merely rubber stamps or affirms the chemical company's findings, rather than conduct their own independent research. But politically as she tries to expand her base, it is not the most solid answer for her because she unfortunately can sound like she is catering to the "fuzzy science" left if she is not careful"
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4208 "No worries. Take care of yourself and cut out the gmo's"
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2170 Attachment
By "renting voter and donor information lists" from the Hillary 2008 campaign to other organizations they control (HillPAC for example), and funneling money back into the campaign to cancel the debt.
Context:https://theintercept.com/2016/06/10/hillary-clinton-used-leadership-pac-as-slush-fund-in-2008-09/
Campaign event policy https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5240
"Less than 100 people - NO cell phones, NO press. Over 100 people YES cell phones, and ONE print pooler will be escorted in for her remarks only and then escorted out. NO tv cameras. "..."Huma spoke to HRC and she agreed with this plan"
Clinton knew using her blackberry was not secure or permitted
Clinton knew using a Blackberry, especially overseas was NOT secure. She did it anyway. She even emailed Obama while she was overseas
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927
VP Biden demise - ✔
Liz W - ✔
Elizabeth Warren
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/
In June 2014 Elizabeth Warren had an organizational meeting scheduled with Clinton's campaign chair, Podesta, her campaign manager Mook and others.
Remember Clinton did not announce her candidacy until April 2015.
Between the date of this meeting and the prior organizational efforts (that clearly show she was running for president by June 2014, at the latest), Clinton gave many paid speeches on Wall Street and to other corporations. This is prohibited. The reason is because that money must be reported as a campaign contributions and limited to avoid pay for play.
Warren refused to endorse Bernie during the primary. Perhaps it was because she was colluding with Clinton.
https://wikileaks.ch/podesta-emails/emailid/2832
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4313
Philippe Reines is upset that Moveon.org wants Elizabeth Warren to run in 2016. He want "Hollywood friends" to intervene. "I don't know who funds them, but don't we have Hollywood friends with ties to MoveOn who can tell them to cool it?"
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4335
There's a meeting scheduled with Warren, but Clinton people have 2 moles on Warren's staff Mindy" - and "Mandy" who "could provide some intel".
Correct the Record was formed and is issuing email "roundups" to Clinton Campaign chair John Podesta and Clinton campaign manager as early as May 10, 2014 https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1381
Paid speeches listed in Wikileaks Podesta emails: Nexenta, 8/28/14 Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd in San Diego, 9/04/14 Deutsche Bank, 10/7/14 tinePublic – Saskatoon, CA, 1/21/15 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927
Hillary and her campaign staff planned a meeting with Elizabeth Warren in June 2014 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4020
Hillary announced her campaign April 13, 2015 http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/13/us/politics/hillary-clinton-2016-presidential-campaign.html?_r=0
The announcement is a formality - paying staff and accepting money is what matters. I guess she could claim she wasn't paying the campaign staff she had assembled but we all know that's bullshit.
Candidates "must register with the FEC once you (or persons acting on your behalf) receive contributions or make expenditures in excess of $5,000."
"After registration, candidate's campaign committees must file quarterly reports to disclose all of their receipts and disbursements."
http://www.fec.gov/ans/answers_candidate.shtml
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6008
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Let's see Bannon's emails from Trump's campaign and compare.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Do you want to buy a bridge? I've got a few for sale.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Everyone else's emails are probably more important the hers. Imagine the process it would take to vet just one of her emails.
1. Determine if it's her words or the script sent to her by a donor.
2. If her words determine whether it comes from her personally or her publicly.
A. If personally determine why she making the statement by researching the subject matter against her donors agenda
B. If publicly determine if true, a lie or a "false statement".
If publicly untrue:
2a. Determine if an intentional lie
2b. Determine if just a false statement
Make sense?